Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) –PHEP 2017 FOA and Aligned Application Process "Hotwash"

Webinar Survey Questions:

1. Are the activities listed in the logic model representative of what is being conducted within your jurisdiction? Y/N (Please explain)

2. Was the Strategies and Activities section of the FOA clear and actionable? Y/N (Please Explain)

3. Did the Approach section of the FOA clearly define the purpose and intent of the HPP-PHEP program? Y/N (Please explain)

4. Were the FOA and Logic Model valuable in informing, planning, and developing your jurisdictions’ work plan? Y/N (Please explain)

5. What type of application-related technical assistance would be helpful to you/your organization in the future? Please explain]

6. Please rank the following statement in regards to completing your joint application package:

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
HPP tools and technical assistance helped me to complete the joint application in a timely manner
PHEP tools and technical assistance helped me to complete the joint application in a timely manner

Discussion: If you answered Disagree or Strongly Disagree, what steps could be taken to improve the process?

7. Please rank how useful of each of the following were in completing your application package:

	Very Useful	Useful	Neither Useful or not Useful	Not Useful	Not at all Useful
FOA
Supplemental Guidance
Joint HPP-PHEP Conference Calls
Application Template and Instructions
HPP FPO Regional Technical Assistance Calls
HPP Awardee Conference Calls

8. Please rank each of the following statements in regards to the instructions that were provided.

Item	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Instructions regarding the Project Narrative were clear
The instructions regarding the work plan were helpful
The instructions for sub-awardee contract plans were helpful
The instructions regarding the budget were useful
The supplemental guidance was easy to use and/or apply

Discussion: If you answered Disagree or Strongly Disagree, what steps could be taken to improve the documents / process?

9. Please rank each of the following statements in regards to the Supplemental Guidance that was provided.

HPP Supplemental Guidance	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The supplemental guidance was clear
The supplemental guidance was helpful
The supplemental guidance was useful
The supplemental guidance was sufficient
The supplemental guidance was easy to use and/or apply
PHEP Supplemental Guidance	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The supplemental guidance was clear
The supplemental guidance was helpful
The supplemental guidance was useful
The supplemental guidance was sufficient
The supplemental guidance was easy to use and/or apply

Discussion Questions:

1. The joint application process resulted in improved planning and coordination in my jurisdiction.

1. Strongly Agree

2. Agree

3. Neutral

4. Disagree

5. Strongly Disagree

2. The joint application process resulted in potential cost savings in my jurisdiction.

6. Strongly Agree

7. Agree

8. Neutral

9. Disagree

10. Strongly Disagree

3. The requirements within the FOA were clearly stated.

1. Strongly Agree

2. Agree

3. Neutral

4. Disagree

5. Strongly Disagree

Discussion: If you answered Disagree or Strongly Disagree, what specific parts or sections of the FOA requirements were not clearly stated? What steps could be taken to improve the document?

4. The logic model was clear and useful in your planning efforts.

11. Strongly Agree

12. Agree

13. Neutral

14. Disagree

15. Strongly Disagree

Discussion: If you answered Disagree or Strongly Disagree, what specific parts of the logic model were not clearly stated? What steps could be taken to improve the document?

Discussion Questions / Follow-up:

1. If you could select one element to improve for the application process for the next budget period, what would it be?

2. What was the most surprising benefit of the joint application process?

3. What is the one alignment success story or best practice that you would like to share?

4. Other feedback, concerns, likes, dislikes?