O*Net Data Collection Program

ICR 201504-1205-010

OMB: 1205-0421

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2015-09-03
Supplementary Document
2015-06-11
Supplementary Document
2015-05-12
Supplementary Document
2015-05-12
Supplementary Document
2015-05-12
Supplementary Document
2015-05-12
Supporting Statement B
2015-04-29
Supporting Statement A
2015-09-04
ICR Details
1205-0421 201504-1205-010
Historical Active 201201-1205-005
DOL/ETA A300LJDA-200704110-5OS06-000
O*Net Data Collection Program
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved with change 09/30/2015
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 06/30/2015
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
09/30/2018 36 Months From Approved 09/30/2015
28,866 0 26,287
14,537 0 13,671
0 0 0

The O*NET Data Collection Program is an ongoing effort to collect and maintain current information on the detailed characteristics of occupations and skills for more than 900 occupations. The resulting database provides the most comprehensive standardized source of occupational and skills information in the nation. O*NET information is used by a wide range of audiences, including individuals making career decisions, public agencies and schools providing career exploration services or education and training programs, and businesses making staffing and training decisions. The O*NET system provides a common language, framework and database to meet the administrative needs of various federal programs, including workforce investment and training programs supported by funding from the Departments of Labor, Education, and Health and Human Services.

PL: Pub.L. 113 - 128 308 Name of Law: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
   US Code: 29 USC 3101-3255 Name of Law: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
   US Code: 29 USC 491-492 Name of Law: Wagner-Peyser Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  79 FR 70569 11/26/2014
80 FR 34701 06/17/2015
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 28,866 26,287 0 2,579 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 14,537 13,671 0 866 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
The projected total annual burden hours for July 2015–June 2018 range from 13,918 to 15,375. The average annual burden is 14,537 hours, compared with an average annual burden of 13,671 hours requested for the previous 3-year period (2012–2015). The total burden hours for the July 2015–June 2018 period, 43,610, reflect a slight increase in burden compared with the 2012–2015 period, for which a total 41,011 hours were requested (U.S. Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration, 2012). The small increase in burden corresponds to an increase in the number of establishment sampling units that are contacted each year, an estimated 49,667 for the July 2015–June 2018 period compared with 43,500 for the June 2012–May 2015 period in the April 10, 2012, OMB Supporting Statement. The slight increase in the number of sampled establishments is attributable to changes in the schedule for fielding cases (occupations), which is impacted by eligibility rates and other sampling characteristics of the specific occupations being studied. The annual costs have increased since 2012–2015, primarily because of inflation in the benefits portion of employee compensation and also because of the increase in the number of sampling units being contacted per year relative to the 2012–2015 period. A few minor questionnaire revisions have been implemented since 2012. In addition, several minor questionnaire revisions for the Knowledge Questionnaire and the Background Questionnaire are pending in this submission. All of these revisions are described in detail in Appendix A. These minor revisions do not represent an increase in respondent burden. As with the burden hours, the slight decrease in total cost burden across the 2 year period July 2016–June 2018 relative to the July 2015–June 2016 period results from initiation of data collection for most occupations during July 2015–June 2016, which causes many of these occupations to complete data collection during the final 2 years. Weighting and Estimation Estimates generated from O*NET survey data are computed with sampling weights that compensate for the unequal probabilities of selecting establishments, occupations within establishments, and employees within each selected occupation. In addition, these base weights are adjusted to further compensate for multiple subwaves of sampling, sample adjustment, population under- and overcoverage caused by frame imperfections, and nonresponse at both the establishment and the employee levels. These weight adjustments can lead to weights that are very large or very small compared with the weights for other sample units. Such weight variability may increase the standard error estimates. When the variation in the weights is large, it is desirable to trim the weights to reduce the variation. For the O*NET estimates, the weighting process involves a weight trimming procedure in which extremely large or small weights are truncated to fall within a specified range. Although trimming weights can introduce bias in the estimates, the variance reduction it achieves usually offsets the potential bias, resulting in estimates with smaller net mean squared errors.

$6,308,981
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Walter Parker 202 693-2778 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/30/2015


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy