Grantee Meeting Evaluation

Form Approved

OMB No. 0920-0953

Exp. Date 8/31/2021

2019 NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting Evaluation – Invitation Email

Dear NIOSH Centers Grantee:

You are invited to participate in an evaluation of the 2019 NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting that was held August 20-21, 2019 at the University of Cincinnati (Cincinnati, OH).

Your input will be invaluable to the planning efforts for the 2021 NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting, which will be held at the University of Utah (Salt Lake City, UT)

Participation in this evaluation includes clicking the link below and providing your responses to the evaluation questions. The evaluation will take less than 10 minutes to complete.

[SURVEYMONKEY LINK TO BE PROVIDED HERE]

This evaluation is approved under OMB Control Number [XXX-YYYY].

For additional information, please contact Dr. Jessica Streit, NIOSH Office of Research Integration, at [email protected]. You may also email Dr. Sarah Felknor, NIOSH Associate Director for Research Integration, at [email protected].

Thank you very much for your consideration of this evaluation!

Sincerely,

The NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting Planning Team

Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to - CDC/ATSDR Reports Clearance Officer; 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS D-74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333 ATTN: PRA (0920-0953).

NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting Evaluation - Instrument

[to be converted to online SurveyMonkey format after OMB approval]

Instructions

This is a brief participant evaluation of the 2019 NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting (hereafter the Meeting), which was held August 20-21 at the University of Cincinnati.

This evaluation is completely voluntary. All of your responses will be kept confidential. Please answer each question about the Meeting to the best of your ability. By completing and submitting this evaluation, you grant your consent to participate.

This evaluation is approved under OMB Control Number [XXX-YYYY].

1. [Select one]

Which of the following best represents your overall satisfaction with the Meeting?

• Very satisfied

• Satisfied

• Dissatisfied

• Very dissatisfied

2. [Select multiple]

Which aspects of the 2019 NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting were most valuable for you?

Please select up to four (4).

• Informational panels

• NIOSH news and opportunities [excluding funding updates]

• Question Storming Session

• Open mic

• NIOSH funding updates

• Networking during the meeting

• Networking at the lunch and social

• Center meetings

• Other [specify]

3. [Select multiple]

Which aspects of the 2019 NIOSH Centers Grantee Meeting were least valuable for you?

Please select up to four (4).

• Informational panels

• NIOSH news and opportunities [excluding funding updates]

• Question Storming Session

• Open mic

• NIOSH funding updates

• Networking during the meeting

• Networking at the lunch and social

• Center meetings

• Other [specify]

4. [Select one]

For this evaluation, engaging refers to an activity that evoked the attention, curiosity, interest, optimism, and passion of Meeting participants.

How engaging was each of the following Meeting presentations and panels?

Meeting presentation or panel	Very engaging	Mostly engaging	A little engaging	Not at all engaging
Future of Work Initiative at NIOSH (Tamers)
Future of Work Panel (Lucchini, Punnett, Sorensen, Cain)
Expanded Focus for OSH Panel (Seixas, Delclos, Schulte, Newman)
Future Research Allocation: BNI Approach (Felknor)
NIOSH News and Opportunities (Kitt)
Wikipedia (Morata)
Outreach Opportunities (Flynn)
FY2020 Funding Updates (DiMuzio)
Changes to the Common Rule (Morley)
New FOAs for Centers (Robison)

5. [Select one]

For this evaluation, relevant refers to an activity with a close connection to the Centers’ interests.

How relevant was each of the following to your Center’s goals and activities (either current or upcoming)?

Meeting presentation or panel	Very relevant	Mostly relevant	A little relevant	Not at all relevant
Future of Work Initiative at NIOSH (Tamers)
Future of Work Panel (Lucchini, Punnett, Sorensen, Cain)
Expanded Focus for OSH Panel (Seixas, Delclos, Schulte, Newman)
Future Research Allocation: BNI Approach (Felknor)
NIOSH News and Opportunities (Kitt)
Wikipedia (Morata)
Outreach Opportunities (Flynn)
FY2020 Funding Updates (DiMuzio)
Changes to the Common Rule (Morley)
New FOAs for Centers (Robison)

6. [Ranking]

The NIOSH webinar series is an available mechanism to continue dialogue on topics discussed at the Meeting. Please rank the following prospective FY2020 webinar topics in order of preference, with 1 indicating your most preferred topic (i.e., the webinar you would be most interested in attending).

_____ Future of work

_____ Expanded Focus for OSH

_____ Burden, Need, and Impact

_____ Other [please specify]

7. [Select one]

For this evaluation, meaningful refers to an activity with a purpose that is serious, important, or useful.

How meaningful was your participation in the Question Storming session on Day 1 of the Meeting?

• Very meaningful

• Mostly meaningful

• A little meaningful

• Not at all meaningful

• Not applicable – I did not attend a Question Storming Session on Day 1.

8. [Select one]

Would your Center be interested in receiving updates as NIOSH continues to work on the challenges we discussed during the Question Storming session?

• Yes. My Center would be interested in receiving updates on NIOSH’s progress.

• No. My Center would not be interested in receiving updates on NIOSH’s progress.

9. [Select one]

For this evaluation, productive refers to an activity that achieves a useful or effective result.

How productive was the Center Business Meeting (Ag, CON, ERC, or TWH) you attended on Day 2 of the Meeting?

• Very productive

• Mostly productive

• A little productive

• Not at all productive

• Not applicable – I did not attend a Center Business Meeting on Day 2.

10. [Open field]

What might we do differently at future Centers Grantee meetings to improve their effectiveness for you?

[text box for responses]

11. [Open field]

Is there anything else you want us to know?

[text box for responses]

This is the end of the 2019 Centers Grantee Meeting Evaluation.

Thank you for your responses!