30 Day Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 187 / Thursday, September 28, 2017 / Notices
symmetrical point, suitable for use in
gas-actuated hand tools.
Also excluded from the scope of this
order are corrugated nails. A corrugated
nail is made up of a small strip of
corrugated steel with sharp points on
one side.
Also excluded from the scope of this
order are thumb tacks, which are
currently classified under HTSUS
subheading 7317.00.10.00.
Certain steel nails subject to this order
are currently classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7317.00.55.02,
7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05,
7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08,
7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18,
7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20,
7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60,
7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80,
7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30,
7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00.
Certain steel nails subject to these
orders also may be classified under
HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00,
8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS
subheadings.
While the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.

merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this administrative review in the
Federal Register.
Consistent with the Department’s
assessment practice in non-market
economy (NME) cases, for entries that
were not reported in U.S. sales
databases submitted by companies
individually examined during the
administrative review, the Department
will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the Vietnam-wide rate.
Additionally, if the Department
determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under the exporter’s case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the Vietnam-wide rate.2
Cash Deposit Requirements

The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from
Vietnam entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
Final Results of Review
the publication date, as provided for by
The Department received no
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
comments concerning the Preliminary
Truong Vinh, Rich State, and Dicha
Results. Accordingly, the Department
Sombrilla, the cash deposit rate will be
continues to determine that the
equal to the weighted-average dumping
following weighted-average dumping
margin listed above; (2) for previously
margins exist for these final results:
investigated or reviewed Vietnamese
and non-Vietnamese exporters not listed
Weightedabove that received a separate rate in a
average
Company
dumping
prior segment of this proceeding, the
margin
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
(percent)
exporter-specific rate published for the
Dicha Sombrilla Co., Ltd ......
323.99 most-recently completed segment of this
Rich State, Inc ......................
323.99 proceeding in which the exporter was
Truong Vinh Ltd ....................
323.99 reviewed; (3) for all Vietnamese
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses to separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that established for the Vietnam-wide
interested parties the calculations
entity, which is 323.99 percent; 3 and (4)
performed for the final results within
for
all non-Vietnamese exporters of
five days of the publication of this
subject merchandise which have not
notice, in accordance with 19 CFR
received their own rate, the cash deposit
351.224(b). However, because we made
rate will be the rate applicable to the
no changes to these margins since the
Vietnamese exporter that supplied that
Preliminary Results, no disclosure of
non-Vietnamese exporter with the
calculations is necessary for these final
subject merchandise. These deposit
results.
requirements, when imposed, shall
Assessment
remain in effect until further notice.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
2 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
Department has determined, and
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
3 Certain Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
of Vietnam: Final Determination of Sales at Less
appropriate entries of subject
Than Fair Value, 80 FR 29622 (May 22, 2015).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:44 Sep 27, 2017

Jkt 241001

PO 00000

Frm 00012

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

45267

Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: September 22, 2017.
Carole Showers,
Executive Director, Office of Policy,
Performing the Duties of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–20800 Filed 9–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0056]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request—Safety
Standard for Bicycle Helmets
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC or
Commission) announces that the CPSC
has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a
request for extension of approval of a
collection of information associated
with the CPSC’s Safety Standard for

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM

28SEN1

45268

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 187 / Thursday, September 28, 2017 / Notices

Bicycle Helmets (OMB No. 3041–0127).
In the Federal Register of July 21, 2017
(82 FR 33875), the CPSC published a
notice announcing the agency’s intent to
seek an extension of approval of this
collection of information. CPSC
received no comments in response to
that notice. Therefore, by publication of
this notice, the Commission announces
that CPSC has submitted to the OMB a
request for extension of approval of that
collection of information without
change.
Written comments on this
request for extension of approval of
information collection requirements
should be submitted by October 30,
2017.

DATES:

Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
[email protected] or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503. In addition, written comments
that are sent to OMB also should be
submitted electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2010–0056.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charu S. Krishnan, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7221, or by email to: ckrishnan@
cpsc.gov.
ADDRESSES:

CPSC has
submitted the following currently
approved collection of information to
OMB for extension:
Title: Safety Standard for Bicycle
Helmets.
OMB Number: 3041–0127.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers and
importers of bicycle helmets.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 38
manufacturers and importers will
maintain test records of an estimated
200 models total annually, including
older models and new models. Testing
on bicycle helmets must be conducted
for each new production lot and the test
records must be maintained for 3 years.
Estimated Time per Response: 200
hours/model to test 40 new models
(including new prototypes) and an
estimated 100 hours/model to test new
production lots of 160 older models.
Additionally, manufacturers and
importers may require 4 hours annually
per model for recordkeeping for
approximately 200 models.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:44 Sep 27, 2017

Jkt 241001

Total Estimated Annual Burden:
24,800 hours (24,000 hours for testing
and 800 hours for recordkeeping).
General Description of Collection: In
1998, the Commission issued a safety
standard for bicycle helmets (16 CFR
part 1203). The standard includes
requirements for labeling and
instructions. The standard also requires
that manufacturers and importers of
bicycle helmets subject to the standard
issue certificates of compliance based
on a reasonable testing program. Every
person issuing certificates of
compliance must maintain certain
records. Respondents must comply with
the requirements in 16 CFR part 1203
for labeling and instructions, testing,
certification, and recordkeeping.
Alberta E. Mills,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–20779 Filed 9–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2015–0022]

Guidance Document on Hazardous
Additive, Non-Polymeric
Organohalogen Flame Retardants in
Certain Consumer Products
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Guidance document.
AGENCY:

The Commission announces
that it has approved a statement that
provides guidance for manufacturers,
importers, distributors, retailers, and
consumers of certain consumer products
that may contain harmful organohalogen
flame retardants in an additive form. To
protect consumers and children from
the potential toxic effects of exposure to
these chemicals, the Commission
recommends that manufacturers of
children’s products, upholstered
furniture sold for use in residences,
mattresses (and mattress pads), and
plastic casings surrounding electronics
refrain from intentionally adding nonpolymeric, organohalogen flame
retardants (‘‘OFRs’’) to their products.
Further, the Commission recommends
that, before purchasing such products
for resale, importers, distributors, and
retailers obtain assurances from
manufacturers that such products do not
contain OFRs. Finally, the Commission
recommends that consumers, especially
those who are pregnant or with young
children, inquire and obtain assurances
from retailers that such products do not
contain OFRs.

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00013

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

DeWane Ray, Deputy Director, Safety
Operations, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: (301)
504–7547, or email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the guidance document is as follows:
Guidance for Hazardous Additive, NonPolymeric Organohalogen Flame
Retardants in Certain Consumer
Products
Summary: The U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission 1 issues this
guidance to manufacturers, importers,
distributors, retailers, and consumers to
protect consumers (particularly
children) from exposure to additive,
non-polymeric organohalogen flame
retardants (‘‘OFRs’’) 2 found in the
following products: (1) Durable infant or
toddler products, children’s toys, child
care articles or other children’s products
(other than children’s car seats); (2)
upholstered furniture sold for use in
residences; (3) mattresses and mattress
pads; and (4) plastic casings
surrounding electronics.3 OFRs, also
referred to as halogenated flame
retardants, typically are added to foams,
textiles, and polymers before, during or
after production in theory to improve
their resistance to fire. OFRs are not
chemically bound to the substrate and
may be released from the product,
thereby leading to potential human and
environmental exposures. On June 30,
2015, a coalition of consumer advocates
and health professionals petitioned the
Commission to declare four categories of
consumer products containing OFRs to
be ‘‘banned hazardous substances’’
under the Federal Hazardous
Substances Act (‘‘FHSA’’). The
petitioners claim that due to their
inherent physical-chemical properties,
OFRs, among other things, are toxic,
migrate widely out of products
regardless of how the products are used,
bioaccumulate, and present a serious
public health concern. On September
20, 2017, the Commission voted to grant
the petition to initiate rulemaking under
1 The Commission voted 3–2 to publish this
Guidance Document in the Federal Register.
Commissioner Robert S. Adler, Commissioner
Marietta S. Robinson, and Commissioner Elliot F.
Kaye voted to approve publication of the Guidance
Document. Acting Chairman Ann Marie Buerkle
and Commissioner Joseph P. Mohorovic voted
against publication of the Guidance Document.
2 For purposes of this guidance, OFRs refers to
additive, non-polymeric chemicals only; it does not
include reactive or polymeric OFRs.
3 This guidance is not a binding or enforceable
rule and would not change any person’s rights,
duties, or obligations under the Federal Hazardous
Substances Act or any other Act administered by
the Commission.

E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM

28SEN1