60-Day FR Notice

70762

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices

8415–01–623–5237—M–XXS
8415–01–623–5525—M–XS
8415–01–623–5526—M–S
8415–01–623–5528—M–R
8415–01–623–5529—M–L
8415–01–623–5534—M–XL
8415–01–623–5537—M–XXL
8415–01–623–5541—L–XXS
8415–01–623–5542—L–XS
8415–01–623–5543—L–S
8415–01–623–5552—L–R
8415–01–623–5553—L–L
8415–01–623–5554—L–XL
8415–01–623–5557—L–XXL
8415–01–623–5740—XL–XXS
8415–01–623–5742—XL–XS
8415–01–623–5789—XL–S
8415–01–623–5790—XL–R
8415–01–623–5793—XL–L
8415–01–623–5795—XL–XL.
8415–01–623–5796—XL–XXL
8415–01–623–5797—XXL–R
8415–01–623–5801—XXL–L
8415–01–623–5803—XXL–XL
8415–01–623–5805—XXL–XXL
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Industries of
the Blind, Inc., Greensboro, NC
Mississippi Industries for the Blind,
Jackson, MS
San Antonio Lighthouse for the Blind, San
Antonio, TX
Mandatory Purchase for: U.S. Army for up to
200,000 ACU Coats for a period of one
year
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics
Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: C-List
Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–28922 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Addition and
Deletion
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Addition to and deletion from
the Procurement List.
AGENCY:

This action adds a service to
the Procurement List that will be
provided by nonprofit agency
employing persons who are blind or
have other severe disabilities, and
deletes a service from the Procurement
List previously furnished by such
agency.

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

Effective Date: 12/16/2015.
Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite
715, Arlington, Virginia 22202–4149.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703)
DATES:

ADDRESSES:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:47 Nov 13, 2015

Jkt 238001

603–7740, Fax: (703) 603–0655, or email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Addition
On 10/2/2015 (80 FR 59740–59741),
the Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled published notice of proposed
addition to the Procurement List.
After consideration of the material
presented to it concerning capability of
qualified nonprofit agency to provide
the service and impact of the additions
on the current or most recent
contractors, the Committee has
determined that the service listed below
is suitable for procurement by the
Federal Government under 41 U.S.C.
8501–8506 and 41 CFR 51–2.4.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. The action will not result in any
additional reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance requirements for small
entities other than the small
organization that will furnish the
service to the Government.
2. The action will result in
authorizing small entities to furnish the
service to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in
connection with the service proposed
for addition to the Procurement List.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. The action will not result in
additional reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance requirements for small
entities.
2. The action may result in
authorizing small entities to furnish the
service to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in
connection with the service deleted
from the Procurement List.
End of Certification
Accordingly, the following service is
deleted from the Procurement List:
Service
Service Type: Custodial Service
Service is Mandatory for: Isle Royale National
Park & Ranger III Vessel, 800 East
Lakeshore Drive, Houghton, MI
Mandatory Source of Supply: Goodwill
Industries of Northern Wisconsin &
Upper Michigan, Inc., Marinette, WI
Contracting Activity: National Park Service,
MWR Regional Contracting, Omaha, NE
Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–28923 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION

End of Certification

[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0038]

Accordingly, the following service is
added to the Procurement List:

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Third Party Testing
of Children’s Products

Service
Service Type: Landscaping Service
Service is Mandatory for: GSA PBS Region 1,
John F. Kennedy Federal Building, 25
New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA
Mandatory Source of Supply: Work,
Incorporated, Dorchester, MA
Contracting Activity: GSA/Public Buildings
Service, Boston, MA

Deletion
On 10/2/2015 (80 FR 59740–59741),
the Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled published notice of proposed
deletion from the Procurement List.
After consideration of the relevant
matter presented, the Committee has
determined that the service listed below
is no longer suitable for procurement by
the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C.
8501–8506 and 41 CFR 51–2.4.

PO 00000

Frm 00016

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) requests comments on a
proposed extension of approval of a
collection of information for Third Party
Testing of Children’s Products,
approved previously under OMB
Control No. 3041–0159. The
Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting an extension of this
collection of information from the Office
of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’).

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM

16NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices
Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by January 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2010–
0038, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The Commission does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail
(email), except through
www.regulations.gov. The Commission
encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other
personal information provided, to:
http://www.regulations.gov. Do not
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public. If furnished at all, such
information should be submitted in
writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: http://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number CPSC–2010–0038, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
DATES:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7815, or by email to: rsquibb@
cpsc.gov.
CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Third Party Testing of
Children’s Products.
OMB Number: 3041–0159.
Type of Review: Renewal of collection
for third party testing of children’s
products and inclusion of the
previously approved burden for marking
and labeling of durable infant and
toddler products into this collection of
information.

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:47 Nov 13, 2015

Jkt 238001

General Description of Collection
Testing and Certification: On
November 8, 2011, the Commission
issued two rules for implementing third
party testing and certification of
children’s products, as required by
section 14 of the Consumer Product
Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’):
• Testing and Labeling Pertaining to
Product Certification (76 FR 69482,
codified at 16 CFR part 1107; ‘‘the
testing rule’’); and
• Conditions and Requirements for
Relying on Component Part Testing or
Certification, or Another Party’s
Finished Product Testing or
Certification to Meet Testing and
Certification Requirements (76 FR
69547, codified at 16 CFR part 1109;
‘‘the component part rule’’).
The testing rule establishes
requirements for manufacturers to
conduct initial third party testing and
certification of children’s products,
testing when there has been a material
change in the product, continuing
testing (periodic testing), and guarding
against undue influence. A final rule on
Representative Samples for Periodic
Testing of Children’s Products (77 FR
72205, Dec. 5, 2012) amended the
testing rule to require that
representative samples be selected for
periodic testing of children’s products.
The component part rule is a
companion to the testing rule that is
intended to reduce third party testing
burdens by providing all parties
involved in the required testing and
certifying of children’s products the
flexibility to conduct or rely upon
testing where it is the easiest and least
expensive. Certification of a children’s
product can be based upon one or more
of the following: (a) Component part
testing; (b) component part certification;
(c) another party’s finished product
testing; or (d) another party’s finished
product certification.
Records required by the testing rule
and the rule on selecting representative
samples appear in 16 CFR 1107.26.
Required records include a certificate,
and records documenting third party
testing and related sampling plans.
These requirements largely overlap the
recordkeeping requirements in the
component part rule, codified at 16 CFR
1109.5(g). Duplicate recordkeeping is
not required; records need to be created
and maintained only once to meet the
applicable recordkeeping requirements.
The component part rule also requires
records that enable tracing a product or
component back to the entity that had
a product tested for compliance, and
also requires attestations of due care to
ensure test result integrity.

PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

70763

Section 104 Rules: The Commission
has issued 14 rules for durable infant
and toddler products under section 104
of the Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (‘‘CPSIA’’)
(‘‘section 104 rules’’). Section 104 rules
issued to date appear in Table 1. Each
section 104 rule contains requirements
for marking, labeling, and instructional
literature:
• Each product and the shipping
container must have a permanent label
or marking that identifies the name and
address (city, state, and zip code) of the
manufacturer, distributor, or seller.
• A permanent code mark or other
product identification shall be provided
on the infant carrier and its package or
shipping container, if multiple
packaging is used. The code will
identify the date (month and year) of
manufacture and permit future
identification of any given model.
Each standard also requires products to
include easy-to-read and understand
instructions regarding assembly,
maintenance, cleaning, use, and
adjustments, where applicable.
OMB has assigned control numbers
for the estimated burden to comply with
marking and labeling requirements in
each section 104 rule. With this
renewal, CPSC is moving the marking
and labeling burden requirements for
section 104 rules into the collection of
information for Third Party Testing of
Children’s Products. The paperwork
burdens associated with the section 104
rules are appropriately included in the
collection for Third Party Testing of
Children’s Products because all of the
section 104 products are also required to
be third party tested. Having all of the
burden hours under one collection for
children’s products provides one OMB
control number and eases the
administrative burden of renewing
multiple collections. CPSC will
discontinue using the OMB control
numbers currently assigned to
individual section 104 rules. The
discontinued OMB control numbers are
listed in Table 1.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers and
importers of children’s products subject
to a children’s product safety rule.
Estimated Number of Respondents
Testing and Certification: CPSC
reviewed every category in the NAICS
and selected categories that included
firms that could manufacture or sell any
consumer product that could be covered
by a consumer product safety rule.
Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau,
we determined that there were
approximately 34,000 manufacturers,
about 77,000 wholesalers, and about

E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM

16NON1

70764

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices

133,000 retailers in these categories.
However, these categories also include
many non-children’s products, which
are not covered by any children’s
product safety rules. Therefore, these

numbers would constitute an
overestimate of the number of firms that
are subject to the recordkeeping
requirements.

Section 104 Rules: Table 1
summarizes the durable infant and
toddler products subject to the marking
and labeling requirements being moved
into OMB control number 3041–0159.

TABLE 1—ESTIMATED BURDEN FOR MARKING AND LABELING IN SECTION 104 RULES
Discontinued OMB Control No.

16 CFR part

3041–0145 ........................................

1215

3041–0141 ........................................
3041–0150 ........................................
3041–0157 ........................................

1216
1217
1218

3041–0147 ........................................
3041–0147 ........................................

1219
1220

3041–0152 ........................................
3041–0160 ........................................

1221
1222

3041–0155 ........................................
3041–0149 ........................................

1223
1224

3041–0158 ........................................

1225

3041–0162 ........................................

1226

3041–0164 ........................................

1227

3041–0166 ........................................

1230

Total Burden Hours ...................

........................

Estimated Time per Response

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Description

Testing and Certification: Based on
comments received during rulemaking
for the testing rule, we estimate
recordkeeping for approximately
300,000 non-apparel children’s products
per year, with an average of 5 hours of
recordkeeping burden associated with
each product. We also estimate
recordkeeping for approximately 1.3
million children’s apparel and footwear
products per year, with an average of 3
hours of recordkeeping burden
associated with each product.
Manufacturers that are required to
conduct periodic testing have an
additional recordkeeping burden
estimated at 4 hours per representative
sampling plan.
Section 104 Rules: Each section 104
rule contains a similar analysis for
marking and labeling that estimates the
time to make any necessary changes to
marking and labeling requirements at
one hour per model.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Testing and Certification: The total
estimated annual burden for
recordkeeping associated with the
testing rule is 5.4 million hours (300,000
non-apparel children’s products × 5

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:47 Nov 13, 2015

Jkt 238001

Mfrs.

Safety Standard for Infant Bath
Seats.
Safety Standard for Infant Walkers ..
Safety Standard for Toddler Beds ...
Safety Standard for Bassinets and
Cradles.
Safety Standard for Full-Size Cribs
Safety Standard for Non-Full-Size
Cribs.
Safety Standard for Play Yards .......
Safety Standard for Infant Bedside
Sleepers.
Safety Standard for Swings .............
Safety
Standard
for
Portable
Bedrails.
Safety Standard for Hand-Held Infant Carriers.
Safety Standard for Soft Infant and
Toddler Carriers.
Safety Standard for Carriages and
Strollers.
Safety Standard for Frame Child
Carriers (not effective until 9/
2016).
...........................................................

7

2

14

16
78
62

4
10
5

64
780
310

78
24

11
4

858
96

31
5

4
2

124
10

10
17

11
2

110
34

71

2

142

54

2

108

85

8

680

16

3

48

........................

........................

3,378

hours per non-apparel children’s
product + 1,300,000 children’s apparel
products × 3 hours per children’s
apparel product = 1.5 million hours +
3.9 million hours, or a total of 5.4
million hours).
Representative Sampling Plans for
Periodic Testing: We estimate that if
each product line averages 50
individual models or styles, then a total
of 32,000 individual representative
sampling plans (1.6 million children’s
products ÷ 50 models or styles) would
need to be developed and documented.
This would require 128,000 hours
(32,000 plans × 4 hours per plan). If
each product line averages 10
individual models or styles, then a total
of 160,000 different representative
sampling plans (1.6 million children’s
products ÷ 10 models or styles) would
need to be documented. This would
require 640,000 hours (160,000 plans ×
4 hours per plan). Accordingly, the
requirement to document the basis for
selecting representative samples could
increase the estimated annual burden by
up to 640,000 hours.
Component Part Testing: The
component part rule shifts some testing
costs and some recordkeeping costs to
component part and finished product

PO 00000

Frm 00018

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Total respondent hours

Models

suppliers because some testing will be
performed by these parties rather than
by the finished product certifiers
(manufacturers and importers). Even if a
finished product certifier can rely
entirely on component part and finished
product suppliers for all required
testing, however, the finished product
supplier will still have some
recordkeeping burden to create and
maintain a finished product certificate.
Therefore, although the component part
testing rule may reduce the total cost of
the testing required by the testing and
certification rule, the rule increases the
estimated annual recordkeeping burden
for those who choose to use component
part testing.
Because we do not know how many
companies participate in component
part testing and supply test reports or
certifications to other certifiers in the
supply chain, we have no concrete data
to estimate the recordkeeping and third
party disclosure requirements in the
component part rule. Likewise, no clear
method exists for estimating the number
of finished product certifiers who
conduct their own component part
testing. In the component part
rulemaking, we suggested that the
recordkeeping burden for the

E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM

16NON1

70765

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices
component part testing rule could
amount to 10 percent of the burden
estimated for the testing and labeling
rule. 76 FR 69546, 69579 (Nov. 8, 2011).
Currently, we have no basis to change
this estimate.
In addition to recordkeeping, the
component part rule requires third party
disclosure of test reports and
certificates, if any, to a certifier who
intends to rely on such documents to
issue its own certificate. Without data,
allocation of burden estimation between
the recordkeeping and third party
disclosure requirements is difficult.
However, based on our previous
analysis, we continue to estimate that
creating and maintaining records
accounts for approximately 90 percent
of the burden, while the third party
disclosure burden is much less, perhaps
approximately 10 percent. Therefore, if
we continue to use the estimate that
component part testing will amount to
about 10 percent of the burden
estimated for the testing rule, then the
hour burden of the component part rule
is estimated to be about 540,000 hours
total annually (10% of 5.4 million
hours); allocating 486,000 hours for
recordkeeping and 54,000 hours for
third party disclosure.
Section 104 Rules: The burden for
marking and labeling for each section
104 rule is provided in Table 1. The
estimated total number of respondent
hours is 3,378.

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

The Commission solicits written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed renewal of this
collection of information. The
Commission specifically solicits
information relevant to the following
topics:
—Whether the collection of information
described above is necessary for the
proper performance of the
Commission’s functions, including
whether the information would have
practical utility;
—Whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
—Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
—Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms
of information technology.

19:47 Nov 13, 2015

[FR Doc. 2015–28845 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DoD–2015–OS–0127]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
Office of the Secretary of
Defense, DoD.
ACTION: Notice to alter a System of
Records.
AGENCY:

The Office of the Secretary of
Defense proposes to alter a new system
of records, DHRA 10 DoD, entitled
‘‘Defense Sexual Assault Advocate
Certification Program’’ to track the
certification of SARC and SAPR VAs.
Information will be used to review,
process, and report on the status of
SARC and SAPR VA certification to
Congress.

SUMMARY:

Comments will be accepted on or
before December 16, 2015. This
proposed action will be effective the day
following the end of the comment
period unless comments are received
which result in a contrary
determination.

DATES:

You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
Officer, Directorate of Oversight and
Compliance, Regulatory and Audit
Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–9010.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.

ADDRESSES:

Request for Comments

VerDate Sep<11>2014

Dated: November 9, 2015.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.

Jkt 238001

Ms.
Cindy Allard, Chief, OSD/JS Privacy
Office, Freedom of Information
Directorate, Washington Headquarters
Service, 1155 Defense Pentagon,

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

PO 00000

Frm 00019

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Washington, DC 20301–1155, or by
phone at (571) 372–0461.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of the Secretary of Defense notices for
systems of records subject to the Privacy
Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended,
have been published in the Federal
Register and are available from the
address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or at http://dpcld.defense.
gov/. The proposed system report, as
required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, was
submitted on November 4, 2015, to the
House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform, the Senate
Committee on Governmental Affairs,
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) pursuant to paragraph 4c
of Appendix I to OMB Circular No. A–
130, ‘‘Federal Agency Responsibilities
for Maintaining Records About
Individuals,’’ dated February 8, 1996
(February 20, 1996, 61 FR 6427).
Dated: November 10, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
DHRA 10 DoD
SYSTEM NAME:

Defense Sexual Assault Advocate
Certification Program (July 11, 2012, 77
FR 40861).
CHANGES:

*

*

*

*

*

SYSTEM LOCATION:

Delete entry and replace with
‘‘National Organization for Victim
Assistance, 510 King Street, Suite 424,
Alexandria, VA 22314–3132.
Back-up: Suntrust Bank, 515 King
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314–3157.’’
*
*
*
*
*
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Delete entry and replace with
‘‘Applicant’s first name, middle initial,
and last name; position type (Sexual
Assault Response Coordinator (SARC)
or Sexual Assault Prevention
Representative Victim Advocate (SAPR
VA)); Service/DoD affiliation and status;
grade/rank; installation/command; work
email address and telephone number;
official military address of applicant
and applicant’s SARC (commanding
officer, street, city, state, ZIP code,
country); position level (Level I, II, III,
or IV); certificates of training; date of
application; verification of sexual
assault victim advocacy experience
(position, dates, hours, supervisor;
name, title, and work telephone number
of verifier); evaluation of sexual assault
victim experience (description of

E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM

16NON1