State Agency Directors/SFA Directors (State, Local, and Tribal Government)

Review of Child Nutrition Data & Analysis for Program Management

Attachment B.9 - Paper State Survey Final

State Agency Directors/SFA Directors (State, Local, and Tribal Government)

OMB: 0584-0620

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Attachment B.9 – Paper State Agency Survey



The purpose of this State School Nutrition Management Information System (MIS) Survey is to assess your agency’s school nutrition electronic management information system (MIS). In addition to a general description of the features of your MIS, FNS is interested in what data are available in your MIS, the level of aggregation of such data, and how you use such data to manage your school nutrition program operations. The information that you provide will be used only for the purposes of this study.

Definitions:

For this survey, the term school nutrition includes only the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program (SBP).

School nutrition MIS means computer software and electronic systems used to record, manage and track major program functions such as claims for reimbursement, direct verification and certification, monitoring and administrative reviews, sponsor applications and record management, and others. We do not consider information captured, stored, and analyzed in spreadsheet applications such as Microsoft Excel to be an electronic MIS. Subsequent mentions of “MIS” refer to your school nutrition MIS.

Structure of the Survey:

This survey is organized into three main sections, each covering a major topic. These sections are:

  1. Description of your current electronic school nutrition MIS

  2. Information on data elements and reporting available in your school nutrition MIS

  3. Technical features of your current school nutrition MIS



The questions in each of these three sections are organized to allow for different individuals to provide answers, if needed. Ideally, the Director or a designated representative who is familiar with the school nutrition MIS would answer the questions in sections 1 and 2. Section 3 is best answered by an individual with technical understanding of the school nutrition MIS. These are just suggestions; any staff member who is knowledgeable about the MIS may respond.

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is OMB-NEW.  The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 60 minutes or 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.



Section 1: Description of State School Nutrition MIS

In this section, we ask some questions about the background of your current school nutrition MIS and the costs associated with acquiring and maintaining it.

The questions are grouped into three areas:

  1. Overview –the general description of the type of software/systems you have, including how you acquired them, the functional modules available, and how long it took to conceive, develop and implement your school nutrition MIS.

  2. Costs –the expenditures associated with the acquisition and ongoing operations of your school nutrition MIS and any planned upgrades.

  3. Challenges and Future Plans – the extent to which your current MIS meets your needs and plans to upgrade or replace it.



Overview

We will start by asking you some general questions about your school nutrition state agency and the tools you use to manage your operations.



  1. In general, how do you manage your state agency’s school nutrition program data? Remember that use of spreadsheet applications such as Microsoft Excel is not considered an electronic MIS for our purposes. Check all that apply.

Custom software developed in-house by our state or acquired from another state

Q3

Custom software developed by a vendor (not including commercial off-the-shelf [COTS] software that is later customized)

Q3

Software purchased or licensed from a vendor (including commercial off-the-shelf [COTS] software that is later customized)

Q3

We use basic spreadsheets such as Microsoft Excel

Q2

We collect and store the data manually on paper

Q2



  1. Why do you not use an electronic MIS to manage at least part of your school nutrition program data? Check all that apply.

The available software is too expensive

END

We cannot find a product that will work for us

END

We do not have the staff to develop one

END

We do not have staff trained to use the software

END

We tried in the past, but it didn’t work for us

END

Other reason (please specify) ____________________________________

END



  1. How many individuals employed in your state school nutrition operations are users of your school nutrition MIS? (Please include all individuals who enter, view, download, or upload data and/or reports.)

Number of users: _______________________________________



  1. Which of the following modules do you have in your current school nutrition MIS? Please indicate the vendor of the modules you have and approximately how long you have had them.

Module

Have

Vendor/Developer

No. of Years

Administrative Review

 Yes

 No

{Select from dropdown list}

  • Ardent Technologies, Inc.

  • ArnAmy, Inc.

  • Colyar Technology Solutions

  • Cybersoft

  • Deloitte

  • Dynamic Internet Solutions (DIS)

  • Estrada Consulting, Inc.

  • Heartland (Nutrikids)

  • Hupp Information Technologies

  • Image API

  • Informatica Corporation

  • Information Research Group, Inc.

  • ISF

  • Kyran

  • Northrop Grumman/Metis

  • Peoplesoft Financials

  • The Canton Group

  • Vision Software

  • Other (please specify)_____________

{Select from dropdown list}

Less than 1 year
1 year to less than 4 years
4 years to less than 7 years
7 years to less than 11 years
11 years to less than 15 years
15 years or more


Sponsor Application and Record Management

 Yes

 No

Financial Management – School Food Authority (SFA) School Nutrition Revenues and Expenditures

 Yes

 No

Financial Management - State Administrative Expense (SAE) Funds

 Yes

 No

SFA Claims and Reimbursement

 Yes

 No

Direct Certification (matching)

 Yes

 No

Online Applications (free/reduced price)

 Yes

 No

Menu Planning

 Yes

 No

Nutrient Analysis

 Yes

 No

USDA Foods Utilization Tracking

 Yes

 No

Professional Standards Training

 Yes

 No

Federal Reporting

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify)________________

 Yes

 No





  1. Please tell us if your needs for the following functions are fully met, partially met, or not met at all by your current school nutrition MIS.

Module

{Populate with Modules Selected in Q4}

Fully met

Partially met

Not met at all

Administrative Review

Sponsor Application and Record Management

Financial Management - SFA School Nutrition Revenues and Expenditures

Financial Management - State Administrative Expense (SAE) Funds

SFA Claims and Reimbursement

Direct Certification (matching)

Online Applications (free/reduced price)

Menu Planning

Nutrient Analysis

USDA Foods Utilization Tracking

Professional Standards Training

Federal Reporting

Other (please specify)_____________________________



  1. What department within your state primarily manages the day-to-day operations of your school nutrition MIS? By primarily manage we mean responsible for arranging staff access to the system and overseeing contracts with vendor(s) (if applicable). Check only one.

School Nutrition Department

Q7

Dedicated IT Department within the State Government

Q7

Other (please specify) ____________________________________

Q7



Costs

Next, we will ask you questions about the costs of your current school nutrition MIS, including cost to develop, implement, upgrade, and operate your school nutrition MIS and the sources of funds used to finance it. Please estimate costs related to NSLP/SBP operations only.





Initial Development and Upgrade Costs for Current Modules

The first questions focus on the costs your state incurred in procuring or developing your current school nutrition MIS and for any subsequent upgrades. For initial development, please include costs of direct development, software development tools, hardware and any other resources expended in initially developing or purchasing each module. For upgrades, please include costs for changes, other than routine updates, made to the software by the software vendor or your in-house IT staff to either enhance existing functions or add new functions. These are sometimes called “add-on” enhancements and should only include changes procured outside of any maintenance contract(s).



  1. Please indicate the cost to initially develop and implement each of the modules in your current school nutrition MIS and for any subsequent upgrades. Please check one response in each column for each module.

Module

{Populate with Modules Selected in Q4}

Initial Development and Implementation Costs

Upgrade Costs (If non-routine upgrade(s) occurred after initial implementation)

Administrative Review

 No direct cost to state school nutrition agency (upgrades are made by state IT staff)

 Less than $50,000

 $50,000 - $99,000

 $100,000 - $299,999

 $300,000 - $499,999

 $500,000 - $699,999

 $700,000 - $999,999

 $1,000,000 -$4,999,999

 $5,000,000 or more

 Don’t know

 No upgrades purchased

 No direct cost to state school nutrition agency (upgrades are made by state IT staff)

 Less than $50,000

 $50,000 - $99,000

 $100,000 - $299,999

 $300,000 - $499,999

 $500,000 - $699,999

 $700,000 - $999,999

 $1,000,000 -$4,999,999

 $5,000,000 or more

 Don’t know

Sponsor Application and Record Management

Financial Management – SFA School Nutrition Revenues and Expenditures

Financial Management - State Administrative Expense (SAE) Funds

SFA Claims and Reimbursement

Direct Certification (Matching)

Online Applications (free/reduced price)

Menu Planning

Nutrient Analysis

USDA Foods Utilization Tracking

Professional Standards Training

Federal Reporting

Other (please specify)________________________



  1. How did you fund the initial development and implementation of your current school nutrition MIS? Check all that apply.

State agency general funds

Q9

Federal State Administrative Expense (SAE) funds – annual allocation

Q9

Federal State Administrative Expense (SAE) funds – reallocation request

Q9

Federal education funds

Q9

Other federal funds (please specify) _______________________________

Q9

Other grant monies (please specify) _______________________________

Q9

Other source (please specify) _______________________________

Q9

Don’t know

Q9





  1. Generally, how often do you upgrade your school nutrition MIS modules (both in-house and/or via software purchased from a vendor)? Check all that apply.

On an as needed basis

Q10

Quarterly

Q10

Semi-annually

Q10

Annually

Q10

Other (please specify) ________________________________________________

Q10

Don’t know

Q10

Never upgraded

Q10



  1. For the components of your current school nutrition MIS that are provided by a vendor, do you own or lease (pay regular license fees for) them? Check all that apply.

We own the software (i.e., own the copyright or equivalent)

Q11

We have a renewable license to use the software

Q11

We have no MIS components provided by a vendor

Q11

We use open source software (software available for free to anyone)

Q11

Other (please specify) __________________________________________

Q11



Operating Costs

Next, we will ask you about the costs of operating and maintaining your school nutrition MIS. ”Operating” refers to the regular use of your MIS to manage your school nutrition activities. “Maintaining” refers to scheduled or ad-hoc activities you or your vendor perform on your school nutrition MIS to ensure optimal performance. Please estimate costs related to NSLP/SBP operations only.



  1. You indicated that you purchased all or some of your current school nutrition MIS from a vendor. Do you have a maintenance contract with your vendor(s)? Check only one.

Yes, our state has maintenance contract(s) with all of our vendor(s)

Q13

Yes, our state has maintenance contract(s) with some of our vendor(s)

Q12

No, we have no maintenance contracts with any of our vendors

Q12



  1. You indicated that you do NOT have a maintenance contract with at least one of your current school nutrition MIS vendor(s). How do you update that vendor’s MIS? Check all that apply.

We make changes using in-house IT staff

Q13

We make changes using contracted software developers

Q13

We do not make any changes to the school nutrition MIS

Q13

Other (please specify) _________________________________________________

Q13



  1. What support functions does your maintenance contract(s) cover? Check all that apply.

Regular updates to conform with FNS policies

Q14

Other updates to system functionality or features

Q14

Patches and fixes to problems

Q14

Training (remote, on- or off-site)

Q14

Backup and recovery

Q14

In-person software support

Q14

In-person hardware support

Q14

Remote software support

Q14

Technical support via telephone or online

Q14

Other (please specify) ______________________________

Q14

Don’t know

Q14



  1. Turning now to annual school nutrition MIS operational costs, for each of the following, indicate the cost to operate your current school nutrition MIS in the 2015-16 school year. Please enter $0 if there was no cost for a particular item.

Operational cost item

Annual cost ($)

Maintenance contract fees


Hardware replacement (If you update hardware less frequently than once per year, please estimate the per year cost of those expenses)


License fees to use school nutrition software

{If Q10 answer choice 2 selected, this should not equal $0}

Other (please specify) _____________________________________






Future Plans

Next, we will ask you about plans and expectations you may have for replacing your school nutrition MIS in the next 12 months. When answering questions on plans over the next 12 months, please exclude updates made to your school nutrition MIS to comply with policy updates by FNS. Policy updates refer to the regulations or policy memoranda that FNS occasionally issues to change requirements or provide guidance on the administration of the school nutrition programs.





  1. Are you expecting to make non-routine upgrades or expansions of your current school nutrition MIS in the next 12 months? Check all that apply.

Purchase new modules

Q16

Perform software upgrades

Q16

Perform hardware upgrades

Q16

Add new sites to the system

Q16

Other changes (please specify) __________________________________

Q16

No upgrades or expansions expected

Q16



  1. When do you expect to replace all or part of your current school nutrition MIS? Check only one.

In less than 1 year

Q17

1 year to less than 3 years

Q17

3 years to less than 6 years

Q17

6 years or more

Q17

No current replacement plans

Q19

Don’t know

Q19



  1. You indicated that you expect to replace all or part of your current school nutrition MIS in the future. How do you anticipate acquiring a new MIS or a module? Check all that apply.

Develop customized MIS using in-house resources

Q18

Develop customized MIS using a vendor

Q18

Purchase a new MIS product from a vendor

Q18

We have not yet made a decision

Q18

Other (please specify) _________________________________________

Q18

Don’t know

Q18



  1. How much do you anticipate it will cost to replace all or part of your current school nutrition MIS? Include all costs such as personnel, software license, and hardware. Check only one.

Less than $50,000

Q19

$50,000 - $99,000

Q19

$100,000 - $249,000

Q19

$250,000 – $499,999

Q19

$500,000 - $999,999

Q19

$1,000,000 - $2,999,999

Q19

$3,000,000 or more

Q19

Don’t know

Q19


Section 2: Data Elements and Reporting

Section 2 of the survey focuses on the types of data or data “elements” that are available in your current school nutrition MIS. Some of these are data you report out to FNS but others may not be.



We have grouped the data into five categories.



  1. Reimbursement claims

  2. Free and Reduced Price Eligibility Determination and Verification

  3. Meal Service and Nutrition Information

  4. Financial Management

  5. Other Data Elements



In addition to asking whether the data are in your school nutrition MIS, we also want to know how frequently you collect them, the level of detail (either SFA or school/site) you have, and whether you generate reports with the data.



Claims for Reimbursement

First, we will ask you about the capabilities of your current school nutrition MIS in helping you manage reimbursement claims.



  1. Does your current school nutrition MIS collect the following data elements reported to FNS on the Form FNS-10, Report of School Program Operations? (References below are to the cells of the Form FNS-10). Please choose Frequency of collection and Finest level of detail for all data available in your school nutrition MIS. Please check all that apply.



Data

Data are available in MIS

Frequency of collection

(Please select most frequent level for entering data)

Finest level of detail available (Choose one)

Meal counts for free, reduced price, paid, and total lunches, breakfasts and afterschool snacks (Part A, 5a, A-D)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA

 Other ___

Average Daily Meals counts for lunches, breakfasts, severe need breakfasts, and afterschool snacks (Part A, 5a-E, 5c-E, 6E, 7E)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA

 Other ___

Number of lunches served in school food authorities (SFAs) that qualify for additional payment (two-cent differential) (Part A, 5b1, D)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA

 Other ___

Number of lunches served in school food authorities (SFAs) certified for performance based reimbursement (eligible for $0.06) (Part A, 5b2, D)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA

 Other ___

Number of public school sites operating NSLP, SBP, and afterschool snacks and their enrollment (October report, Part B, 12a+b, F-J)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Annual

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA

 Other ___

Number of private school sites operating NSLP, SBP and afterschool snacks and their enrollment (October report, Part B, 13a+b, F-J)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Annual

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA

 Other ___

Number of residential child care institution (RCCI) sites operating NSLP, SBP and afterschool snacks and their enrollment (October report, Part B, 14a+b, F-J)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Annual

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA Student

 Other ___

Total number of children approved for free lunches and reduced-price lunches (October report, Part B, 15a+b, F)

 Yes

 No

 Not Applicable

 Daily

 Monthly

 Annual

 Other

 Student

 Site or School

 SFA

 Other ___





Free and Reduced Price Eligibility Determinations and Verification

Next, we will ask you some questions about the capabilities of your current school nutrition MIS in helping your state manage free and reduced price eligibility determinations and verification.



  1. Does your school nutrition MIS collect FNS-742 (School Food Authority Verification Collection Report) data at the site/school level?


Yes

Q21

No

Q21


  1. Does your school nutrition MIS collect FNS-874 (formerly 742a) (Local Educational Agency Second Review of Applications Report) data at the site/school level?


Yes

Q22

No

Q22


  1. Does your current school nutrition MIS collect and maintain a list of schools/group of schools/SFAs operating the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and their Identified Student Percentages (ISP) or claiming percentages, and enrollment? Check all that apply for each item.


Operating Provision

MIS collects this data

Available for reports

Not applicable, no CEP schools in our state

List of schools operating CEP

Claiming percentages or identified student percentages (ISP) for schools operating CEP

Enrollment for schools operating CEP



  1. Does your current school nutrition MIS collect and maintain a list of schools operating Provision 2 and schools operating Provision 3 and their claiming percentages and enrollment? Check all that apply for each item.


Operating Provision

We collect this data

Available for reports

Not applicable, no Provision 2 or 3 schools in our state

List of schools operating Provision 2

Claiming percentages for schools operating Provision 2

Enrollment for schools operating Provision 2

List of schools operating Provision 3

Claiming percentages for schools operating Provision 3

Enrollment for schools operating Provision 3


Meal Service and Nutrition Information

The next set of questions focuses on the data in your school nutrition MIS related to meal service and nutrition. We are interested in how you collect and store information on meal pattern component compliance and dietary specification compliance by your school nutrition sites.



  1. Does your current school nutrition MIS maintain data on SFA meal pattern component compliance? This includes documentation that shows meal components and quantities by grade level, such as detailed menus and/or a completed FNS-approved menu planning tool. Check all that apply.

Yes, SFAs upload or enter this data electronically into the state MIS

Q25

Yes, SFAs manually enter this data into an online form

Q25

No, we do not collect information on meal pattern component compliance in our MIS

Q26



  1. What is the frequency of data collection on SFAs’ meal pattern component compliance? Check all that apply.

Annually

Q26

During Administrative Review

Q26

On an as needed basis

Q26

Other (please specify) __________________________________________

Q26



  1. Does your current school nutrition MIS maintain data on SFA dietary specification compliance? These data include documentation that shows results from a nutrient analysis or simplified nutrient assessment for calories, saturated fat, sodium and trans fat using USDA approved software. Check all that apply.

Yes, SFAs upload or enter this data electronically into the state MIS

Q27

Yes, SFAs manually enter this data into an online form

Q27

Yes, we enter or collect this information during administrative review

Q27

No, we do not collect information on dietary specification compliance in our MIS

Q28



  1. What is the frequency of collection of data on SFA dietary specification compliance? Check all that apply.

Annually

Q28

During administrative review

Q28

On an as needed basis

Q28

Other (please specify) __________________________________________

Q28



  1. Do you have an automated report in your school nutrition MIS for SFA compliance with meal components and dietary specifications? At a minimum, this includes a list of SFAs and schools receiving the additional 6 cent reimbursement.

Yes

Q29

No

Q29





Financial Management

Next, we will ask you about the types of financial data your school nutrition MIS collects and generates. Many of these questions focus on data that you collect from SFAs in your state.



  1. Does your current school nutrition MIS collect an Annual Financial Report from each SFA in the state? This report is also called a Balance Sheet or Statement of Revenues and Expenditures and contains information on the SFA’s revenues, expenditures and ending net cash resources (account balance) for a school year.

Yes

Q30

No

Q30



  1. For each of the following types of SFA revenue data, please indicate whether the data element is available in your school nutrition MIS and, if so, the frequency with which it is collected from SFAs, level of detail, and whether reports are generated from the data.

Types of SFA revenue data

Data are available in MIS

Frequency of collection (Please select most frequent level for entering data)

Finest level of detail available

Internal management reports available from these data

USDA Meal Reimbursements

 Yes

 No

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Daily

  • Weekly

  • Monthly

  • Quarterly

  • Annually

  • Other___


{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Site/School

  • SFA



 Yes

 No

Student Meal Payments

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Adult Meal Revenues

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

State/local Meal Reimbursements

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

USDA Foods Monetary Value

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Non-Program Food Sales, including A La Carte Sales and Vending

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Contracted/Catering Sales

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other State Funding

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Funds Transferred in

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Grants (state or federal)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Interest

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) ______________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) ______________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) ______________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No



  1. For each of the following types of SFA expenditure data, please indicate whether the data element is available in your school nutrition MIS and, if so, the frequency with which the data that is entered is collected from SFAs, level of detail, and whether reports are generated from the data.

Types of SFA expenditure data

Data are available in MIS

Frequency of collection (Please select most frequent level for entering data)

Finest level of detail available

Internal Management reports available from these data

Purchased Food

 Yes

 No

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Daily

  • Weekly

  • Monthly

  • Quarterly

  • Annually

  • Other ___


{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Site/School

  • SFA


 Yes

 No

Food production and operating supplies

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

USDA Foods Miscellaneous Charges

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Labor Costs (salaries and benefits)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Equipment Purchases (>$5000)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Purchased Services

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Indirect Cost Charges

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Funds Transferred out

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) _____________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) _____________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No



  1. Does your current school nutrition MIS collect SFA meal prices charged? Some meal price information is reported annually on the FNS School Food Authority Paid Lunch Report Form FNS-828.

Yes

Q33

No

Q34



  1. How does your current school nutrition MIS collect SFA meal prices charged?

Most frequently charged price by SFA elementary, middle and high school levels

Q34

Price by individual school

Q34



  1. What types of performance and operating efficiency measures does your current school nutrition MIS collect from SFAs? Please choose frequency of collection and finest level of detail for all data available in your school nutrition MIS.

Performance and operating efficiency measures

Data to calculate these measures are available in MIS

Calculated measure is available in MIS

Frequency of collection (Please select most frequent level for entering data)

Finest level of detail available

Meals per labor hour

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Monthly

  • Quarterly

  • Annually

  • Other

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Site/School

  • SFA


Meal equivalents (e.g., ratio of # breakfasts to lunch)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Percentage of certified students served by meal type (Free/Reduced Price/Paid)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Percentage of Meals Reimbursed by Category (Free/Reduced Price/Paid)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Targeted maximum cost per meal (“plate costs”)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) ____________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) _____________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No





Other Data Elements

The next set of questions on data elements do not fall into any of the previous categories. They focus on data available on other administrative activities.



  1. How does your state use school nutrition MIS to conduct Administrative Reviews of SFAs? Please indicate to what extent your current school nutrition MIS captures each of the following administrative review tools and forms. Check only one per row.

