0428 Supporting Statement May 2015

0428 Supporting Statement May 2015.pdf

Record Retention Requirements for the Soy Protein/CHD Health Claim

OMB: 0910-0428

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Record Retention Requirements
For the Soy Protein/CHD Health Claim
OMB Control No. 0910-0428
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Terms of Clearance: None.
A. Justification
1. Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary
Section 403(r)(3)(A)(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
343(r)(3)(A)(i)) provides for the use of food label statements characterizing a relationship of any
nutrient of the type required to be in the label or labeling of the food to a disease or a health related
condition only where that statement meets the requirements of the regulations promulgated by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services to authorize the use of such a health claim. The Food and
Drug Administration (FDA, we) authorized the use in food labeling of a health claim about the
relationship between soy protein and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in § 101.82 (21 CFR
101.82) of our regulations. To bear the soy protein/CHD health claim, foods must contain at least
6.25 grams of soy protein per reference amount customarily consumed. Analytical methods for
measuring total protein can be used to quantify the amount of soy protein in foods that contain soy
as the sole source of protein. However, at the present time there is no validated analytical
methodology available to quantify the amount of soy protein in foods that contain other sources of
protein. For these latter foods, we must rely on information known only to the manufacturer to
assess compliance with the requirement that the food contain the qualifying amount of soy protein.
Thus, we require manufacturers to have and keep records to substantiate the amount of soy protein
in a food that bears the health claim and contains sources of protein other than soy, and to make
such records available to appropriate regulatory officials upon written request. The information
collected includes nutrient databases or analyses, recipes or formulations, purchase orders for
ingredients, or any other information that reasonably substantiates the ratio of soy protein to total
protein.
We request OMB approval for extension of the following information collection requirements
contained in § 101.82:
21 CFR 101.82 -- Recordkeeping
Requires food manufacturers to retain, and make available to regulatory officials, records
concerning the ratio of soy protein to other sources of protein in a food product bearing a soy
protein/CHD health claim.
2. Purpose and Use of the Information Collection
We use the information during inspection review of firms’ label claims to determine the basis of soy
protein/CHD health claims. The purpose of the information collection is to permit calculation of
the ratio of soy protein to other sources of protein in a food when that food bears a soy protein/CHD
health claim. Requiring records retention in this circumstance for soy protein/CHD health claims is

necessary for the efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act. Without access to this information, we
would be unable to ensure that food products that contain non-soy proteins comply with the
requirements for the soy protein/CHD health claim.
Description of Recordkeepers: Recordkeepers include businesses engaged in the manufacture of
foods containing soy and other proteins that bear soy protein/CHD health claims. Respondents are
from the private sector (for-profit businesses).
3. Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction
The regulation does not specifically prescribe the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological techniques or other forms of information technology as necessary for use by firms.
Companies are free to use whatever forms of information technology may best assist them in
retaining the appropriate records and making them available to regulatory officials.
The agency estimates that about ninety-five percent (95%) of the recordkeeping will be maintained
electronically in the next three years.
4. Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information
No duplication of Federal regulations concerning the regulation for a health claim for soy
protein/CHD is likely because of the clear Congressional authorization that FDA promulgate
regulations pertaining to health claims for foods as opposed to the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (meats and poultry) and the Federal Trade Commission (advertising).
5. Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities
We estimate that ten percent (10%) of recordkeepers are small businesses. The recordkeeping is no
more burdensome for small businesses than for large. The requirements are the minimum
requirements for the health claim for soy protein and CHD. We aid small businesses in complying
with our requirements through the our Regional Small Business Representatives and through the
scientific and administrative staffs within the agency. We have provided a Small Business Guide
on our website at http://www.fda.gov/oc/industry/.
6. Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently
Data collection occurs occasionally. There are no consequences to Federal program or policy
activities if the information is not collected or is collected less frequently. Under the regulations, a
food manufacturer could not use a soy protein/CHD health claim on a food product containing nonsoy sources of protein if it did not retain the appropriate records for possible review by regulatory
officials.
7. Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5
There are no special circumstances associated with this collection of information.

2

8. Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside the
Agency
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d), we published a 60-day notice for public comment in the
Federal Register of March 10, 2015 (80 FR 12640). No comments were received.
9. Explanation of Any Payment or Gift to Respondents
We do not provide any payments or gifts to respondents.
10. Assurance of Confidentiality Provided to Respondents
Company records such as nutrient databases or analyses, recipes or formulations, and purchase
orders for ingredients, which may be consulted or copied during FDA inspections, often contain
trade secret and confidential commercial information. This information is safeguarded by section
301(j) of the FD&C Act and would be protected from disclosure under the Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) under sections 552(a) and (b) (5 U.S.C. 552(a) and (b)) and by part 20 of our
regulations (21 CFR part 20).
11. Justification for Sensitive Questions
This information collection does not involve any questions that are of a personally sensitive nature.
12. Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
12 a. Annualized Hour Burden Estimate
Description of Respondents: Respondents are businesses engaged in the manufacture of foods
containing soy and other proteins that bear soy protein/CHD health claims. Respondents are from
the private sector (for-profit businesses).
We estimate the burden of this collection of information as follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden1
21 CFR Section

No. of
Recordkeepers

No. of Records per
Recordkeeper

Total Annual
Records

Average Burden
per
Recordkeeping

Total Hours

101.82(c)(2)(ii)(B)

25

1

25

1

25

1

There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

Based upon our experience with the use of health claims, we estimate that only about 25 firms
would be likely to market products bearing a soy protein/CHD health claim and that only, perhaps,
one of each firm's products might contain non-soy sources of protein along with soy protein. The
records required to be retained by § 101.82(c)(2)(ii)(B) are the records, e.g., the formulation or
recipe, that a manufacturer has and maintains as a normal course of its doing business. Thus, the
burden to the food manufacturer is limited to in assembling and retaining the records, which we
estimate will take 1 hour annually.
3

12 b. Annualized Cost Burden Estimate
We estimate the annualized burden hour cost to a respondent for assembling and retaining the
required records to be approximately $2,176. We estimate a recordkeeper’s average wage to be that
of a Federal government employee at the GS-13/Step-1 rate for the Washington-Baltimore locality
pay area for the year 2015, which makes the annual wage cost for assembling and retaining the
required records approximately $1,088 (25 hours x $43.52 per hour). To account for overhead, this
cost is increased by 100%, making the total estimated burden hour cost to the recordkeepers $2,176.
13. Estimates of Other Total Annual Cost Burden to Recordkeepers
There are no capital, start-up, operating, or maintenance costs associated with this collection.
14. Annualized Cost to Federal Government
Our review of the retained records would generally occur as part of our scheduled inspection of a
food firm. We estimate that our review of the retained records would take one hour per product (25
products x one hour = 25 hours). Thus, we estimate the annual cost to the Federal government to be
25 hours at rate of $43.52/hour, the GS-13/Step-1 rate for the Washington-Baltimore locality pay
area for the year 2015 (25 hours x $43.52/hour = $1088). To account for overhead, this cost is
increased by 100%, making the total estimated annual cost to the Federal government $2,176.
15. Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments
There is no change in the burden estimate.
16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule
The information obtained from this information collection will not be published.
17. Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate
There are no reasons why display of the expiration date for OMB approval of the information
collection would be inappropriate.
18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
There are no exceptions to the certification.

4


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleMicrosoft Word - 0428 Supporting Statement May 2015.doc
AuthorDHC
File Modified2015-06-04
File Created2015-06-04

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy