0596-0010 - Forest Industries - Renewal - Supporting Statement BX

0596-0010 - Forest Industries - Renewal - Supporting Statement B.DOCX

Forest Industries Post Data Collection Systems

OMB: 0596-0010

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Supporting Statement B for OMB 0596-0010

Forest Industries and Logging Operations Data Collection Systems


Note: This request is for the renewal of the approved information collection OMB 0596-0010, Forest Industries and Logging Operations Data Collection Systems, which will expire December 31, 2019. The USDA Forest Service requests approval from OMB to revise our sampling approach and continue the collection of information related to forest industries and logging operations.

B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods

    1. Describe (including a numerical estimate) the potential respondent universe and any sam­pling or other respondent selection method to be used. Data on the number of entities (e.g., establishments, State and local government units, households, or persons) in the universe covered by the collection and in the corre­sponding sample are to be provided in tabular form for the uni­verse as a whole and for each of the strata in the proposed sample. Indicate expected response rates for the collection as a whole. If the collection had been conducted previously, include the actual response rate achieved during the last collection.

Mill Survey: Data is collected from all known primary wood-using mills that use harvested wood in log or chip form, such as sawlogs, veneer logs, pulpwood, and pulp chips, to manufacture products such as lumber, paper, and biomass energy. All known primary wood products industries in the United States, and Canadian mills that process wood material from the United States, are sampled annually. Sample intensity will be dependent on the primary product and the state. For states not participating in the annual sample, a canvas of all other known wood products industries will be conducted every 2-5 years, depending on the state.

A total of 7,325 primary wood-using mills will be sampled during the 2019 – 2021 time period covered by this Information Collection Request (Table 1). All primary wood-using mills will be contacted and/or accounted for during this survey for which the sample will be drawn. For respondents that are still in operation but cannot be contacted or decline to participate, historical information from previous mill responses, or other ancillary information is used. If a respondent is deemed to be out of business, it is removed from future canvasses.

Table 1.—Number of primary wood-using mills by type of mill and data collection year



Data collection year


Response Rate

Survey type

Total

2019

2020

2021

 

2015

Pulpwood Producers

396

132

132

132

 


96%

Other Primary Wood Products Industries

6,929

2,519

2,184

2,226

 


76%

  Total

7,325

2,651

2,316

2,358

 




Loggers Survey: The loggers’ survey will be conducted on active logging sites visited as part of ongoing Harvest Utilization Studies, which are carried out annually across the nation to collect information on fell tree utilization. Based on previous experience with access to logging sites we anticipate a response rate 85% or higher.


Table 2. Number of logging establishments and expected annual number of sites visited by region

Region

Logging Establishments

Operations per year

South

3,858

195-260

North

2,339

170-180

West

1,910

30-35

Total

8,107

395-475



    1. Describe the procedures for the collection of information including:

  • Statistical methodology for stratification and sample selection,

  • Estimation procedure,

  • Degree of accuracy needed for the pur­pose described in the justification,

  • Unusual problems requiring specialized sampling procedures, and

  • Any use of periodic (less frequent than annual) data collection cycles to reduce burden.

Mill Survey: The annual sample of all primary processors provides a barometer of timber industry activity as well as information specific to current product demand for states that elect to participate is describe in the sample design below.


Sample frame:


The USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program maintains a current list of all facilities that accept roundwood in the United States. This list will include, at a minimum, the facility name, location, facility type, primary product, number of employees, capacity, and previous total mill receipts (or estimated total receipts if the facility in new). This list will serve as the sampling frame and will be updated annually.


Sample selection:


Several sampling design were tested by Coulston et al. (2018) including simple random sampling, probability proportional to size sampling, and two types of stratified simple random sampling. The two types of stratified simple random sampling were (1) creating equal size cumulative measure of size strata by primary product and sampling 2 elements per strata, and (2) using Neyman allocation and cluster analysis to determine the number of strata per primary product and the sample size for each strata. Recommendations from Coulston et al. (2018) were to use a stratified simple random sample where strata are determined by equal sizes of cumulative total facility receipts. This approach was shown to provide estimates significantly more precise that recommended in Forest Service Handbook 4809.11.Chapter 10 (5% sampling error for annual estimates of timber cut in the eastern United States, and 10% sampling error in the western United States).

FIA will use a three-level stratified simple random sample design to sample wood using facilities. State is the first level. Primary product is the second level. The third level is developed by (1) identifying sampled with certainty strata for facilities with > 10 million cuft of receipts and then by (2) creating equally sized strata of cumulative previous facility total receipts (or estimated total receipts) for those facilities with <= 10 million cuft of receipts. Two facilities will be selected at random within each third level stratum (except for the sampled with certainty strata). The target sampling fraction within each second level strata (State by primary product) is 0.4. However, because of the sampled with certainty strata, all pulpmills that receive pulpwood (primary product) will be sampled.


Estimation:


We use the standard direct estimators for stratified simple random sampling from Cochran (1977). Under the stratified simple random sample design each N facility (i) belongs to a single strata h. The within strata selection probability is πh=nh/Nh. The estimated population total for Y is then:

(1)

with estimated variance

(2)

where

(3)

and

(4)

is the mean for stratum h.

Equations 1-4 are used when the desired estimate follows strata boundaries. These equations are modified to construct estimates for domains or subpopulations j that cross strata boundaries.

The estimated total for Yj is then:

(5)

with estimated variance

(6).

Here we introduce the domain indicator Ij which takes the value of 1 when facility i is in the domain and zero otherwise. The indicator is then used in the construction of strata (h) and domains (j) means and variances:

(7)

and

(8).


References:


Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 428p.


Coulston, J.W., Westfall, J.A., Wear, D.N., Edgar, C.B., Prisley, S.P., Treiman, T.,

Abt, R.C., Smith, W.B. 2018. Annual monitoring of US timber production: rationale and design. Forest Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxy010. In press


USDA Forest Service. 2008. Operational procedures. First report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on forest inventory and analysis. Forest Service Handb. 4809.11. Washington, DC: 11: 1-1.


For states not participating in the annual sample a canvas of all other known wood products industries will be conducted every 2-5 years, depending on the State. When combined with the annual canvas of the pulpwood processors provides a complete set of industrial harvest information of the State, as well its impact on the forest resources.



Loggers Survey: Logging sites are selected assuming an infinite or uncountable population, as the population of sites depends on a state’s logger capacity but also on weather and market conditions at a given time. This makes the size of the population varying and unknown. A state’s sample size is determined using the utilization ratios’ sample error tables developed by Zarnoch et al. (2004).


Sites are selected independently from a stratified population to allocate sites to all significant primary products including saw logs, veneer logs, pulpwood, composite panels, poles and pilings, posts, firewood, and other miscellaneous as applicable. Stratification is accomplished using information from a state’s most current primary mill survey, which provides the species group and product type breakdown.


    1. Describe methods to maximize response rates and to deal with issues of non-response. The accuracy and reliability of information collected must be shown to be adequate for intended uses. For collections based on sam­pling, a special justification must be provid­ed for any collection that will not yield "reli­able" data that can be generalized to the universe studied.

Mill Survey: Respondents are provided several formats to provided information, using mail, phone, e-mail, or personal visits. These same methods are used for multiple follow up attempts to contact respondents. For respondents that are still in operation but cannot be contacted or decline to participate, historical information from previous mill response is used. If a respondent is deemed to be out of business, it is removed from the canvass.

Loggers Survey: Loggers that allow entry to the site for fell tree data collection will be asked to participate on the survey. If a logger doesn’t allow access to the site, then a replacement site is selected if available. If the logger allows entry to the site but declines to participate on the survey, then the record will be noted as non-response. To maximize response, survey questions will be asked and recorded on-site. No follow-up is needed.



    1. Describe any tests of procedures or methods to be undertaken. Testing is encouraged as an effective means of refining collections of information to minimize burden and improve utility. Tests must be approved if they call for answers to identical questions from 10 or more respondents. A proposed test or set of tests may be submitted for approval separate­ly or in combination with the main collection of information.

No tests of procedures or methods are planned for either survey. However, we have made slight improvements or adjustments to the questionnaire based on feedback received during previous information collections under this approval.



    1. Provide the name and telephone number of individuals consulted on statistical aspects of the design and the name of the agency unit, contractor(s), grantee(s), or other person(s) who will actually collect and/or analyze the information for the agency.

Mill Survey: Sampling is based on methods developed by Coulston et al. (2018). Consult John Coulston (540-231-4674) for additional information on statistical aspects of the design. Data will be gathered by FIA personnel or FIA representatives, University of Montana-Missoula Bureau of Business and Economic Research personnel, and collaborators from State agencies. All analysis will be done by FIA personnel.


References:

Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 428p.


Coulston, J.W., Westfall, J.A., Wear, D.N., Edgar, C.B., Prisley, S.P., Treiman, T.,

Abt, R.C., Smith, W.B. 2018. Annual monitoring of US timber production: rationale and design. Forest Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxy010. In press


USDA Forest Service. 2008. Operational procedures. First report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on forest inventory and analysis. Forest Service Handb. 4809.11. Washington, DC: 11: 1-1.


Loggers Survey: Sampling is based on method developed by Zarnoch et al. (2004). Data will be gathered by FIA personnel or FIA representatives, University of Montana-Missoula Bureau of Business and Economic Research personnel, and collaborators from State agencies. All analysis will be done by FIA personnel.


References:

Zarnoch, Stanley J.; Bentley, James W.; Johnson, Tony G. 2004. Determining Sample Size for Tree Utilization Surveys. Res. Paper SRS-34. Ashville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Southern Research Station. 11p.

Page 1 of 5


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-20

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy