2018_3141-0009 Supporting Statement

SUPPORTING STATEMENT
FOR RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
FOR 25 CFR PART 543
A.

Justification
1.

Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.
Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the
collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and
regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or the Act), Public Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C.
2701, et seq., was signed into law on October 17, 1988. The Act established the National Indian
Gaming Commission (NIGC or Commission) and set out a comprehensive framework for the
regulation of gaming on Indian lands. The Act sets standards for the regulation of Indian gaming,
including the requirement that the Commission monitor class II gaming conducted on Indian
lands on a continuing basis in order to ensure that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of
the gaming operation and to protect such gaming as a means of generating tribal revenue, and to
assure that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly by both the operator and players. 25 U.S.C.
2702(2), 2706(b)(1). The Commission is also authorized to “promulgate such regulations and
guidelines as it deems appropriate to implement” IGRA. 25 U.S.C. 2706(b)(10). The
Commission has promulgated part 543 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, to aid it in
monitoring class II gaming on a continuing basis.
25 CFR § 543.3
Section 543.3 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, requires a tribal gaming regulatory
authority (TGRA) to submit a notice to the Commission that it is extending the deadline, by an
additional six months, to achieve compliance with the requirements of the new tier after a
gaming operation has moved from one tier to another.

25 CFR § 543.5
Section 543.5 requires a TGRA to submit to the Commission a detailed report after the
TGRA has approved an alternate standard to any of the NIGC’s minimum internal control
standards. The report must include the following information: (i) an explanation of how the
alternate standard achieves a level of security and integrity sufficient to accomplish the purpose
of the standard that it is replacing; and (ii) the alternate standard as approved, and the record on
which it is based.
25 CFR § 543.23
Section 543.23(c) requires a tribe to maintain and make internal audit reports available to
the Commission upon request. The reports must include the following information: (i) audit
objectives; (ii) audit procedures and scope; (iii) findings and conclusions; (iv) recommendations,
if applicable; and (v) management’s response.
Section 543.23(d) requires a tribe to hire an independent certified public accountant
(CPA) to perform an assessment, in accordance with agreed-upon procedures (AUP), to verify
whether the gaming operation is in compliance with the Commission’s minimum internal control
standards (MICS) and/or tribal internal control standards (TICS) established by the TGRA that
are at least as stringent as the NIGC MICS, or system of internal control standards (SICS) if they
provide at least the same level of controls as the NIGC MICS. The tribe must then submit two
copies of the AUP assessment report within 120 days of the gaming operation’s fiscal year end.
2.

Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used.
Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of
the information received from the current collection.

As mentioned above, IGRA mandates the Commission to monitor class II gaming
activities (conducted on Indian lands) on a continuing basis in order to ensure that the Indian

tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation and to protect such gaming as a means of
generating tribal revenue, and to assure that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly by both the
operator and players. The Commission uses these information collection activities to further
IGRA’s purposes.
Under the Commission’s MICS, gaming operations are divided into three tiers based on
their annual gross gaming revenues: (i) tier A = more than $3 million but not more than $8
million; (ii) tier B = more than $8 million but not more than $15 million; and (iii) tier C = more
than $15 million. Depending on the tier into which it falls, a gaming operation may have less
stringent or more stringent MICS requirements than another gaming operation that falls under a
different tier. When a gaming operation moves from one tier to another tier, it has nine months
(from the date of the independent CPA’s audit report) to achieve compliance with the
requirements of the new tier. However, a TGRA may extend that deadline by an additional six
months by submitting a notice to the Commission. The Commission uses these notices when
reviewing AUP reports to ensure that a particular gaming operation is in compliance with the
NIGC MICS requirements that are applicable to the tier into which the gaming operation falls.
With regard to the detailed report after a TGRA has approved an alternate standard to any
of the NIGC MICS, the Commission uses these reports to ensure that any alternate standard
established by the TGRA is at least as stringent as the NIGC MICS. The requirement that tribes
maintain and make internal audit reports available to the Commission upon request further
IGRA’s overall purposes, as set forth above.
Finally, the Commission makes use of the AUP assessment reports to verify whether
gaming operations are in compliance with the NIGC MICS and/or TICS that are at least as

stringent as the NIGC MICS, or SICS if they provide at least the same level of controls as the
NIGC MICS.
3.

Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves
the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for
adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using
information technology to reduce burden.

Under NIGC regulations, tribes and/or TGRAs can submit and/or maintain information
via compatible automated, electronic, and/or mechanical means.
4.

Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar
information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the
purposes described in Item 2 above.

The required information is unique to each Indian tribe and/or gaming operation. No
similar information pertaining to gaming on Indian lands is collected by the Commission or by
other federal agencies.
5.

If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small
entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize
burden.

Not applicable.
6.

Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the
collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any
technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

In order for the Commission to monitor class II gaming on a continuing basis as required
by IGRA, the NIGC established its MICS and set them as the minimum of what Indian gaming
operations must do to be in compliance with IGRA. Without these information collection
activities (as described in Item 2), the Commission would be hampered in the fulfillment of its
mission.

7.

Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection
to be conducted in a manner:
• requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often
than quarterly;
• requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of
information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;
• requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of
any document;
• requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical,
government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three
years;
• in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce
valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;
• requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been
reviewed and approved by OMB;
• that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority
established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure
and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which
unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible
confidential use; or
• requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other
confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has
instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the
extent permitted by law.

The Act requires the Commission to ensure that tribes are the primary beneficiaries of
their gaming operations and to protect such gaming as a means of generating tribal revenue. 25
U.S.C. 2703. To that end, NIGC regulations require tribes and/or TGRAs to maintain and/or
submit certain information that the Commission treats as privileged or confidential in nature,
including internal audit reports, alternate internal control standards, and AUP assessment reports.
The Act removes from the Commission any discretion that it would otherwise have to disclose
such information that falls within FOIA exemptions 4 and 7, and requires the Commission to
disclose such information only to other law enforcement agencies for law enforcement purposes.
25 U.S.C. 2716.
8.

If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of
publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR
1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to

submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to
that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these
comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.
Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their
views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of
instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and
on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.
Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be
obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every
3 years - even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior
periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a
specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.
On June 12, 2018, a 60-day notice containing the information collection requirements
was published in the Federal Register allowing the public an opportunity to comment on the
requirements. See 80 FR 27344 (June 12, 2018). The public comment period closed on August
13, 2018. No public comments were received.
In addition, the Commission surveyed tribal gaming operators and/or TGRAs regarding
the submission and recordkeeping requirements contained in its regulations. The Commission
asked the tribal gaming operators and/or TGRAs to provide annual hourly estimates required to
perform each of the activities, as well as any cost estimates. The Commission has adjusted its
previous estimates accordingly.
9.

Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other
than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

Not applicable. The Commission does not provide any payment or gifts to respondents.
10.

Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the
basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

The Act mandates the Commission to preserve any and all information received pursuant
to IGRA as confidential, and removes from the Commission any discretion that it would
otherwise have to disclose any information that falls within FOIA exemptions 4 and 7. 25 U.S.C.

2716(a). The Commission may disclose such information only to other law enforcement agencies
for law enforcement purposes. 25 U.S.C. 2716(b).
11.

Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such
as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are
commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons
why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be
made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom
the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their
consent.

Not applicable. No sensitive questions are asked.
12.

Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The
statement should:
• Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour
burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless
directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain
information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a
sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour
burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences
in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden,
and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not
include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.
• If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate
hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in
Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.
• Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens
for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage
rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for
information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this
cost should be included in Item 13.

The Commission tracks the number of tier change notices, alternate standard reports, and
AUP assessment report submissions that it receives per calendar year. To arrive at the estimates
below, the Commission averaged the number of annual submissions that it received from
calendar years 2015 – 2017 in order to determine the total estimated number of annual
respondents and total estimated annual responses.

As mentioned in Item 8 above, the Commission consulted with tribal gaming operators
and/or TGRAs to gather the burden estimates for these information collection activities. Because
the estimates provided by the tribal gaming operators and/or TGRAs varied (sometimes
dramatically), the Commission averaged the estimates received only after dropping the highest
and lowest estimates for each aspect of the information collection.
Commission regulations require tribes to hire an independent CPA to perform an internal
control standards assessment and to produce an AUP report. The majority of the dollar cost for
this information collection ($8,358,000) is the estimated annual total amount that the tribes spend
in order to engage these CPAs (average of $21,000 per AUP assessment report). The remaining,
unspecified costs were provided by the tribes.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL BURDEN TOTALS
CFR CITE/
COLLECTION

NUMBER OF FREQUENCY OF
ANNUAL
RESPONSES PER
RESPONDENTS
YEAR

543.3
543.5
543.23(c)
543.23(d)

1
1
211
211

TOTAL

424

13.

Varies
Varies
1
1

TOTAL
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
HOURS PER
RESPONSES RESPONSE

1
1
398
398
798

1
108
18
3

TOTAL
HOURS

TOTAL
ANNUAL
COST

1
108
7,164
1,194

$0
$40
$1,194
$8,358,000

8,467

$8,359,234

Provide an estimate for the total annual cost burden to respondents or
recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include
the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).
• The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital
and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and
(b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services
component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with
generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information.
Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors
including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of
capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which
costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other
items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing

•

•

computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing
equipment; and record storage facilities.
If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present
ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost
of purchasing or contracting out information collections services should
be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden
estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than
10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and
use 10/95 existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with
the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.
Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or
services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to
achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the
information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information
or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual
business or private practices.

All estimated costs and hour burdens are shown in Item 12.
14.

Provide estimates of annualized costs to the Federal government. Also,
provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should
include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment,
overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not
have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies may also
aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

The Commission determined its cost and burden hour estimates, inclusive of operational
expenses, based on the workflows of the agency, and the functions specific to the receipt,
recordation, and analysis of the submissions. As a general matter, the cost rate was based upon
the hourly rate of personnel assigned to task. Support services are included in cost estimates.
ESTIMATED AGENCY ANNUAL BURDEN TOTALS

NUMBER OF
CFR CITE/
ANNUAL
COLLECTION RESPONDENTS

FREQUENCY
OF
RESPONSES
PER YEAR

TOTAL
ANNUAL
RESPONSES

REVIEW
HOURS
PER
RESPONSE

TOTAL
HOURS

HOURLY
RATE

1
1

Varies
Varies

1
1

1
10

1
10

$51
$65

$45
$650

543.23(d)

211

1

398

2

796

$51

$40,596

TOTAL

213

543.3
543.5

400

807

TOTAL
AGENCY
COST

$41,291

15.

Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in
Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I.

The Commission has made the following adjustments to its estimated burdens:
(a) The Commission has decreased the estimated number of total annual responses from 834 to
798. Recordkeeping and auditing requirements under regulations 543.5 and 543.23(d) are only
applicable to facilities that conduct Class II gaming. Based on the numbers tracked by the
Commission, it appears that the number of tribes engaging in Class II gaming has decreased and,
therefore, this estimated number has followed suit;
(b) the Commission has decreased the number of the estimated burden hours from 11,241 to
8,467 and this is also due to the reduction of tribes engaging in Class II gaming as well as tribal
feedback of lower average hours per response.
(c) the Commission has decreased the estimated annual cost burden from $8,736,040 to
$8,359,234 and this is also directly attributable to the factors noted above.
16.

For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans
for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques
that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including
beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of
report, publication dates, and other actions.

This is an ongoing information collection with no ending date and no plans for
publication.
17.

If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of
the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be
inappropriate.

Not applicable.

18.

Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19,
“Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions,” of OMB Form
83-I.

Not applicable. The Commission certifies compliance with 5 CFR § 1320.9.
B.

Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods.
This section is not applicable. Statistical methods are not employed.