Draft: March 3, 2016
Survey for
National
Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC)
Applicants
and Potential Applicants
Thank you for your willingness to provide feedback on the National Historical Publications and Records Commission’s application process. Your comments will help us make the process more effective and user friendly.
☐ Subscriptions to Grants.gov announcements
☐ Announcements on email listservs (if so, please indicate which one below__________________)
☐ NHPRC website or Facebook Page
☐ Other ____________(comment below)
Easy |
Somewhat Easy |
Neither Difficult or Easy |
Somewhat Difficult |
Difficult |
Don’t Know or No Opinion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easy |
Somewhat Easy |
Neither Difficult or Easy |
Somewhat Difficult |
Difficult |
Don’t Know or No Opinion |
Using Grants.gov |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Understanding the grant announcement and requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matching your project to NHPRC grant programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussing the historical significance of the materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writing the work plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preparing the Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifying the supplemental materials and keeping them to the required length |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very clear |
Somewhat clear |
Neither clear or confusing |
Somewhat confusing |
Very Confusing |
Don’t Know or No Opinion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easier than NHPRC |
About the same as NHPRC |
More difficult than NHPRC |
Don’t Know or No Opinion |
|
|
|
|
|
Much more likely |
Somewhat likely |
No effect |
Cost share was not required |
|
|
|
Initial proposal was three pages and only finalists submitted 20-page narrative |
|
|
|
NHPRC funded more local historical records projects |
|
|
|
The NHPRC budget was more certain each year |
|
|
|
NHPRC had more funds for grants |
|
|
|
|
Very Much |
Somewhat |
Neutral |
A Little |
Not at all |
Don’t Know or No Opinion |
Webinars discussing how to apply for a specific program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meetings or phone calls with program officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Historical Records Advisory Board advice or comments on drafts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHPRC staff review of draft applications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to respond to peer reviews & staff questions during application review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedback after grant decisions are made |
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐ College/University
☐ Historical Society
☐ Museum
☐ State Archives
☐ Local Government Archives
☐ Non-Profit Organization
☐ Other _________________________ (write-in) (comment box)
☐ 0-25 people
☐ 26-100
☐ 101-500
☐ 501-2,000
☐ 2,000+
☐ Documentary Editor
☐ Curator
☐ Librarian
☐ Archivist
☐ Grant Administrator
☐ Historian
☐ Other __________________ (write in) (comment box)
☐ American Association for State and Local History
☐ American Historical Association
☐ Association for Documentary Editing
☐ Digital Humanists
☐ National Association of Government Archives and Records Administrators
☐ Organization of American Historians
☐ Society of American Archivists
☐ Other Archival Group: ________________________ (comment box)
☐ Other: ___________________________ (comment box)
☐ The institution has applied for but not received
☐ The institution has applied for and received
☐ The institution has never applied
☐ NEH
☐ IMLS
☐ National Park Service
☐ Library of Congress
☐ National Science Foundation
☐ Department of Education
☐ Other ___________ (Please comment below)
[open ended box]
We appreciate you completing the survey! If you need more information about the NHPRC, please visit our website at: www.archives.gov/nhprc or send us an email at [email protected].
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | LBARBER |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-22 |