Justification Memo - OMBudsman Listening Sessions and Feedback Survey Supervisory Appeals and Dispute Resolution

Justification Memo 0127 Listening Sessions Feedback Survey Supervisory Appeals.docx

Occasional Qualitative Surveys

Justification Memo - Ombudsman Listening Sessions and Feedback Survey Supervisory Appeals and Dispute Resolution

OMB: 3064-0127

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf





Shape5 Shape6 Shape7 Shape8

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

550 17th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20429-9990

550 17th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20429-9990


September 18, 2019


 

Memorandum to: William E. Bestani

Policy Analyst

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

Office of Management and Budget

Executive Office of the President                            

                                    

From: Manny Cabeza

Regulatory Counsel

Assessments and Legislation Group

Legal Division

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation      

     


RE: Listening Session on Supervisory Appeals and Dispute Resolution Process and Session Feedback Survey


Under FDIC “fast-track” generic clearance entitled “Occasional Qualitative Surveys” (3064-0127), the FDIC hereby submits for OMB review our plan for conducting listening sessions regarding the FDIC appeals and dispute resolution process (Process). Each of the nine sessions will consist of approximately 25 banking industry representatives that have registered to take part in the session. Each session will begin with an overview of the Process, followed by “Listening Session on Supervisory Appeals and Dispute Resolution Process open discussion topics,” and concluding with a discussion recap. In addition, participants will be given an “Appeals and Dispute Process Listening Session Evaluation.”

The purpose of the listening sessions is to gain information regarding the bankers’ views on the current appeals and dispute resolution process, as well as to identify potential areas for improvement. Participants will be asked to provide feedback on the following potential topics: opportunities for informally resolving disagreements between banks and FDIC Field and Regional management and staff; general processes and timeframes for pursuing formal reviews at the Division Director and Supervisory Appeals Review Committee (SARC) levels; material supervisory determinations (MSDs) in the FDIC Appeals Guidelines; the composition and functions of the SARC; the role of the Office of the Ombudsman in resolving formal and informal disagreements; other observations, recommendations, or concerns relative to the FDIC’s processes for resolving disagreements; and, opportunities for additional transparency on agency operations by expanding information available on the FDIC website. In addition, each participant will be provided a survey soliciting feedback on the listening sessions.


The FDIC estimates that there will be 9 sessions held during the year each attended by 25 respondents for a total of 225 respondents. The estimated annual burden is as follows:



Number of Sessions: 9

Estimated Number of respondents per session: 25

Total Estimated Annual Respondents: 225

Estimated Time to Respond:

Listening Sessions - 2.5 hours

Evaluation Survey - .25 hours

Total Estimated Time to Respond 2.75 hours

Total Estimated Annual Burden: 618.75 hours


Total estimated annual burden for the collection of this information is 618.75 hours. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you for your consideration.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-15

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy