Supporting Statement A for 0925-0348 WTP_docx

Supporting Statement A for 0925-0348 WTP_docx.docx

Hazardous Waste Worker Training

OMB: 0925-0348

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf



Supporting Statement A for

HAZARDOUS WASTE WORKER TRAINING – 42 CFR Part 65 (NIEHS)

Extension

(OMB NO. 0925-0348; Exp. December 31, 2015)

Date: December 2015

Federal Government Employee Address:

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

P.O. Box 12233

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Name: JOSEPH T. HUGHES, JR.

Address: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences P.O. Box 12233 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Telephone: (919) 541-0217

Fax:

Email: [email protected]











Table of Contents




List of Attachments:

Attachment 1 - Information Collection Questionnaire (Data Management System) (Word Version)

Attachment 2 - Information Collection Questionnaire (Data Management System) Screenshots

Attachment 3 - - WTP 30 day frn



A. Abstract

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) was given major responsibility for initiating a worker safety and health training program under Section 126 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) for hazardous waste workers and emergency responders. A network of non-profit organizations that are committed to protecting workers and their communities by delivering high-quality, peer-reviewed safety and health curricula to target populations of hazardous waste workers and emergency responders has been developed. In twenty-eight years (FY 1987-2015), the NIEHS Worker Training program has successfully supported 20 primary grantees that have trained more than 3.3 million workers across the country and presented over 194,000 classroom and hands-on training courses, which have accounted for nearly 39 million contact hours of actual training. Grantees are to provide information in accordance with S65.4 (a), (b), (c) and 65.6(a) on the nature, duration, and purpose of the training, selection criteria for trainees’ qualifications and competency of the project director and staff, the adequacy of training plans and resources, including budget and curriculum, and response to meeting training criteria in OSHA’s Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Regulations (29 CFR 1910.120). As a cooperative agreement, there are additional requirements for the progress report section of the application. Grantees are to provide their information into the WTP Grantee Data Management System. The information collected is used by the Director through officers, employees, experts, and consultants to evaluate applications based on technical merit to determine whether to make awards.

A.1 Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary

This request is for OMB review this submission as an extension of the information collection requirements in 42 CFR Part 65, National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Hazardous Waste Worker Training. Section 126(g) of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (42 USC 9960 a) authorized the NIEHS to administer a program of grants for the training and education of workers who engage in activities related to hazardous waste removal, or containment, or emergency response operation.

The regulations, published in October 1990, establish standards for eligibility and application procedures. Specifically, the regulations establish the following requirements:

§ 65.4(a) Reporting and Recordkeeping.

Establishes specific reporting and record keeping for joint applications.

§ 65.4(b) Reporting.

States the minimum information to be included in the application.

§ 65.4(c) Reporting.

Requires the respondent to provide assurance to the awarding component that there will be no discrimination in selection of trainees or instructors in relation to union membership contained under OMB No. 0925-0348 (expiration date December 31, 2015). This regulation does not call for information of a sensitive nature.

§ 65.6(b) Reporting.

States the requirement of written application for continuation award. Application is made by the use of forms PHS 398 and 2590 (OMB No. 0925-0001, expiration date August 31, 2015).

Supplementary information for the 42 CFR Part 65 regulations, published in December 1994, became necessary when Congress passed the Hazardous Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act (HMTUSA) of 1990, which created a new grant program in training hazardous materials transportation employees for NIEHS. Although no funds for this activity have been passed through from the Department of Transportation (DOT), our Legislative Implementation Plan (LIP) for this program required that we make reference to this new statutory authority and go through the rulemaking process.

A.2 Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

Respondent organizations are to provide information in accordance with § 65.4(a), (b), (c) and § 65.6(b) on the nature, duration, and purpose of the training, selection criteria for trainees’ qualifications, and competency of the project director and staff, cooperative arrangements in the case of joint applications, the adequacy of training plans and resources, including budget and response to meeting training criteria in OSHA's Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Regulations (29 CFR 1910.120). The information collected is used by the Director through officers, employees, experts, and consultants to evaluate applications based on technical merit to determine whether to make awards. The information collected the past three years has been utilized in training summaries containing information on numbers of workers trained, courses conducted and contact hours; progress reports; and highlights of accomplishments.

A.3 Use of Information Technology and Burden Reduction

In an effort to reduce the burden to the respondent, electronic submission of training data is collected via the NIEHS WTP Curricula Information and Data Management System (DMS), which is a private web-based application for entering and retrieving programmatic data, submitting training data, entering progress report information, utilizing the curricula submission upload function and electronic mail. Electronic grant applications have expanded to include dozens of U.S. organizations, leading toward full implementation of the alternative path of electronic transmission of grant applications. A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) was done for the database being used to collect the information. The DMS system was certified and accredited on 11/4/2008. No PII is collected by the DMS.

A.4 Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information

The information requested is unique to each application. No other method of obtaining the required information exists. Similar information is not available. However, in the case of continuation grants pre-printed forms for each previously funded respondent organization are prepared with basic information from the initial application and transmitted to the organizations in the first stage of application.

A.5 Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities

42 USC 9660 (a) restricts awards under this program to nonprofit organizations.

A.6 Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently

Application for previously recommended support (noncompeting continuation) is requested annually, for consistency with other PHS grant programs and the Federal budget process. However, it is necessary to request information on the training data semi-annually since actual and estimated numbers are reported within the noncompeting continuation application. The semi-annually reporting requirement ensures that updated data is reported.

A.7 Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5

The information collection requirements are consistent with guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5.


A.8.1 Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice



The information collection was published in the Federal Register on September 16, 2015, Vol. 80, No. 179, pages 55634 -55635 and allowed 60-days for public comment. No public comments were received. The grantees under the cooperative agreement meet at least twice annually to discuss data collection needs and reporting format.

A.8.2 Efforts to Consult Outside Agency


The grantees under the cooperative agreement meet at least twice annually to discuss data collection needs and reporting format. Consultants reviewed the Information Collection Questionnaire (Data Management System), and there were no problems.

Consultants:

Tom Ouimet, MPH

Yale University

Office of Environmental Health and Safety

135 College Street (1st floor)

New Haven, CT 06510

Phone: (203) 737-2132


Ted Outwater

Senior Advisor, Safety and Training

2201 Pershing St.

Durham, NC 27705

Phone: (919) 928-6778


Tom Mcquiston, Ph.D.

Tony Mazzocchi Center for Health, Safety and Environmental Education

Sr. Associate for Research and Evaluation

60 Blvd of the Allies, Room 904
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Phone: (919) 260-7835


A.9 Explanation of Any Payment of Gift to Respondents

Respondents are not provided a payment or gift.

A.10 Assurance of Confidentiality Provided to Respondents

Applications, grants and related documents for the NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Training was published in the Federal Register on December 13, 1994, page 64139 under the existing Privacy Act System of Records #09-25-0036. No Personally Identifiable Information (PII) is collected.

A.11 Justification for Sensitive Questions

Some information provided by respondents, as required by other applicable regulations, may be considered sensitive. However, approval for collection of information of this nature is contained under OMB No. 0925-0001 (expiration date 10-31-18). This regulation does not call for information of a sensitive nature. No PII information is being collected.

A.12.1 Estimated Annualized Burden Hours

The annual reporting hour burden is as follows: number of respondents: 20; number of responses per respondent: 2; and annual hour burden per response: 560. The average time per response is 14 hours per year. The estimated hour burden for each respondent includes 9 hours to create documents and 5 hours for support staff to compile the documents.

A.12-1 Estimated Annualized Burden Hours

Form Name

Type of Respondent

Number of Respondents

Number of Responses per Respondent

Average Burden Per Response (in hours)

Total Annual Burden Hour

Information Collection Questionnaire (Data Management System)

Grantee

20

2

14

560

Total


20

40


560





A.12-2 Annualized Cost to respondents

The annualized cost to respondents is estimated at: $18,200.00







A.12-2 Annualized Cost to the Respondents



Type of Respondent (per Grantee)

Number of Respondents

Frequency of Response

Average Burden Per Response

(in hours)

Hourly Wage Rate*

Respondent Cost

Professional Staff

10

2

9

$40.00

$14,400

Support Staff

10

2

5

$19.00

$3,800

Total

20




$18,200





*United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#00-0000)



A.13 Estimate of Other Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents or Record Keepers

There are no other total annual cost burdens to report. There are no Capitol Costs, Operating Costs and/or Maintenance Costs to report.

A.14 Annualized Cost to the Federal Government

Administration of the program involves development and monitoring activities. The average annual cost to the government is $30,299.69 which will include personnel hours in the maintenance of the information database, which is done under an existing contract with loaded labor rates and includes monitoring, coding, updating, trouble shooting, etc.



Staff



Grade/Step

Salary

% of Effort

Fringe (if applicable)

Total Cost to Gov’t

Federal Oversight






Program Analyst

13/4

$94,613

0.13


$12,299.69













Contractor Cost






Web Developer/Programmer

N/A

$120,000

0.15

N/A

$18,000

Travel





0

Other Cost





0







Total





$30,299.69



A.15 Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments

There are no changes or adjustments. This is an extension of a currently approved information collection request.

A.16 Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule

There are no plans for publication. Projected data and progress reports are due in May. Final data and progress reports are due in October.

A.17 Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate

There is no objection to the display of OMB expiration date.

A.18 Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions: None

The information collection activity complies with 5 CFR 1320.

8


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorLambert, Jane (NIH/NIEHS) [E]
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-24

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy