Supporting Statement

Supporting Statement.doc

REG-208172-91 (TD 8787 -final) Basis Reduction Due to Discharge of Indebtedness

OMB: 1545-1539

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

REG-208172-91

TD 8787 (final)



  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


This document contains final and temporary regulations that provide ordering rules for the reduction of bases of property under sections 108 and 1017 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The regulations will affect taxpayers that exclude discharge of indebtedness income from gross income under section 108.

2 USE OF DATA


The Service will use the information described under 1, above, to verify that taxpayers and affected partnerships have complied with the Code.


  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


There are no small entities affected by this collection.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Consequences of less frequent collection on federal programs or policy activities could result in a decreased amount of taxes collected by the Service, inaccurate and untimely filing of tax returns, and an increase in tax violations.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


The notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on January 7, 1997 (62 FR 955). Written comments were received in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. One speaker provided testimony at a public hearing held on May 29, 1997.


After consideration of all the comments, the proposed regulations under sections 108 and 1017 are adopted, as revised by this Treasury decision. The final regulations were published in the Federal Register on October 22, 1998 (63 FR 56559).


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice dated November 10, 2015 (80 FR 60779).

  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


A privacy impact assessment (PIA) has been conducted for information collected under this request as part of the “Individual Master File (IMF)” system and a Privacy Act System of Records notice (SORN) has been issued for this system under IRS 24.030-CADE Individual Master File and IRS 34.037 IRS Audit Trail and Security Records System .  The Department of Treasury PIAs can be found at http://www.irs.gov/uac/Privacy-Impact-Assessments-PIA


Title 26 USC 6109 requires inclusion of identifying numbers in returns, statements, or other documents for securing proper identification of persons required to make such returns, statements, or documents and is the authority for social security numbers (SSNs) in IRS systems. 


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 1.108-4 of the regulations requires a taxpayer to file Form 982, Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness (and Section 1082 Basis Adjustment), to make an election under section 108(b)(5) to exclude discharge of indebtedness income from gross income under section 108(a)(1)(A), (B), or (C). The burden for this requirement is reflected in the burden of Form 982.


Section 1.1017‑l(f) of the regulations requires a taxpayer to check the appropriate box on Form 982 to obtain the benefits of the election regarding section 1221(1) real property. The burden for this requirement is reflected in the burden of Form 982.


Section 1.1017‑l(g) of the regulations requires a taxpayer to attach a statement provided by each consenting partnership. This statement must contain the name, address, and taxpayer identification number of the partnership; state that the partnership has reduced the partner's share of the adjusted bases of the partnership's depreciable property or depreciable real property, whichever is applicable, to the extent that the partner's adjusted basis in the partnership interest has been reduced under section 1017(b)(3)(C), section 1017(b)(3)(F), or section 1017(b)(4)(C), whichever is applicable; identify both the properties and the amounts of basis reduction; and include the partnership's tax matters partner's signature under penalties of perjury. We estimate that 2,000 partnerships will be affected by the partnership provisions in the regulation, that each partnership will prepare five (5) statements, and that each partnership will require one (1) hour, an average, to prepare each statement. The total burden for this requirement is 10,000 hours (2,000 x 5 x 1).


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.

  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


There is no estimated cost burden to respondents.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There is no estimated annualized cost to the federal government.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulations sunset as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.






5



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorJ11FB
Last Modified ByDepartment of Treasury
File Modified2016-01-05
File Created2016-01-05

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy