Customer Satisfaction Survey for the NSF Electronic Research Administration Forum, May 14, 2020

Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

ERA Forum Webinar Spring 2020 Survey_DRAFT_20200416

Customer Satisfaction Survey for the NSF Electronic Research Administration Forum, May 14, 2020

OMB: 3145-0215

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Shape1


NSF ERA Forum Webinar Survey

Thank you for participating in the May 2020 ERA Forum Webinar! Your feedback is very important to us. Please complete the following survey based on your participation in the webinar. Please answer each question to the best of your ability.

Survey Questions and Answers


Questions

Answers

In what capacity do you primarily interact with NSF?

  • Principal Investigator (PI)

  • co-Principal Investigator (co-PI)

  • Other Senior Personnel

  • Other Authorized User (OAU)

  • Sponsored Project Office

  • Authorized Organization Representative (AOR)

  • Other (please specify) [text box]

Which of the following best describes your current organizational affiliation?

  • Large research university

  • Primarily undergraduate institution

  • Minority serving institution

  • Community college

  • Other non-profit organization

  • For-profit organization

  • Other (Please specify) [text box]

Have you used the new Research.gov Proposal Preparation and Submission System to submit an NSF proposal?

  • Yes [IF ANSWERED YES QUESTION #4]

  • No [IF ANSWERED NO QUESTION #5]

Please indicate how many proposals you have prepared and submitted using the new Research.gov Preparation and Submission System.

  • 1 [ALL ANSWERS QUESTION #6]

  • 2 to 5

  • 6 to 10

  • More than 10

You indicated that you have not yet prepared and submitted a proposal using the new Research.gov Proposal Preparation and Submission System. Please provide additional information regarding why you have chosen not to submit on Research.gov.

Select all that apply: [ALL ANSWERS QUESTION #6]

  • Proposal Type not yet available on the Research.gov system

  • I prefer FastLane/I am familiar with FastLane

  • I have not had time to learn the new Research.gov Proposal Preparation and Submission System

  • My organization requires me to use FastLane

  • I attempted to prepare and submit a proposal using the Research.gov Proposal Preparation and Submission System but could not submit due to compliance check errors

  • Other: [Open ended text]


[SURVEY PAGE BREAK]


[SURVEY PAGE BREAK]

Section Title: Research.gov Demo of Separately Submitted Collaborative Proposals from Multiple Organizations

Based on the ERA Forum Webinar presentation, please answer the following questions regarding the Research.gov Demo of Separately Submitted Collaborative Proposals.

Survey Questions and Answers


Questions

Answers

In Research.gov have you used and or tried to submit separately submitted collaborative proposals?

  • Yes [IF ANSWERED YES QUESTION #7]

  • No [IF ANSWERED NO QUESTION #8]

In Research.gov, how would you rate your satisfaction with the separately submitted proposal functionality?

  • Very Satisfied

  • Satisfied

  • Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied

  • Dissatisfied

  • Very Dissatisfied

  • Not Applicable

Using FastLane, approximately how many separately submitted collaborative proposals have you been involved with preparing and/or submitting?

  • None

  • 1-10

  • 11-25

  • More than 25

In FastLane, how would you rate your satisfaction with the separately submitted proposals functionality?


  • Very Satisfied

  • Satisfied

  • Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied

  • Dissatisfied

  • Very Dissatisfied

  • Not Applicable

How often do you include subawards in your separately submitted collaborative proposals?


  • Always

  • Sometimes

  • Rarely

  • Never

Based on the demo of the new separately submitted proposal functionality in Research.gov, how satisfied are you with the new functionality?


  • Very Satisfied

  • Satisfied

  • Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied

  • Dissatisfied

  • Very Dissatisfied

  • Not Applicable

Based on the demo of the new separately submitted proposal functionality in Research.gov, how can separately submitted proposals be improved for your organization?

  • Open ended [text box]

In FastLane, how often have you needed to change or update a proposal section after submission, but before reviewers are assigned?

  • Sometimes

  • Rarely

  • Never

In Research.gov, would you expect a Proposal File Update (PFU) to include the ability to make changes to the budget?

  • Yes, I would expect PFU to include a budget revision option

  • No, I would expect a separate Budget Revision section

  • I am not familiar with PFU

For clarity, what would you call the function that allows you to make a change to a proposal section after submission, but before reviewers are assigned?

  • Proposal File Update (PFU)

  • Proposal File Update (PFU)/Budget Revision (BR)

  • Update Submitted Proposal

  • Other (please specify) [text box]

In Research.gov, what navigation challenges have you experienced when navigating to in-progress proposals or navigating to Proposal File Updates/Budget Revisions in Research.gov? (Please provide as many details as possible)

  • Open ended [text box]

In Research.gov, what challenges have you experienced related to Proposal File Updates/Budget Revisions? (Please provide as many details as possible)

  • Open ended [text box]

In Research.gov, what challenges have you experienced related to proposal preparation and submission? (Please provide as many details as possible)

  • Open ended [text box]


[SURVEY PAGE BREAK]


Section Title: Survey Wrap-up

Based on the overall ERA Forum Webinar presentations, please answer the following questions.

Survey Questions and Answers


Questions

Answers

Your comments, questions, and feedback are very important to NSF. Based on the ERA Forum Webinar topics please include any additional feedback in the space provided. (text box)

  • Open ended [text box]

Please share any topics of interest you would like to focus on at future NSF ERA Forums.

  • Open ended [text box]

OPTIONAL: If you would like to be added to NSF’s list of volunteers who participate in future application usability studies, surveys, and webinars, please enter your contact information below.

  • Your Name: ______________________________

  • Your Organization: ________________________

  • Your Email: ______________________________

Did you find today's Forum informative?

  • Yes [IF ANSWERED SURVEY COMPLETE]

  • No [IF ANSWERED QUESTION #23]

  • Neutral [IF ANSWERED SURVEY COMPLETE]

You indicated that you did not find today’s NSF ERA Forum informative. Could you please share any suggestions for improvement?

  • Open ended [text box]


Thank you for participating in this survey!

May 2020

NSF ERA Forum Webinar Spring 2020 Survey

DIAS Research.gov Business Office

0


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorClinton, Donald C. (Contractor)
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-14

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy