0240 SS day 20171220

0240 SS day 20171220.docx

Karnal Bunt; Revision of Regulations for Importing Wheat

OMB: 0579-0240

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Karnal Bunt; Revision of Regulations

for Importing Wheat

0579-0240


December 2017



A. JUSTIFICATION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.


The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is responsible for preventing plant diseases or insect pests from entering the United States, preventing the spread of pests and noxious weeds not widely distributed in the United States, and eradicating those imported pests when eradication is feasible.


Under the Plant Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 – et seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to prohibit or restrict the importation, entry, or movement of plants and plant pests to prevent the introduction plant pests into the United States or their dissemination within the United States.


APHIS’ domestic Karnal bunt regulations are contained in Subpart-Karnal Bunt (7 CFR 301.89-1 through 301.89-16). APHIS’ Karnal bunt related import regulations are contained in Subpart, Wheat Diseases (7 CFR 319.59-1 through 7 CFR 319.59-4).


The Karnal bunt regulations for regions that import wheat to regions affected with Karnal bunt, as well as articles that would be regulated for Karnal bunt increased the flexibility of the regulations so that they could provide more readily for the recognition of areas where Karnal bunt is not known to occur within regions where Karnal bunt is known to be present; described conditions, including requirements for phytosanitary certificates, under which wheat and related articles from regions affected with Karnal bunt could be imported into the United States; and specified cleaning and/or disinfection requirements for imported farm machinery and other equipment used to handle or store Karnal bunt-positive seed or host crops.


Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum), and triticale (Triticum aestivum X Secale cereale), a hybrid of wheat and rye. Karnal bunt is caused by the smut fungus Tilletia indica (Mitra) Mundkur and is spread by spores, primarily through the movement of infected seed. Karnal bunt is found in Afghanistan, India, Iraq, Pakistan, and portions of Mexico and the United States.


APHIS is asking OMB to continue approval of this information collection activity for an additional 3 years in connection with APHIS’ efforts to prevent the spread of plant pests and plant diseases throughout the United States.



2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


APHIS uses the following information activities to prohibit the spread of fungal disease of wheat into the United States from certain parts of the world.


Phytosanitary Certificates - (Business and Foreign Officials) - 7 CFR 319.59-4(c)(4)

In order to enable APHIS to verify that the articles are being imported in compliance with the regulations, the articles would also have to be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the National Plant Protection Organization (NPPO) of the region of origin that includes the following additional declaration: “These articles originated in areas where Karnal bunt is not known to occur, as attested to either by survey results or by testing for bunted kernels or spores.” When necessary, APHIS could use approved testing procedures to verify the accuracy of such a declaration.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


APHIS has no control or influence over when foreign countries will automate their phytosanitary certificates. However, APHIS is involved with the Government-wide utilization of the International Trade Data System (ITDS) via the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) to improve business operations and further Agency missions.  This will allow respondents to submit the data required by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and its Partner Government Agencies (PGAs), such as APHIS  to import and export cargo through a Single Window concept.  APHIS is also establishing a system known as e-File for CARPOL (Certification, Accreditation, Registration, Permitting, and Other Licensing) activities.  This new system will strive to automate some of these information collection activities.  The system is still being developed and business processes continue to be identified and mapped.



4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purpose described in item 2 above.


The information APHIS collects is exclusive to its mission to prevent the introduction of plant pests and plant diseases into the United States. The information is not available from any other source.




5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


The information APHIS collects is the minimum needed to protect the United States from the importation of plant disease and plant pests. APHIS has determined 40 percent of the respondents are small entities.


6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


This information collection is critical to its mission of preventing the infestation of Karnal bunt into noninfested areas of the United States.



7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted

in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in

5 CFR 1320.5.


  • requiring respondents to report informa­tion to the agency more often than quarterly;

  • requiring respondents to prepare a writ­ten response to a collection of infor­ma­tion in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any docu­ment;

  • requiring respondents to retain re­cords, other than health, medical, governm­ent contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

  • in connection with a statisti­cal sur­vey, that is not de­signed to produce valid and reli­able results that can be general­ized to the uni­verse of study;

  • requiring the use of a statis­tical data classi­fication that has not been re­vie­wed and approved by OMB;

  • that includes a pledge of confiden­tiali­ty that is not supported by au­thority estab­lished in statute or regu­la­tion, that is not sup­ported by dis­closure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unneces­sarily impedes shar­ing of data with other agencies for com­patible confiden­tial use; or

  • requiring respondents to submit propri­etary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demon­strate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permit­ted by law.


No special circumstances exist that would require this collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.



8. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.


APHIS consulted with the following individuals regarding the karnal bunt:


Trimurti International,

Garrosh Indiral

Trimurti Grandeur Plot No. 88,

Sector No. 19/C, Opp, A.P.M.C.

Market-II, Phase-II, Vashi, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 703 India

+(91)-(22)-407418


Heirloom Organics, LLC

Lee Marshall

330 Soldier Creek Rd.

Grants Pass, OR 97526

1-877-980-7333


Aiyer’s Incorporated

Davi Patel

18707 Pioneer Blvd.

Artesia, CA 90701

562-402-9622


On Friday, October 13, 2017, pages 47692-47693, APHIS published in the Federal Register, a 60-day notice seeking public comments on its plans to request a 3-year renewal of this collection of information. No comments were received from the public.



9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than reenumeration of contractors or grantees.


This information collection activity involves no payments or gifts to respondents.



10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in stature, regulation, or agency policy.


No additional assurance of confidentiality is provided with this information collection. Any and all information obtained in this collection shall not be disclosed except in accordance with

5 U.S.C. 552a.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and others that are considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


This information collection activity asks no questions of a personal or sensitive nature.



12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated.


. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.


See APHIS Form 71 for hour burden estimates.


. Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.


The respondents are United States importers/exporters, and foreign officials. The total burden hours to the respondents are 188 hours. These estimates were developed by using historical data through discussions with the Federal foreign officials and APHIS, International Services, by the average hourly wage of $10.00 (188 x $10.00) = $1,880.00


13. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information, (do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.


There is zero annual cost burden associated with capital and start-up, operation and maintenance, and purchase of services in connection with its program.



14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


The estimated cost for the Federal Government is $2,995.00.



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I.


ICR Summary of Burden:

Shape1

Requested

Program Change Due to New Statute

Program Change Due to Agency Discretion

Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate

Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA

Previously Approved

Annual Number of Responses

150

0

0

-352

0

500

Annual Time Burden (Hr)

188

0

0

-414

0

600

Annual Cost Burden ($)

0

0

0

0

0

0


There is an adjustment decrease of -496 respondents and -350 responses resulting in a decrease of -412 total burden hours. The number of participants in the program decreased which caused the burden hours.



16. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.


There are no forms associated with this information collection.



17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

This is not applicable. APHIS will display the expiration date.



18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the

Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act.”


APHIS certifies compliance with all provisions of the Act.



B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods


Statistical methods are not used in this information collection.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSupporting Statement
Authorlctoran
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-21

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy