In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three
years.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
03/31/2022
36 Months From Approved
03/31/2019
3,045
0
290
67,700
0
64,316
0
0
8,314
The National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Plating and Polishing Area
Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWWWW) apply to both existing and
new plating and polishing facilities that are an area source of
hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions and that use one or more of
the following metal HAP: cadmium, chromium, lead manganese, or
nickel (hereafter referred to as the plating and polishing metal
HAP). A plating and polishing facility is a plant site that is
engaged in any of the following processes: non-chromium
electroplating; electroless or non-electrolytic plating; other
non-electrolytic metal coating processes such as chromate
conversion coating, nickel acetate sealing, sodium dichromate
sealing, and manganese phosphate coating, and thermal spraying; dry
mechanical polishing of finished metals and formed products after
plating or thermal spraying; electroforming; and electro-polishing.
New facilities include those that commenced construction,
modification ,or reconstruction after the date of proposal. In
general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications,
performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of
the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records
of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period
during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These
notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining
compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart WWWWWW.
There is an increase in the
total estimated burden and number of responses from the
most-recently approved ICR due to several adjustments. First,
burden hours were added to allow each facility to refamiliarize
themselves with the regulatory requirements each year. Second, the
number of sources that complete but do not submit annual compliance
certifications was left out of the response count in the previous
renewal and this has been corrected. There is a decrease in the
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs since the
previous renewal due to an adjustment. There are no ongoing
monitoring requirements in the rule and no new sources are expected
to incur capital/startup costs. Therefore, the capital/startup
costs were reduced to zero since those costs have already been
incurred when the existing sources became subject to the rule.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.