Annual Report Revisions - Track Changes Version

DUR FFY 2015 Medicaid DUR report tracked changes.docx

Medicaid Drug Utilization Review (DUR) Annual Report (CMS-R-153)

Annual Report Revisions - Track Changes Version

OMB: 0938-0659

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Shape2

OMB approved # 0938-0659







MEDICAID DRUG UTILIZATION REVIEW ANNUAL REPORT FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR

Section 1927 (g) (3) (D) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires each State to submit an annual report on the operation of its Medicaid Drug Utilization Review (DUR) program. Such reports are to include:

descriptions of the nature and scope of the prospective and retrospective DUR programs; a summary of the interventions used in retrospective DUR and an assessment of the education program; a description of DUR Board activities; and an assessment of the DUR programs impact on quality of care as well as any cost savings generated by the program.


This report covers the period October 1, to September 30, and is due for submission to CMS Central Office by no later than June 30, . Answering the attached questions and returning the requested materials as attachments to the report will constitute compliance with the above- mentioned statutory requirement.






If you have any questions regarding this survey instrument or the DUR Annual Report, please contact

CMS: DURPolicy@cms.hhs.gov.





















According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid O.M.B. control number. The valid O.M.B. control number for this information collection is 0938-0659. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 302 hours per response, including the time

to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: CMS, 7500 Security Boulevard, Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Reports Clearance Officer, Mail Stop C4-26-05, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.




MEDICAID DRUG UTILIZATION REVIEW ANNUAL REPORT



Shape7 FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR



I. DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION


State Name Abbreviation







Shape8 Medicaid Agency Information


Shape9 Identify State person responsible for DUR Annual Report Preparation. Name:

Shape10 Email Address:


Area Code/Phone Number:




II. PROSPECTIVE DUR (ProDUR)


Identify by name and indicate the type of your pharmacy POS vendeor (contractor, state-operated other).





Shape11 1. If not state-operated, is the POS vendor also the MMIS fiscal agent?


Yes No



2. Identify prospective DUR criteria source.


First Data Bank OtherMedi-sSpan Other


If the answer above is “Other,” please specify.




Shape12 3. Are new prospective DUR criteria approved by the DUR Board?


Yes No



Shape13 If answer above is No,” please explain.:








Shape14 4. When the pharmacist receives a ProDUR alert message that requires a pharmacists review, does your system allow the pharmacist to override the alert using the “conflict, intervention and outcome codes?


Yes No



5. How often Ddo you receive and review periodic reports from your ProDUR contractor providing individual pharmacy provider activity in summary and in detail?


Mmonthly Qquarterly Aannually Never


Yes No


a) If answer above is Yes, how often is the report received by the agency: If the answer above is “Never,” please explain why you do not receive and review the reports.


__________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________



ab) If you receive reports, do you follow-up with those providers who routinely override with interventions?


Yes No



c) b) If the answer to (b) above is Yes, by what method do you follow-up?


Contact Ppharmacy

Refer to Program Integrity for Review

Shape15 Other, (please explain).





____________________________________________________________________


d) If the answer to (b) above is “No,” please explain why you do not follow-up with providers.


_____________________________________________________________






Shape16 6. Early Refill:


a) At what percent threshold do you set your system to edit?


Non-controlled drugs: %


Controlled drugs: %


b) When an early refill message occurs, does the state require prior authorization?


Non-controlled drugs: Yes No


Controlled drugs: Yes No



c) For non-controlled drugs, if the answer to 4 (b) above is Yes,” who obtains authorization?


Pharmacist Prescriber Either



d) For controlled drugs, if the answer to 4 (b) above is Yes,” who obtains authorization?


Pharmacist Prescriber Either



e) For non-controlled drugs, if the answer to 4 (b) above is No,” can the pharmacist override at the point of service?


Yes No



f) For controlled drugs, if the answer to 4 (b) above is No,” can the pharmacist override at the point of service?


Yes No


7. When the pharmacist receives an early refill DUR alert message that requires the Pharmacists review, does your system state’s policy allow the pharmacist to override for situations such as:


a)

Lost/stolen Rx

Yes

No

b)

c)

Vacation

Other,: please explain. provide details

Yes

No


8. Does your system have an accumulation edit to prevent patients from obtaining additional refills during the calendar yearcontinuously filling prescriptions early?


Yes No


  1. If “Yes,” please explain your edit.






  1. If No,” do you plan to implement this edit?


Yes No



9. Does the state or the state’s Board of Pharmacy have any policy prohibiting the auto-refill process that

occurs at the POS?

Yes No



109. Has the state provided the DUR criteria data requested on Table 1 – Top 10Drug Claims Data Reviewed by the DUR Board Pro DUR Alerts by Problem Type indicating by problem type those criteria with the most significant severity level reviewed by the DUR BoardHas the state completed table X?

Yes No


11. Section 1927(g)(A) of the Social sSecurity Act requires that the pharmacist offer patient counseling at the time of dispensing. Who in your state has responsibility for monitoring compliance with the oral counseling requirement? Check all that apply:


a) Medicaid agency

b) State Board of Pharmacy

c) Other ,– please explain.

_____________________________________________________________________________________


_____________________________________________________________________________________



12. Has the state included Attachment 1 – Pharmacy Oral Counseling Compliance Report a report on state efforts to monitor pharmacy compliance with the oral counseling requirement?


Yes No


III. RETROSPECTIVE DUR (RetroDUR)


Shape17 1. Identify, by name and type, the vendor that performed your Retro DUR activities during the time period covered by this report (company, academic institution, or other organization).








Shape18 a) Is the Retro DUR vendor also the Medicaid fiscal agent?


Yes No


b) Is the Retro DUR vendor also the developer/supplier of your retrospective DUR criteria?


Yes No



If No, please explain:.



___________________________________________________________________________________


___________________________________________________________________________________


2. Does the DUR Board approve the Retro DUR criteria?


Yes No



Shape19 If No, please explain.








Shape20 3. Has the state included Attachment 2 – Retrospective DUR Educational Outreach

Summary, a year end summary of the Top 10 problem types for which educational interventions were taken?


Yes No



IV. DUR BOARD ACTIVITY


1. State is including a brief summary of DUR Board activities and meeting minutes during the time period covered by this report as Attachment 3 - Summary of DUR Board Activities.


Yes No



2. Does your state have a Disease Management Program?


Yes No



a) If Yes, have you performed an analysis of the programs effectiveness?


Yes No



Shape21 b) If the answer to (a) above is Yes, please provide a brief summary of your findings:






Shape22 c) If the answer to (number 2) above is Yes, is your DUR Board involved with this program?


Yes No



3. Does your state have an approved CMS Medication Therapy Management Program?


Yes No



a) If Yes, have you performed an analysis of the programs effectiveness?


Yes No



b) If the answer to (a) above is Yes, please provide a brief summary of your findings.





Shape23 c) If the answer to (number 3) above is Yes, is your DUR Board involved with this program?


Yes No


d) If the answer to (number 3) above is No, are you planning to develop and implement a program?


Yes No




V. PHYSICIAN ADMINISTERED DRUGS


The Deficit Reduction Act required collection of NDC numbers for covered outpatient physician administered drugs. These drugs are paid through the physician and hospital programs. Has your MMIS been designed to incorporate this data into your DUR criteria for: both


a) Pro DUR and Retro DUR?


Yes No



If No, do you have a plan to include this information in your DUR criteria in the future?


Yes No


b) Retro DUR?


Yes No



If No, do you have a plan to include this information in your DUR criteria in the future?


Yes No








VI. GENERIC POLICY AND UTILIZATION DATA


1. State is including a description of policies that may affect generic utilization percentage as

Attachment 4 - Generic Drug Substitution Policies.


Yes No



2. In addition to the requirement that the prescriber write in his/her own handwriting Brand Medically Necessary for a brand name drug to be dispensed in lieu of the generic equivalent, does your state have a more restrictive requirement?


Yes No



If Yes, check all that apply:


a) Require that a MedWatch Form be submitted

b) Require medical reason for override accompany prescriptions

c) Prior eauthorization is required

d) Other, – please explain.


3. Indicate the generic utilization percentage for all covered outpatient drugs paid during this reporting period, using the computation instructions in Table 2 - Generic Utilization Data


Number of Generic Claims


Total Number of Claims


Generic Utilization Percentage


4. Indicate the percentage dollars paid for generic covered outpatient drugs in relation to all covered outpatient drug claims paid during this reporting period using the computation instructions in Table 2 - Generic Utilization Data

Shape24 Shape25 Generic Dollars: Total Dollars:


Generic Expenditure Percentage:





VII. PROGRAM EVALUATION / COST SAVINGS/COST AVOIDANCE


1. Did your state conduct a DUR program evaluation of the estimated cost savings/cost avoidance?


Yes No


2. Who conducted your program evaluation for the cost savings estimate/cost avoidance? (company, academic institution, other institution) (name)




Shape26 3. Please provide your ProDUR and RetroDUR program cost savings/cost avoidance in the chart below.



ProDUR Total Estimated Avoided Costs


RetroDUR Total Estimated Avoided Costs


Other cost avoidance


Grand Total estimated Avoided Costs





4. Please provide the estimated percent impact of your state’s cost savings/cost avoidance program compared to total drug expenditures for covered outpatient drugs.


Use the following formula:


Divide the estimated Grand Total Estimated Avoided Costs from Question 3 above by the total dollar amount provided in Section VI, Question 4. Then multiply this number by 100.


Grand Estimated Net Savings Amount ÷ Total Dollar Amount × 100 = %


5. State has provided the Medicaid Cost Savings/Cost Avoidance Evaluation as Attachment

5 – Cost Savings/Cost Avoidance Methodology.


Yes No




VIII. FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE DETECTION


A. LOCK-IN or PATIENT REVIEW AND RESTRICTIVE PROGRAMS


1. Do you have a documented process in place that identifies potential fraud or abuse of controlled drugs by beneficiaries?


Yes No

If Yes, what actions does this process initiate? Check all that apply.

a) Deny claims and require preior- authorization

b) Refer to Lock In Program

c) Refer to Program Integrity Unit

Shape27 d) Other (e.g. SURS, Office of Inspector General), please explain:.







Shape28 2. Do you have a lock-in” program for beneficiaries with potential misuse or abuse of

controlled substances?


Yes No



If Yes, what criteria does your state use to identify candidates for lock-in? Check all that apply.


Number of controlled substances (CS)

Different prescribers of CS

Multiple pharmacies

Number days’ supply of CS

Exclusivity of short acting opioids

Multiple ER visits

Other


If Yes,” do you restrict the beneficiary to:

i. a prescriber only Yes No

ii.

a pharmacy only

Yes

No

iii.

a prescriber and pharmacy

Yes

No


What is the usual lock-in” time period?


6 months

12 months

Shape29 Other, please explain.:








Shape30 3. On the average, what percentage of the FFS population is in lock-in status annually?


%


4. Please provide an estimate of the savings attributed to the lock-in program for the fiscal year under review.


$



5. Do you have a documented process in place that identifies possible fraud or abuse of controlled drugs by prescribers?


Yes No

If Yes, what actions does this process initiate? Check all that apply.

a.) Deny claims written by this prescriber

b.) Refer to Program Integrity Unit

Shape31 c.) Refer to the appropriate Medical Board

d.) Other, – please explain:.








Shape32 6. Do you have a documented process in place that identifies potential fraud or abuse of controlled drugs by pharmacy providers?


Yes No


If Yes, what actions does this process initiate? Check all that apply

a.) Deny claim

b.) Refer to Program Integrity Unit

c.) Refer to Board of Pharmacy

d.) Other, – please explain.



__________________________________________________________________


__________________________________________________________________


7. Do you have a documented process in place that identifies potential fraud or abuse of non-controlled drugs by beneficiaries?


Yes No




If “Yes,” please explain your program for fraud or abuse of non-controlled substances.



________________________________________________________________________


____________________________________________________________________




B. PRESCRIPTION DRUG MONITORING PROGRAM (PDMP)


1. Does your state have a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP)?


Yes No


a) If the answer above isYes,” does your agency have the ability to query the state’s PDMP database?


Yes No



b) If the answer to (number 1) above isYes, do you require prescribers (in your provider agreement with the agency) to access the

PDMP patient history before prescribing restricted substances?


Yes No



c) If the answer to (number 1) above isYes, please explain how the state applies this information to control fraud and abuse.

d) If the answer to (number 1) above isYes, do you also have access to border states’ PDMP information?

Yes No


2. Are there barriers that hinder the agency from fully accessing the PDMP that prevent the program from being utilized the way it was intended to be to curb abuse?


Yes No


Shape33 Shape34 If “Yes, please explain the barriers (e.g. lag time in prescription data being submitted, prescribers not accessing, pharmacists unable to view prescription history before filling script).











3. Have you had any changes to your state’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program during this

reporting period that have improved the agency’s ability to access PDMP data?

Yes No


If Yes, please explain.:


______________________________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________________________



C. PAIN MANAGEMENT CONTROLS


1. Does your state or your agency require that Pain Management providers be certified?


Yes No



2 Does your program obtain the DEA Active Controlled Substance Registrants File in order to identify prescribers not authorized to prescribe controlled drugs?


Yes No



a) If the answer above is “Yes, do you apply this DEA file to your ProDURur POS edits to prevent unauthorized prescribing?


Yes No



Shape35 b) If the answer to (a) above isYes,” please explain how the information is applied.








Shape36 c) If the answer to (a) above isNo, do you plan to obtain the DEA Active Controlled Substance Registrants file and apply it to your POS edits?


Yes No



3. Do you apply this DEA file to your RetroDUR reviews?


Yes No








Shape37 If Yes,” please explain how it is applied.








Shape38 4. Do you have measures in place to either monitor or to manage the prescribing of methadone for pain management?

Yes No Other



If Yes, check all that apply:


Ppharmacist override

Ddeny claim and require PA

Qquantity limits

Iintervention letters

Morphine equivalent daily dose program

Step therapy or Clinical criteria


If “No” or “Other,” please explain what you do in lieu of the above or why you do not have measures in place to either manage or monitor the prescribing of methadone for pain management.


D. OPIOIDS


1. Do you currently have POS edits in place to limit the quantity of short-acting opioids?


Yes No


  1. If “Yes,” what is your maximum daily limit in terms of number of units (i.e. tablets, capsules)?


units/day



  1. If Yes,” what is your maximum days supply per prescription limitations?


30 day supply

90 day supply

Shape39 oOther, please explain.








Shape40 2. Do you currently have POS edits in place to limit the quantity of long-acting opioids?


Yes No



a)If “Yes,” what is your maximum daily limit in terms of number of units (i.e. tablets, capsules)?

2 units/day

3 units/day


b) If Yes,” what isare your maximum days supply per prescription limitations?


30 day supply

90 day supply

Shape41 oOther, please explain.







3. Do you currently have edits in place to monitor opioids and benzodiazepines being used concurrently?


Yes No



If “Yes,” please explain.___________________________________________________________






Shape42 E. MORPHINE EQUIVALENT DAILY DOSE (MEDD)


1. Have you set recommended maximum morphine equivalent daily dose measures?


Yes No



If Yes, what is your maximum morphine equivalent daily dose limit in milligrams?


mg per day


If “No,” please explain the measure or program you utilize.



___________________________________________________________________________________________


2. Do you provide information to your prescribers on how to calculate the morphine equivalent daily

dosage?


Yes No



If Yes,” how is the information disseminated?


Wwebsite

Pprovider notice

Eeducational seminar

Shape43 oOther, explain.








Shape44 3. Do you have an algorithm in your POS system that alerts the pharmacy provider that the morphine equivalent daily dose prescribed has been exceeded?


Yes No



F. BUPRENORPHINE and BUPRENORPHINE/NALOXONE COMBINATIONS


  1. Does your agency set total mg per/ per day limits on the use of buprenorphine and

buprenorphine/naloxone combination drugs?


Yes No



If Yes, please specify the total mg/day?


8mg12 mg


12 mg 16 mg

16 mg 24 mg

Shape45 oOther, please explain.








Shape46 2. What are your limitations on the allowable length of this treatment?


6 months

12 months


nNo limit

Shape47 oOther, please explain.







Shape48


3. Do you require that the maximum mg per day allowable be reduced after a set period of time?


Yes No


  1. If Yes, what is your reduced (maintenance) dosage?


8mg

12mg

16mg

oOther, please explain.


  1. If “Yes,” Wwhat are your limitations on the allowable length of the reduced dosage treatment?


6 months

12 months

nNo limit

oOther, please explain.


4. Do you limit the type of dosage form that can be dispensed to only the sublingual film have at least one preferred buprenorphine/naloxone combination product available on your PDL?


Yes No


5. Do you currently have edits in place to monitor opioids being used concurrently with any buprenorphine drug?


Yes No


If ”Yes,” can the POS pharmacist override the edit?


Yes No



G. PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS ANTIPSYCHOTICS /STIMULANTS

ANTIPSYCHOTICS


1. Do you have a documented program in place to either manage/ or monitor the appropriate use of psychotropicantipsychotic drugs in children?


Yes No




If Yes, do you either manage/ or monitor:


oOnly children in foster care

aAll children

oOther, please explain.

If Yes,” do you have edits in place to monitor :


Child’s Age Dosage Polypharmacy


Please briefly explain the specifics of your antipsychotic monitoring program(s).


If you do not have an antipsychotic monitoring programNo, do you plan on implementing a program in the future?


Yes No



If No, please explain why you will not be implementing a program to monitor the appropriate use of

antipsychotic drugs in children.


STIMULANTS


2. Do you have any documented restrictions or special program in place to monitor/, manage or control the use of stimulants?


Yes No


If Yes, is your program limited to:


Cchildren

Aadults

Bboth


Shape49 Please briefly explain your program.







Shape50





IX. INNOVATIVE PRACTICES


Have you developed any innovative practices during the past year which you have included in

Attachment 6 - Innovative Practices? (e.g. Hepatitis CCV, Cystic Fibrosis, MEDD, Value Based Purchasing)


Yes No


X. E-PRESCRIBING



1. Has your state implemented e-prescribing?


Yes No


If Yes, please respond to Questions 2 and 3 below. IfNo, are you planning to develop this capability?

31. Does your (MMIS or pharmacy vendor) have a portal to the capability to electronically provide, upon inquiry, patient drug history data and pharmacy coverage limitations to a prescriber prior to prescribing, upon inquiry?


Yes No



a) If Yes, do you have a methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of providing drug information and medication history prior to prescribing?


Yes No


b) If Yes, please explain the evaluation methodology in Attachment 7 E-Prescribing Activity Summary.


c) If the answer to (number 1) above isNo, are you planning to develop this capability?


Yes No



2. Does your system use the NCPDP Origin Code that indicates the prescription source?


Yes No


XI. MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATIONS (MCOs)


1. Does your state have MCO’s?


Yes No


If “No,” please skip the rest of this section.


12. Is your pharmacy program included in the capitation rate (carved-in)?


Yes No Partial



If partial” please specify the drug-categories that are carved out.





Shape51 __________________________________________________________________________



23. Does the state set requirements for the MCOs pharmacy benefit? (e.g. same PDL, same ProDUR/Retro DUR)


Yes No



If “Yes," please check all requirements that apply below:


Formulary Reviews same PDL same ProDUR same RetroDUR



If Yes,” please briefly explain your policy.





Shape52 If No, do you plan to set standards in the future?


Yes No



4-3. Does the state require the MCOs to monitor or report their DUR activities?


Yes No


If “Yes,”, please explain your review process.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


If No, do you plan to develop a program to monitor or have report MCO(s) report their DUR activities in the future?


Yes No



If “No,” please explain.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


  1. Does all of the Medicaid MCOs in your state have a targeted intervention program (i.e. CMC/ Lock In) for the misuse or abuse of controlled substances?


Yes No



If “No,” please explain.


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________





XIII. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Attachment 8 – Executive Summary




MEDICAID DRUG UTILIZATION REVIEW ANNUAL REPORT


INSTRUCTIONS: Nomenclature Format for Attachments


States: Please use this standardized format for naming attachments. ATT#-FFY- State Abbrev-Abbreviated Report name (NO SPACES!) Example for Arizona: (each state should insert their 2 letter state code) Attachments:



ATT1-201_-AZ-POCCR (Pharmacy Oral Counseling Compliance Report)

ATT2-201_-AZ-REOS (RetroDUR Educational Outreach Summary)

ATT3-201_-AZ-SDBA (Summary of DUR BD Activities)

ATT4-201_-AZ-GDSP (Generic Drug Substitution Policies)


ATT5-201_-AZ-CSCAM (Cost Savings/Cost Avoidance Methodology)


ATT6-201_-AZ-IPN (Innovative Practices Narrative)

ATT7-201_-AZ-EAS (E-Prescribing Activity Summary)

ATT8-201_-AZ-ES (Executive Summary)




I. EXPLANATION FOR ATTACHMENTS AND TABLES



ATTACHMENT 1 – PHARMACY ORAL COUNSELING COMPLIANCE REPORT


This attachment reports the monitoring of pharmacy compliance with all prospective DUR requirements performed by the State Medicaid Agency, the State Board of Pharmacy, or other entity responsible for monitoring pharmac y activities. If the State Medicaid Agenc y itself monitors compliance with these requirements, it may provide a survey of a random sample of pharmacies

with regard to compliance with the Omnibus Budget Reduction Act (OBRA) of 1990 prospective DUR requirement. This report details state efforts to monitor pharmacy compliance with the oral counseling requirement. This attachment should describe in detail the monitoring efforts that were performed and how effective these efforts were in the fiscal year reported.




ATTACHMENT 2 – RETROSPECTIVE EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH SUMMARY


This is a year-end summary report on RetroDUR screening and

educational interventions.

The year-end summary report should be limited to the TOP 10 problems with the largest number of exceptions. The results of RetroDUR screening and interventions

should be included.



ATTACHMENT 3 – SUMMARY OF DUR BOARD ACTIV ITIES


This summary should be a brief descriptive report on DUR Board activities during the fiscal year reported. This summary should:


Indicate the number of DUR Board meetings held.


List additions/deletions to DUR Board approved criteria.


a) For prospective DUR, list problem type/drug combinations added or deleted.

b) For retrospective DUR, list therapeutic categories added or deleted.



Describe Board policies that establish whether and how results of prospective


DUR screening are used to adjust retrospective DUR screens. Also, describe policies that establish whether and how results of retrospective DUR screening are used to adjust prospective DUR screens.





Describe DUR Board involvement in the DUR education program (e.g., newsletters, continuing education, etc.). Also, describe policies adopted to determine mix of patient or provider specific intervention types (e.g., letters, face-to-face visits, increased monitoring).




ATTACHMENT 4 – GENER IC DRUG SUBSTITUTION POLIC IES


Please report any factors that could affect your generic utilization percentage and include any relevant documentation.




ATTACHMENT 5 – COST SAVINGS/COST AVOIDANCE METHODOLOGY


Include copy of program evaluations/cost savings estimates prepared by state or contractor noting methodology used.




ATTACHMENT 6 – INNOVATIVE PRACTIC ES


Please describe in detailed narrative form any innovative practices that you believe have improved the administration of your DUR program, the appropriateness of prescription drug use and/or have helped to control costs (e.g., disease management, academic detailing, automated prior authorizations, continuing education programs).




ATTACHMENT 7 – E-PRESCRIBING ACTIV ITY SUMMARY


Please describe all development and implementation plans/accomplishments in the area of e- prescribing. Include any evaluation of the effectiveness of this technology (e.g., number of prescribers e-prescribing, percent e-prescriptions to total prescriptions, relative cost savings).



ATTACHMENT 8 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY





TABLE 1 – TOP 10DRUG CLAIMS DATA REVIEWED BY THE DUR BOARD [ add new table name] PROSPECTIVE DUR CRITERIA REVIEWED BY DUR BOARD


Indicate by problem type those criteria with the most significant severity levels that were reviewed in-depth by DUR Board. For each problem type below in the first column list the drugs/ drug category/ disease combinations for which DUR Board conducted in-depth reviews.


PROBLEM TYPE KEY: INAPPROPRIATE - IA; THERAPEUTIC - TC; DRUG DRUG - D/D; DRUG ALLERGY - D/A; DRUG DISEASE – D/D;


Table1

AHFS T C

(Level 2)

AHFS T C

(Level 4)

AHFS T C

(Level 6)

AHFS T C

(Level 8)

Drug

Name

Disease

Criteria

Implemented

IA DOSE1








IA DOSE2








IA DOSE3








TC DUPLICAT ION1








TC DUPLICAT ION2








TC DUPLICAT ION3








D/A INT ERACT ION1








D/A INT ERACT ION2








D/A INT ERACT ION3








IA DURAT ION1








IA DURAT ION2








IA DURAT ION3








D/D INT ERACT IONS1








D/D INT ERACT IONS2








D/D INT ERACT IONS3








D/Dis CONT RAINDICAT ION1








D/Dis CONT RAINDICAT ION2








D/Dis CONT RAINDICAT ION3








OT HER (specify)1








OT HER (specify)2








OT HER (specify)3








OT HER (specify)4








OT HER (specify)5








OT HER (specify)6








OT HER (specify)7








OT HER (specify)8








OT HER (specify)9










List the requested data in each category in the chart below.

Column 1- Top 10 Prior Authorization (PA) Requests by Drug Name

Column 2- Top 10 PA Requests by Drug Class

Column 3- Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons other than eligibility (i.e. Quantity Limits, Early Refill, PA, Therapeutic Duplications, Age Edits)

Column 4- Top 10 Drug Names by Amount Paid

Column 5- From Data in column 4, Determine the Percentage of Total Drug Spend

Column 6- Top 10 Drug Names by Claim Count

Column 7- From Data in Column 6, Determine the Percentage of Total Claims


Top 10

PA Requests

By Drug Name

Top 10

PA Requests

By Drug Class

Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons (i.e. QL, Early Refill, PA, Duplication)

Top 10 Drug Names by Amount Paid

% of Total Spent for Drugs by Amount Paid

Top 10 Drug Names by Claim Count

Drugs By Claim Count % of Total Claims






































xxxxxxxxxxx







xxxxxxxxxxx







xxxxxxxxxxx







xxxxxxxxxxx







xxxxxxxxxxx








TABLE 2 – GENER IC UTILIZAT ION DATA


Please provide the following utilization data for this DUR reporting period for all covered outpatient drugs paid. Exclude Third Party Liability. (COMPLETE TABLE 2)


Computation Instructions:

KEY:

Single-Source (S) - Drugs having an FDA New Drug Application (NDA), and there are no generic alternatives available on the market.

Non-Innovator Multiple-Source (N) - Drugs that have an FDA Abbreviated New Drug

Application (ANDA), and there exists generic alternatives on the market.

Innovator Multiple-Source (I) - Drugs which have an NDA and no longer have patent exclusivity.


1. Generic Utilization Percentage: To determine the generic utilization percentage of all covered outpatient drugs paid during this reporting period, use the following formula:



N ÷ (S + N + I) × 100 = Generic Utilization Percentage



2. Generic Expenditures Percentage of Total Drug Expenditures: To determine the generic expenditure percentage (rounded to the nearest $1000) for all covered outpatient drugs for this reporting period use the following formula:


$N ÷ ($S + $N + $I) × 100 = Generic Expenditure Percentage



TABLE 2: GENERIC DRUG UTILIZATION



Single-Source (S) Drugs


Non-Innovator (N) Drugs


Innovator Multi-Source (I) Drugs


Total


Total Reimbursement Amount Less

Co-Pay


Total

Number of Claims

Total Reimbursement Amount Less

Co-Pay

Total

Number of Claims

Reimbursement

Amount Less

Co-Pay

Total

Number of Claims








CMS has developed an extract file from the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program Drug Product Data File identifying each NDC along with sourcing status of each drug: S, N, or I (see Key below). This file will be made available from CMS to facilitate consistent reporting across States with this data request.

Shape5 Shape6

CMS-R-153 (05/2017)

1


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorMadlyn Kruh
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-23

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy