OMB Approval Memo

0695 OMB Approval Memo - Safe Drug Disposable Notecard 2019.docx

Data to Support Drug Product Communications

OMB Approval Memo

OMB: 0910-0695

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

FDA DOCUMENTATION FOR THE GENERIC CLEARANCE,

Testing Communications on Drugs”
(0910-0695)

Shape1


TITLE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION: Rapid Message Testing with Consumer Panel — Safe Drug Disposal Notecard


DESCRIPTION OF THIS SPECIFIC COLLECTION

  1. Statement of need:


The purpose of this project is to conduct timely message testing of a notecard intended to educate minority consumers about the importance of disposing prescription medications properly. This notecard compliments FDA’s “Safe Disposal of Medicines” campaign, and it is tailored to meet the needs of minority consumers in an easy to read and understand, portable format. There are gaps that exist in disposal practices among minorities, so it is important to have culturally and linguistically relevant health education materials to teach the importance of proper drug disposal.


The notecard can be easily distributed at health fairs and other community events, and it can be displayed by consumers in common areas (e.g. on a refrigerator) to reinforce safe disposal practices. Specifically, these practices include using a drug take-back program, or in the absence of this option, determining whether to flush the drug down the toilet or safely place it in the trash.

Communications science tells us that we must test messages with our intended audiences before communicating them. Thus, FDA plans to test this communication using online cognitive interviews with a small sample of 22 U.S. adults drawn from a diverse consumer panel.


This data collection is the 12th in a series of FDA rapid message testing projects submitted to OMB under generic clearance. These projects are part of FDA’s effort to make consumer testing part of its routine communication development processes. This project is in keeping with the spirit of the 2015 Executive Order1 to improve how information is presented to consumers by applying behavioral science insights, and it meets repeated calls from FDA’s Risk Communication and Advisory Committee to conduct message testing with targeted samples of the general public.


  1. Intended use of information:


FDA’s contractor Westat will test the form with a small sample of target audience members to ensure the message meets its objectives without causing unintended negative effects. FDA’s Risk Communication and Advisory Committee includes renowned experts and researchers in social sciences, marketing, health literacy, and related fields. From its very first meeting in 2008, the Committee has consistently advised and reaffirmed that testing communications with the target audience is necessary for FDA, and that using small samples is an effective approach for testing and communicating in a timely manner. In fact, research has shown that “saturation,” or the point at which no new information or themes are observed, can occur with as few as 12 interviews, as described in Guest et al (2006).


FDA will use the collected interview data to refine its messaging by improving the comprehensibility, enhancing the cultural appropriateness and sensitivity, and improving the personal relevance for a higher public health impact. Specifically, FDA is asking Westat to gain insight to the following questions:

  • Is the notecard clear and understandable?

  • What is the main message that participants get from the notecard?

  • Do participants recognize the call to action to choose an appropriate disposal option?

  • Does the notecard provide participants with useful information about safe drug disposal, including the risks and benefits?

  • Do participants indicate that any of the notecard’s information is new to them?

  • Do participants recognize the pictures and understand how they relate to the text?

  • Is the general layout appealing?

  • Do participants want the information presented in other formats (e.g., fact sheet, magnet, foldable card)?


The data collected will not be statistically representative of the target audience population. Therefore, the data will not be used for making policy or regulatory decisions.


  1. Description of respondents:


We will conduct 22 30-minute interviews with U.S. adults. Westat has partnered with EurekaFacts, a market research firm specializing in recruiting hard-to-reach audiences. EurekaFacts uses a number of outreach methods, including internal respondent lists, targeted calling, and community outreach to recruit diverse populations. EurekaFacts tracks and stores all respondent activity on secure servers and assigns a unique ID number to all respondents to track participation. EurekaFacts is certified to the ISO 20252:2012 market, opinion, and social research quality standard.


We will use a participant screener to recruit a mix of consumers who have either used a prescription medicine in the past 12 months or who manage medications for an ill, disabled, or elderly adult. The notecard will be tested in English with 14 racial/ethnic minority participants. The notecard will also be tested with eight participants who speak Spanish as their first language. The participant screener and interview guide are currently being translated for the Spanish language interviews. To the extent possible, the participant pool will be diverse in terms of gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, and geography.


  1. Date(s) to be Conducted:


We plan to conduct interviews in June/July 2019.


  1. How the Information is being collected:


We will conduct all interviews remotely using telephone and screen sharing technology with participants on web-enabled devices such as desktop computers, laptops, tablets or mobile phones. We will ensure that any materials provided to the participants for the test are compatible with all devices. We will postal mail materials to participants who do not have access to screen sharing technology.


For each 30-minute interview, a trained interviewer will lead the discussion using a semi-structured interview guide that ensures consistency in major topics but allows flexibility in probing each participant on particular questions.


