Document

Summarizing ExperieNces with Site Enrollment in NCORP Cancer Care Delivery Research Studies NCORP SENSE Project

ICR 201905-0925-001 · OMB 0925-0642 · Object 91665101.

Document Viewer [pptx]

Status: The document is viewable through fallback artifacts while conversion repair continues in the background.

Queue: A repair attempt failed. The document remains flagged for retry and verification. (priority 90 · attempts 1 · next 2026-07-28 08:04:21)

Missing: html

Download: Source copy (pptx) | pdf

Primary: presentationSource: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Loading document viewer…

Document Metadata

Record metadata
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Summarizing ExperieNces with Site Enrollment in NCORP Cancer Care Delivery Research Studies NCORP SENSE Project
Adjei, Brenda (NIH/NCI) [E]
Impress
2019-05-06
2026-07-28
failed_conversion

Extracted Text

Summarizing ExperieNces with Site Enrollment in
NCORP Cancer Care Delivery Research Studies
NCORP SENSE Project

NCORP SENSE Project - Rationale
• Robust cancer care delivery research (CCDR) portfolio
•

19 CCDR studies approved

•

~2/3 assessing clinician and/or organizational characteristics

•

10 cluster RCTs

• Challenges
•

Delays in activating studies

•

Compliance with protocol efficiency guidelines

•

Site representativeness of participating sites

• The Need
•

Understand effective strategies used by NCORP Research Bases to
increase site enrollment on CCDR studies
2

Qualitative Assessment with NCORP Research Base Staff
Purpose:
 Obtain feedback on effective strategies used by NCORP RBs
regarding RB site enrollment experiences to cancer care delivery
research (CCDR) studies
 Identify best practices/lessons learned to expedite time to study
activation and enhance site representativeness
Method:
 Select one CCDR protocol for each Research Base (see Table 1)
 For each protocol, conduct interviews (30-45 min) with key staff
involved in study development, implementation, and coordination/
operations (n=28-35)
 Key staff are CCDR Subcommittee Chairs/Co-Chairs, Study
Chairs/Investigators, Study Coordinators, Operations Leads, and
others as appropriate
3

Selected NCORP CCDR Protocols by Research Base (n=7)
Table 1.
Research Base

CCDR Protocol

Alliance

A231601CD: Improving Surgical Care and Outcomes in Older Cancer Patients
Through Implementation of an Efficient Pre-Surgical Toolkit (OPTI-Surg)

NRG

NRG-CC007CD: Optimizing Survivorship Care Plans for Prostate Cancer
Survivors who Receive Androgen Deprivation Therapy

ECOG-ACRIN

EAQ171CD Smokefree – Implementing Virtual Tobacco Treatment in Community
Oncology Practices (Smoke Free 2.0)

COG

ACCL16N1CD: Documentation and Delivery of Guideline-Consistent Treatment in
AYA Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

SWOG

A Pragmatic Trial to Evaluate a Guideline Based Colony Stimulating Factor
Standing Order Intervention and to Determine the Effectiveness of Colony
Stimulating Factor Use as Prophylaxis for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy with
Intermediate Risk for Febrile Neutropenia Trial Assessing CSF Prescribing
Effectiveness and Risk (TrACER)

URCC

URCC-18004CD: Understanding the Impact of Drug Shortages on Oncology Care
Delivery

Wake Forest

WF20817CD: Implementation of Smoking Cessation Services within NCORP
Community Sites with Organized Lung Cancer Screening Programs (OaSiS)

4

Next Steps
 Email from Westat, Inc to schedule interviews
 Directly to Research Base PIs and Study Co-Chairs
 From: Melanie Chansky or Sophia Tsakraklides

 NCI Lead
 Brenda Adjei ([email protected]) with any questions or concerns

5