Logic Model

Attachment 1 Logic Model 10-06-2016 .docx

Children’s Mental Health Initiative National Evaluation

Logic Model

OMB: 0930-0375

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Logic Model of the CMHI National Evaluation of the CMHI Expansion and Sustainability Grants


Goals

Inputs


Activities

Proximal outcomes

Distal outcomes

  • Expanded implementation of SOC (population; geographic area; services, etc.)

  • Implementation of expansion of SOC across multiple sectors

  • Improved culturally relevant services impedes access to hard-to-reach populations

  • Improved representation of C and F needs

  • Sustainability of system of care components after CMHI funding ends

  • Improved cross agency coordination of services and policy throughout grantee area

  • Improved coordination of care for clients

  • Improved client and system outcomes

  • Better understand­ing of barriers to and facilitators to expansion

  • Develop understanding of how to inform successful system of care expansion


  • SAMHSA funding for grantees to plan and expand systems of care

  • Technical assistance from national center

  • Local infrastructure and processes established through previous CMHI community grants

  • New commitment to expand system of care across broader areas

  • New governance and management structures supporting implementation throughout SOC

  • CDP system for collecting performance indicators

  • Previous experiences with, and findings from, local and national evaluation of CMHI community grants

  • New roles for C and F representatives


Policy/ Partnerships

State

  • Establish policy, administrative and regulatory structures to support SOC implementation

  • Increase interagency collaboration in statewide planning and implementation

  • Expand family and youth involvement in governance

  • Engage in ongoing monitoring of system performance


Local

  • Increase interagency collaboration in statewide planning and implementation

  • Coordinate direct care across agencies

  • Expand family and youth involvement in management

  • Engage in ongoing monitoring of quality of care and services processes

State

  • Policy changes implemented

  • Increase in family and youth roles across SOC

  • Improved coordination for organizations/agencies

  • Improved system performance


Local

  • Service system processes more child- and family-friendly

  • Greater coordination of care

  • Improved quality of care and service processes

  • Greater expansion of SOC

  • Greater sustainability of SOC

  • Reduction in duplication of services across agencies

  • Closing of service gaps within and across agencies

  • Less fragmentation across service sectors


Services/ Supports

State

  • Expand service array across state and close gaps

  • Promote adoption of culturally valid service and support options

  • Mandate provision of evidence-based services and supports


Local

  • Conduct outreach to historically underserved populations

  • Provide full array of services/supports within the community that are culturally valid

  • Offer evidence-based service options

  • Conduct strength-based assessment

  • Provide individualized care in partnership with families

  • Prioritize least restrictive settings

  • Integrate family and youth support options and advocacy


State

  • Improved cultural and linguistic policy

  • Improved service array options


Local

  • Improved access to services and supports

  • Increased use of services among historically underserved populations

  • More responsive service delivery to child and family needs

  • More culturally appropriate care

  • Greater use of evidence-based service options


  • Reduction in service gaps across state and within local systems

  • Reduced out-of-home and out-of-community services

  • Improved child and family outcomes

  • Enduring quality practice




Goals

Inputs


Activities

Proximal outcomes

Distal outcomes



Financing

State

  • Create cross agency financial planning

  • Maximize financing options for SOC

  • Explore Medicaid expansion opportunities

  • Look for braided/blended options

  • Develop strategies to fund new services


Local

  • Develop multi-agency review teams to blend/braid funding for highest risk clients

  • Share resources and processes

  • Explore additional local funding sources

State

  • Increased funding options

  • Reduce costs across service sectors

  • Improved cross agency financial planning


Local

  • Reduce local operating costs

  • Reduce financial barriers to care


  • Reduced costs across state and local systems

  • Reduced cost-shifting across service sectors

  • Identification of cost off-sets


Training/Workforce


State

  • Implement policies to support diverse and competent workforce (e.g., fund positions, mandate and fund training, outreach in hiring)

  • Support training on evidence-based options

  • Mandate training on system of care approaches


Local

  • Build and support diverse and competent workforce (e.g., training, funding, outreach and hiring)

  • Conduct training in EBTs

  • Monitor provider quality of care

  • Conduct training on system of care approaches

  • Diversify workforce to fit client population


State

  • Implement policies to support diverse and competent workforce (e.g., fund positions, mandate and fund training, outreach in hiring)

  • Support training on evidence-based options

  • Mandate training on system of care approaches


Local

  • More diverse and competent workforce

  • Greater fidelity to EBTs

  • Better quality of care delivered by providers

  • Reduced staff turnover

  • Improved cultural and linguistic, practice

  • More stable work force

  • Workforce competent to meet needs of population

  • Better quality and appropriateness of care


Strategic Communications

State

  • Engage in outreach and social marketing efforts

  • Generate reports on outcomes and cost avoidance

  • Create partnerships with and among policy leaders

  • Establish strong family and youth advocacy organizations

  • Foster System of Care Leadership


Local

  • Partner with state advocacy and policy makers

  • Collect data on outcomes and costs

  • Engage in local advocacy

  • Support Leadership at local and state levels

State

  • Greater public awareness

  • Engaged Policy Makers

  • Increased Leadership

  • Stable and established youth and family advocacy organizations


Local

  • Engaged local policy makers

  • Participation in state and local advocacy

  • Use of data for system development and advocacy

Reduced public stigma

Increased public confidence in service delivery

Effective legislation

Positive media awareness



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorMary Anne Myers
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy