Download:
pdf |
pdf25450
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2018 / Notices
commerce in the United States must
petition for and be granted a waiver
prior to the distribution in commerce of
that product in the United States.
Manufacturers may also submit a
request for interim waiver pursuant to
the requirements of 10 CFR 430.27.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
III. Consultations with Other Agencies
In accordance with 10 CFR
430.27(f)(2), DOE consulted with the
Federal Trade Commission (‘‘FTC’’) staff
concerning the Huawei petition for
waiver. The FTC staff did not have any
objections to granting a waiver to
Huawei.
IV. Order
After careful consideration of all the
material that was submitted by Huawei
in this matter, DOE grants a waiver
regarding the below specified basic
models. Therefore, in accordance with
10 CFR 430.27, it is ORDERED that:
(1) Huawei must test and rate Huawei
brand EPS basic models HW–
200200UPX, HW–200300UPX, HW–
200325UPX, HW–200500UPX in
accordance with the alternate test
procedure as set forth in paragraph (2)
of this section.
(2) The alternate test procedure for the
Huawei basic models listed in
paragraph (1) of this section of this
Order is the test procedure for EPSs
prescribed by DOE at Appendix Z,
except that under section 4(a)(i)(E) and
Table 1 of Appendix Z, the adaptive
EPSs must be tested such that when
testing at the lowest achievable output
voltage (i.e., 5V), the Nameplate Output
Current shall be 2A (which corresponds
to an output power of 10W at the 100%
loading condition). The 75%, 50%, and
25% loading conditions shall be scaled
accordingly and the nameplate output
power of such an EPS, at the lowest
output voltage, shall be equal to 10W.
(3) Representations. Huawei must
make representations about the
efficiency of the basic models identified
in paragraph (1) of this section for
compliance, marketing, or other
purposes only to the extent that the
basic model has been tested in
accordance with the provisions set forth
above and such representations fairly
disclose the results of such testing in
accordance with Appendix Z and 10
CFR 429.37.
(4) This waiver shall remain in effect
according to the provisions of 10 CFR
430.27. This Decision and Order will
terminate on the compliance date of any
future updates to the test procedure for
EPSs located in Appendix Z that
address the issue presented in the
waiver. At such time, testing to
demonstrate compliance with standards,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 May 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
and any other representations of energy
use, will require manufacturers to use
the relevant test procedure for these
products.
(5) This waiver is issued on the
condition that the statements,
representations, and documentation
provided by Huawei are valid. DOE may
revoke or modify this waiver at any time
if it determines the factual basis
underlying the petition for waiver is
incorrect, or the results from the
alternate test procedure are
unrepresentative of the basic models’
true energy consumption characteristics.
10 CFR 430.27(k)(1). Likewise, Huawei
may request that DOE rescind or modify
the waiver if Huawei discovers an error
in the information provided to DOE as
part of its petition, determines that the
waiver is no longer needed, or for other
appropriate reasons. 10 CFR
430.27(k)(2).
(6) Granting of this waiver does not
release Huawei from the certification
requirements set forth at 10 CFR part
429.
of Nonproliferation and Arms Control,
NA–24, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Room
7F–075, Washington, DC 20585. Due to
potential delays in DOE’s receipt and
processing of mail sent through the U.S.
Postal Service, DOE encourages
responders to submit comments
electronically to ensure timely receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information on DOE’s
regulation of assistance to foreign
atomic energy activities pursuant to 10
CFR part 810 is available at https://
www.energy.gov/nnsa/10-cfr-part-810.
For other questions, contact Katie
Strangis, Policy Advisor, Office of
Nonproliferation and Arms Control,
NA–24, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Room
7F–075, Washington, DC 20585,
telephone (202) 586–8623.
This
information collection request contains:
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 23,
(1) OMB No. A1901–0263; (2)
2018.
Information Collection Request Title:
lllllllllllllllllllll Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy
Activities; (3) Type of Review:
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Extension; (4) Purpose: This collection
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
of information is necessary in order to
Energy.
provide the Secretary of Energy with the
appropriate information needed to make
[FR Doc. 2018–11793 Filed 5–31–18; 8:45 am]
informed determinations regarding
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
requests to directly or indirectly engage
or participate in the development or
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
production of special nuclear material
outside the United States; (5) Annual
Agency Information Collection
Estimated Number of Respondents: 89;
Extension
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total
Responses: 596; (7) Annual Estimated
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security
Number of Burden Hours: 1,788; (8)
Administration, U.S. Department of
Annual Estimated Reporting and
Energy.
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $178,600.
ACTION: Notice and request for
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
comments.
the extended collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
of the functions of the agency, including
(DOE), pursuant to the Paperwork
whether the information shall have
Reduction Act of 1995, intends to
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
extend for three years an information
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection request with the Office of
proposed collection of information,
Management and Budget (OMB).
including the validity of the
DATES: Comments regarding this
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
proposed information collection must
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
be received on or before July 31, 2018.
If you anticipate difficulty in submitting clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
comments within that period, contact
burden of the collection of information
the person listed below as soon as
on respondents, including through the
possible.
use of automated collection techniques
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
or other forms of information
sent by email to [email protected].
technology.
Include ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ in
Statutory Authority: Section 57 b.(2)
the subject line. Comments can also be
sent by fax at (202) 586–6789 or by mail of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) of 1954
to Katie Strangis, Policy Advisor, Office and Section 161(c) of the AEA.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2018 / Notices
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 25,
2018.
Sean Oehlbert,
Acting Policy Director, Office of
Nonproliferation and Arms Control,
Department of Energy’s National Nuclear
Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018–11787 Filed 5–31–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9978–77–ORD]
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and
Equivalent Methods; Designation of
One New Reference Method
Office of Research and
Development; Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of the designation of a
new reference method for monitoring
ambient air quality.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has designated one new reference
method for measuring concentrations of
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Vanderpool, Exposure Methods
and Measurement Division (MD–D205–
03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711. Phone:
919–541–7877. Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
part 53, the EPA evaluates various
methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air
pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) as set forth
in 40 CFR part 50. Monitoring methods
that are determined to meet specific
requirements for adequacy are
designated by the EPA as either
reference or equivalent methods (as
applicable), thereby permitting their use
under 40 CFR part 58 by States and
other agencies for determining
compliance with the NAAQS. A list of
all reference or equivalent methods that
have been previously designated by EPA
may be found at http://www.epa.gov/
ttn/amtic/criteria.html.
The EPA hereby announces the
designation of one new reference
method for measuring concentrations of
NO2 in ambient air. This designation is
made under the provisions of 40 CFR
part 53, as amended on October 26,
2015(80 FR 65291–65468).
The new reference method for NO2 is
an automated method (analyzer)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 May 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
utilizing the measurement principle
based on gas phase chemiluminescence.
This newly designated reference method
is identified as follows:
RFNA–0418–250, ‘‘Sabio Model 6040
Ambient NO/NO2/NOX Analyzer’’,
operated in the measurement range of
0–0.5 PPM, an any ambient temperature
in the range of 5–40 °C, within a line
voltage range determined by the
selected optional pump [115 VAC
external pump: 105–125 VAC (60 Hz);
230 VAC external pump: 210–250 VAC
(50–60 Hz); 24 VDC internal pump: 90–
260 VAC (50–60 Hz)], at any sample
flow rate in the range of 0.50–0.75 L/
min, in accordance with the ‘‘Sabio
Model 6040 Ambient NO/NO2/NOX
Analyzer Instruction Manual’’, with or
without optional zero/span ports for
external calibration, and with or
without an optional inlet filter.
This application for a reference
method determination for this NO2
method was received by the Office of
Research and Development on March
28, 2018. This analyzer is commercially
available from the applicant, Sutron
Corporation, 21 Cypress Blvd., Suite
1130, Round Rock, TX 78665.
A representative test analyzer was
tested in accordance with the applicable
test procedures specified in 40 CFR part
53, as amended on October 26, 2015.
After reviewing the results of those tests
and other information submitted by the
applicant, EPA has determined, in
accordance with part 53, that this
method should be designated as a
reference method.
As a designated reference method,
this method is acceptable for use by
states and other air monitoring agencies
under the requirements of 40 CFR part
58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance.
For such purposes, this method must be
used in strict accordance with the
operation or instruction manual
associated with the method and subject
to any specifications and limitations
(e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the designated
method description (see the
identification of the method above).
Use of the method also should be in
general accordance with the guidance
and recommendations of applicable
sections of the ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume I,’’
EPA/600/R–94/038a and ‘‘Quality
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II,
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Program,’’ EPA–454/B–13–003, (both
available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/
amtic/qalist.html). Provisions
concerning modification of such
methods by users are specified under
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25451
Section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods
by Users) of Appendix C to 40 CFR part
58.
Consistent or repeated noncompliance
with any of these conditions should be
reported to: Director, Exposure Methods
and Measurement Division (MD–E205–
01), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of this reference method
is intended to assist the States in
establishing and operating their air
quality surveillance systems under 40
CFR part 58. Questions concerning the
commercial availability or technical
aspects of the method should be
directed to the applicant.
Dated: May 21, 2018.
Timothy Watkins,
Director, National Exposure Research
Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 2018–11832 Filed 5–31–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–9039–6]
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7156 or https://www2.epa.gov/
nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 05/21/2018 Through 05/25/2018
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
Notice
Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act
requires that EPA make public its
comments on EISs issued by other
Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters
on EISs are available at: https://
cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/
action/eis/search.
EIS No. 20180111, Draft, NMFS, NAT,
Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for Issuing Annual Catch
Limits to the Alaska Eskimo Whaling
Commission for a Subsistence Hunt
on Bowhead Whales for the Years
2019 and Beyond, Comment Period
Ends: 07/24/2018, Contact: John
Henderschedt, 301–427–8385.
EIS No. 20180112, Draft, FHWA, NY,
Hunts Point Interstate Access
Improvement Project, Comment
Period Ends: 07/16/2018, Contact:
Erik Koester, 718–482–4683.
EIS No. 20180113, Draft, CBP, ID, Bog
Creek Road Project, Comment Period
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2018-06-01 |
File Created | 2018-06-01 |