82FR19080-30 day

19080

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 25, 2017 / Notices

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Agency Proposal
for the Collection of Information
Submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for Review;
Comment Request
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Commission has
submitted a proposal for the collection
of information to OMB for approval. The
proposed information collection is a 3year extension of the current ‘‘generic
clearance’’ (approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
No. 3117–0016) under which the
Commission can issue information
collections (specifically, producer,
importer, purchaser, and foreign
producer questionnaires and certain
institution notices) for the following
types of import injury investigations:
Antidumping, countervailing duty,
escape clause, market disruption,
NAFTA safeguard, and ‘‘interference
with programs of the USDA.’’ Any
comments submitted to OMB on the
proposed information collection should
be specific, indicating which part of the
questionnaires or study plan are
objectionable, describing the issue in
detail, and including specific revisions
or language changes.
DATES: To be assured of consideration,
comments should be submitted to OMB
by May 25, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Comments about the
proposal should be directed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building,
SUMMARY:

Washington, DC 20503, Attention:
Wendy Liberante, Desk Officer for U.S.
International Trade Commission. Copies
of any comments should be provided to
Jeremy Wise (U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the proposed collection of
information and supporting
documentation may be obtained from
Nathanael Comly (USITC,
[email protected]; 202–205–
3174). Hearing-impaired persons can
obtain information on this matter by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (http://
www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(1) The proposed information
collection consists of five forms, namely
the Sample Producers’, Sample
Importers’, Sample Purchasers’, and
Sample Foreign Producers’
questionnaires (separate forms are
provided for questionnaires issued for
the five-year reviews), Sample
Administrative Protective Order
Application Form and Sample Notice of
Institution for Five-Year Reviews.
(2) The types of items contained
within the sample questionnaires,
administrative protective order
application, and institution notice are
largely determined by statute. Actual
questions formulated for use in a
specific investigation depend upon such
factors as the nature of the industry, the
relevant issues, the ability of
respondents to supply the data, and the
availability of data from secondary
sources.

(3) The information collected through
questionnaires issued under the generic
clearance for import injury
investigations is consolidated by
Commission staff and forms much of the
statistical base for the Commission’s
determinations. Affirmative
Commission determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
investigations result in the imposition of
duties on imports entering the United
States, determined by the Department of
Commerce, which are in addition to any
normal customs duties. If the
Commission makes an affirmative
determination in a five-year review, the
existing antidumping or countervailing
duty order remains in place. The data
developed in escape-clause, market
disruption, and interference-withUSDA-program investigations (if the
Commission finds affirmatively) are
used by the President/U.S. Trade
Representative to determine the type of
relief, if any, to be provided to domestic
industries.
The submissions made to the
Commission of the administrative
protective order application form forms
the basis for which parties are granted
disclosure of business proprietary
information. The submissions made to
the Commission in response to the
notices of institution of five-year
reviews form the basis for the
Commission’s determination as to
whether a full or expedited review
should be conducted.
(4) Likely respondents consist of
businesses (including foreign
businesses) or farms that produce,
import, or purchase products under
investigation. Estimated total annual
reporting burden for the period July
2017–June 2020 that will result from the
collection of information is presented
below.

TABLE 1—PROJECTED ANNUAL BURDEN DATA, BY TYPE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION, JULY 2017–JUNE 2020
Producer
questionnaires

Importer
questionnaires

Purchaser
questionnaires

Foreign
producer
questionnaires

Institution
notices for
5-year reviews

Number of respondents ...............
Frequency of response ................
Total annual responses ...............
Hours per response .....................

750
1
750
52

2,000
1
2,000
41

1,600
1
1,600
23

1,400
1
1,400
22

183
1
183
10

856
1
856
3

6,789
1
6,789
28.4

Total hours ............................

39,000

82,000

36,800

30,800

1,830

2,568

192,998

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Item

1 e.g.

Other 1

Administrative Protective Order forms and questionnaires to purchasers in the adequacy phase of a review investigation.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:42 Apr 24, 2017

Jkt 241001

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM

25APN1

Total

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 25, 2017 / Notices
No record keeping burden is known to
result from the proposed collection of
information.
By order of the Commission.
Dated: April 19, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–08258 Filed 4–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1050]

Certain Dental Ceramics, Products
Thereof, and Methods of Making the
Same Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
March 17, 2017, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Ivoclar Vivadent AG of
Schaan, Liechtenstein; Ivoclar Vivadent,
Inc. of Amherst, New York; and Ardent,
Inc. of Amherst, New York. A
supplement to the complaint was filed
on April 3, 2017. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain dental ceramics, products
thereof, and methods of making the
same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
7,452,836 (‘‘the ’836 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 6,517,623 (‘‘the ’623 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,802,894 (‘‘the ’894
patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 6,455,451
(‘‘the ’451 patent’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:42 Apr 24, 2017

Jkt 241001

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
April 18, 2017, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain dental ceramics,
products thereof, and methods of
making the same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15–19, and 22 of
the ’836 patent; claim 27 of the ’623
patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 12, 16, 21, 23, 38,
and 39 of the ’894 patent; and claims 3,
4, 17, 18, 19, 30, 52, 53, and 61 of the
’451 patent, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(e)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:

PO 00000

Frm 00066

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 9990

19081

Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Benderestrasse 2,
FL–9494, Schaan, Liechtenstein
Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc., 175 Pineview
Drive, Amherst, NY 14228
Ardent, Inc., 175 Pineview Dr.,
Amherst, NY14228
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
GC Corporation, 3–2–14 Hongo,
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–0033 Japan
GC America, Inc., 3737 W. 127th Street,
Alsip, IL 60803
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 19, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–08259 Filed 4–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM

25APN1