Document
Summarizing ExperieNces with Site Enrollment in NCORP Cancer Care Delivery Research Studies NCORP SENSE Project
ICR 201905-0925-001 · OMB 0925-0642 · Object 91665101.
This document may belong to an older filing. More recent activity for OMB 0925-0642:
Document Viewer [pptx]
Status: The document is viewable through fallback artifacts while conversion repair continues in the background.
Queue: A repair attempt failed. The document remains flagged for retry and verification. (priority 90 · attempts 1 · next 2026-07-28 08:04:21)
Missing: html
Download: Source copy (pptx) | pdf
Loading document viewer…
Document Metadata
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation |
|---|---|
| File Title | Summarizing ExperieNces with Site Enrollment in NCORP Cancer Care Delivery Research Studies NCORP SENSE Project |
| Author | Adjei, Brenda (NIH/NCI) [E] |
| Last Modified By | Impress |
| File Modified | 2019-05-06 |
| File Created | 2026-07-28 |
| Conversion State | failed_conversion |
Extracted Text
Summarizing ExperieNces with Site Enrollment in NCORP Cancer Care Delivery Research Studies NCORP SENSE Project NCORP SENSE Project - Rationale • Robust cancer care delivery research (CCDR) portfolio • 19 CCDR studies approved • ~2/3 assessing clinician and/or organizational characteristics • 10 cluster RCTs • Challenges • Delays in activating studies • Compliance with protocol efficiency guidelines • Site representativeness of participating sites • The Need • Understand effective strategies used by NCORP Research Bases to increase site enrollment on CCDR studies 2 Qualitative Assessment with NCORP Research Base Staff Purpose: Obtain feedback on effective strategies used by NCORP RBs regarding RB site enrollment experiences to cancer care delivery research (CCDR) studies Identify best practices/lessons learned to expedite time to study activation and enhance site representativeness Method: Select one CCDR protocol for each Research Base (see Table 1) For each protocol, conduct interviews (30-45 min) with key staff involved in study development, implementation, and coordination/ operations (n=28-35) Key staff are CCDR Subcommittee Chairs/Co-Chairs, Study Chairs/Investigators, Study Coordinators, Operations Leads, and others as appropriate 3 Selected NCORP CCDR Protocols by Research Base (n=7) Table 1. Research Base CCDR Protocol Alliance A231601CD: Improving Surgical Care and Outcomes in Older Cancer Patients Through Implementation of an Efficient Pre-Surgical Toolkit (OPTI-Surg) NRG NRG-CC007CD: Optimizing Survivorship Care Plans for Prostate Cancer Survivors who Receive Androgen Deprivation Therapy ECOG-ACRIN EAQ171CD Smokefree – Implementing Virtual Tobacco Treatment in Community Oncology Practices (Smoke Free 2.0) COG ACCL16N1CD: Documentation and Delivery of Guideline-Consistent Treatment in AYA Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia SWOG A Pragmatic Trial to Evaluate a Guideline Based Colony Stimulating Factor Standing Order Intervention and to Determine the Effectiveness of Colony Stimulating Factor Use as Prophylaxis for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy with Intermediate Risk for Febrile Neutropenia Trial Assessing CSF Prescribing Effectiveness and Risk (TrACER) URCC URCC-18004CD: Understanding the Impact of Drug Shortages on Oncology Care Delivery Wake Forest WF20817CD: Implementation of Smoking Cessation Services within NCORP Community Sites with Organized Lung Cancer Screening Programs (OaSiS) 4 Next Steps Email from Westat, Inc to schedule interviews Directly to Research Base PIs and Study Co-Chairs From: Melanie Chansky or Sophia Tsakraklides NCI Lead Brenda Adjei ([email protected]) with any questions or concerns 5