Supporting Statement A
30 CFR Part 780 – Surface Mining Permit Applications - Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plans
OMB Control Number 1029-0036
Terms of Clearance: None
General Instructions
A completed Supporting Statement A must accompany each request for approval of a collection of information. The Supporting Statement must be prepared in the format described below, and must contain the information specified below. If an item is not applicable, provide a brief explanation. When the question “Does this ICR contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods?” is checked "Yes," then a Supporting Statement B must be completed. OMB reserves the right to require the submission of additional information with respect to any request for approval.
Specific Instructions
Justification
1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.
2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. Be specific. If this collection is a form or a questionnaire, every question needs to be justified.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden and specifically how this collection meets GPEA requirements.
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.
5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.
6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:
* requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
* requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;
* requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
* requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;
* in connection with a statistical survey that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;
* requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;
* that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or
* requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information, unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and in response to the PRA statement associated with the collection over the past three years, and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.
Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.
Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every three years — even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.
9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.
12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:
* Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.
* If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens.
* Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here.
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual non-hour cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden already reflected in item 12.)
* The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information (including filing fees paid for form processing). Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.
* If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.
* Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments in hour or cost burden.
16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.
18. Explain each exception to the topics of the certification statement identified in "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions."
SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR REPORTING
AND RECORD KEEPING FOR 30 CFR PART 780
Introduction
This information collection clearance package is being submitted by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (“we” or OSMRE) to request renewed information collection authority for 30 CFR Part 780 of the OSMRE permanent regulatory program. This regulation governs the minimum requirements for preparing Reclamation and Operation Plans to be submitted as part of a surface mining permit application package for new permits and for permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area but are not incidental boundary revisions. For this update, we included information collection required for permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area but are not incidental boundary revisions because we believe it more accurately reflects the burden hours required for applicants and state regulators to comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. Because of this, the number of permit activities increased for applicants and state regulators to comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both applicants and state regulators submitted increases to the burden estimates for most of the sections where the collection of information is required. The information collection for this part was previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned clearance number 1029-0036.
Each section of Part 780 for which there is an information collection or record-keeping requirement is discussed separately. The responses to some items in the instructions for the supporting statement are identical for each section and these responses appear on pages 8-12 of this document.
The following tables summarize the basis for requested hours and costs for 30 CFR Part 780.
SECTION |
NUMBER OF APPLICANTS |
NUMBER OF STATE RESPONSES |
HOURS PER APPLICANT |
HOURS PER STATE |
BURDEN HOURS REQUESTED |
HOURS CURRENTLY APPROVED |
DIFFERENCE |
780.11 |
133 |
132 |
8 |
7 |
1,988 |
806 |
1,182 |
780.12 |
133 |
132 |
16 |
2 |
2,392 |
953 |
1,439 |
780.13 |
133 |
132 |
80 |
6.5 |
11,498 |
6,661 |
4,837 |
780.14 |
133 |
132 |
80 |
32 |
14,864 |
5,638 |
9,226 |
780.16 |
133 |
132 |
30 |
11 |
5,442 |
2,996 |
2,446 |
780.18 |
133 |
132 |
8 |
5 |
1,724 |
1,156 |
568 |
780.21 |
133 |
132 |
160 |
21.5 |
24,118 |
1,376 |
22,742 |
780.22 |
133 |
132 |
120 |
18.5 |
18,402 |
3,468 |
14,934 |
780.23 |
133 |
132 |
40 |
9 |
6,508 |
5,495 |
1,013 |
780.25 |
133 |
132 |
40 |
10 |
6,640 |
1,152 |
5,488 |
780.27 |
27 |
27 |
16 |
2.5 |
500 |
345 |
155 |
780.29 |
133 |
132 |
16 |
5 |
2,788 |
2,426 |
362 |
780.31 |
133 |
132 |
8 |
5 |
1,724 |
1,612 |
112 |
780.33 |
133 |
132 |
16 |
4 |
2,656 |
1,734 |
922 |
780.35 |
36 |
36 |
27 |
12 |
1,404 |
10,359 |
-8,955 |
780.37 |
133 |
132 |
23 |
7 |
3,983 |
4,620 |
-637 |
780.38 |
133 |
132 |
77.5 |
6 |
11,100 |
3,470 |
7,630 |
TOTAL |
|
|
765.5 |
164 |
117,731 |
54,267 |
63,464 |
NON-LABOR COST TO RESPONDENTS FOR 30 CFR PART 780
SECTION |
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS |
COST PER RESPONDENT |
TOTAL COST REQUESTED |
CURRENTLY APPROVED TOTAL COSTS |
DIFFERENCE |
780.11 |
133 |
$75 |
$9,975 |
$8,700 |
$1,275 |
780.12 |
133 |
$75 |
$9,975 |
$8,700 |
$1,275 |
780.13 |
133 |
$150 |
$19,950 |
$17,400 |
$2,550 |
780.14 |
133 |
$168 |
$22,344 |
$19,488 |
$2,856 |
780.16 |
133 |
$168 |
$22,344 |
$19,488 |
$2,856 |
780.18 |
133 |
$1,100 |
$146,300 |
$127,600 |
$18,700 |
780.21 |
133 |
$200 |
$26,600 |
$23,200 |
$3,400 |
780.22 |
133 |
$5,000 |
$665,000 |
$580,000 |
$85,000 |
780.23 |
133 |
$100 |
$13,300 |
$11,600 |
$1,700 |
780.25 |
133 |
$100 |
$13,300 |
$11,600 |
$1,700 |
780.27 |
27 |
$25 |
$675 |
$575 |
$100 |
780.29 |
133 |
$50 |
$6,650 |
$5,800 |
$850 |
780.31 |
133 |
$400 |
$53,200 |
$46,400 |
$6,800 |
780.33 |
133 |
$55 |
$7,315 |
$6,380 |
$935 |
780.35 |
36 |
$600 |
$21,600 |
$138,600 |
-$117,000 |
780.37 |
133 |
$50 |
$6,650 |
$5,800 |
$850 |
780.38 |
133 |
$25 |
$3,325 |
$2,900 |
$425 |
|
TOTAL |
$8,341 |
$1,048,503 |
$1,034,231 |
$14,272 |
Identical Responses to Statements
For all Sections of 30 CFR Part 780
3. This information is unique to each applicant and mining area. Respondents are individual mining companies who apply for permits on an as-needed basis, and the SRAs (SRA’s) who must review and approve the permit applications. OSMRE continues to work with SRA’s and coal companies to develop procedures for the preparation and processing of permit applications electronically. Progress has been made in virtually all coal-producing states to use electronic and information technology to submit and receive permit applications which improve efficiency and reduce the time and cost burden to permit applicants and SRA’s. OSMRE continues to actively support SRA’s implementation of electronic permitting and other reports normally prepared and submitted on paper. OSMRE currently estimates that 75% of applications are received electronically, with some SRA’s in the early stages of electronic exchange, while others receive 95% of permit applications on CD’s or are directly downloaded to the State-run internet server. Applicants realize some cost reductions due to electronic submission of data through eliminating reproduction costs and postage.
4. The information requested for 30 CFR Part 780 is time-sensitive and unique to each site. Duplication is minimal to nonexistent. OSMRE is the only Federal agency charged with implementation of sections 507 and 508 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (the Act or SMCRA).
5. There are no special provisions for small businesses or other small entities. Special provisions are not appropriate because the requested information is the minimum needed to document the permit and to conduct coal mining and reclamation operations. Adequate documentation is essential to ensure protection of public health and safety, water quantity and quality, wildlife habitat, while encouraging to maximize the production or recovery of coal reserves and to minimize the environmental disturbances around the coal mining site. Therefore, the hour burden on any small entity subject to these regulations and associated collections of information cannot be reduced to accommodate them.
6. Information required in Part 780 provides the basis for SMCRA permitting decisions by SRA’s. Information required for Part 780 is provided at the time of application and is, therefore, not collected on a periodic basis.
7. Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2) are not exceeded. Generally, 3 copies are submitted by permit applicants to the SRA’s. In States that promote electronic submissions, 1 to 3 CD’s are submitted by applicants. In the Commonwealth of Virginia, applicants are encouraged to either submit an application on CD, or to complete the application using the State’s website where drop-down menus and pre-populated hydrologic and geologic data are employed for convenience.
Where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, 3 paper or electronic copies are normally requested, one for review by OSMRE, one for the land management agency, and one to be maintained locally for public review.
OSMRE continues to strongly urge SRA’s to request that permit applications be submitted through electronic means to reduce the number of copies and ease of review.
8. In December 2017, OSMRE contacted a mining company official, a coal industry representative, and two regulatory authorities with experience in the preparation or processing of surface coal mining applications to determine the burden placed on respondents by 30 CFR Part 780 of the Federal regulations (see list below).
The
Falkirk Mining Company
2801 1st Street S.W.
P.O. Box
1087
Underwood, ND 58576-1087
PA Coal Alliance
212 M. 3rd Street
Suite 102
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Permits and Technical Services
Cambria District Office
286 Industrial Park Road
Ebensburg, PA 15931
North Dakota Public Service Commission
Reclamation & AML Division
600 E. Boulevard, Dept. 408
Bismarck, ND 58505-0480
These groups provided burden estimates for this Part, but did not provide any suggestions for improving the regulations or ways to minimize the burden on respondents.
On November 20, 2017, OSMRE published in the Federal Register (82 FR 55114) a notice requesting comments from the public regarding the need for the collection of information, the accuracy of the burden estimate, ways to enhance the information collection, and ways to minimize the burden on respondents. This notice gave the public 60 days in which to comment. However, no comments were received.
9. No payments or gifts were made to respondents.
10. In general, confidential information is not provided. However, the permit applicant may request that certain portions of the application be held confidential for certain business or other reasons, such as coal reserves in the planned mining area or to protect the location of archeological resources on public and Indian lands. These requests are handled in accordance with the procedures provided for in §773.13(d).
11. Sensitive questions are not asked.
12. OSMRE uses the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) figures for calculating cost burden placed on respondents and on the Federal government. These figures are derived for mining companies found at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_212100.htm and for state government employees found at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999200.htm. We have also included a benefits factor at a rate of 1.4 times salary for the coal companies, and a benefits factor of 1.6 for state government employees. These benefit estimates were developed in accordance with the BLS news release USDL-17-1646, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation—September 2017, dated December 15, 2017, (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf).
14. OSMRE uses the Office of Personnel Management figures for calculating wage costs for Federal employees. These figures are found in the table at http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2018/RUS_h.pdf. We have also included a benefits factor of 1.6 for Federal employees in accordance with the BLS news release USDL-17-1646.
SUMMARY OF ANNUAL BURDEN TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
SECTION |
FEDERAL OVERSIGHT |
FEDERAL PROGRAMS |
TOTAL |
780.11 |
$303 |
$227 |
$530 |
780.12 |
$455 |
$190 |
$645 |
780.13 |
$4,549 |
$341 |
$4,890 |
780.14 |
$3,032 |
$663 |
$3,695 |
780.16 |
$4,549 |
$910 |
$5,459 |
780.18 |
$606 |
$152 |
$758 |
780.21 |
$910 |
$1,516 |
$2,426 |
780.22 |
$910 |
$1,516 |
$2,426 |
780.23 |
$4,549 |
$606 |
$5,155 |
780.25 |
$1,365 |
$1,516 |
$2,881 |
780.27 |
$758 |
$303 |
$1,061 |
780.29 |
$1,819 |
$379 |
$2,198 |
780.31 |
$6,065 |
$303 |
$6,368 |
780.33 |
$3,032 |
$227 |
$3,259 |
780.35 |
$7,581 |
$1,365 |
$8,946 |
780.37 |
$6,065 |
$758 |
$6,823 |
780.38 |
$3,470 |
$7,630 |
$11,100 |
TOTAL |
$50,018 |
$18,602 |
$68,620 |
16. OSMRE has no plans to publish the information.
17. The OMB approval number is displayed in 30 CFR 780.10.
18. There are no exceptions to the certification.
§780.11 – Operation Plan: General Requirements
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(7) and 508(a)(5) of the Act, §780.11 requires the permit applicant to provide a description of the mining operations to be conducted within the permit area that includes the type and method of coal mining techniques to be used and a narrative explaining construction, maintenance and use of facilities.
2. Paragraph (a) requires a narrative description of the mining methods, engineering techniques, and major equipment planned for use in the operation, and a description of the anticipated production of the mine.
Paragraph (b) requires a narrative description of the planned use of certain listed facilities, including construction, modification, maintenance, and removal of such facilities.
This information is necessary to enable the regulatory authority to evaluate the cumulative impact of the proposed operations on the resources of the area, including the hydrologic balance, land, vegetation, and fish and wildlife. In addition, this information will aid the regulatory authority in determining whether the applicant can meet the applicable performance standards.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements
See Identical Responses to Statements.
See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and SRAs referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications submitted in 2016, with each applicant requiring 8 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 permit applications x 8 hours per response = 1,064 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 7 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 applications x 7 hours per review = 924 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 1,988 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
1 |
23.21 |
23 |
Engineering Technician |
4 |
38.93 |
156 |
Mining Engineer |
2 |
59.40 |
119 |
Operations Manager |
1 |
97.68 |
98 |
Total |
8 |
|
396 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.11 is $396. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $396 x 133 permits = $52,668.
In addition, it takes 7 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.11 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 7 hours = $256 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $256 x 132 permit applications = $33,792.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $52,688 for industry + $33,792 for SRAs = $86,460.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $75 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $75 x 133 applications = $9,975.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 4 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 4 hours x $75.81 = $303.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 3 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $227 (1 application x 3 hours per application x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 303 Oversight
+ $ 227 Federal Programs
$ 530 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 806 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 1,988 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.11.
806 hours currently approved
+ 1,182 hours due to adjustments
1,988 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $9,975. This represents an increase of $1,275 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.12 – Operation Plan: Existing Structures
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(13) of the Act, §780.12 requires the permit applicant to provide a description of each existing structure proposed to be used in the mining or reclamation operation and a compliance plan for structures proposed to be modified or constructed for use in the operation.
2. This regulation is necessary in order to put persons on notice of the effect of permitting and performance standards on existing structures. In the absence of such specific regulations, permit applicants would be required to submit for existing structures the information and plans required for new structures in order to demonstrate compliance with the performance and design criteria in Subchapter K. The purpose of this regulation is to require sufficient information to demonstrate that the permit applicant is either entitled to an exemption from reconstruction requirements, to ascertain the need for the existing structure, and to ensure performance standards are met for environmental and public health and safety concerns.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and State regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications submitted in 2016, with each applicant requiring 16 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 permit applications x 16 hours per response = 2,128 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2016 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 2 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 2 hours per review = 264 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 2,392 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
1 |
23.21 |
23 |
Engineering Technician |
11 |
38.93 |
428 |
Mining Engineer |
4 |
59.40 |
238 |
Total |
16 |
|
689 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.12 is $689 (rounded). The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $689 x 133 permits = $91,637.
In addition, it takes 2 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.12 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 2 hours = $73 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $73 x 132 permit applications = $9,636.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $91,637 for industry + $9,636 for SRAs = $101,273.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $75 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $75 x 133 applications = $9,975.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 6 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 6 hours x $75.81 = $455 (rounded).
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 2.5 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $190 (1 findings x 2.5 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 455 Oversight
+ $ 190 Federal Programs
$ 645 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 953 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 2,392 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.12.
953 hours currently approved
+ 1,439 hours due to adjustments
2,392 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $9,975. This represents an increase of $1,275 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.13 – Operation Plan: Blasting
Justification
1. In accordance with section 507(g) of the Act, §780.13 requires each applicant for a permit for surface coal mining and reclamation to submit a blasting plan that will meet the requirements of 515(b)(15). The plan must demonstrate understanding of such basic issues as schedules, preblast surveys, recordkeeping logs, distance restrictions, control of adverse effects of blasting, and use of trained, certified blasters. The applicant must also describe any system used to monitor compliance with the standards of §816.67 including the type, capability, and sensitivity of any blast‑monitoring equipment and proposed procedures and locations of monitoring, and blasting near underground mines.
2. This plan provides the regulatory authority with information demonstrating how the applicant intends to comply with the performance standards. These standards establish limits for maximum airblast, flyrock, and ground vibration resulting from blasting. If it were not collected, there would be no way to comply with the law.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and State regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications submitted in 2016, with each applicant requiring 80 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 blasting plans x 80 hours per respondent = 10,640 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 6.5 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 6.5 hours per review = 858 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 11,498 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Mining Engineer |
75 |
59.40 |
4,455 |
Operations Manager |
5 |
97.68 |
488 |
Total |
80 |
|
4,943 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.13 is $4,943. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $4,943 x 133 permits = $657,419.
In addition, it takes 6.5 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.13 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 6.5 hours = $238 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $238 x 132 permit applications = $31,416.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $657,419 for industry + $31,416 for SRAs = $688,835.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
A non-labor cost for each respondent of $150 may be included for blasting plan costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $150 x 133 blasting plans = $19,950.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 60 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 60 hours x $75.81 = $4,549 (rounded).
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 4.5 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $341 (rounded) (1 findings x 4.5 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 4,549 Oversight
+ $ 341 Federal Program
$ 4,890 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 6,661 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 11,498 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.13.
6,661 hours currently approved
+ 4,837 hours due to adjustments
11,498 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $19,950. This represents an increase of $2,550 due to a decrease in use as an adjustment.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.14 – Operation Plan: Maps and Plans
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(13) and (14) of the Act, §780.14 requires each applicant to submit maps and plans of the proposed mine operation and adjacent areas.
2. Accurate maps and plans are needed by the regulatory authority to determine whether the applicant can meet the performance standards of Part 816. This information will give the regulatory authority an overview of the entire operation to supplement the information on plans for the proposed permit area. This information is necessary in order to assess the cumulative impacts of the entire mining operation, to ensure high quality planning and design required in the application. If the information were not collected, there would be no way to comply with the law.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 80 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 permit applications x 80 hours per response = 10,640 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 32 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 32 hours per review = 4,224 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 14,864 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondent:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
2 |
23.21 |
46 |
Engineering Technician |
64 |
38.93 |
2,492 |
Mining Engineer |
12 |
59.40 |
712 |
Operation Manager |
2 |
97.68 |
195 |
Total |
80 |
|
3,445 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.14 is $3,445. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $3,445 x 133 permits = $458,185.
In addition, it takes 32 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.14 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 32 hours = $1,169 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $1,169 x 132 permit applications = $154,308.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $458,185 for industry + $154,308 for SRAs = $612,493.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $168 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $168 x 133 maps/plans = $22,344.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 40 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 40 hours x $75.81 = $3,032.
Federal Programs: We believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 8.75 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $663 (1 applications x 8.75 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 3,032 Oversight
+ $ 663 Federal Programs
$ 3,695 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 5,638 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 14,864 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.14.
5,638 hours currently approved
+ 9,226 hours due to adjustments
14,864 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $22,344. This represents an increase of $2,856 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
Supporting Statement for Reporting Requirements of § 780.15
Section 508(a)(9) of SMCRA requires that each application for a surface mining permit include the steps to be taken to comply with applicable air and water quality laws and regulations. However, the regulations at 30 CFR 780.15 primarily reflect sections 515(a) and (b)(4) of SMCRA, which provide that each permit must require that surface coal mining and reclamation operations be conducted so as to “stabilize and protect all surface areas *** to effectively control erosion and air pollution attendant to erosion.” Paragraph (a) of §780.15 provides that, if the proposed operations would produce more than one million tons of coal per year and would be located west of the 100th meridian west longitude, the application must include (1) an air quality monitoring program to evaluate the effectiveness of fugitive dust control practices for §816.95, and (2) a plan for fugitive dust control practices for §816.95. Paragraph (b) of §780.15 requires that all other applications, regardless of size or location, include “a plan for fugitive dust control practices as required for §816.95.” However, on January 10, 1983, in response to a court decision restricting OSMRE’s jurisdiction to air pollution attendant to erosion, OSMRE revised §816.95 to remove both the requirement for a plan for fugitive dust control practices and the list of fugitive dust control practices. The preamble effectively acknowledges that the revised performance standards render the permit application regulations moot.
The regulatory authority no longer has any meaningful use for the information submitted under this rule. To the extent that it includes information required for compliance with the Clean Air Act, the rule satisfies the requirement of section 508(a)(9) of SMCRA.
§780.16 – Fish and Wildlife Information
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 508(a)(13) of the Act, §780.16 requires a plan of how the operator will minimize disturbances and adverse impacts to fish, wildlife and related environmental values and achieve enhancement, where applicable. Maps showing each facility to be used to protect and enhance fish and wildlife and locations of wildlife monitoring points shall be included.
2. This information is needed by the regulatory authority to ensure minimal disturbance and adverse impacts on fish and wildlife and related environmental values during the mining activities. If it were not collected, there would be no way to comply with the law.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 30 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 permit applications x 30 hours per response = 3,990 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring hours to review the air quality monitoring programs for lands and operations under this section. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 applications x 11 hours per review = 1,452 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 5,442 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
2 |
23.21 |
46 |
Environmental Technician |
22 |
38.93 |
856 |
Environmental Engineer |
4 |
56.32 |
225 |
Operations Manager |
2 |
97.68 |
195 |
Total |
30 |
|
1,322 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.16 is $1,322. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $1,322 x 133 permits = $175,826.
In addition, it takes 11 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.16 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 11 hours = $402 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $402 x 132 permit applications = $53,064.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $175,826 for industry + $53,064 for SRAs = $228,890.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor costs for each respondent of $168 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $168 x 133 applications with fish and wildlife plans = $22,344.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 60 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 60 hours x $75.81 = $4,549.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016 we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 12 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $910 (1 findings x 12 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 4,549 Oversight
+ $ 910 Federal Programs
$ 5,459 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 2,996 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 5,442 hours as shown below. Because we included information collection required for permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of permit activities increased for applicants and state regulators to comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both state regulators and applicants reestimated respondent burden and provided new estimated to comply with § 780.16.
2,996 hours currently approved
+ 2,446 hours due to adjustments
5,442 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $22,344. This represents an increase of $2,856 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.18 –Reclamation Plan: General Requirements
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b), 508(a), and 515(b) of the Act, §780.18 requires that each application contain a plan detailing reclamation of the lands within the proposed permit area to be submitted by the permit applicant.
2. Detailed information is required to enable the regulatory authority to determine whether the proposed mining operation will be conducted in compliance with the performance standards contained in Subchapter K of these regulations and to make the findings required to issue a permit. The required information includes a detailed timetable for the completion of each major step in the reclamation plan and a detailed estimate of the cost of reclamation together with supporting calculations, and is necessary for the regulatory authority to determine the amount of the bond. Information includes plans for spoil handling, soil replacement, revegetation, conservation of the coal resource, acid/toxic material handling, combustible material handling, sealed or managed mine openings complying with the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 8 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 permit applications x 8 hours per response = 1,064 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 5 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 5 hours per review = 660 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 1,724 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
.5 |
23.21 |
12 |
Environmental Technician |
5 |
32.27 |
161 |
Environmental Engineer |
2 |
56.32 |
113 |
Operations Manager |
.5 |
97.68 |
49 |
Total |
8 |
|
335 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.18 is $335. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $335 x 133 permits = $44,555.
In addition, it takes 5 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.18 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 5 hours = $183 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $183 x 132 permit applications = $24,156.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $44,555 for industry + $24,156 for SRAs = $68,711.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor costs for each respondent of $1,100 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $1,100 x 133 applications = $146,300.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 8 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 8 hours x $75.81 = $606.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 2 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $152 (1 applications x 2 hours per application x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 606 Oversight
+ $ 152 Federal Programs
$ 758 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 1,156 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 1,724 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.18.
1,156 hours currently approved
+ 568 hours due to adjustments
1,724 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $146,300. This represents an increase of $18,700 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.21 – Hydrologic Information
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(11) and (14), 508(a)(3), 516(b)(4), (9), and (12), 517(b)(2), and 717(b) of the Act, 30 CFR 780.21 requires the collection and analysis of hydrologic information by the applicant. This information is needed for the regulatory authority to determine whether the proposed mining operation will be conducted in compliance with the performance standards contained in Subchapter K of these regulations and to make the necessary findings to issue a permit. This section specifies the information used to gain an understanding of conditions as they exist prior to mining so that changes can be predicted prior to mining and detected throughout the life of the operation. Collection of this information allows steps to be taken to minimize impacts and to plan for remedial and restorative measures.
2. Use of information required by each specific paragraph of this section is as follows:
Paragraph (b) ‑‑ This paragraph requires an applicant to provide baseline hydrologic information, including the location and ownership of existing wells, springs, and other ground-water resources, seasonal quality and quantity of ground water, and usage; the name, location, ownership and description of all surface‑water bodies, the location of discharge areas into any surface‑water body, surface‑water quality and quantity, and data sufficient to demonstrate seasonal variation and water usage.
Paragraph (e) ‑‑ This paragraph requires the applicant to provide information on alternative water supplies if the hydrologic analysis shows that the existing sources of ground water or surface water that are being used prior to mining may be contaminated, interrupted or reduced as a result of the proposed mining operation.
Paragraph (f) ‑‑This paragraph requires the applicant to make a determination of the probable hydrologic consequences upon the quantity and quality of ground water and surface water under seasonal flow in the proposed permit and adjacent areas. This determination is a predictive estimate of potential impacts on the hydrologic balance. It will be used by the regulatory authority to evaluate whether the operation has been designed to minimize disturbances to the hydrologic balance both within and outside the permit area and to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the point area.
Information collected during baseline studies, surface ‑ and ground‑water inventories and modeling exercises, with supplemental information, if necessary would be used by the applicant and the regulatory authority to predict probable hydrologic impacts. This assessment will be used by the applicant to design the mining operation and reclamation plans, to protect the water rights of others and by the regulatory authority as part of the cumulative hydrologic impact assessment. This information is not collected by other Federal agencies.
Paragraph (h) ‑‑ This paragraph requires the applicant to submit information to the regulatory authority regarding hydrology reclamation plans for protection of the hydrologic balance during the conduct of mining and reclamation activities. This plan must contain maps and descriptions indicating the steps to be taken during mining and reclamation through bond release to meet the requirements of the performance standards. This information is needed to assure that the operation will have a minimal impact on the hydrologic balance, that the protection of water rights of others is assured and that all performance standards have been considered and will be met. This information is site-specific for each individual mining operation and is generally not collected by other Federal agencies. This information is required of all mining operations.
Paragraph (i) and (j) ‑‑ These paragraphs require the mine operator to develop, with qualifications, a ground‑ and surface‑water monitoring plan for the proposed mining operation and to submit periodic monitoring data to the regulatory authority. This monitoring information is mine-specific and would not generally be available elsewhere. This information is necessary to:
ensure that steps have been taken to protect the hydrologic balance,
detect changes in surface or ground‑water quality and quantity and implement remediation plans, if necessary, and
assure that a permitted mine operates in compliance with the Act, regulations and the terms of the permit.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. Some of this information may be available through other Federal and State agencies and may be submitted in the respondent's application, if applicable.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 160 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 permit applications x 160 hours per response = 21,280 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 8 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 21.5 hours per review = 2,838 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 24,118 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
5 |
23.21 |
116 |
Earth Drillers |
80 |
32.03 |
2,562 |
Geological Engineer |
40 |
56.32 |
2,253 |
Hydrologist |
20 |
56.36 |
1,127 |
Environmental Science Technician |
50 |
32.27 |
1,613 |
Operations Manager |
5 |
97.68 |
488 |
Total |
160 |
|
8,043 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.21 is $8,043. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $8,043 x 133 permits = $1,069,719.
In addition, it takes 21.5 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.21 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 21.5 hours = $785 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $785 x 132 permit applications = $103,620.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $1,069,719 for industry + $103,620 for SRAs = $1,173,339.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $200 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $200 x 133 applications = $26,600.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 12 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 12 hours x $75.81 = $910.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 applications for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 20 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $1,516 (1 applications x 20 hours per review x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 910 Oversight
+ $ 1,516 Federal Programs
$ 2,426 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 1,376 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 24,118 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.21.
1,376 hours currently approved
+ 22,742 hours due to an adjustment
24,118 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $26,600. This represents an increase of $3,400 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.22 – Geologic Information
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(11), (14) and (15), and 508 (a)(13) of the Act, §780.22 requires geologic information for surface mining and reclamation operations. Collection and analysis of geologic information by the applicant and the regulatory authority is necessary to determine the probable hydrologic consequences of the operations and any potentially acid‑ or toxic‑forming substances that may affect the quality of the groundwater.
2. The information collected by the applicant is used in the preparation of the permit application package, whose contents are evaluated by the regulatory authority. The written record is used by the regulatory authority to verify that water quality will not be damaged by the mining operation. The use of the information or records required by each paragraph is as follows:
Paragraph (b) ‑‑ Information on the area and structural geology and the lithology of the strata in the permit area and potentially impacted off‑site areas is used in relation to studies of the impact of surface mining and reclamation operations on ground water. Information from cross sections, maps, plans, test borings, core samples, and chemical analyses is used in the narrative description of the geology within the permit area, also in relation to studies of the impact of surface mining and reclamation operations on ground water.
Paragraph (c) ‑‑ Information from samples from deeper test borings or drill cores or from areas outside the permit area is also used to evaluate the impact of surface mining and reclamation operations on ground water.
Paragraph (d) ‑‑ The written finding is made by the regulatory authority to authenticate the fact that there is already available adequate information regarding the test borings and core samples necessary to grant the applicant a waiver.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 120 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 permit applications x 120 hours per respondent = 15,960 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 18.5 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 18.5 hours per review = 2,442 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 18,402 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
2.5 |
23.21 |
58 |
Environmental Science Technicians |
70 |
32.27 |
2,259 |
Geological Engineer |
45 |
56.32 |
2,534 |
Operations Manager |
2.5 |
97.68 |
244 |
Total |
120 |
|
5,095 |
Therefore, the estimated wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.22 is $5,095. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $5,095 x 133 permits = $677,635.
In addition, it takes 18.5 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.22 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 18.5 hours = $676 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $676 x 132 permit applications = $89,232.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $677,635 for industry + $89,232 for SRAs = $766,867.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $5,000 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the total cost to all respondents would be $5,000 x 133 applications = $665,000.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 12 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 12 hours x $75.81 = $910.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 20 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $1,516 (1 applications x 20 hours per review x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 910 Oversight
+ $ 1,516 Federal Programs
$ 2,426 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 3,468 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 18,402 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.22.
3,468 hours currently approved
+ 14,934 hours due to adjustments
18,402 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $665,000. This represents an increase of $85,000 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.23 – Reclamation Plan: Land Use Information
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 508(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of the Act, §780.23 requires information on the applicant's reclamation plan, including postmining land uses, land use information, premining environmental resource information, vegetation information, and cross sections, maps, and plans regarding the presentation of premining slopes.
2. The uses of the information in §780.23 required by each of the specific paragraphs of this section are as follows:
(a) and (b) - This information is designed to aid the regulatory authority in making decisions on proposed postmining land use. The analysis required should discuss and compare the information required to be submitted under sections dealing with land use information and general reclamation requirements. This will provide the basis for a complete evaluation of the projected impacts of proposed mining and reclamation on the land-use capabilities of the area affected.
(c) - This section requires the application to include the surface owner’s and local government land agency’s comments on the proposed use of the land. Information from this section is used by the regulatory authority to evaluate the proposed postmining land uses and to assess the compatibility of the proposed land use with the existing land use policies and plans.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 40 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 respondents x 40 hours per response = 5,320 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRA’s have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines, and they require 9 hours to review this section. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRA’s is 132 mines x 9 hours = 1,188 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 6,508 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12 in Identical Responses to Statements, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
2 |
23.21 |
46 |
Environmental Technician |
24 |
38.93 |
934 |
Environmental Engineer |
13 |
56.32 |
732 |
Operations Manager |
1 |
97.68 |
98 |
Total |
40 |
|
1,810 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.23 is $1,810. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $1,810 x 133 permits = $240,730.
In addition, it takes 9 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12 in Identical Responses to Statements, we estimate that a State engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.23 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 9 hours = $329 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $329 x 132 permit applications = $43,428.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $240,730 for industry + $43,428 for SRAs = $284,158.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $100 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $100 x 133 applications = $13,300.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 60 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 60 hours x $75.81 = $4,549.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 8 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $606 (1 applications x 8 hours per review x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 4,549 Oversight
+ $ 606 Federal Programs
$ 5,155 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 5,495 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 6,508 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.23.
5,495 hours currently approved
+ 1,013 hours due to adjustments
6,508 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $13,300. This represents an increase of $1,700 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.25 - Reclamation Plan:
Siltation Structures, Impoundments, and Refuse Piles
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(14), 508(a)(5) and (13), 515(a), 515(b)(10) and (11), and 515(f) of the Act, §780.25 requires design and other permit application requirements for siltation structures, impoundments, and refuse piles.
