Supporting_Statement - 0584-0012 SBP Final 8.24.15

Supporting_Statement - 0584-0012 SBP Final 8.24.15.docx

7 CFR Part 220, School Breakfast Program

OMB: 0584-0012

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf


SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM 7 CFR PART 220

OMB CLEARANCE NUMBER 0584-0012

REVISION OF A CURRENTLY APPROVED COLLECTION


Susan Weeks, Program Analyst

Food and Nutrition Service, USDA

Special Nutrition Programs

Child Nutrition Programs

Program Monitoring Branch

Special Nutrition Program

3101 Park Center Drive

Alexandria, VA 22302

PH: 703-305-1506

[email protected]










Table of Contents

A1. Circumstances that make the collection of information necessary …..…….................. 2

A2. Purpose and Use of the Information ………………………………………………….. 2

A3. Use of information technology and burden reduction . ……………………………… 3

A4. Efforts to identify duplication .………………………………………………………. 4

A5. Impacts on small businesses or other small entities …………………………………. 4

A6. Consequences of collecting the information less frequently ……………………….... 5

A7. Special circumstances relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5 …………………. 5

A8. Comments to the Federal Register Notice and efforts for consultation …………….... 6

A9. Explain any decisions to provide any payment or gift to respondents ………………. 7

A10. Assurances of confidentiality provided to respondents …………………………….. 8

A11. Justification for any questions of a sensitive nature ………………………………... 8

A12. Estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information ……………………... 8

A13. Estimates of other total annual cost burden ……………………………………….... 12

A14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government …………………... 12

A15. Explanation of program changes or adjustments ………………………………….... 12

A16. Plans for tabulation, and publication and project time schedule ……………………. 14

A17. Displaying the OMB Approval Expiration Date ……………………………………. 14

A18. Exceptions to the certification statement identified in Item 19 …………………….. 14

Attachments

  1. Public Comment

  2. Excel Burden Chart for 0584-0012 School Breakfast Program

  3. Burden Narrative for 0584-0012 School Breakfast Program

A. JUSTIFICATION

  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


This is a revision of the currently approved information collection for the School Breakfast Program (SBP). Section 4 of the Child Nutrition Act (CNA) of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773) authorizes the School Breakfast Program as a nutrition assistance program and authorizes payments to States to assist them to initiate, maintain, or expand nonprofit breakfast programs in schools. The provision requires that “Breakfasts served by schools participating in the School Breakfast Program under this section shall consist of a combination of foods and shall meet minimum nutritional requirements prescribed by the Secretary on the basis of tested nutritional research.”


  1. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


This information collection is required to administer and operate this program in accordance with the National School Lunch Act (NSLA). The Program is administered at the State and school food authority (SFA) levels and the operations include the submission and approval of applications, execution of agreements, submission of claims, payment of claims, monitoring and providing technical assistance. States, SFAs, and schools under this Act are required to keep accounts and records as may be necessary to enable FNS to determine whether the program is in compliance with this Act and the regulations. FNS would not be able to properly monitor State agency and SFA compliance without this data collection. Additionally, State agencies are required to report program data using forms FNS-10 and FNS-777.  The reporting burden associated with these reports is associated with the information collection for the Food Programs Reporting System (FPRS), OMB control #0584-0594, expiration date 6/30/2017 and is not duplicated in this information collection.  However, the recordkeeping burden is still maintained in this collection.


  1. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms or information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also, describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


FNS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, 2002 to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. All 56 state agencies and United States territories that administer this program submit some program and financial data electronically to FNS via the Food Programs Reporting System (FPRS) at https://www.FPRS.usda.gov. The burden for the data reported in FPRS on the FNS-10 and FNS-777 is included in the information collection for the Food Programs Reporting System (FPRS), OMB control #0584-0594, expiration date 6/30/2017, and is not associated with this collection to avoid duplicate burden. State agencies collect participation and meal count information from School Food Authorities via their own electronic systems. There is a small amount of non-electronic submissions that are sent via email or flash drive or facsimile, such as providing records for Management Evaluations to FNS upon request. FNS estimates that 99.6 % of the information submitted in this collection is collected electronically (via FPRS or the State agency systems) and only a negligible amount is submitted non-electronically.


  1. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purpose described in item 2 above.


There is no similar data collection available. Every effort has been made to avoid duplication. FNS has reviewed USDA reporting requirements and state administrative agency requirements. FNS solely administers and monitors the SBP.


  1. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


Information being requested or required has been held to the minimum required for the intended use. Although smaller SFA record fewer financial transactions involving the SBP, they deliver the same program benefits and perform the same function as any other SFA. Thus, they maintain the same kinds of information on file. FNS estimates that 1-3% of respondents are small entities (approximately 1,103 to 3,308 respondents).

  1. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


The information is collected for the purpose of administering an ongoing program. Applications can be accepted and agreements executed at any time, although SFAs generally execute agreements at or shortly before the beginning of each school year. SFAs submit claims for reimbursement for every month they operate the SBP because funds for the SBP are budgeted on a fiscal year basis. If the data is collected less frequently, FNS would not be able to properly monitor program funding and program trends.


  1. Circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner that is inconsistent with 5 CFR 1320.5:

  • requiring respondents to report informa­tion to the agency more often than quarterly;

School Food Authorities (SFAs) submit monthly claims for reimbursement. This is necessary for SFAs to receive timely reimbursement for actual breakfasts served and to ensure program accountability.

  • requiring respondents to prepare a writ­ten response to a collection of infor­ma­tion in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any docu­ment;

  • requiring respondents to retain re­cords, other than health, medical, governm­ent contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

  • in connection with a statisti­cal sur­vey, that is not de­signed to produce valid and reli­able results that can be general­ized to the uni­verse of study;

  • requiring the use of a statis­tical data classi­fication that has not been re­vie­wed and approved by OMB;

  • that includes a pledge of confiden­tiali­ty that is not supported by au­thority estab­lished in statute or regu­la­tion, that is not sup­ported by dis­closure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unneces­sarily impedes shar­ing of data with other agencies for com­patible confiden­tial use; or

  • requiring respondents to submit propri­etary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demon­strate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permit­ted by law.


There are no other special circumstances. The collection of information is conducted in a manner consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5


  1. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments.

A 60 day notice was published on April 9, 2015 in the Federal Register, Vol. 80, No. 68, page 19064. The comment period for the information collection ended on June 8, 2015. One comment was received in response to the agency’s notice: “The California Department of Education feels the estimated total hours per response for State Agencies is too low.” (Attachment A). FNS acknowledges that there is very little reporting associated with this information collection for State agencies, since the bulk of the reporting burden for State agencies for the School Breakfast Program is accounted for in the FPRS information collection.

  • Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

FNS consults with Regional Offices regarding any proposed changes as the result of legislative, regulatory or administrative changes. Regional offices are in constant contact with State agencies which provides feedback on FNS processes and procedures for this information collection.


  1. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No payment or gift was provided to respondents.



  1. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


The Department will comply with the Privacy Act of 1974. No confidential information is associated with this information collection.


  1. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior or attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


There are no questions of a sensitive nature included in this clearance package.


  1. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information.

The statement should include:

  • Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.



The following tables and Attachment B reflect the estimated burden associated with this information collection for each type of respondent.


ESTIMATED ANNUAL BURDEN FOR 0584-0012, SCHOOL BREAKFAST PROGRAM – REVISION OF A CURRENTLY APPROVED COLLECTION


Reporting

Description of Activity Required


Section

Estimated Number of

Respondents

Frequency

of

Response

Average Annual

Responses

Average

Burden per

Response

Annual Burden

Hours


SA submits requests for funds to pay SBP claims.


SA submits records to USDA for MEs and audits.



220.5




220.15(b)



56




19



36




1



2,016




19



0.25




3



504




57

Total SA Reporting


56

---

2,035

---

561



SFA submits application to SA for new school breakfast program.


SFA submits to SA monthly claim for reimbursement.


SFA submits request for exception for late claim.


SFA submits response to audits.


220.7(a)





220.11(a)




220.11(b)





220.15(c)


168





20,386




204





82


1





10




1





1


168





203,860




204





82


0.25





1




0.75





2


42





203,860




153





164

Total SFA Reporting


20,386

---

204,314

---

204,219


Schools submit counts breakfasts served by category to the SFA.

220.11(b)



89,828



10



898,280



0.05



44,914



Total Schools Reporting


89,828


898,280


44,914


Total Reporting


110,270

---

1,104,629

---

249,694



Record Keeping


Description of Activity Required


Section

Estimated Number of

Respondents

Frequency

of

Response

Average Annual

Responses

Average

Burden per

Response

Annual Burden Hours


SA maintains Program records to support payments made to SFAs and reports submitted to FNS.