Note takers will chart their findings into a standardized reporting template so that all notes are organized in a consistent manner. Interviewers will review the notes to ensure accuracy. With the consent of participants, we will audio record each interview.


FDA staff will have the ability to listen to the interview sessions, and this will be made known to participants as part of the informed consent.


  1. Confidentiality of Respondents:


We will provide all respondents with informed consent language that ensures they understand the project purpose, that their participation is voluntary, and that their responses will be kept secure to the extent permitted by law. As part of the consent procedure, respondents will be asked whether they allow audio recording of the interview. Recording will not begin before participants have had the opportunity to ask for any clarification and provide consent. Participants will be asked to again confirm their consent when recording begins. Participants who do not allow audio recording may still participate in the interview. In these cases, Westat will take notes that are more detailed than when relying on the audio recording.


No participant’s identifiable information such as name will be included in the interview notes. All interview materials will be stored on a secure network drive, which will only be accessible to individuals granted access to work on the project. Interview notes will be zipped electronically and password-protected for email or secure file transfer delivery. Prior to forwarding any data to FDA, Westat will destroy all names and contact information of participants to protect their personal identity. Additionally, the interview notes and interpretive report delivered to FDA after message testing will omit all information that could be used to identify respondents.


All electronic data storage media that contain confidential, private, or proprietary information will be maintained within secure areas. Data collected in hard copy will be kept in locked cabinets when not in use.


FDA’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewed this study and determined it is exempt from the requirements of 45 CFR §46.101b(2).



  1. Amount and justification for any proposed incentive


For this project, EurekaFacts will provide $35 incentives to participants at the end of each 30-minute interview in the form of a check.


EurekaFacts uses diverse recruitment methodologies, including invitations and lists, and incentivizes any respondents for any participation to maintain a quality recruitment. Respondents do not volunteer their time. The table below details the previous incentives approved by OMB for this series of rapid message tests.


Project #

Communication Tested

Interview Length/Incentive

OMB approval date

1

Clinical Trials Brochure

45 min/$50

August 4, 2017

2

Caregiver Tipsheet

30 min/$35

September 26, 2017

3

Public Service Announcement Video about Generic Drugs

30 min/$35

October 25, 2017

4

Opioid Analgesics Patient Counseling Guide

45 min/$50

November 27, 2017

5

Vaccines and Seniors Brochure

30 min/$35

May 10, 2018

6

Public Service Announcements about Safe Disposal of Opioids

30 min/$35

July 26, 2018

7

Nicotine Dialogue Campaign Branding

30 min/$35

August 23, 2018

8

Testosterone Medication Guide

45 min/$50

October 12, 2018

9

Asthma Fact Sheet

30 min/$35

February 12, 2019

10

Transmucosal Immediate Release Fentanyl Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy Program Patient-Prescriber Agreement Form

45 min/$50

April 4, 2019

11

BeSafeRx Campaign Messages

45 min/$50

May 17, 2019



  1. Questions of a Sensitive Nature


We do not anticipate asking any sensitive questions in the interviews. Instead, the questions will focus on individuals’ experience with prescription medicines and their reactions to the messages and material.


Nevertheless, respondents will be told that they may skip any question that they do not want to answer or may stop participating at any time.


  1. Description of Statistical Methods


We do not plan to use formal statistical methods in this study but rather qualitative analysis methods. Our analysis approach is based on the Framework method, as described in Spencer et al (2003). Framework is a matrix-based approach to data management, which facilitates both case and theme based analysis. The Framework method allows for data reduction through summarization and synthesis yet retains links to original data, in this case the interview notes. We will use the qualitative analysis software NVivo, which has included a Framework functionality since 2011. The software will allow us import interview notes, create links between the notes and the Framework matrices, and develop new queries or matrices as needed.


The Framework method will allow us to recognize patterns within the data. Findings will be supported with verbatim participant quotes and grounded in accepted principles of health communications.



Bibliography

Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., & O'Connor, W. (2003). Analysis practices, principles and processes. In Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82.



BURDEN HOUR COMPUTATION (Number of responses (X) estimated response or participation time in minutes (/60) = annual burden hours):

Type/Category of Respondent

No. of Respondents

Participation Time (minutes)

Burden

(hours)

Screener

100

3

5

Interviews

22

30

11


Total

16


REQUESTED APPROVAL DATE: June 27, 2019


NAME OF PRA ANALYST & PROGRAM CONTACT:


Ila S. Mizrachi

Paperwork Reduction Act Staff

[email protected]

(301)796-7726


Brian Lappin

CDER/Office of Communications

[email protected]

(301)796-9126



FDA CENTER: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (FDA/CDER)

6

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleOMBMemoMERCPtP
SubjectMERC OMB MEP
AuthorHillabrant
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-15

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy