Download:
pdf |
pdfOMB No. 3117‐0016/USITC No. 17‐1‐3649; Expiration Date: 6/30/2017
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)
U.S. PRODUCERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
STEEL CONCRETE REINFORCING BAR FROM JAPAN, TAIWAN, AND TURKEY
This questionnaire must be received by the Commission by TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2017.
See last page for filing instructions.
NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. LATE QUESTIONNAIRES MAY NOT BE INCORPORATED.
The information called for in this questionnaire is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in
connection with its countervailing duty and antidumping investigations concerning steel concrete reinforcing bar
(“rebar”) from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Inv. No. 701‐TA‐564 and 731‐TA‐1338‐1340 (Final)). The information
requested in the questionnaire is requested under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII. This report is
mandatory and failure to reply as directed can result in a subpoena or other order to compel the submission of records
or information in your firm’s possession (19 U.S.C. § 1333(a)).
Name of firm
Address
City
State
Zip Code
Website
Has your firm produced rebar (as defined on next page) at any time since January 1, 2014?
NO
(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the questionnaire to the Commission)
YES
(Complete all parts of the questionnaire, and return the entire questionnaire to the Commission)
Return questionnaire via the U.S. International Trade Commission Drop Box by clicking on the
following link: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: RBAR)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission. By
means of this certification I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the
information provided in this questionnaire and throughout this proceeding in any other import‐injury proceedings conducted by
the Commission on the same or similar merchandise.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this
investigation or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits,
reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C.
Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. I understand that all
contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements
Name of Authorized Official Title of Authorized Official
Date
Phone:
Signature
Fax:
Email address
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 2
PART I.—GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.‐‐This proceeding was instituted in response to a petition filed on September 20, 2016, by
the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members: Byer Steel Group, Inc., Cincinnati, OH;
Commercial Metals Company, Irving, TX; Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Tampa, FL; Nucor Corporation,
Charlotte, NC; and Steel Dynamics, Inc., Pittsboro, IN. Countervailing and antidumping duties may be
assessed on the subject imports as a result of these proceedings if the Commission makes affirmative
determinations of injury, threat, or material retardation, and if the U.S. Department of Commerce
(“Commerce”) makes affirmative determinations of subsidization and/or dumping. Questionnaires and
other information pertinent to this proceeding are available at
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/title_7/2017/steel_concrete_reinforcing_bar_japan_taiwan_and/f
inal.htm
Rebar.—The merchandise subject to these investigations is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in
either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack
thereof. Subject merchandise includes deformed steel wire with bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or
grade) and which has been subjected to an elongation test. The subject merchandise includes rebar that
has been further processed in the subject country or a third country, including but limited to a cutting,
grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the
merchandise from the scope of the investigations if performed in the country of manufacture of the
rebar. Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or smooth rebar). Also excluded from
the scope is deformed steel wire meeting ASTM A1064/A1064M with no bar markings (e.g., mill mark,
size, or grade) and without being subject to an elongation test.
The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ("HTSUS")
primarily under statistical reporting numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The
subject merchandise may also be reported under other HTSUS numbers including 7215.90.1000,
7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018,1 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057,
7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 7228.20.1000,
and 7228.60.6000.
Reporting of information.‐‐ If information is not readily available from your records, provide carefully
prepared estimates. If your firm is completing more than one questionnaire (i.e., a producer, importer,
and/or purchaser questionnaire), you need not respond to duplicated questions.
Confidentiality.‐‐The commercial and financial data furnished in response to this questionnaire that
reveal the individual operations of your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the
extent that such data are not otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may
be required by law (see 19 U.S.C. § 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a
manner that will reveal the individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of
numerical business proprietary information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential
business information only at the request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Verification.‐‐The information submitted in this questionnaire is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission. To facilitate possible verification of data, please keep all files, worksheets, and supporting
1 Prior to the establishment of statistical reporting numbers 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018 on July 1, 2016, rebar
may have been imported under statistical reporting number 7221.00.15 (discontinued on July 1, 2016).
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 3
documents used in the preparation of the questionnaire response. Please also retain a copy of the final
document that you submit.
Release of information.‐‐The information provided by your firm in response to this questionnaire, as
well as any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative
protective order provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1677f) and section 207.7 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and
other authorized individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection
with this proceeding or other import‐injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or
similar merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were
divulged to unauthorized individuals.
I‐1a. OMB statistics.‐‐Please report below the actual number of hours required and the cost to your
firm of completing this questionnaire.
Hours
Dollars
The questions in this questionnaire have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that
issues of concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful,
and as limited as possible. Public reporting burden for this questionnaire is estimated to average
50 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, and
completing and reviewing the questionnaire.
We welcome comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate, suggestions for
reducing the burden, and any suggestions for improving this questionnaire. Please attach such
comments to your response or send to the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E St. SW,
Washington, DC 20436.
I‐1b. TAA information release.‐‐In the event that the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC)
makes an affirmative final determination in this proceeding, do you consent to the USITC's
release of your contact information (company name, address, contact person, telephone
number, email address) appearing on the front page of this questionnaire to the Departments of
Commerce, Labor, and Agriculture, as applicable, so that your firm and its workers can be made
eligible for benefits under the Trade Adjustment Assistance program?
Yes
No
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
I‐2.
Page 4
Establishments covered.‐‐Provide the city, state, zip code, and brief description of each
establishment covered by this questionnaire. If your firm is publicly traded, please specify the
stock exchange and trading symbol in the footnote to the table. Firms operating more than one
establishment should combine the data for all establishments into a single report.
“Establishment”‐‐Each facility of a firm involved in the production of rebar, including auxiliary
facilities operated in conjunction with (whether or not physically separate from) such facilities.
Establishments
City, State
Zip (5 digit)
Description
covered1
1
I‐3.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Additional discussion on establishments consolidated in this questionnaire: .
Petition support.‐‐Does your firm support or oppose the petition?
Petition
I‐4.
Oppose
Take no position
Japan AD
Taiwan AD
Turkey AD (all firms)
Turkey CVD (Habas only)
Ownership.‐‐Is your firm owned, in whole or in part, by any other firm?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Support
Firm name
Address
Extent of
ownership
(percent)
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
I‐5.
I‐6.
Page 5
Related importers/exporters.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or
foreign, that are engaged in importing rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and/or Turkey into the United
States or that are engaged in exporting rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and/or Turkey to the United
States?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
Address
Affiliation
Related producers.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or foreign, that are
engaged in the production of rebar?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
Address
Affiliation
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 6
PART II.‐‐TRADE AND RELATED INFORMATION
Further information on this part of the questionnaire can be obtained from Amelia Shister (202‐205‐
2047, [email protected]). Supply all data requested on a calendar‐year basis.
II‐1. Contact information.‐‐ Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which
Commission staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted
in part II.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
Fax
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
II‐2.
Changes in operations.‐‐Please indicate whether your firm has experienced any of the following
changes in relation to the production of rebar since January 1, 2014.
(check as many as appropriate)
(If checked, please list the date/month/ year of event(s) and
describe the nature of the events; leave blank if not applicable)
plant openings
plant closings
relocations
expansions
acquisitions
consolidations
prolonged shutdowns or
production curtailments
revised labor agreements
raw material supply shortage or
disruption (e.g. billet steel, rail
steel, axle steel, or steel scrap)
other (e.g., technology)
Page 7
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 8
II‐3a. Production using same machinery.‐‐ Please report your firm’s production of products made on
the same equipment and machinery used to produce rebar, and the combined production
capacity on this shared equipment and machinery in the periods indicated.
“Overall production capacity” or “capacity” – The level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the specified periods. Assume
normal operating conditions (i.e., using equipment and machinery in place and ready to
operate; normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year) and time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup).
“Production” – All production in your U.S. establishment(s), including production consumed
internally within your firm and production for another firm under a toll agreement.
Quantity (in short tons)
Calendar years
Item
Overall production capacity
2016
0
0
0
Merchant‐quality bar
SBQ bar
0
0
0
Out‐of‐scope.‐‐
Plain/smooth rebar
Wire rod
2
Other products
Total
2
2015
Production of:
Rebar1
1
2014
Data entered for production of rebar will populate here once reported in question II‐7.
Please identify these products: .
II‐3b. Operating parameters.‐‐The production capacity reported in II‐3a is based on operating hours
per week, weeks per year.
II‐3c. Capacity calculation.‐‐Please describe the methodology used to calculate overall production
capacity reported in II‐3a, and explain any changes in reported capacity.
II‐3d. Production constraints.‐‐Please describe the constraint(s) that set the limit(s) on your firm’s
production capacity.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 9
II‐3e. Product shifting.—
(i)
Is your firm able to switch production (capacity) between rebar and other products using
the same equipment and/or labor?
No
Yes‐‐ (i.e., have produced other products or are able to produce other
products). Please identify other actual or potential products:
.
(ii)
Please describe the factors that affect your firm’s ability to shift production capacity
between products (e.g., time, cost, relative price change, etc.), and the degree to which
these factors enhance or constrain such shifts.
II‐4.
Tolling.‐‐Since January 1, 2014, has your firm been involved in a toll agreement regarding the
production of rebar?
“Toll agreement”‐‐Agreement between two firms whereby the first firm furnishes the raw
materials and the second firm uses the raw materials to produce a product that it then returns
to the first firm with a charge for processing costs, overhead, etc.
No
Yes‐‐Please describe the toll arrangement(s) and name the firm(s) involved
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
II‐5.
Page 10
Foreign trade zones.‐‐
(a)
Firm's FTZ operations.‐‐Does your firm produce rebar in and/or admit rebar into a
foreign trade zone (FTZ)?
“Foreign trade zone” is a designated location in the United States where firms utilize
special procedures that allow delayed or reduced customs duty payments on foreign
merchandise. A foreign trade zone must be designed as such pursuant to the rules and
procedures set forth in the Foreign‐Trade Zones Act.
No
Yes‐‐Describe the nature of your firms operations in FTZs and
identify the specific FTZ site(s).
(b)
Other firms' FTZ operations.‐‐To your knowledge, do any firms in the United States
import rebar into a foreign trade zone (FTZ) for use in distribution of rebar and/or the
production of downstream articles?
No/Don’t know
Yes‐‐Identify the firms and the FTZs.
II‐6.
Importer.‐‐Since January 1, 2014, has your firm imported rebar?
“Importer”–The person or firm primarily liable for the payment of any duties on the
merchandise, or an authorized agent acting on his behalf. The importer may be the consignee,
or the importer of record.
No
Yes‐‐COMPLETE AND RETURN A U.S. IMPORTERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
II‐7.
Page 11
Production, shipment, and inventory data.‐‐Report your firm’s production capacity, production,
shipments, and inventories related to the production of rebar in its U.S. establishment(s) during
the specified periods.
“Average production capacity” or “capacity” – The level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the specified periods. Assume
normal operating conditions (i.e., using equipment and machinery in place and ready to
operate; normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year) and time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup; and a typical or representative product mix).
“Production” – All production in your U.S. establishment(s), including production consumed
internally within your firm and production for another firm under a toll agreement.
“Commercial U.S. shipments” –Shipments made within the United States as a result of an arm’s
length commercial transaction in the ordinary course of business. Report net values (i.e., gross
sales values less all discounts, allowances, rebates, prepaid freight, and the value of returned
goods) in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. your point of shipment.
“Internal consumption” – Product consumed internally by your firm.
“Transfers to related firms” –Shipments made to related domestic firms. Such transactions are
valued at fair market value.
“Related firm”–A firm that your firm solely or jointly owns, manages, or otherwise controls.
Such transactions are valued at fair market value.
“Export shipments”–Shipments to destinations outside the United States, including shipments
to related firms.
“Inventories”‐‐Finished goods inventory, not raw materials or work‐in‐progress.
Note: As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records used in
the preparation of the trade data, as Commission staff may contact your firm regarding questions on the
trade data. The Commission may also request that your company submit copies of the supporting
documents/records (such as production and sales schedules, inventory records, etc.) used to compile
these data.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
II‐7.
Page 12
Production, shipment, and inventory data.‐‐Continued
Quantity (in short tons) and value (in $1,000)
Calendar years
Item
1
2014
2015
2016
Average production capacity (quantity) (A)
Beginning‐of‐period inventories (quantity) (B)
Production.‐‐
In straight lengths (quantity) (C)
0
0
0
Export shipments:
Quantity (L)
Value (M)
In coils (quantity) (D)
Total in‐scope rebar production (E)
U.S. shipments:
Commercial shipments:
Quantity (F)
Value (G)
Internal consumption:
Quantity (H)
2
Value (I)
3
Transfers to related firm(s):
Quantity (J)
2
Value (K)
4
End‐of‐period inventories (quantity) (N)
1
The production capacity reported is based on operating
hours per week,
weeks per year. Please
describe the methodology used to calculate production capacity, and explain any changes in reported capacity
.
2
Internal consumption and transfers to related firms must be valued at fair market value. In the event that your
firm uses a different basis for valuing these transactions, please specify that basis (e.g., cost, cost plus, etc.) and
provide value data using that basis for each of the periods noted above: .
3
Identify the following regarding your transfers to related firms(s):
(1) What was the relationship between your firm and the related firm(s) (e.g., joint venture, wholly owned
subsidiary)?
Explain: .
(2) Did your firm retain marketing rights to all transfers? No Yes, explain: .
(3) Did the related firm(s) also process raw material inputs from sources other than your firm?
No Yes, explain: .
4
Identify your firm’s principal export markets: .
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 13
RECONCILIATION OF SHIPMENTS, PRODUCTION, AND INVENTORY.‐‐Generally, the data reported for the
end‐of‐period inventories (i.e., line N) should be equal to the beginning‐of‐period inventories (i.e., line B),
plus production (i.e., lines C and D), less total shipments (i.e., lines F, H, J, and L). Please ensure that any
differences are not due to data entry errors in completing this form, but rather reflect your firm’s actual
records; and, also provide explanations for any differences (e.g., theft, loss, damage, record systems
issues, etc.) if they exist.
Calendar years
Reconciliation
2014
B + C + D – F – H – J – L ‐ N = should equal zero ("0") or
provide an explanation.1
2015
0
2016
0
0
1
Explanation if the calculated fields above are returning values other than zero (i.e., “0”) but are nonetheless
accurate: .
II‐8.
Channels of distribution.‐‐Report your firm’s commercial U.S. shipments by channel of
distribution.
“Distributors” –Firms that sell the rebar without any processing or forming.
“Distributors/End users”–Firms that function as both sellers of the rebar without further
processing or forming and also further process the rebar for fabrication or for direct application.
“End users”–Firms that purchase rebar for fabrication or for direct application.
Quantity (in short tons)
Calendar years
Channels of distribution
Commercial U.S. shipments:
To distributors (quantity) (O)
2014
2015
2016
To distributors/end users (quantity) (P)
To end users (quantity) (Q)
Transfers to related firms/ internal
consumption:
To distributors (quantity) (R)
To distributors/end users (quantity) (S)
To end users (quantity) (T)
RECONCILIATION OF CHANNELS.‐‐Please ensure that the quantities reported for channels of distribution
(i.e., lines O through T) in each time period equal the quantity reported for commercial U.S. shipments
(i.e., line F) or internal consumption or transfers to related firms (i.e., lines H and J) in each time period. If
the calculated fields below return values other than zero (i.e., “0”), the data reported must be revised
prior to submission to the Commission.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 14
Calendar years
Reconciliation
Commercial shipment reconciliation: O + P + Q
‐ F = zero ("0"), if not revise.
2014
2015
0
2016
0
0
Internal consumption and transfers
reconciliation: R + S + T ‐ H ‐ J = zero ("0"), if
not revise.
0
0
0
II‐9a. U.S. shipments by product type and length.‐‐Report your firm’s U.S. shipments (i.e., commercial
U.S. shipments, internal consumption, and transfers to related firms in the United States) by
product type and length.
Product type
U.S. shipments.‐‐
Coiled rebar (U)
Straight lengths.‐‐
Less than 20 feet (V)
U.S. shipments quantity 2016
(short tons)
≥ 20 but < 40 feet (W)
≥ 40 but < 60 feet (X)
≥ 60 feet (Y)
Subtotal straight lengths (Z)
0
Total U.S. shipments (AA)
0
Reconciliation
AA – F – H – J = zero ("0"), if not revise.
U.S. shipments quantity 2016
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 15
II‐9b. U.S. shipments by grade.‐‐Report your firm’s U.S. shipments (i.e., commercial U.S. shipments,
internal consumption, and transfers to related firms in the United States) by grade.
Product grade
U.S. shipments.‐‐
Grade 40 (AB)1
U.S. shipments quantity 2016
(short tons)
1
1
Grade 75 (AD)
A706 rebar (AE)
Other grades (AF)
Grade 60 (AC)
Total U.S. shipments (AG)
0
1
Refers to minimum yield strength, in thousands of pounds per square inch (psi) (e.g.,
grade 40 = 40,000 psi).
Reconciliation
AG – F – H – J = zero ("0"), if not revise.
U.S. shipments quantity 2016
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
II‐9c.
Page 16
U.S. shipments by size.‐‐Report your firm’s U.S. shipments (i.e., commercial U.S. shipments,
internal consumption, and transfers to related firms in the United States) by size in 2016.
U.S. shipments 2016
Product size
U.S. shipments.‐‐
No. 3.—
Quantity (AH)
Commercial
U.S. shipments
Transfer
shipments
Internal
consumption
Total U.S.
shipments
Quantity (in short tons) and value (in $1,000)
0
Value (AI)
0
No. 4.—
Quantity (AJ)
0
Value (AK)
0
No. 5.—
Quantity (AL)
0
Value (AM)
0
No. 6.—
Quantity (AN)
0
Value (AO)
0
Other sizes.—
Quantity (AP)
0
Value (AQ)
0
All sizes.—
Quantity (AR)
0
0
0
0
Value (AS)
0
0
0
0
U.S. shipments 2016
Product size
Commercial
U.S. shipments
Transfer
shipments
Internal
consumption
Total U.S.
shipments
Quantity reconcile= zero
("0"), if not revise.
0
0
0
0
Value reconcile= zero
("0"), if not revise.
0
0
0
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 17
II‐10. Employment data.‐‐Report your firm’s employment‐related data related to the production of
rebar and provide an explanation for any trends in these data.
“Production Related Workers” (PRWs) includes working supervisors and all nonsupervisory
workers (including group leaders and trainees) engaged in fabricating, processing, assembling,
inspecting, receiving, storage, handling, packing, warehousing, shipping, trucking, hauling,
maintenance, repair, janitorial and guard services, product development, auxiliary production
for plant’s own use (e.g., power plant), recordkeeping, and other services closely associated with
the above production operations.
“Hours worked” includes time paid for sick leave, holidays, and vacation time. Include overtime
hours actually worked; do not convert overtime pay to its equivalent in straight time hours.
“Wages paid” –Total wages paid before deductions of any kind (e.g., withholding taxes, old‐age
and unemployment insurance, group insurance, union dues, bonds, etc.). Include wages paid
directly by your firm for overtime, holidays, vacations, and sick leave.
Calendar years
Item
2015
2016
Average number of PRWs (number)
Hours worked by PRWs
(1,000 hours)
Wages paid to PRWs ($1,000)
Explanation of employment trends:
2014
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 18
II‐11. Purchases.‐‐Other than direct imports, has your firm otherwise purchased rebar since January 1,
2014?
“Purchase” – A transaction to buy product from a U.S. corporate entity such as another U.S.
producer, a U.S. distributor, or a U.S. firm that has directly imported the product.
“Direct import” –A transaction to buy from a foreign supplier where your firm is the importer of
record or consignee.
No
Yes‐‐Report such purchases below and explain the reasons for your firms'
purchases:
(Quantity in short tons)
Calendar years
Item
2014
2015
2016
1
Purchases from U.S. importers of rebar
from—
Japan
Taiwan
Turkey— Habas
Turkey— All other firms
All other sources
Purchases from domestic producers
2
Purchases from other sources
2
1
Please list the name of the importer(s) from which your firm purchased this product. If your firm’s import
suppliers differ by source, please identify the source for each listed supplier: .
2
Please list the name of the producer(s) or U.S. distributor(s) from which your firm purchased this product:
.
II‐12. Other explanations.‐‐If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part II
that did not provide a narrative box, please note the question number and the explanation in
the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your firm had in
providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with the MS Word
questionnaire.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 19
PART III.‐‐FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Address questions on this part of the questionnaire to David Boyland (202‐708‐4725,
[email protected]).
III‐1. Contact information.‐‐ Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which
Commission staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted
in part III.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
Fax
III‐2. Accounting system.‐‐Briefly describe your firm’s financial accounting system.
A.
When does your firm’s fiscal year end (month and day)?
If your firm’s fiscal year changed during the data‐collection period, explain
below:
B.1. Describe the lowest level of operations (e.g., plant, division, company‐wide) for
which financial statements are prepared that include rebar:
2. Does your firm prepare profit/loss statements for rebar:
Yes
No
3. How often did your firm (or parent company) prepare financial statements
(including annual reports, 10Ks)? Please check relevant items below.
Audited, unaudited, annual reports, 10Ks, 10Qs,
Monthly, quarterly, semi‐annually, annually
4. Accounting basis: GAAP, cash, tax, or other comprehensive
basis of accounting (specify)
Note: As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records
used in the preparation of the financial data, as Commission staff may contact your firm
regarding questions on the financial data. The Commission may also request that your company
submit copies of the supporting documents/records (financial statements, including internal
profit‐and‐loss statements for the division or product group that includes rebar, as well as specific
statements and worksheets) used to compile these data.
III‐3.
Cost accounting system.‐‐Briefly describe your firm’s cost accounting system (e.g., standard
cost, job order cost, etc.).
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
III‐4.
Page 20
Allocation basis.‐‐Briefly describe your firm’s allocation basis, if any, for COGS, SG&A, and
interest expense and other income and expenses.
III‐5.
Product listing.‐‐Please list the products your firm produced in the facilities in which your firm
produced rebar, and provide the share of net sales accounted for by these products in your
firm’s most recent fiscal year.
Products
III‐6.
Share of sales
rebar
%
%
%
%
%
Does your firm purchase inputs (raw materials, labor, energy, or any services) used in the
production of rebar from any related suppliers (e.g., inclusive of transactions between related
firms, divisions and/or other components within the same company)?
Yes‐‐Continue to question III‐7.
III‐7.
No‐‐Continue to question III‐9a.
Inputs from related suppliers.‐‐Please identify the inputs used in the production of rebar that
your firm purchases from related suppliers and that are reflected in question III‐9a. For “Share
of total COGS” please report this information by relevant input on the basis of your most
recently completed fiscal year. For “Input valuation” please describe the basis, as recorded in
your company’s own accounting system, of the purchase cost from the related supplier; e.g., the
related supplier’s actual cost, cost plus, negotiated transfer price to approximate fair market
value.
Input
Related supplier
Share of total COGS
Input valuation as recorded in the firm’s accounting books and records
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
III‐8.
Page 21
Inputs purchased from related suppliers.‐‐Please confirm that the inputs purchased from
related suppliers, as identified in III‐7, were reported in III‐9a (financial results on rebar) in a
manner consistent with your firm’s accounting books and records.
Yes
No‐‐In the space below, please report the valuation basis of inputs purchased from related
suppliers as reported in question III‐9a.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 22
III‐9a. Operations on rebar.‐‐Report the revenue and related cost information requested below on the
rebar operations of your firm’s U.S. establishment(s).1 Do not report resales of products. Note
that internal consumption and transfers to related firms must be valued at fair market value.
Input purchases from related suppliers should be consistent with and based on information in
the firm’s accounting books and records. Provide data for your firm’s three most recently
completed fiscal years. If your firm was involved in tolling operations (either as the toller or as
the tollee), please contact David Boyland at 202‐708‐4725 before completing this section of the
questionnaire.
Quantity (in short tons) and value (in $1,000)
Fiscal years ended‐‐
Item
2014
2015
2016
2
Net sales quantities:
Commercial sales (“CS”)
Internal consumption (“IC”)
Transfers to related firms (“Transfers”)
0
0
0
Internal consumption
Transfers to related firms
0
0
0
Total net sales quantities
2
Net sales values:
Commercial sales
Total net sales values
3
Cost of goods sold (COGS):
Raw materials
Direct labor
Other factory costs
Total COGS
0
0
0
Gross profit or (loss)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses:
Selling expenses
General and administrative expenses
Total SG&A expenses
Operating income (loss)
Other expenses and income:
Interest expense
All other expense items
All other income items
Net income or (loss) before income taxes
Depreciation/amortization included above
0
0
0
1 Include only sales (whether domestic or export) and costs related to your U.S. manufacturing operations.
2
Less discounts, returns, allowances, and prepaid freight. The quantities and values should approximate the corresponding
shipment quantities and values reported in Part II of this questionnaire.
3 COGS (whether for domestic or export sales) should include costs associated with CS, IC, and Transfers.
Note ‐‐ The table above contains calculations that will appear when you have entered data in the MS
Word form fields.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 23
III‐9b. Financial data reconciliation.‐‐The calculable line items from question III‐9a (i.e., total net sales
quantities and values, total COGS, gross profit (or loss), total SG&A, and net income (or loss))
have been calculated from the data submitted in the other line items. Do the calculated fields
return the correct data according to your firm's financial records ignoring non‐material
differences that may arise due to rounding?
Yes No‐‐If the calculated fields do not show the correct data, please double check the
feeder data for data entry errors and revise.
Also, check signs accorded to the post operating income line items; the two
expense line items should report positive numbers (i.e., expenses are
positive and incomes or reversals are negative‐‐instances of the latter
should be rare in those lines) while the income line item also in most
instances should have its value be a positive number (i.e., income is positive,
expenses or reversals are negative).
If after reviewing and potentially revising the feeder data your firm has
provided, the differences between your records and the calculated fields
persist please identify and discuss the differences in the space below.
III‐10. Nonrecurring items (charges and gains) included in the subject product financial results.‐‐For
each annual period for which financial results are reported in question III‐9a, please specify all
material (significant) nonrecurring items (charges and gains) in the schedule below, the specific
question III‐9a line item where the nonrecurring items are included, a brief description of the
relevant nonrecurring items, and the associated values (in $1,000), as reflected in question III‐
9a; i.e., if an aggregate nonrecurring item has been allocated to question III‐9a, only the
allocated value amount included in question III‐9a should be reported in the schedule below.
Note: The Commission’s objective here is to gather information only on material (significant)
nonrecurring items which impacted the reported financial results of the subject product in
question III‐9a.
Fiscal years ended‐‐
Nonrecurring item: In this column please provide a brief
description of each nonrecurring item and indicate the
specific line item in question III‐9a where the nonrecurring
item is classified.
2014
2015
2016
Nonrecurring item: In these columns please report the amount of the relevant
nonrecurring item reported in question III‐9a.
Value ($1,000)
1. , classified as
2. , classified as
3. , classified as
4. , classified as
5. , classified as
6. , classified as
7. , classified as
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 24
III‐11. Classification of identified nonrecurring items (charges and gains) in the accounting books and
records of the company.‐‐If non‐recurring items were reported in table III‐10 above, please
identify where your company recorded these items in your accounting books and records in the
normal course of business; i.e., just as responses to question III‐10 identify where these items
are reported in question III‐9a.
III‐12. Asset values.‐‐Report the total assets (i.e., both current and long‐term assets) associated with
the production, warehousing, and sale of rebar. If your firm does not maintain some or all of
the specific asset information necessary to calculate total assets for rebar in the normal course
of business, please estimate this information based upon a method (such as production, sales,
or costs) that is consistent with relevant cost allocations in question III‐9a. Provide data as of
the end of your firm’s three most recently completed fiscal years.
Note: Total assets should reflect net assets after any accumulated depreciation and allowances
deducted.
Total assets should be allocated to the subject products if these assets are also related to other
products. Please provide a brief explanation if there are any substantial changes in total asset
value during the period; e.g., due to asset write‐offs, revaluation, and major purchases.
Value (in $1,000)
Fiscal years ended‐‐
Item
2014
1
Total assets (net)
1
III‐13.
2015
2016
Describe
Capital expenditures and research and development expenses.‐‐Report your firm’s capital
expenditures and research and development expenses for rebar. Provide data for your firm’s
three most recently completed fiscal years.
Value (in $1,000)
Fiscal years ended‐‐
Item
Capital expenditures
Research and development expenses
1
2014
1
2015
2016
2
Please describe the nature, focus, and significance of your firm’s capital expenditures on the subject product.
2
Please describe the nature, focus, and significance of your firm’s R&D expenses related to subject product.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 25
III‐14. Data consistency and reconciliation.‐‐Please indicate whether your firm’s financial data for
questions III‐9a, 12, and 13 are based on a calendar year or on your firm’s fiscal year:
Calendar year
Fiscal year Specify fiscal year
Please note the quantities and values reported in question III‐9a should reconcile with the data
reported in question II‐7 (including export shipments) as long as they are reported on the same
calendar year basis.
RECONCILIATION OF TRADE VS FINANCIAL DATA.‐‐Please ensure that the quantities and values reported
for total shipments in part II equal the quantities and values reported total net sales in part III of this
questionnaire in each time period unless the financial data from part III are reported on a fiscal year
basis, in which case only the interim periods must reconcile. If the calculated fields below return values
other than zero (i.e., “0”) and both are being reported on a calendar basis, please explain the discrepancy
below.
Full year data
Reconciliation
2014
Quantity: Trade data from part
II less financial data from part III,
= zero ("0") except as noted
above.
2015
0
Value: Trade data from part II
less financial data from part III, =
zero ("0") except as noted
above.
0
Do these data in question III‐9a reconcile with data in question II‐7?
Yes
No
If no, please explain.
2016
0
0
0
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 26
III‐15a. Effects of imports on investment.‐‐Since January 1, 2014, has your firm experienced any actual
negative effects on its return on investment or the scale of capital investments as a result of
imports of rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey?
No
Yes‐‐My firm has experienced actual negative effects as follows:
(check as many as appropriate)
(please describe)
Cancellation, postponement,
or rejection of expansion
projects
Denial or rejection of
investment proposal
Reduction in the size of
capital investments
Return on specific
investments negatively
impacted
Other
III‐15b. Does your firm’s response differ by country?
No
Yes
If yes, indicate which country and why:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 27
III‐16a. Effects of imports on growth and development.‐‐Since January 1, 2014, has your firm
experienced any actual negative effects on its growth, ability to raise capital, or existing
development and production efforts (including efforts to develop a derivative or more advanced
version of the product) as a result of imports of rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey?
No
Yes‐‐My firm has experienced actual negative effects as follows:
(check as many as appropriate)
(please describe)
Rejection of bank loans
Lowering of credit rating
Problem related to the issue
of stocks or bonds
Ability to service debt
Other
III‐16b. Does your firm’s response differ by country?
No
Yes
If yes, indicate which country and why:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 28
III‐17a. Anticipated effects of imports.‐‐Does your firm anticipate any negative effects due to imports of
rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey?
No
Yes
If yes, my firm anticipates negative effects as follows:
III‐17b. Does your firm’s response differ by country?
No
Yes
If yes, indicate which country and why:
III‐18. Other explanations.‐‐If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part III
that did not provide a narrative box, please note the question number and the explanation in
the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your firm had in
providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with the MS Word
questionnaire.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 29
PART IV.‐‐ PRICING AND MARKET FACTORS
Further information on this part of the questionnaire can be obtained from Craig Thomsen (202‐205‐
3226, [email protected]).
IV‐1. Contact information.‐‐Please identify the individual that Commission staff may contact
regarding the confidential information submitted in part IV.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
Fax
PRICE DATA
IV‐2. This question requests quarterly quantity and value data for your firm’s commercial shipments
to unrelated U.S. customers between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016 of the following
products produced by your firm.
Product 1.‐‐ Straight ASTM A615, No. 3, grade 60 rebar
Product 2. ‐‐ Straight ASTM A615, No. 4, grade 60 rebar
Product 3. ‐‐ Straight ASTM A615, No. 5, grade 60 rebar
Product 4. ‐‐ Straight ASTM A615, No. 6, grade 60 rebar
Please note that values should be f.o.b., U.S. point of shipment and should not include U.S.‐inland
transportation costs. Values should reflect the final net amount paid to your firm (i.e., should be net
of all deductions for discounts or rebates).
During January 2014‐December 2016, did your firm produce and sell to unrelated U.S.
customers any of the above listed products (or any products that were competitive with these
products)?
Yes.‐‐Please complete the following pricing data table(s) as appropriate.
No.‐‐Skip to question IV‐3.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
IV‐2.
Page 30
Price data.‐‐Report below the quarterly price data1 for pricing products2 produced and sold by
your firm which has not been further fabricated beyond being cut‐to‐length.
Report data in actual short tons and actual dollars (not 1,000s).
Product 1
Quantity
Value
(Quantity in short tons, value in dollars)
Product 2
Product 3
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Product 4
Period of shipment
Quantity
Value
2014:
January‐March
April‐June
July‐September
October‐
December
2015:
January‐March
April‐June
July‐September
October‐
December
2016:
January‐March
April‐June
July‐September
October‐
December
1
Net values (i.e., gross sales values less all discounts, allowances, rebates, prepaid freight, and the value of returned goods), f.o.b. your firm’s
U.S. point of shipment.
2
Pricing product definitions are provided on the first page of Part IV.
Note.‐‐If your firm’s product does not exactly meet the product specifications but is competitive with the specified product, provide a description of
your firm’s product. Also, please explain any anomalies in your firm’s reported pricing data.
Product 1:
Product 2:
Product 3:
Product 4:
Pricing data methodology.—Please describe the method and the kinds of documents/records
that were used to compile your price data.
Note: As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records used in
the preparation of the price data, as Commission staff may contact your firm regarding questions on the
price data. The Commission may also request that your company submit copies of the supporting
documents/records (such as sales journal, invoices, etc.) used to compile these data.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
IV‐3.
Page 31
Price setting.‐‐ How does your firm determine the prices that it charges for sales of rebar (check
all that apply)? If your firm issues price lists, please submit sample pages of a recent list.
Transaction
by
transaction
Contracts
IV‐4.
Set
price
lists
Other
If other, describe
Discount policy.‐‐ Please indicate and describe your firm’s discount policies (check all that
apply).
Quantity
discounts
Annual
total
volume
discounts
IV‐5.
No
discount
policy
Other
Describe
Pricing terms.‐‐
(a)
What are your firm’s typical sales terms for its U.S.‐produced rebar?
Net 30
days
Net 60
days
2/10 net
30 days
Other
Other (specify)
(b)
On what basis are your firm’s prices of domestic rebar usually quoted (check one)?
Delivered
F.o.b.
If f.o.b., specify point
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
IV‐6.
Page 32
Contract versus spot.‐‐Approximately what share of your firm’s sales of its U.S.‐produced rebar
in 2016 was on a (1) long‐term contract basis, (2) annual contract basis, (3) short‐term contract
basis, and (4) spot sales basis?
Long‐term
contracts
(multiple
deliveries for
more than 12
months)
Share of 2016
sales
IV‐7.
%
Type of sale
Short‐term
Annual
contracts
contracts
(multiple
(multiple
deliveries for
deliveries for 12
less than 12
months)
months)
%
Total
(should
sum to
100.0%)
Spot sales
(for a single
delivery)
%
%
0.0
%
Contract provisions.‐‐Please fill out the table regarding your firm’s typical sales contracts for
U.S.‐produced rebar (or check “not applicable” if your firm does not sell on a long‐term, short‐
term and/or annual contract basis).
Long‐term contracts
(multiple deliveries for
more than 12 months)
365
Typical sales
contract provisions
Item
Average contract
duration
No. of
days
Price renegotiation
(during contract
period)
Yes
No
Quantity
Price
Both
Yes
No
Fixed quantity
and/or price
Meet or release
provision
Not applicable
Annual contracts
(multiple
deliveries for 12
months)
Short‐term contracts
(multiple deliveries
for less than 12
months)
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 33
IV‐8. Price Indices.‐‐Does your firm base its rebar prices on the published prices from any of the
following sources?
No—Skip to question IV‐9.
Yes‐‐Check all that apply to your firm.
Publication
(Check all that apply)
London Metal Exchange
Platts Metal Week
U.S. import statistics
1
Source(s) other than those listed above
1
List the source(s):
IV‐9.
Lead times.‐‐What is your firm’s share of sales from inventory and produced to order and what
is the typical lead time between a customer’s order and the date of delivery for your firm’s sales
of its U.S.‐produced rebar?
Lead time (average
Source
Share of 2016 sales
number of days)
From inventory
%
Produced to order
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
0.0 %
IV‐10. Shipping information.‐‐
(a)
What is the approximate percentage of the total cost of U.S.‐produced rebar that is
accounted for by U.S. inland transportation costs? percent
(b)
Who generally arranges the transportation to your firm’s customers’ locations?
Your firm Purchaser (check one)
(c)
Indicate the approximate percentage of your firm’s sales of rebar that are delivered the
following distances from its production facility.
Distance from production facility
Share
Within 100 miles
%
101 to 1,000 miles
%
Over 1,000 miles
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
0.0 %
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 34
IV‐11. Geographical shipments.‐‐In which U.S. geographic market area(s) has your firm sold its U.S.‐
produced rebar since January 1, 2014 (check all that apply)?
Geographic area
√ if applicable
Northeast.–CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and VT.
Midwest.–IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, and WI.
Southeast.–AL, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, MD, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, and WV.
Central Southwest.–AR, LA, OK, and TX.
Mountains.–AZ, CO, ID, MT, NV, NM, UT, and WY.
Pacific Coast.–CA, OR, and WA.
Other.–All other markets in the United States not previously listed,
including AK, HI, PR, and VI.
IV‐12. End uses.‐‐List the end uses of the rebar that your firm manufactures. For each end‐use
product, what percentage of the total cost is accounted for by rebar and other inputs?
Share of total cost of end use product
accounted for by
Total
(should sum to
100.0% across)
End use product
Rebar
Other inputs
%
%
0.0 %
%
%
0.0 %
%
%
0.0 %
IV‐13. Substitutes.‐‐Can other products be substituted for rebar?
No
Yes‐‐Please fill out the table.
Substitute
End use in which this
substitute is used
Have changes in the price of this substitute
affected the price for rebar?
No Yes
1.
2.
3.
Explanation
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 35
IV‐14. Demand trends.‐‐ Indicate how demand within the United States and outside of the United
States (if known) for rebar has changed since January 1, 2014. Explain any trends and describe
the principal factors that have affected these changes in demand.
Market
Overall
No
Overall
increase change decrease
Fluctuate
with no
clear trend
Explanation and factors
Within the
United
States
Outside
the United
States
IV‐15. Product changes.‐‐Have there been any significant changes in the product range, product mix,
or marketing of rebar since January 1, 2014?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe and quantify if possible.
IV‐16. Conditions of competition.‐‐
(a) Is the rebar market subject to business cycles (other than general economy‐wide
conditions) and/or other conditions of competition distinctive to rebar? If yes, describe.
Check all that apply.
Please describe.
No
Skip to question IV‐17.
Yes‐Business cycles (e.g.
seasonal business)
Yes‐Other distinctive
conditions of competition
(b) If yes, have there been any changes in the business cycles or conditions of competition for
rebar since January 1, 2014?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 36
IV‐17. Supply constraints.‐‐Has your firm refused, declined, or been unable to supply rebar
customer(s) since January 1, 2014 (examples include placing customers on allocation or
“controlled order entry,” declining to accept new customers or renew existing customers,
delivering less than the quantity promised, been unable to meet timely shipment commitments,
etc.)?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
IV‐18. Raw materials.‐‐How have rebar raw material prices changed since January 1, 2014?
Fluctuate
with no
Explain, noting how raw material price changes
Overall
No
Overall
increase change decrease clear trend have affected your firm’s selling prices for rebar.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 37
IV‐19. Interchangeability.‐‐Is rebar produced in the United States and in other countries
interchangeable (i.e., can they physically be used in the same applications)?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = the products from a specified country‐pair are always interchangeable
F = the products are frequently interchangeable
S = the products are sometimes interchangeable
N = the products are never interchangeable
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
Japan
Taiwan
Turkey
Other countries
United States
Japan
Taiwan
Turkey
For any country‐pair producing rebar that is sometimes or never interchangeable, identify the
country‐pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude interchangeable use:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 38
IV‐20. Factors other than price.‐‐Are differences other than price (e.g., quality, availability,
transportation network, product range, technical support, etc.) between rebar produced in the
United States and in other countries a significant factor in your firm’s sales of the products?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = such differences are always significant
F = such differences are frequently significant
S = such differences are sometimes significant
N = such differences are never significant
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
Japan
Taiwan
Turkey
Other countries
United States
Japan
Taiwan
Turkey
For any country‐pair for which factors other than price always or frequently are a significant
factor in your firm’s sales of rebar, identify the country‐pair and report the advantages or
disadvantages imparted by such factors:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 39
IV‐21. Customer identification.‐‐List the names and contact information for your firm’s 10 largest U.S.
customers for rebar since January 1, 2014. Indicate the share of the quantity of your firm’s total
shipments of rebar that each of these customers accounted for in 2016.
Customer’s name
Contact person
Email
Telephone
City
State
Share
of
2016
sales
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 40
IV‐22. Competition from imports
(a)
Lost revenue.‐‐Since January 1, 2014: To avoid losing sales to competitors selling rebar
from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey, did your firm:
No
Yes
(b)
Reduce prices
Roll back announced price increases
Lost sales.‐‐Since January 1, 2014: Did your firm lose sales of rebar to imports of this
product from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey?
No
Yes
(c)
The submission of lost sales/lost revenue allegations is to be completed only by NON‐
PETITIONERS.
If your firm indicated “yes” to any of the above, your firm can provide the Commission
with additional information by downloading and completing the lost sales/lost revenues
worksheet at http://usitc.gov/trade_remedy/question.htm. Note that the Commission
may contact the firms named to verify the allegations reported.
Is your firm submitting the lost sales/lost revenues worksheet?
No—Please explain.
Yes—Please complete the worksheet and submit via the Commission dropbox.
https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: RBAR)
IV‐23. Other explanations.‐‐If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part
IV that did not provide a narrative response box, please note the question number and the
explanation in the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your
firm had in providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with
the MS Word questionnaire.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey (Final)
Page 41
HOW TO FILE YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
This questionnaire is available as a “fillable” form in MS Word format on the
Commission’s website at:
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/title_7/2017/steel_concrete_reinforcing_bar_japan_taiwa
n_and/final.htm
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the questionnaire
document. Please submit the completed questionnaire using one of the methods noted
below. If your firm is unable to complete the MS Word questionnaire or cannot use one
of the electronic methods of submission, please contact the Commission for further
instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.—Upload the MS Word questionnaire along with a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/
Pin: RBAR
• E‐mail.—E‐mail the MS Word questionnaire to [email protected]; include a scanned copy of
the signed certification page (page 1). Submitters are strongly encouraged to encrypt nonpublic
documents that are electronically transmitted to the Commission to protect your sensitive information
from unauthorized disclosure. The USITC secure drop‐box system and the Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS) use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140‐2 cryptographic
algorithms to encrypt data in transit. Submitting your nonpublic documents by a means that does not
use these encryption algorithms (such as by email) may subject your firm’s nonpublic information to
unauthorized disclosure during transmission. If you choose a non‐encrypted method of electronic
transmission, the Commission warns you that the risk of such possible unauthorized disclosure is
assumed by you and not by the Commission.
If your firm does not produce this product, please fill out page 1, print, sign, and submit a scanned copy
to the Commission.
Parties to this proceeding.—If your firm is a party to this proceeding, it is required to serve a copy of the
completed questionnaire on parties to the proceeding that are subject to administrative protective
order (see 19 CFR § 207.7). A list of such parties may be obtained from the Commission’s Secretary (202‐
205‐1803). A certificate of service must accompany the completed questionnaire you submit (see 19 CFR
§ 207.7). Service of the questionnaire must be made in paper form.
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Microsoft Word - US Producers--Rebar (F) |
Author | joanna.lo |
File Modified | 2017-03-13 |
File Created | 2017-03-13 |