Using web and mobile-based applications during NPS Citizen Science events

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
1024-0275 30-Day FRN.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2019-02-26	Available
DI-4001-a1978593MT.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2016-01-06	Available
1024-0275 60 day FRN.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2018-12-10	Available
1024-0275.SSA.12-12-2018.docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2018-12-12	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
234458	General Public Observations (eBird)	Other-NPS Citizen Science Registration Webpage	New
217621	Non-federal scientists: NPS Portal (Mock-up)	Other-website mock-up	Removed
217620	General Public Observations (iNaturalist)	Other-NPS Registration Webpage	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1024-0275	ICR Reference No: 201812-1024-003
Status: Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201507-1024-001
Agency/Subagency: DOI/NPS	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Using web and mobile-based applications during NPS Citizen Science events
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 05/07/2020
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/27/2019
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	05/31/2023	36 Months From Approved	05/31/2020
Responses	112,500	0	61,250
Time Burden (Hours)	9,375	0	5,104
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The National Park Service (NPS) is requesting approval to use mobile and web-based applications (e.g., iNaturalist, eBird, etc.) as a means to record on-site species observations during NPS sponsored citizen science events. iNaturalist and eBird are third-party websites that allow the public to provide observations that include locations, photographs, and sound. Both of these platforms are currently being used by visitors in parks. OMB approval will allow parks to sponsor events and use the tools to collect data during the events.The participation of citizen scientists via iNaturalist provides immediate on-site input that is often not available with the current level of NPS staffing.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 54 USC 100702 Name of Law: National Park Service Protection Interpretation and research in System
   US Code: 15 USC 3724 Name of Law: Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science
   US Code: 16 USC 1a-7 Name of Law: National Park Service Organic Act of 1916
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	83 FR 59413	11/23/2018
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	84 FR 6157	02/26/2019
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 2

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
General Public Observations (iNaturalist)
Non-federal scientists: NPS Portal (Mock-up)
General Public Observations (eBird)

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	112,500	61,250	0	51,250	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	9,375	5,104	0	4,271	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Short Statement: The adjusted net increase is reflected in our request for an annual increase of 51,250 additional observations and 4,271 respondent burden hours. This would result in an annual total of 112,500 observations and 9,375 respondent burden hours. The program change for this collection is based upon the notable success we had using iNaturalist during the Centennial BioBlitz events. We would now like to request an increase in the number of annual iNaturalist observations for this collection as well as add eBird. We did not feel it necessary to have a separate burden for non-federal scientists. This category has been removed and the burden for this group is now included in the estimated burden for iNaturalist and eBird.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $86,015

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Does this ICR request any personally identifiable information (see OMB Circular No. A-130 for an explanation of this term)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.     No

Does this ICR include a form that requires a Privacy Act Statement (see 5 U.S.C. §552a(e)(3))? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.     No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/27/2019

---