Administrative Review tool

MIS FULLY automates data collection and processing

MIS PARTIALLY automates data collection and processing

Forms from FNS website are used (entered manually outside of MIS)

Not applicable to our state

Eligibility Certification and Benefit Issuance Error Worksheet (SFA-1)

Special Provisions Non-Base Year and CEP Claiming Percentage/Funding Level Summary Form (SFA-1A)

Other Eligibility Certification and Benefit Issuance Errors Worksheet (SFA-2)

Community Eligibility Provision ISP Validation Form (SFA-2A)

School Data and Meal Pattern Error Form (S-1)

Meal Compliance Risk Assessment Tool

Non-reimbursable Meal Allocation Form

Nutrient Analysis Protocols

Nutrient Analysis and Validation Checklist

Dietary Specifications Assessment Tool

Off-site Assessment Tool

On-site Assessment Tool

Resource Management Comprehensive Review Form

Resource Management Risk Indicator Tool

Fiscal Action Workbook

General Areas (i.e., Professional Standards, Civil Rights, Local Wellness, etc.)





Supplemental SFAs Contracting with Food Service Management Companies Review Form


  1. What types of professional standards and training data does your current school nutrition MIS collect? Please choose Frequency, Finest level of detail and if you have internal management reports for all data available in your school nutrition MIS.

Professional standards and training data

Data are available in MIS

Frequency of collection

(Please select most frequent level for entering data)

Finest level of detail available

Internal management reports available from these data

Training hours offered

 Yes

 No

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Daily

  • Monthly

  • Quarterly

  • Annually

  • Other

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Individual

  • SFA

  • State

 Yes

 No

Individual state employee training hours tracking

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Number of state employees meeting professional standards

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

SFA employee training hours tracking

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Number of SFA employees meeting professional standards

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Education/experience level for SFA directors

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) ______________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) _______________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) _______________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No





  1. What types of school food safety inspection data does your current school nutrition MIS collect? Please choose frequency of collection, finest level of detail, and if you have internal management reports for all data available in your school nutrition MIS.

    School food safety inspection data

    Data are available in MIS

    Frequency of collection (Please select most frequent level for entering data)

    Finest level of detail available

    Internal Management reports available from these data

    Number of inspections

     Yes

     No

    {Choose one from dropdown box}

    • Monthly

    • Quarterly

    • Annually

    {Choose one from dropdown box}

    • Site or School

    • SFA

    • State


     Yes

     No

    Results of food safety inspections (e.g., scores or pass/fail)

     Yes

     No

     Yes

     No

    Other (please specify) ___________

     Yes

     No

     Yes

     No

    Other (please specify) ___________

     Yes

     No

     Yes

     No

  2. Do any SFAs in your state have contracts with food service management companies (FSMCs)?

Yes

Q39

No

Q40



  1. What types of FSMC contracts data does your current school nutrition MIS collect? Please choose frequency of collection, finest level of detail, and if you have internal management reports for all data available in your school nutrition MIS.

FSMC contracts data

Data are available in MIS

Frequency of collection (Please select most frequent level for entering data)

Finest level of detail available

Internal management reports available from these data

Data on FSMC contract details (e.g., name of FSMC, year of contract, fixed price vs. cost reimbursable)

 Yes

 No

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Monthly

  • Quarterly

  • Annually

  • Other

{Choose one from dropdown box}


  • Site or School

  • SFA

  • State


 Yes

 No

Copies of contracts between SFAs and FSMCs

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Data to support monitoring of SFA contracts (e.g. tracking receipt of rebates, discounts and credits)

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Data and logs to support bids/procurement of FSMC services

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) ________________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No

Other (please specify) ________________

 Yes

 No

 Yes

 No




Reporting Capabilities and Data Quality

The next questions focus on the reporting capabilities of your current school nutrition MIS and the quality of the data in the MIS. We also ask about the processes you have within your school nutrition MIS to ensure that data is accurate (e.g., edit checks) and has not been tampered with or manipulated (data integrity).



  1. Which of the following types of analysis and tracking of data are you able to perform using your current school nutrition MIS? Check all that apply.

Standard, summary reports that came with the software

Q41

Standard, detailed reports that came with the software

Q41

Customized reports by choosing data categories

Q41

Customized reports by writing code such as structured query language (SQL), Crystal Reports, etc.

Q41

Management dashboards or interfaces that provide visual analysis of data or key indicators

Q41

Scorecards that show progress of specified measures against their targets

Q41

Other reports (please specify) ________________________________________________

Q41

Our school nutrition MIS does not perform analysis and tracking of data

Q41



  1. What data quality and integrity checks are built into your current school nutrition MIS? Check all that apply.

Incomplete applications

Q43

Over-claims (for example, number of meals claimed greater than student enrollment)

Q43

Duplicate students (for example, same student claimed more than once for same meal service)

Q43

Required claim edit checks

Q43

Reasonableness of data (for example, system only accepts values within an anticipated range)

Q43

Audit logs, which record all activities of users

Q43

Reports with missing data are rejected

Q43

Checks to ensure data are not manipulated outside of the software

Q43

Other (please specify) ______________________________________________________

Q43

Other (please specify) ______________________________________________________

Q43

Other (please specify) ______________________________________________________

Q43

Don’t know/Unsure

Q42

Our school nutrition MIS does not provide data quality and integrity checks

Q42





  1. You indicated that your current school nutrition MIS does not provide data quality and integrity checks or you are unsure if it does. How do you ensure that your data is accurate? Check all that apply.

Manually check all reports

Q43

Manually check randomly selected reports

Q43

We don’t check data accuracy

Q43

Other (please specify) _________________________________________________

Q43

Don’t know

Q43



  1. How does your current school nutrition MIS support oversight, monitoring and accountability? Check all that apply.

Real-time access to SFA claiming systems

Q44

Custom reports on missing data

Q44

Custom reports on late data

Q44

Integrated address book/email system or messaging system to communicate with SFAs on data issues

Q44

Ability to design and test new components to improve agency protocols

Q44

System of logs and checks to identify error-prone SFAs

Q44

Criteria and reports to identify high-performing SFAs

Q44

Edit checks integrated into SFA data entry forms

Q44

Edit checks integrated into State reporting forms

Q44

Trend analyses to compare data received to historical trends.

Q44

Other (please specify) _________________________________________________

Q44



  1. How would you rate the quality of the following types of data in your current school nutrition MIS? For each data type, please select one of the four quality categories that best describes your quality rating of the data available in your school nutrition MIS.

Data type

Quality

Administrative Review Preparation

  • [Excellent] Meets or exceeds all our needs

  • [Good] Meets most of our needs

  • [Adequate] Meets some of our needs

  • [Poor] Meets few, if any, of our needs

  • Not Applicable

Meal Claiming

Menu Planning

Nutrient Analysis

Order Processing

Recipes

FNS 10 Report of School Program Operations

FNS 742 Report (Verification Collection Report)

FNS 834 Report (State Agency (NSLP/SNAP) Direct Certification Rate Data Element Report)

FNS -640 Report (Administrative Review Data Report)

FNS-874 Report (Local Education Agency Second Review of Applications)

Other



  1. In using your school nutrition MIS, do you face any of the following challenges concerning data collection? Check all that apply.

The level of detail does not meet our needs

Q46

The data is not adequately secured or protected from external manipulation

Q46

The level of security makes it difficult to use the system

Q46

Not all users are adequately trained to use the system

Q46

Data is collected to fulfill an old FNS report form and there is too much lag time to reprogram the system to meet the requirements of the new FNS report form

Q46

Other (please specify) _______________________________________

Q46

I do not face any challenges with data collection

Q46



  1. In using your school nutrition MIS, do you face any of the following challenges concerning data aggregation? Check all that apply.

Our data are spread over disparate systems, making data aggregation time consuming

Q47

The data are too fine-grained, making it difficult to aggregate them and produce reports

Q47

Compiling all or some of our data requires manual data re-entry tasks

Q47

Other (please specify) _______________________________________

Q47

I do not face any challenges with data aggregation

Q47



  1. In using your school nutrition MIS, do you face any of the following challenges concerning reporting? Check all that apply.

Reports do not cover all topics relevant to management of the program

Q48

Reports are not available at the level of detail needed to support program management

Q48

All or some of the reports to the FNS involve manual compilation

Q48

Data is reported in a format to fulfill an old FNS report form and there is too much lag time to reprogram the system to meet the requirements of the new FNS report form

Q48

Other (please specify) _______________________________________

Q48

I do not face any challenges with reporting

Q48



Section 3: Technical Features of School Nutrition MIS

This section contains questions about the technical features of your current school nutrition MIS. In particular, we will cover the following topics:

  1. Copyright Protection - Copyright protection for your custom-built software

  2. Interoperability – How your system connects and shares data with other systems

  3. Architecture and Deployment – How you access and store data within your system

  4. Data Security – How your system performs backups and secures sensitive student data



Copyright Protection

The following questions focus on copyright protection for your in-house or custom developed software.



  1. You indicated that a component of your school nutrition MIS was custom-built. Who owns the copyright? Check all that apply.

The state

Q49

The developer/vendor

Q49

Other (please specify) _________________________________

Q49

No copyright

Q49

Don’t know

Q49



  1. Can your current school nutrition MIS be transferred with no or minimal costs to other state school nutrition agencies? This may be possible if your MIS was purchased using federal funds and your agency owns the copyright.

Yes

Q50

No

Q50

Don’t know

Q50


Interoperability

We will now ask about interoperability, which is how your MIS connects to other data systems within your state.



  1. Do you share system login capability with SFAs?

    Yes, SFAs can login to the State system

    Q51

    Yes, the State agency can login to SFA systems

    Q51

    No

    Q51

    Don’t know

    Q51

  2. How do you share data with your SFAs/sites? An example of data sharing would be how direct certification match files are shared with or incorporated by the appropriate LEAs. Check all that apply.

Manually key in data to SFA systems

Q52

File import/export stored on a secure server

Q52

File import/export using removable media such as flash drive, CD, DVD, etc.

Q52

SFAs connect directly to the state system to retrieve or upload data

Q52

Other collaborative platforms such as SharePoint

Q52

Some other means (please specify) _______________________________

Q52



  1. Is your school nutrition MIS part of a larger state MIS?

Yes

Q53

No

Q54

Don’t know

Q54



  1. Does your state MIS offer single sign-on capability for your school nutrition MIS? Single sign-on allows users to access multiple systems with one username and password.

Yes

Q54

No

Q54

Don’t know

Q54



  1. Do you share data (send to or receive from) with any of the following programs or agencies? Check all that apply.

SNAP State or Local Agencies

Q55

TANF State or Local Agencies

Q55

Foster Care/Department of School Children and Family Services

Q55

State Medicaid agency

Q55

Other (please specify) ____________________________________________

Q55

We do not share data with any other agency

Q56



  1. How do you share data with the programs/agencies you selected earlier?

Manually key in data to other program/agency systems

Q56

File import/export stored on a secure server

Q56

File import/export using removable media such as flash drive, CD, DVD, etc.

Q56

Connect directly to download or upload data

Q56

Other collaborative platforms such as SharePoint

Q56

Other means (please specify) _______________________________

Q56



  1. Do you or your software vendor implement any interoperability standards within your school nutrition MIS? “Interoperability standards” refers to following third-party defined protocols to support efficient interactions between software/data systems. Check all that apply.

School Interoperability Framework (SIF)

Q57

Ed-Fi Alliance

Q57

Common Education Data Standards (CEDS)

Q57

Other standards _________________________

Q57

Part of a standard but do not know the name

Q57

Not part of any standards

Q57

Don’t know

Q57



Architecture and Deployment

The next questions focus on how your school nutrition MIS is physically deployed and operated. In particular, FNS is interested in whether your data are stored locally or in the cloud.





  1. Where are the data from your current school nutrition MIS stored? Check all that apply.

At a central state location

Q58

In the cloud, hosted by the vendor

Q58

Other (please specify) ______________________________________________________

Q58

Don’t know

Q58



  1. What type of database management system does your school nutrition MIS use to store data? Check all that apply.

  • Oracle Q59

  • Microsoft SQL Q59

  • MySQL Q59

  • PostgresSQL Q59

  • IMB DB2 Q59

  • IBM Informix Q59

  • SAP Sybase Q59

  • Teradata Q59

  • Non-relational database (e.g. MonoDB, Cassandra, HBase, Neo4j) Q59

  • Other (please specify) _______________________________ Q59

  • Don’t know Q59




Data Security

The next questions focus on your backup and data security systems and protocols. By protocols, we mean the set of rules and procedures that govern backup and security of your school nutrition MIS.



  1. How long do you retain data in your current school nutrition MIS? By retain we mean that the data are electronically available in your system without the need to restore the data from an archive. Check only one.

Just the current school year

Q60

1 year to less than 4 years

Q60

4 years to less than 7 years

Q60

7 years to less than 10 years

Q60

Indefinitely

Q60

Other time period (please specify)________________________________

Q60



  1. Do you have any of the following security protocols to protect the data in your current school nutrition MIS, specifically those related to personally identifiable information? Check all that apply.

Login requirements

END

Data encryption

END

Confidential data maintained in a secure environment

END

User profiles with access to only specific data

END

Virus protection

END

Security penetration testing

END

Virtual private network (VPN)

END

Training for users to protect from phishing (i.e. email scams)

END

Other (please specify) __________________

END

Other (please specify) __________________

END

Other (please specify) __________________

END






Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. As we noted at the beginning, the information you provided will be used only for the purposes of this study.



Please provide the following information about any staff members who have assisted in completing this survey.


Job Title


# of Years at State agency

1.




2.




3.




4.






If you have any questions about completion of this survey please contact Madeleine Levin, at 202-774-1982 or [email protected].

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorSamuel Kofi Ampaabeng
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-23

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy