Free Trade Agreements
1651-0117
A. Justification
1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statue and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.
Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are established to reduce and eliminate trade barriers, strengthen and develop economic relations, and to lay the foundation for further cooperation to expand and enhance benefits of the agreement. These agreements establish free trade by reduced-duty treatment on imported goods.
The U.S. has entered into the following FTAs: United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement (US-CFTA) (Public Law 108-77);.the Republic of Singapore (Public Law 108-78, 117 Stat. 948,19 U.S.C. 3805 note); Australia (Public Law 108-286); Morocco (Public Law 108-302); Jordan (Public Law 107-43); Bahrain (Public Law 109-169); Oman (Public Law 109-283); Peru (Public Law 110–138, 121 Stat. 1455); Korea (Public Law 112-41); Colombia (Public Law 112-42, 125 Stat. 462); Panama (Public Law 112-43); and Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua (CAFTA-DR) (Public Law 109-53, 119 Stat. 462).
These FTAs involve collection of data elements such as information about the importer and exporter of the goods, a description of the goods, tariff classification number, and the preference criterion in the Rules of Origin.
Respondents can obtain information on how to make claims under these FTAs at http://www.cbp.gov/trade/free-trade-agreements, and use a standard fillable format for the FTA submission by going to http://www.cbp.gov/document/guides/certification-origin-template
.
2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.
The information is to be used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers to document preferential tariff treatment under the provisions of the free trade agreements.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.
This information is submitted via the Document Image System into ACE.
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.
This information is not duplicated in any other place or any other form.
5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.
This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses or other small entities.
6. Describe consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently.
If this information were not collected, CBP would not be able to ensure that duty-free or reduced-duty treatment is provided on imported goods under the free trade agreements.
7. Explain any special circumstances.
This information is collected in a manner consistent with the guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to
submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments.
Public comments were solicited through two Federal Register notices published on April 27, 2018 (Volume 83, Page 18581) on which no comments were received, and on August 10, 2018 (Volume 83, Page 39770) on which no comments have been received.
9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.
There is no offer of a monetary or material value for this information collection.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
All data submitted and entered into ACE is subject to and protected by the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905) and is considered confidential, except to the extent as otherwise provided by law. A PIA for the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), dated July 31, 2015, and a SORN for IIS, dated July 26, 2016 (Vol. 81, Page 48826) will be included in this ICR. There are no assurances of confidentiality provided to the respondents of this information collection
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary and the specific uses to be made of the information.
There are no questions of a sensitive nature.
Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information.
INFORMATION COLLECTION TITLE |
TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
NO. OF RESPONSES PER RESPONDENT |
TOTAL RESPONSES |
TIME PER RESPONSE |
U.S.-Chile FTA |
80,000 |
40,000 |
1 |
40,000 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Singapore FTA |
90,000 |
45,000 |
1 |
45,000 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Australia FTA |
40,000 |
20,000 |
1 |
20,000 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Morocco FTA |
8,000 |
4,000 |
1 |
4,000 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Bahrain FTA |
1,000 |
500 |
1 |
500 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Jordan FTA |
5,000 |
2,500 |
1 |
2,500 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Oman FTA |
200 |
100 |
1 |
100 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Peru TPA |
8,000 |
4,000 |
1 |
4,000 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Korea FTA |
400,000 |
200,000 |
1 |
200,000 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Colombia TPA |
80,000 |
40,000 |
1 |
40,000 |
2 hours
|
U.S.-Panama TPA |
5,000 |
2,500 |
1 |
2,500 |
2 hours
|
CAFTA-DR-U.S. FTA |
4,800 |
800 |
3 |
2,400 |
2 hours
|
TOTAL |
722,000 |
359,400 |
|
361,000 |
|
Public Cost
The estimated cost to the respondents is $21,486,720. This is based on the estimated burden hours (722,000) multiplied by (x) the average loaded hourly wage rate for importers ($29.76). CBP calculated this loaded wage rate by first multiplying the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) 2017 median hourly wage rate for Cargo and Freight Agents ($20.11), which CBP assumes best represents the wage for importers, by the ratio of BLS’ average 2017 total compensation to wages and salaries for Office and Administrative Support occupations (1.4801), the assumed occupational group for importers, to account for non-salary employee benefits.1,2 This figure is in 2017 U.S. dollars and CBP assumes an annual growth rate of 0 percent; the 2017 U.S. dollar value is equal to the 2018 U.S. dollar value.
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information.
There are no record keeping, capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.
The estimated annual cost to the Federal Government associated with the review of these records is $3,780,731. This is based on the number of responses that must be reviewed (361,000) multiplied by (x) the time burden to review and process each response (.166 hours) = 59,926 hours multiplied by (x) the average hourly loaded rate for a CBP Trade and Revenue employee ($63.09)3 = $3,780,731.
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 12 or 13.
There has been no increase or decrease in the estimated annual burden hours previously reported for this information collection. There is no change in the information collected.
For collection of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication
This information collection will not be published for statistical purposes.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date, explain the reasons that displaying the expiration date would be inappropriate.
CBP will display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection.
18. “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.”
CBP does not request an exception to the certification of this information collection.
No statistical methods were employed.
1 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment Statistics, “May 2017 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States- Median Hourly Wage by Occupation Code.” Updated March 30, 2018. Available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/2017/may/oes_nat.htm. Accessed June 11, 2018.
2 The total compensation to wages and salaries ratio is equal to the calculated average of the 2017 quarterly estimates (shown under Mar., June, Sep., Dec.) of the total compensation cost per hour worked for Office and Administrative Support occupations ($26.2600) divided by the calculated average of the 2017 quarterly estimates (shown under Mar., June, Sep., Dec.) of wages and salaries cost per hour worked for the same occupation category ($17.7425). Source of total compensation to wages and salaries ratio data: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation Historical Listing March 2004 – March 2018, “Table 3. Civilian workers, by occupational group: employer costs per hours worked for employee compensation and costs as a percentage of total compensation, 2004-2018 by respondent type.” March 2018. Available at https://www.bls.gov/web/ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed June 11, 2018.
3 CBP bases this wage on the FY 2018 salary and benefits of the national average of CBP Trade and Revenue positions, which is equal to a GS-13, Step 3. Source: Email correspondence with CBP’s Office of Finance on June 1, 2018.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | Supporting Statement |
| Author | Lori J. Whitehurst |
| Last Modified By | SYSTEM |
| File Modified | 2018-08-21 |
| File Created | 2018-08-21 |