2. Both permit applicants and SMCRA regulatory authorities use the information required by this rule to ensure that siltation structures, impoundments, and refuse piles are designed to protect public safety, property, and the environment.
3. See list of items with identical responses.
4. See list of items with identical responses.
5. See list of items with identical responses.
6. See list of items with identical responses.
7. See list of items with identical responses.
8. See list of items with identical responses.
9. See list of items with identical responses.
10. See list of items with identical responses.
11. See list of items with identical responses.
12. Reporting and Reviewing Burden.
a. Burden Hour Estimates for Respondents.
Burden on Permit Applicants
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 40 hours to complete this portion of the application. Permit applicants prepare and submit information under regulations and guidance implementing sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Therefore, 133 respondents x 40 hours per response = 5,320 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRA’s have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines, and they require 10 hours to review this section. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRA’s is 132 mines x 10 hours = 1,320 hours.
The total annual burden for all respondents is 6,640 hours.
b. Estimated Annual Wage Cost to Respondents.
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
3 |
23.21 |
70 |
Engineering Technician |
13 |
38.93 |
506 |
Mining Engineer |
21 |
59.40 |
1,247 |
Operations Manager |
3 |
97.68 |
293 |
Totals |
40 |
|
2,116 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.25 is $2,116. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $2,116 x 133 permits = $281,428.
In addition, it takes 10 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.25 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 10 hours = $365 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $365 x 132 permit applications = $48,180.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $281,428 for industry + $48,180 for SRAs = $329,608.
13. Total Annual Non-Wage Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-Up Costs:
We estimate that non-labor costs for each application will average $100 per application for items such as equipment, copying costs, and travel to the mine site and other locations, which translates to a total cost of $13,300 for all applicants (133 applications x $100 per application).
b. Operation, Maintenance, and Services:
None other than those associated with customary and usual business practices.
14. Estimate of Costs to the Federal Government
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 18 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 18 hours x $75.81 = $1,365.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 20 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $1,516 (1 findings x 20 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 1,365 Oversight
+ $ 1,516 Federal programs
$ 2,881 Total Federal cost
15. There are currently 1,152 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 6,640 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.25.
1,152 hours currently approved
+ 5,488 hours due to an adjustment
6,640 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $13,300. This represents an increase of $1,700 due to the reasons mentioned above.
See list of items with identical responses.
17. See list of items with identical responses.
See list of items with identical responses.
§780.27 - Reclamation Plan: Surface Mining Near Underground Mining
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(14) and 515(b)(12) of Act, §780.27 requires surface mine operators, mining within 500 feet of an underground mine, to file an application describing the measures to be used to protect the underground mine workings in comply with the performance standards contained in §816.79.
2. This information is the basis for the regulatory authority to ensure compliance with the requirement of §816.79.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we estimated that 20% of the 133 permit applications (27) will be required to submit this information, with each applicant requiring 16 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 27 respondents x 16 hours per response = 432 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over the 27 mines mentioned above, requiring 2.5 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 27 mines x 2.5 hours per review = 68 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 500 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
1.5 |
23.21 |
35 |
Mining Engineer |
13 |
59.40 |
772 |
Operations Manager |
1.5 |
97.68 |
147 |
Total |
16 |
|
954 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.27 is $954. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $954 x 27 permits = $25,758.
In addition, it takes 2.5 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12 in Identical Responses to Statements, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.27 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 2.5 hours = $91 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $91 x 27 permit applications = $2,457.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $25,758 for industry + $2,457 for SRAs = $28,215.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $25 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $25 x 27 applications = $675.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 10 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 10 hours x $75.81 = $758.
Federal Programs: We will assume that we will receive approximately 1 application for a new permit which includes information collection under this section where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 4 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $303 (1 findings x 4 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 758 Oversight
+ $ 303 Federal Programs
$ 1,061 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 345 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 500 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.27.
345 hours currently approved
+ 155 hours due to adjustments
500 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $675. This represents an increase of $100 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.28 - Activities in or Adjacent to Perennial or Intermittent Streams
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on February 20, 2014, vacated the stream buffer zone rule that we published December 12, 2008 (73 FR 75814). The court remanded the matter to us for further proceedings consistent with the decision. In relevant part, the Memorandum Decision stated that vacatur of the 2008 stream buffer zone rule resulted in reinstatement of the regulations in effect before the vacated rule took effect. Therefore, consistent with the Memorandum Decision and Order of the court, this section has been eliminated.
§780.29 - Diversions
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(7) and 508(a)(5) of the Act, §780.29 requires a description of diversions to be constructed within the proposed permit area to enable the regulatory authority to determine how stream channels, overland flow, and shallow ground-water flow will be controlled.
2. This information is needed by the regulatory authority to determine the methods used by the applicant in the construction of diversions to control stream channels, overland, and shallow ground water flow. This will provide information to the regulatory authority to determine if proposed diversions are in compliance with applicable regulations.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 16 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 respondents x 16 hours per response = 2,128 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 5 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 5 hours per review = 660 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 2,788 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
1 |
23.21 |
23 |
Mining Engineer |
14 |
59.40 |
831 |
Operations Manager |
1 |
97.68 |
98 |
Total |
16 |
|
952 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.29 is $952. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $952 x 133 permits = $126,616.
In addition, it takes 5 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.29 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 5 hours = $183 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $183 x 132 permit applications = $24,156.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $126,616 for industry + $24,156 for SRAs = $150,772.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $50 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $50 x 133 applications = $6,650.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 24 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 24 hours x $75.81 = $1,819.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for a new permit where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 5 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $379 (1 findings x 5 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 1,819 Oversight
+ $ 379 Federal Programs
$ 2,198 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 2,426 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 2,788 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.29.
2,426 hours currently approved
+ 362 hours due to adjustments
2,788 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $6,650. This represents an increase of $850due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements
§780.31 - Protection of Publicly Owned Parks and Historic Places
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 522(e)(1), (2), and (3) of the Act, §780.31 requires the permit applicant to describe measures to minimize or prevent adverse impacts to national forests, public parks and historic places.
2. This information will enable the regulatory authority to determine whether coal mining would adversely affect a publicly owned park or any publicly owned place included in the National Register of Historic Places. If such a park or historical place were affected, the regulatory authority would notify the agency with jurisdiction over that park or place to review and approve/disapprove a permit for the coal mining operation.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 8 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 respondents x 8 hours per response = 1,064 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 6 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 5 hours per review = 660 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 1,724 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Environmental Technician |
7 |
38.93 |
273 |
Operations Manager |
1 |
97.68 |
98 |
Total |
8 |
|
371 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.31 is $371. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $371 x 133 permits = $49,343.
In addition, it takes 5 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.31 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 5 hours = $183 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $183 x 132 permit applications = $24,156.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $49,343 for industry + $24,156 for SRAs = $73,499.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $400 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $400 x 133 applications = $53,200.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 80 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 80 hours x $75.81 = $6,065.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 4 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $303 (1 findings x 4 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 6,065 Oversight
+ $ 303 Federal Programs
$ 6,368 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 1,612 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 1,724 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.31
1,612 hours currently approved
+ 112 hours due to an adjustment
1,724 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $53,200. This represents an increase of $6,800 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.33 - Relocation or Use of Public Roads
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(13) and 522(e) of the Act, §780.33 requires each application to describe with appropriate maps and cross sections the measures to be used to protect public roads in the permit area.
2. This information is necessary for the regulatory authority to ensure that the rights of present users and nearby landowners affected are protected where there is a public road relocation, the construction of a new road, or mining activity within 100 feet of public roads.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
a. Annual Burden to Respondents:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 16 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 respondents x 16 hours per response = 2,128 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 4 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 4 hours per review = 528 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 2,656 hours.
b. Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Mining Engineer |
13 |
59.40 |
772 |
Operations Manager |
3 |
97.68 |
293 |
Total |
16 |
|
1,065 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.33 is $1,065. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $1,065 x 133 permits = $141,645.
In addition, it takes 4 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.33 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 4 hours = $146 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $146 x 132 permit applications = $19,272.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $141,645 for industry + $19,272 for SRAs = $160,917.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $55 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $55 x 133 applications = $7,315.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 40 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 40 hours x $75.81 = $3,032.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 3 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $227 (1 findings x 3 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 3,032 Oversight
+ $ 227 Federal Programs
$ 3,259 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 1,734 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 2,656 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.33.
1,734 hours currently approved
+ 922 hours due to adjustments
2,656 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $7,315. This represents an increase of $935 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.35 – Disposal of Excess Spoil
Justification
1. The regulations at §780.35, which establish permit application requirements for the disposal of excess spoil from surface mines, reflect the requirement in section 508(a)(5) of SMCRA that the permit application include a statement of the engineering techniques to be used in mining and reclamation, as well as a description of how the operation will comply with each requirement of section 515. Paragraph (b)(22) of section 515 addresses the disposal of excess spoil.
2. The regulatory authority uses the geotechnical investigation and fill design requirements of this section to ensure that excess spoil is disposed of safely in a stable manner with a minimum of adverse environmental impacts.
3. See list of items with identical responses.
4. See list of items with identical responses.
5. See list of items with identical responses.
6. See list of items with identical responses.
7. See list of items with identical responses.
8. See list of items with identical responses.
9. See list of items with identical responses.
10. See list of items with identical responses.
11. See list of items with identical responses.
12. Reporting and Reviewing Burden
a. Burden Hour Estimates for Respondents
Burden on Permit Applicants
According to studies that we and the states have previously completed, more than 98% of all excess spoil fills are located in Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia. We used the 2016 data from Kentucky to estimate the number of permit actions requiring information collection under § 780.35. Kentucky issued 27 permitting actions (new permits and major revisions) involving excess spoil fills on surface mines out of a total 69 new permits and major revisions (39 percent) in 2016. Assuming 39% of new permit and major revisions in West Virginia and Virginia would also contain excess spoil fills in 2017, we estimate that the states will issue an average of 36 permitting actions (new permits and major revisions) per year approving excess spoil fills on surface mines (22 in Kentucky + 9 in West Virginia + 5 in Virginia).
Based on information received through consultations with industry representatives identified in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, each applicant will need 27 hours to prepare the information required by §780.35. We estimate that the total annual burden to permit applicants for compliance with this section will be 972 hours (36 applications with excess spoil fills x 27 hours per application).
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Consultations with SRAs indicate that for each application, the regulatory authority will need 12 hours to review the information required by §780.35. We estimate that the total annual burden for SRAs to review permit applications for §780.35 will be 432 hours (36 permit and permit revision applications received per year by SRAs with proposed excess spoil fills x 12 hours per application).
Therefore, we estimate that the total annual burden for all respondents under this section will be 1,404 hours (972 hours for permit applicants + 432 hours for State regulatory authority review).
b. Estimated Annual Wage Cost to Respondents
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Clerical |
1 |
23.21 |
23 |
Engineering Technician |
18 |
38.93 |
701 |
Mining Engineer |
7 |
59.40 |
415 |
Operations Manager |
1 |
97.68 |
98 |
Totals |
27 |
|
1,237 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.35 is $1,237. The total annual wage cost to all industry respondents is $44,532 ($1,237 per application x 36 new permit and permit revision applications per year that involve this section).
In addition, it takes 12 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.35 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 12 hours = $438 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $438 x 36 permit applications = $15,768.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $44,532 for industry + $15,768 for SRAs = $60,300.
13. Total Annual Non-Wage Cost Burden to Respondents.
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $600 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying and travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $600 x 36 applications = $21,600.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Costs to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 100 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 100 hours x $75.81 = $7,581.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2016, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for a new permit where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 18 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $1,365 (1 applications x 18 hours per application x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 7,581 Oversight
+ $ 1,365 Federal programs
$ 8,946 Total Federal cost
15. There are currently 10,359 hours approved for this section. We are requesting a decrease in burden hours to 1,404 hours as shown below. This adjustment is due to a decrease in the number of permit applications and revisions that involve excess spoil disposal fills, from 195 permit applications to 36.
10,359 hours currently approved
- 8,955 hours due to adjustments
1,404 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $21,600. This represents a decrease of $117,000 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See list of items with identical responses.
17. See list of items with identical responses.
18. See list of items with identical responses.
§780.37 – Road Systems
Justification
1. Sections 507(b)(14), 508(a) and 510(b) of the Act require the submission of a complete mining and reclamation plan showing the locations of each facility and the land to be affected so the regulatory authority can determine the feasibility of the proposed plan to meet the performance standards of sections 515(b)(17) and (18) of the Act. The regulation at §780.37(a) establishes the permitting requirements for reclamation plans to include plans and drawings for each road that is used in the surface mining activities. The regulatory authority reviews and approves these plans that cover the design, specifications, and construction and removal of each proposed road as being in compliance with the performance standards in §§816.150 and .151 for roads.
2. These plans and drawings from the applicant that describe each road width, gradient, surfacing material, cut, fill embankment, culvert, bridge, drainage ditch, low-water crossing and drainage structure are needed so the regulatory authority is provided with comprehensive and reliable information on each structure. From the drawings and specification, the regulatory authority must approve each road that is located in the channel of an intermittent stream or perennial stream, each road stream ford that is used as a temporary route and each alteration or relocation of a natural drainageway. These drawings and specifications are approved by the regulatory authority as being properly designed and consistent with engineering and environmental standards. This information is needed to determine that each road or approved drainage structure does not cause pollution of water, damage to fish or wildlife or their habitat or public or private property.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 23 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 respondents x 23 hours per response = 3,059 total hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 7 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 7 hours per review = 924 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 3,983 hours.
Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Engineering
|
11 |
38.93 |
428 |
Civil Engineer |
10 |
60.16 |
602 |
Operations Manager |
2 |
97.68 |
195 |
Total |
23 |
|
1,225 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.37 is $1,255. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $1,225 x 133 permits = $162,925.
In addition, it takes 7 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State environmental engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.37 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 7 hours = $256 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $256 x 132 permit applications = $33,792.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $162,925 for industry + $33,792 for SRAs = $196,717.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
Non-labor cost for each respondent of $50 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $50 x 133 applications = $6,650.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 80 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 80 hours x $75.81 = $6,065.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2010, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 10 hours to review each. At an average salary of $75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $758 (1 findings x 10 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 6,065 Oversight
+ $ 758 Federal Programs
$ 6,823 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 4,620 hours approved for this section. We are requesting a decrease in burden hours to 3,983 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.37.
4,620 hours currently approved
- 637 hours due to adjustments
3,983 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $6,650. This represents an increase of $850 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
§780.38 – Support Facilities
Justification
1. In accordance with sections 507(b)(14), and 508(a) and 510(b) of the Act, §780.38 requires the submission of a complete mining and reclamation plan showing the plans and locations of each facility and the land to be affected so the regulatory authority can determine the feasibility of the proposed plan to meet the performance standards of section 515(b)(4) of the Act. This section requires the stabilization and protection of all surface areas affected by the surface coal mining and reclamation operation to effectively control erosion and attendant air and water pollution. The regulation at §780.38 establishes the permitting requirements for each reclamation plan to include descriptions, plans, and drawings for each conveyor, rail system, or other transportation system or support facility that is used in the surface mining activities. These plans and drawings include a map, appropriate cross-sections, and design drawings.
2. These plans and drawings from the applicant are needed so the regulatory authority is provided with comprehensive and reliable information on each system or facility. These plans and specifications are approved by the regulatory authority as being in sufficient detail to demonstrate compliance with §816.181 for each system or facility. This information is needed to determine that each system or facility effectively controls erosion, attendant air and water pollution.
3. See Identical Responses to Statements.
4. See Identical Responses to Statements.
5. See Identical Responses to Statements.
6. See Identical Responses to Statements.
7. See Identical Responses to Statements.
8. See Identical Responses to Statements.
9. See Identical Responses to Statements.
10. See Identical Responses to Statements.
11. See Identical Responses to Statements.
12. Burden Estimates:
Burden on Mine Applicants and Permittees
Based on the Fiscal Year 2017 annual evaluation reports, 2017 permitting activity, and contacts with permit applicants and state regulators referenced in item 8 in Identical Responses to Statements, we determined that there were approximately 133 surface coal mining permit applications, with each applicant requiring 77.5 hours to complete this portion of the application. Therefore, 133 respondents x 77.5 hours per response = 10,308 hours.
Burden on State Regulatory Authorities
Our FY 2017 oversight data show that the 24 SRAs have jurisdiction over 132 of the 133 mines mentioned above, requiring 6 hours to review this section of the permit application. Therefore, we estimate that the burden to SRAs is 132 mines x 6 hours per review = 792 hours.
Total burden for all respondents is 11,100 hours.
Annual Wage Cost to Respondents:
Using BLS data for mining companies as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate the following wage costs (rounded) required to complete the collection for this section (wage costs include benefits calculated at 1.4 of hourly wages):
Industry Wage Cost
Position |
Hour Burden per Response |
Cost Per Hour ($) |
Total Wage Burden ($) |
Engineering
|
25 |
38.93 |
973 |
Mining Engineer |
47 |
59.40 |
2,792 |
Operations Manager |
5.5 |
97.68 |
537 |
Total |
77.5 |
|
4,302 |
Therefore, the estimated annual wage cost for each industry respondent for §780.38 is $4,302. The total wage cost to all industry respondents is $4,302 x 133 permits = $572,166.
In addition, it takes 6 hours for each State regulatory authority to review this section of the permit application.
Using BLS data for State government employees as discussed in “Identical Responses to Statements” for item 12, we estimate that a State engineering technician will earn $36.53 per hour with benefits. Therefore, the estimated total annual wage cost for SRAs to review §780.38 of each permit application is $36.53 per hour x 6 hours = $219 (rounded). The total wage cost to all SRAs is $219 x 132 permit applications = $28,908.
Therefore, we estimate that the burden to all respondents is $572,166 for industry + $28,908 for SRAs = $601,074.
13. Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents:
a. Capital and Start-up Costs
A non-labor cost for each respondent of $25 may be included for permit application costs for items such as equipment, copying, travel to the mine site and other locations for data collection and laboratory analyzes. Therefore, the estimated total cost to all respondents would be $25 x 133 applications = $3,325.
b. Operation, Maintenance and Services
Not applicable. Costs for this section are incurred prior to the commencement of mining.
14. Estimate of Cost to the Federal Government:
Oversight: OSMRE believes that we will conduct an oversight review of this topic in one State program per year and that the review will require an average of 80 hours. A GS 13/5 regulatory program specialist/engineer earning $75.81 per hour with benefits (see item 14 in Identical Responses to Statements for details) will review the application. Therefore, the oversight cost for this section will be 80 hours x $75.81 = $6,065.
Federal Programs: Based upon data collected in 2013, we believe that we will receive approximately 1 application for new permits where OSMRE is the regulatory authority, requiring 5 hours to review each. At an average salary of 75.81 per hour as referenced above, the annual wage cost to the Federal government to review this section of the permit application will be $379 (1 findings x 5 hours per finding x $75.81 per hour).
Total Federal Cost
$ 6,065 Oversight
+ $ 379 Federal Programs
$ 6,444 Total Federal Cost
15. There are currently 3,470 hours approved for this section. We are requesting an increase in burden hours to 11,100 hours as shown below. Because we included permit revisions that add acreage to the permit area, the number of respondents increased for applicants and state regulators who comply with information collection required under 30 CFR Part 780. In addition, both State regulators and applicants who were contacted increased the estimated time required to prepare responses for § 780.38.
3,470 hours currently approved
+ 7,630 hours due to adjustments
11,100 hours requested
This request includes a non-wage cost of $3,325. This represents an increase of $425 due to the reasons mentioned above.
16. See Identical Responses to Statements.
17. See Identical Responses to Statements.
18. See Identical Responses to Statements.
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| File Title | SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR REPORTING |
| Author | Stephen Parsons |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2021-01-21 |