60-Day FR Notice

9312

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Notices

Estimated Time per Response: Based
on staff’s review of industry sources,
each respondent will spend an
estimated 40 hours annually on the
collection of information related to the
rule.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 720
hours (18 firms × 40 hours).
General Description of Collection: On
December 22, 1992, the Commission
issued rules prescribing requirements
for a reasonable testing program to
support certificates of compliance with
the Safety Standard for Automatic
Residential Garage Door Operators (57
FR 60449). These regulations also
require manufacturers, importers, and
private labelers of residential garage
door operators to establish and maintain
records to demonstrate compliance with
the requirements for testing to support
certification of compliance. 16 CFR part
1211, subparts B and C.
Request for Comments
The CPSC solicits written comments
from all interested persons about the
proposed collection of information. The
CPSC specifically solicits information
relevant to the following topics:
—Whether the collection of information
described above is necessary for the
proper performance of the CPSC’s
functions, including whether the
information would have practical
utility;
—Whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
—Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
—Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms
of information technology.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–04706 Filed 3–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0056]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Safety Standard for
Omnidirectional Citizens Band Base
Station Antennas
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:22 Mar 13, 2019

Jkt 247001

As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
requests comments on a proposed
extension of approval of a collection of
information associated with the
Commission’s Safety Standard for
Omnidirectional Citizens Band Base
Station Antennas, approved previously
under OMB Control No. 3041–0006. The
CPSC will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting an extension of this
collection of information from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by May 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2012–
0056, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The CPSC does not accept comments
submitted by electronic mail (email),
except through www.regulations.gov.
The CPSC encourages you to submit
electronic comments by using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Division of the Secretariat,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other
personal information provided, to:
http://www.regulations.gov. Do not
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public. If furnished at all, such
information should be submitted in
writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: http://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number CPSC–2012–0056, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bretford Griffin, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301)
504–7037, or by email to: bgriffin@
cpsc.gov.
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Safety Standard for
Omnidirectional Citizens Band Base
Station Antennas.
OMB Number: 3041–0006.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers,
importers, and private labelers of
omnidirectional citizens band base
station antennas.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
Approximately seven firms supply
omnidirectional citizen band base
station antennas.
Estimated Time per Response: Based
on the information compiled by
manufacturers, importers, and private
labelers of antennas to test and maintain
records for certificates of compliance,
we estimate an average of 220 hours per
firm for annual testing and
recordkeeping.
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
1,540 hours (7 firms × 220 hours).
General Description of Collection: The
Safety Standard for Omnidirectional
Citizens Band Base Station Antennas
(16 CFR part 1204) establishes
performance requirements for
omnidirectional citizens band base
station antennas to reduce unreasonable
risks of death and injury that may result
if an antenna contacts overhead power
lines while being erected or removed
from its site. The regulations
implementing the standard (16 CFR part
1204, subpart B) require manufacturers,
importers, and private labelers of
antennas subject to the standard to test
the antennas for compliance with the
standard and to maintain records of that
testing.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Request for Comments
The CPSC solicits written comments
from all interested persons about the
proposed collection of information. The
CPSC specifically solicits information
relevant to the following topics:
—Whether the collection of information
described above is necessary for the
proper performance of the CPSC’s
functions, including whether the
information would have practical
utility;
—Whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
—Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
—Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

14MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Notices
collection techniques, or other forms
of information technology.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–04685 Filed 3–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0058]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Safety Standard for
Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
requests comments on a proposed
extension of approval of a collection of
information relating to testing and
recordkeeping requirements in the
Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power
Lawn Mowers, approved previously
under OMB Control No. 3041–0091. The
CPSC will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting an extension of this
collection of information from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by May 13, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2012–
0058, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The CPSC does not accept comments
submitted by electronic mail (email),
except through www.regulations.gov.
The CPSC encourages you to submit
electronic comments by using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described above.
Written Submissions: Submit written
submissions by mail/hand delivery/
courier to: Division of the Secretariat,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–7923.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received may be posted
without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other
SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:22 Mar 13, 2019

Jkt 247001

personal information provided, to:
http://www.regulations.gov. Do not
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public. If furnished at all, such
information should be submitted in
writing.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: http://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number CPSC–2012–0058, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bretford Griffin, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7037, or by email to: bgriffin@
cpsc.gov.
CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Safety Standard for WalkBehind Power Lawn Mowers.
OMB Number: 3041–0091.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers and
importers of walk-behind power lawn
mowers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
Approximately 25 manufacturers and
importers of walk-behind power lawn
mowers.
Estimated Time per Response: Walkbehind power lawn mowers are
manufactured seasonally to meet
demand. They are manufactured during
an estimated 130 days out of the year.
When they are manufactured, firms are
required to test and maintain records of
those tests. Staff estimates three hours
daily for testing and recordkeeping per
firm totaling 390 hours per firm (3 hours
× 130 days). In addition, to produce
labels and apply labels on the newly
manufactured lawn mowers, staff
estimates one hour daily for each firm
during the production cycle for a total
of 130 hours per firm (1 hour × 130
days).
Total Estimated Annual Burden:
9,750 hours on testing and
recordkeeping (25 firms × 390 hours)
and 3,250 hours for labeling (25 firms ×
130 hours). Aggregate annual burden
hours related to testing, recordkeeping,
and labeling are estimated to be 520
hours per firm and 13,000 hours for the
industry.
General Description of Collection: In
1979, the Commission issued the Safety
Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn
Mowers (16 CFR part 1205) to address

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

PO 00000

Frm 00026

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

9313

blade contact injuries. Subpart B of the
standard sets forth regulations
prescribing requirements for a
reasonable testing program to support
certificates of compliance with the
standard for walk-behind power lawn
mowers. 16 CFR part 1205, subpart B.
In addition, section 14(a) of the CPSA
(15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires
manufacturers, importers, and private
labelers of a consumer product subject
to a consumer product safety standard
to issue a certificate stating that the
product complies with all applicable
consumer product safety standards.
Section 14(a) of the CPSA also requires
that the certificate of compliance must
be based on a test of each product or
upon a reasonable testing program. The
information collection is necessary
because these regulations require
manufacturers and importers to
establish and maintain records to
demonstrate compliance with the
requirements for testing and labeling to
support the certification of compliance.
Request for Comments
The CPSC solicits written comments
from all interested persons about the
proposed collection of information. The
CPSC specifically solicits information
relevant to the following topics:
—Whether the collection of information
described above is necessary for the
proper performance of the CPSC’s
functions, including whether the
information would have practical
utility;
—Whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
—Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
—Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms
of information technology.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–04686 Filed 3–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
Wednesday, March 13,
2019; 11:00 a.m.*

TIME AND DATE:

* The Commission unanimously determined by
recorded vote that Agency business requires calling

E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM

Continued

14MRN1