SUPPORTING STATEMENT
This submission is being made pursuant to 44 U.S.C. § 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 to revise the existing approval and obtain the full three-year clearance.
A. Justification:
1. Sections 201, 202, and 203 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, require common carriers to establish just and reasonable charges, practices, and regulations for their interstate telecommunications services. See 47 U.S.C. Sections 201, 202, and 203. Section 251(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 251(b)(5), requires local exchange carriers to establish reciprocal compensation arrangements for the transport and termination of telecommunications.
For services that are still covered under Section 203, tariff schedules containing charges, rates, rules, and regulations must be filed with the FCC. If the FCC takes no action within the notice period, then the filing becomes effective. The Commission is granted broad authority to require the submission of data showing the value of the property used to provide these services, some of which are automatically required by its rules and some of which can be required through individual requests. All filings that become effective are considered legal but only those filed pursuant to Section 204(a)(3) of the Act are deemed lawful.
For services that are detariffed, no tariffs are filed at the FCC and determination of reasonableness and any unreasonable discrimination is generally performed through the complaint process.
Pursuant to its statutory mandate to assure just, reasonable, and not unreasonably discriminatory charges for interstate telecommunications services, the FCC has adopted specific rules, applicable to incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs), regarding the development of rates, terms and conditions for interstate access and end user services. See 47 C.F.R. Parts 61 and 69. Competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) are not subject to Part 69.
ILECs can make a voluntary tariff filing at anytime, but are required to update rates annually or biennially. See 47 C.F.R. Section 69.3. To minimize the regulatory burden on reporting ILECs, as well as reviewers, the Commission has undertaken many reforms as described in the following paragraphs.
The Commission has developed standardized Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) that set forth the summary material ILECs file to support revisions to the rates in their interstate access service tariffs. The TRPs display basic data on rate development in a consistent manner, thereby facilitating review of the ILEC rate revisions by the Commission and interested parties. The TRPs have served this purpose effectively in past years.
Incentive-based regulation (price caps) was developed by the Commission to simplify the process of determining the reasonableness of rates or rate structures for those ILECs subject to price caps. ILECs having 50,000 or fewer access lines do not have to file any supporting material unless requested to do so.
In the Open Internet Order (FCC 15-24),1 the Commission adopted rules that, among other things, reclassify broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service under Title II. Providers of retail mass market broadband Internet access services must offer the service as a Title II telecommunications service. Rate-of-return ILECs that have elected to offer retail mass market broadband Internet access services as a Title II (without forbearance) prior to the Open Internet Order may continue to do so. Alternatively, they can opt into the Open Internet framework specified in the Order after notifying the Wireline Competition Bureau.
Through forbearance, the Commission has allowed those ILECs whose petitions have been granted to choose mandatory detariffing of certain broadband and packet services. See 47 U.S.C. Section 10(a).
On November 18, 2011, the Commission released the USF/ICC Transformation Order, FCC 11-161,2 requiring or permitting incumbent and competitive local exchange carriers, as part of transitioning regulation of interstate and intrastate switched access rates and reciprocal compensation rates to bill-and-keep under section 251(b)(5), to file tariffs with state commissions and the FCC. This transition affects different switched access rates at specified timeframes and establishes an Access Recovery Charge by which incumbent LECs will be able to assess end users a monthly charge to recover some or all of the revenues were permitted to recover resulting from reductions in intercarrier compensation rates.
On March 23, 2016, the Commission adopted the Rate-of-Return Order,3 reforming universal service for rate-of-return LECs. These reforms required rate-of-return LECs to make one-time tariff filings with the necessary support materials outside the normal annual filing period.
On April 20, 2017, the Commission adopted the Business Data Services Order,4 reforming the business data services/special access regulations for incumbent and competitive LECs by detariffing certain business data services and modifying the regulatory obligations for those business data services that will remain tariffed. Additionally, the Business Data Services Order adopted an X‑factor of two percent and required price cap ILECs to make a one-time filing to revise their TRPs to implement the new X‑factor to become effective on December 1, 2017.5 In particular, the Commission amended section 61.45(b)(1)(iv) of its rules to state that the X-factor shall equal 2 percent effective December 1, 2017. To ease the burden on industry, the only factor that changes in the revised TRPs is the X-factor. Base period demand and the value of GDP-PI will stay constant for this particular filing.6 We estimate that 13 price cap carriers will on a one-time basis file revised TRPs.
This information collection does not affect individuals or households; thus there are no impacts under the Privacy Act.
The statutory authority for this collection is contained in: 47 U.S.C. §§ 201, 202, 203, and 251(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §§ 201, 202 and 203, and 251(b)(5).
2. For those services still requiring cost support, TRPs assist in determining whether ILEC access charges are just and reasonable as required under the Act.
3. ILECs file interstate tariffs and supporting information, including the TRPs, electronically through the Commission’s Electronic Tariff Filing System (ETFS). We do not know the extent to which state commissions allow electronic filing of intrastate tariffs and the associated supporting materials.
4. The Commission updates the price cap and rate-of-return TRP every year to eliminate respondents’ requirement to file cost and demand data that may be more than two years old and to bring the TRP into conformance with current Commission policies. Without the TRP, except in exceptional cases, similar data would be unavailable to the Commission. The TRPs are designed to provide data to evaluate forecasts of cost and demand for the coming year which would not be available in other Commission-required documents. We are unaware of the extent to which individual state commissions update their support requirements.
5. The collection does not involve small businesses as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. However, the Commission recognizes that the ability of the ILECs to provide supporting material varies depending on the ILECs’ size. For example, the Commission does not require a TRP from small companies that file pursuant to Section 61.39 of the Commission’s rules.
6. Part 69 of the FCC’s rules requires the annual or biennial filing of access rates. In 1993, the Commission changed its rules to allow all ILECs, except price cap ILECs, to make biennial filings. Biennial filings for price cap ILECs are impractical, because the inflation index that impacts the price cap indices are required under our rules to be updated annually. Supporting materials for intrastate tariff filings will be required each year.
7. The collections are not being conducted in any manner inconsistent with the guidelines of 5 C.F.R. Section 1320.5(d)(l).
8. The 60 day notice was published in the Federal Register as required by 5 C.F.R. § 1320.8(d) on June 21, 2017 (82 FR 28318). The Commission did not receive any PRA comments.
9. The Commission does not anticipate providing any payment or gift to respondents.
10. Respondents are not being asked to submit confidential information to the Commission. If the Commission requests respondents to submit information which respondents believe is confidential, respondents may request confidential treatment of such information under Section 0.459 of the Commission’s rules.
11. There are no questions of a sensitive nature with respect to the information collected.
12. The following represents the estimates of hour burden of the collection of information:
A. Reporting Requirement of Supporting Materials for Interstate Tariffs
(1) Number of respondents: 95 incumbent LECs plus NECA.
(2) Frequency of response: One-time, on occasion, annual or biennial reporting requirements.
(3) Total number of responses annually: 96.
96 respondents x an average of 1 response per year = 96 responses.
(4) Annual hour burden per respondent: 53 hours.
(5) Total annual burden: 5,088 hours.
The Commission estimates that ILECs would make 1 filing per year, which would take 53 hours to prepare.
96 respondents x 1 filing/year x 53 hours = 5,088 hours.
(6) Total estimate of “in-house” cost to respondents: $220,259.52.
(7) Explanation of calculation:
The Commission estimates that respondents will use personnel comparable in pay to a
GS-12/Step 5 employee, earning $43.29 per hour.
5,088 hours/year x $43.29/hour = $220,259.52
B. Reporting Requirement of Supporting Materials for Intrastate Tariffs
(1) Number of respondents: 2,749.
(2) Frequency of response: One-time, on occasion, and annual reporting requirements.
(3) Total number of responses annually: 2,749.
(4) Estimated time per response: 20 hours. Without surveying the states, it is difficult to estimate the support burden for intrastate tariffs because we do not know the specific state requirements, which likely vary widely.
(5) Total annual burden: 54,980 hours.
The Commission estimates that 2,749 respondents will require 20 hours of reporting time per filing.
2,749 respondents x 20 hours per response x 1 response per year per respondent = 54,980 hours.
(6) Total estimate of “in-house” cost to respondents: $2,380,084.20.
(7) Explanation of calculation:
The Commission estimates that respondents will use personnel comparable in pay to a
GS-12/Step 5 employee, earning $43.29 per hour.
54,980 hours x $43.29 per hour = $2,380,084.20.
C. Certification Requirement
(1) Number of respondents: 1,307.
(2) Frequency of response: Annual reporting requirement.
(3) Total number of responses annually: 1,307.
(4) Estimated time per response: 0.5 hours.
(5) Total annual burden: 654 hours.
The Commission estimates that 1,307 respondents will require 0.5 hours of reporting time per filing.
1,307 respondents x 0.5 hours per response x 1 response per year per respondent = 654 (653.5 rounded up).
(6) Total estimate of “in-house” cost to respondents: $28,311.66.
(7) Explanation of calculation:
The Commission estimates that respondents will use personnel comparable in pay to a
GS-12/Step 5 employee, earning $43.29 per hour.
654 hours x $43.29 per hour = $28,311.66.
D. One-time Reporting Requirement: TRP Update with Revised X-Factor
(1) Number of respondents: 13.7
(2) Frequency of response: One-time reporting requirement.
(3) Total number of responses annually: 13.
(4) Estimated time per response: 12 hours.
(5) Total annual burden: 156 hours.
The Commission estimates that 13 respondents will require 12 hours of reporting time per filing.
13 respondents x 12 hours per response x 1 response per year per respondent = 156 hours.
(6) Total estimate of “in-house” cost to respondents: $6,753.24.
(7) Explanation of calculation:
The Commission estimates that respondents will use personnel comparable in pay to a
GS-12/Step 5 employee earning $43.29 per hour.
156 hours x $43.29 per hour = $6,753.24.
Total respondents: 2,749.
Total Annual Responses: 96 + 2,749 + 1,307 + 13 = 4,165 responses.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 5,088 + 54,980 + 654 + 156 = 60,878.
Total “in-house” cost to Respondents: $220,259.52 + 2,380,084.20 + $28,311.66 +$6,753.24 = $2,635,408.50.
13. Estimated cost to the Respondent: There are no TRP filing costs to the respondents.
14. Estimated cost to the Commission: The cost of the certification review is encompassed in our current tariff review costs.
15. The Commission notes the following update since the previous submission:
We have adjusted the number of respondents to reflect changes in the marketplace. In particular, we have decreased the number of incumbent LECs from 1,340 to 1,307. The total number of incumbent LECs plus competitive LECs has decreased from 2,840 to 2,749 (-91).
To reflect the removal of the one-time tariff filing requirements necessitated by the Rate-of-Return Report and Order and the addition of the one-time tariff filing requirement to implement the Business Data Services Order which resulted in a program change to:
The total annual responses have decreased from 5,437 to 4,165 (-1,272); and
The total annual burden hours have decreased from 66,000 to 60,878 (-5,122).
16. The Commission does not anticipate that it will publish any of the information proposed to be collected as a result of the TRP.
17. The Commission does not intend to seek approval not to display the OMB expiration date for OMB approval of the information collected.
18. There are no exceptions to the Certification Statement.
B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods:
This information collection does not employ any statistical methods.
1 Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, GN Docket No. 14-28, Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling and Order, 30 FCC Rcd 5601 (2015) (Open Internet Order).
2 Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 07-135, 05-337, 03-109, CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45, GN Docket No. 09-51, WT Docket No. 10-208, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 26 FCC Rcd 17663 (2011) (USF/ICC Transformation Order).
3 Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket Nos. 10-90 and 14-58, CC Docket No. 01-92, Report and Order, Order and Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 16-33 (adopted May 23, 2016) (Rate-of-Return Order).
4 Business Data Services in an Internet Protocol Environment, WC Docket No. 16-143 et al., Report and Order, Order, FCC 17-43 (adopted April 20, 2017) (Business Data Services Order).
5 Id., para. 257.
6 Id., para. 258.
7 We note that this figure represents 210 issuing carriers.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | 3060-0400 |
| Author | Pamela Arluk |
| Last Modified By | SYSTEM |
| File Modified | 2017-09-07 |
| File Created | 2017-09-07 |