Post Meeting Survey of Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Attendees at the NACP Grantee Meeting 2018

Attachment C: NACP Grantee Post Meeting Survey_text

Form Approved

OMB No. 0923-0047

Exp. Date: 12/31/2018

2018 National Asthma Control Program Grantees’ Meeting

Evaluation

CDC estimates the average public reporting burden for this collection of information as approximately 10 minutes per

response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data

needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is

not required to respond to collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments

regarding this burden statement or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this

burden to CDC/ATSDR Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS D-74, Atlanta, GA 30333, ATTN: PRA (0923-0047).

Please give us feedback!

Overall Ratings – Circle ONE number (do not circle WORDS)

OVERALL MEETING

Rate the value of the grantee meeting relative Very little Value 1 2 3 Average value 4 5 6 Highest value

to your work with state asthma program

Rate the ease of the meeting logistics Very difficult 1 2 3 Average 4 5 6 Very simple

(Consider registration, transportation, breaks,

security process. Etc.)

Rate the meeting length Far too long 1 2 3 About Right 4 5 6 Far Too Short

As compared to other meetings, please rate

how much you learned from this meeting No learning 1 2 3 Average 4 5 6 I learned a lot

What is the likelihood you will USE what

you learned when you return to your state? Unlikely 1 2 3 I might 4 5 6 Very Likely

Rate the time allotted to asking questions

and substantive discussions Not enough 1 2 3 Just right 4 5 6 Far too much

Rate the time allotted to NETWORKING Not enough 1 2 3 Just right 4 5 6 Far too much

Did you have sufficient time to share Completely 1 2 3 Just right 4 5 6 Far too much

innovations, perspectives and lessons learned? Inadequate time wasted

Rate your level of agreement overall: the Completely 1 2 3 Agree 4 5 6 Absolutely

topics presented were well organized disagree agree

Rate your level of agreement overall: the Completely 1 2 3 Agree 4 5 6 Absolutely

pacing and materials covered worked well disagree agree

MEETING SESSIONS

What breakout session did you attend? 1-Program Mgr 2-Surveillance 3-Evaluator 4-N/A did not attend

How likely are you to use information from Very unlikely 1 2 3 Probably 4 5 6 Definitely will

the breakout session? Will

Rate the value of your experience with the Very little Value 1 2 3 Average value 4 5 6 Highest value

World Café session

Rate how much you agree with this statement: Completely 1 2 3 Somewhat 4 5 6 I understand

“I have a better understanding of new Disagree Agree completely

developments at CDC and in the new Division”

Rate how much you agree with this statement: Completely 1 2 3 Somewhat 4 5 6 I understand

“I have a better understanding of the NACP Agree completely

CCARE Initiative.”

Rate how you felt about the session on A waste of time 1 2 3 Somewhat 4 5 6 Very worth-

Performance Measures useful while

What aspects of the meeting made it MOST USEFUL FOR YOU?

What should we DEFINITELY DO in future meetings?

What aspects of the meeting made it LEAST USEFUL FOR YOU?

What should we DEFINITELY NOT DO in future meetings?

Is there anything else we SHOULD have asked about?

Is there anything you want to tell us?

Thanks for giving us feedback!