SA maintains evidence of investigations of complaints and actions taken.


SA maintains records regarding claims against SFAs.


SA imposes rules on competitive foods.


220.13(b)(1)






220.13(c)






220.14(d)





220.12(a)


56







56






56





56


36







1






12





1


2,016







56






672





56


0.083







2






0.25





1


167







112






168





56

Total SA Record keeping


56

---

2,800

---

503



SFA maintains monthly claim for reimbursement records.


220.11(a)





20,386





10




203,860





0.083





16,920



Total SFA Recordkeeping


20,386


203,860


16,920



Schools maintain food production, menu, and recent nutritional analysis records.


Schools record breakfasts by category.


220.8(a)(3)

220.9(a)







220.11(b)


89,828







89,828


180







180


16,169,040








16,169,040


0.12







0.1



1,940,285








1,616,904

Total Schools Record keeping


89,828


32,338,080


3,557,189

Grand Total Record keeping


110,270


32,544,740


3,574,613*

*Please note that in the above table and in Attachment B, the grand total recordkeeping burden is calculated at 3,574,613. However, when the individual recordkeeping totals are added together, the grand total recordkeeping burden equals 3,574,612. In actuality, this figure is 3,574,612.51 , which has been rounded up to 3,574,613.

SUMMARY OF BURDEN (OMB #0584-0012)

TOTAL NO. RESPONDENTS

110,270

AVERAGE NO. RESPONSES PER RESPONDENT

305.1543

TOTAL ANNUAL RESPONSES

33,649,369

AVERAGE HOURS PER RESPONSE

0.1137

BURDEN REQUESTED WITH SBP REVISION

3,824,307


  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.

The estimate of respondent cost is based on the burden estimates and utilizes the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2014 National Occupational and Wage Statistics, Occupational Group (25-0000) (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm). The hourly mean wage (for education-related occupations) for functions performed by State agency and local education agency staff are estimated at $25.10 per staff hour.


TOTAL COST TO PUBLIC = 3,824,307 hours X $25.10 per hour = $95,990,105.70


  1. Estimate of other total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information (do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.


There is no start-up or annual maintenance costs for this collection of information.


  1. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


It is estimated that federal employees receiving an average General Schedule (GS) grade 12 step 6 wage based on the Washington DC-Northern Virginia locality area take approximately 80 hours to analyze data received from State agencies:

$42.70 x 80 hours = $ 3,416.00 (estimated annualized cost to the Federal government).


  1. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in item 13 or 14 of the OMB 83-I.


This is a revision of a currently approved collection.  The currently approved burden inventory for this collection is 3,924,902 hours. Due to adjustments, the estimated annual burden is 3,824,307, a decrease of 100,595 hours. However, the estimated total number of annual responses has increased. The current total number of responses is 33,432,713. FNS estimates the new total number of responses as 33,649,369, which is an increase of 216,656 responses.


Adjustments were made as a result of 1) a slight decrease in SFAs (20,697 to 20,386) which decreased 19,668 hours of reporting burden and decreased 258 hours of recordkeeping burden and and 2) a slight increase in schools (88,769 to 89,828) which added 530 hours of reporting burden and 41,937 hours of recordkeeping burden. Significant adjustments were made to reduce duplicate burden, such as removing 34,742 hours of duplicate recordkeeping burden for the State agency for maintaining claim records for which the requirement and burden is assigned to the SFAs in addition to removing 717 hours of duplicate reporting burden for the FNS-777 that is now captured in the FPRS information collection. Adjustments were made to more accurately reflect the time spent per response which resulted in removing 86,307 hours of recordkeeping burden. Adjustments were made to reflect the reduced number of respondents that were submitting late claims which resulted in decreasing 623 hours of reporting burden and 608 hours of recordkeeping burden. Procedures that were not actually occurring resulted in removal of 112 hours of reporting burden. Also, 28 hours of recordkeeping burden was removed for a requirement that was not an information collection requirement. In addition, FNS transferred 42 hours from recordkeeping to reporting burden that were mistakenly attributed as recordkeeping burden in the previous renewal. Overall burden hours were reduced by 100,595 hours. These changes are also summarized in the burden narrative (Attachment C).


  1. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.


There are no plans to tabulate or publish any information in connection with this information collection.



  1. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


We are not seeking approval to not display the expiration date.


  1. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act."


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSBP ICR Supporting Statement
AuthorSusan Weeks
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy