Download:
pdf |
pdfOMB No. 3117‐0016/USITC No. 17‐3‐3802; Expiration Date: 6/30/2020
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)
U.S. PURCHASERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
TIN‐ AND CHROMIUM‐COATED STEEL SHEET FROM JAPAN
This questionnaire must be received by the Commission by January 8, 2018
See last page for filing instructions.
The information called for in this questionnaire is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in
connection with its review of the antidumping duty order concerning Tin‐ and Chromium‐Coated Steel Sheet (“TCCSS”)
from Japan (inv. No. 731‐TA‐860 (Third Review)). The information requested in the questionnaire is requested under the
authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII. This report is mandatory and failure to reply as directed can result in a
subpoena or other order to compel the submission of records or information in your possession (19 U.S.C. § 1333(a)).
Further information on this questionnaire can be obtained from Cindy Cohen (202‐205‐3230, [email protected]).
Name of firm
Address
City
State
Zip Code
Website
Has your firm purchased TCCSS (as defined on the next page) from any source (domestic or foreign) at any time
since January 1, 2012’?
NO
(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the questionnaire to the Commission)
YES
(Complete all parts of the questionnaire, and return the entire questionnaire to the Commission)
Return questionnaire via the Commission Drop Box by clicking on the following link:
https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/. (PIN: TCCSS)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission. By
means of this certification I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the
information provided in this questionnaire and throughout this proceeding in any other import‐injury proceedings or reviews
conducted by the Commission on the same or similar merchandise.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this
proceeding or other proceedings may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits,
reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C.
Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. I understand that all
contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Name of Authorized Official Title of Authorized Official
Phone:
Date
Signature
Email address
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 2
PART I.—GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.‐‐On August 28, 2000, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) issued an antidumping
duty order on imports of TCCSS from Japan. On May 1, 2017, the Commission instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. If both the Commission and Commerce make
an affirmative determination, the order will remain in place. If either the Commission or Commerce
makes a negative determination, Commerce will revoke the order. Questionnaires and other
information pertinent to this proceeding are available at
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2017/tin_and_chromium_coated_steel_sheet_japan
/third_review_full.htm.
TCCSS covered by these investigations is tin mill flat‐rolled products that are coated or plated with tin,
chromium or chromium oxides. Flat‐rolled steel products coated with tin are known as tin plate. Flat‐
rolled steel products coated with chromium or chromium oxides are known as tin‐free steel or
electrolytic chromium‐coated steel. The scope includes all the noted tin mill products regardless of
thickness, width, form (in coils or cut sheets), coating type (electrolytic or otherwise), edge (trimmed,
untrimmed or further processed, such and scroll cut), coating thickness, surface finish, temper, coating
metal (tin, chromium, chromium oxide), reduction (single‐ or double‐reduced), and whether or not
coated with a plastic material. All products that meet the written physical description are within the
scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded.
TCCSS is currently imported under statistical reporting numbers 7210.11.00, 7210.12.00, 7210.50.00,
7212.10.00, and 7212.50.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). It may also
be imported under HTSUS statistical reporting number 7225.99.00 and 7226.99.01. The HTSUS
provisions are for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive.
Excluded TCCSS Products ‐‐Single reduced electrolytically chromium coated steel with a thickness 0.238
mm (85 pound base box) (± 10%) or 0.251 mm (90 pound base box) (± 10%) or 0.255 mm (± 10%) with
770 mm (minimum width) (± 1.588 mm) by 900 mm (maximum length if sheared) sheet size or 30.6875
inches (minimum width) (± 1/16 inch) and 35.4 inches (maximum length if sheared) sheet size; with type
MR or higher (per ASTM) A623 steel chemistry; batch annealed at T2 1/2 anneal temper, with a yield
strength of 31 to 42 kpsi (214 to 290 Mpa); with a tensile strength of 43 to 58 kpsi (296 to 400 Mpa);
with a chrome coating restricted to 32 to 150 mg/m 2; with a chrome oxide coating restricted to 6 to 25
mg/m 2 with a modified 7B ground roll finish or blasted roll finish; with roughness average (Ra) 0.10 to
0.35 micrometers, measured with a stylus instrument with a stylus radius of 2 to 5 microns, a trace
length of 5.6 mm, and a cut‐off of 0.8 mm, and the measurement traces shall be made perpendicular to
the rolling direction; with an oil level of 0.17 to 0.37 grams/base box as type BSO, or 2.5 to 5.5 mg/m 2as
type DOS, or 3.5 to 6.5 mg/m 2 as type ATBC; with electrical conductivity of static probe voltage drop of
0.46 volts drop maximum, and with electrical conductivity degradation to 0.70 volts drop maximum
after stoving (heating to 400 degrees F for 100 minutes followed by a cool to room temperature).
Single reduced electrolytically chromium‐or tin‐coated steel in the gauges of 0.0040 inch nominal,
0.0045 inch nominal, 0.0050 inch nominal, 0.0061 inch nominal (55 pound base box weight), 0.0066 inch
nominal (60 pound base box weight), and 0.0072 inch nominal (65 pound base box weight), regardless
of width, temper, finish, coating or other properties. Single reduced electrolytically chromium coated
steel in the gauge of 0.024 inch, with widths of 27.0 inches or 31.5 inches, and with T‐1 temper
properties. Single reduced electrolytically chromium coated steel, with a chemical composition of
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 3
0.005% max carbon, 0.030% max silicon, 0.25% max manganese, 0.025% max phosphorous, 0.025% max
sulfur, 0.070% max aluminum, and the balance iron, with a metallic chromium layer of 70‐130 mg/m 2,
with a chromium oxide layer of 5‐30 mg/m 2, with a tensile strength of 260‐440 N/mm 2, with an
elongation of 28‐48%, with a hardness (HR‐30T) of 40‐58, with a surface roughness of 0.5‐1.5 microns
Ra, with magnetic properties of Bm (KG) 10.0 minimum, Br (KG) 8.0 minimum, Hc (Oe) 2.5‐3.8, and MU
1400 minimum, as measured with a Riken Denshi DC magnetic characteristic measuring machine, Model
BHU‐60. Bright finish tin‐coated sheet with a thickness equal to or exceeding 0.0299 inch, coated to
thickness of 3/4 pound (0.000045 inch) and 1 pound (0.00006 inch).
Electrolytically chromium coated steel having ultra‐flat shape defined as oil can maximum depth of 5/64
inch (2.0 mm) and edge wave maximum of 5/64 inch (2.0 mm) and no wave to penetrate more than 2.0
inches (51.0 mm) from the strip edge and coilset or curling requirements of average maximum of 5/64
inch (2.0 mm) (based on six readings, three across each cut edge of a 24 inches (61 cm) long sample with
no single reading exceeding 4/32 inch (3.2 mm) and no more than two readings at 4/32 inch (3.2 mm))
and (for 85 pound base box item only: cross buckle maximums of 0.001 inch (0.0025 mm) average
having no reading above 0.005 inch (0.127 mm)), with a camber maximum of 1/4 inch (6.3 mm) per 20
feet (6.1 meters), capable of being bent 120 degrees on a 0.002 inch radius without cracking, with a
chromium coating weight of metallic chromium at 100 mg/m2 and chromium oxide of 10 mg/m 2, with a
chemistry of 0.13% maximum carbon, 0.60% maximum manganese, 0.15% maximum silicon, 0.20%
maximum copper, 0.04% maximum phosphorous, 0.05% maximum sulfur, and 0.20% maximum
aluminum, with a surface finish of Stone Finish 7C, with a DOS‐A oil at an aim level of 2 mg/square
meter, with not more than 15 inclusions/foreign matter in 15 feet (4.6 meters) (with inclusions not to
exceed 1/32 inch (0.8 mm) in width and 3/64 inch (1.2 mm) in length), with thickness/temper
combinations of either 60 pound base box (0.0066 inch) double reduced CADR8 temper in widths of
25.00 inches, 27.00 inches, 27.50 inches, 28.00 inches, 28.25 inches, 28.50 inches, 29.50 inches, 29.75
inches, 30.25 inches, 31.00 inches, 32.75 inches, 33.75 inches, 35.75 inches, 36.25 inches, 39.00 inches,
or 43.00 inches, or 85 pound base box (0.0094 inch) single reduced CAT4 temper in widths of 25.00
inches, 27.00 inches, 28.00 inches, 30.00 inches, 33.00 inches, 33.75 inches, 35.75 inches, 36.25 inches,
or 43.00 inches, with width tolerance of #1/8 inch, with a thickness tolerance of #0.0005 inch, with a
maximum coil weight of 20,000 pounds (9071.0 kg), with a minimum coil weight of 18,000 pounds
(8164.8 kg) with a coil inside diameter of 16 inches (40.64 cm) with a steel core, with a coil maximum
outside diameter of 59.5 inches (151.13 cm), with a maximum of one weld (identified with a paper flag)
per coil, with a surface free of scratches, holes, and rust.
Electrolytically tin coated steel having differential coating with 1.00 pound/base box equivalent on the
heavy side, with varied coating equivalents in the lighter side (detailed below), with a continuous cast
steel chemistry of type MR, with a surface finish of type 7B or 7C, with a surface passivation of 0.7
mg/square foot of chromium applied as a cathodic dichromate treatment, with coil form having
restricted oil film weights of 0.3‐0.4 grams/base box of type DOS‐A oil, coil inside diameter ranging from
15.5 to 17 inches, coil outside diameter of a maximum 64 inches, with a maximum coil weight of 25,000
pounds, and with temper/coating/dimension combinations of: (1) CAT 4 temper, 1.00/.050 pound/base
box coating, 70 pound/base box (0.0077 inch) thickness, and 33.1875 inch ordered width; or (2) CAT5
temper, 1.00/0.50 pound/base box coating, 75 pound/base box (0.0082 inch) thickness, and 34.9375
inch or 34.1875 inch ordered width; or (3) CAT5 temper, 1.00/0.50 pound/base box coating, 107
pound/base box (0.0118 inch) thickness, and 30.5625 inch or 35.5625 inch ordered width; or (4) CADR8
temper, 1.00/0.50 pound/base box coating, 85 pound/base box (0.0093 inch) thickness, and 35.5625
inch ordered width; or (5) CADR8 temper, 1.00/0.25 pound/base box coating, 60 pound/base box
(0.0066 inch) thickness, and 35.9375 inch ordered width; or (6) CADR8 temper, 1.00/0.25 pound/base
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 4
box coating, 70 pound/base box (0.0077 inch) thickness, and 32.9375 inch, 33.125 inch, or 35.1875 inch
ordered width.
Electrolytically tin coated steel having differential coating with 1.00 pound/base box equivalent on the
heavy side, with varied coating equivalents on the lighter side (detailed below), with a continuous cast
steel chemistry of type MR, with a surface finish of type 7B or 7C, with a surface passivation of 0.5
mg/square foot of chromium applied as a cathodic dichromate treatment, with ultra‐flat scroll cut sheet
form, with CAT 5 temper with 1.00/0.10 pound/base box coating, with alithograph logo printed in a
uniform pattern on the 0.10 pound coating side with a clear protective coat, with both sides waxed to a
level of 15‐20 mg/216 sq. in., with ordered dimension combinations of (1) 75 pound/base box (0.0082
inch) thickness and 34.9375 inch x 31.748 inch scroll cut dimensions; or (2) 75 pound/base box (0.0082
inch) thickness and 34.1875 inch x 29.076 inch scroll cut dimensions; or (3) 107 pound/base box (0.0118
inch) thickness and 30.5625 inch x 34.125 inch scroll cut dimension.
Tin‐free steel coated with a metallic chromium layer between 100‐200 mg/m2and a chromium oxide
layer between 5‐30 mg/m2; chemical composition of 0.05% maximum carbon, 0.03% maximum silicon,
0.60% maximum manganese, 0.02% maximum phosphorous, and 0.02% maximum sulfur; magnetic flux
density (“Br”) of 10 kg minimum and a coercive force (“Hc”) of 3.8 Oe minimum.
Tin‐free steel laminated on one or both sides of the surface with a polyester film, consisting of two
layers (an amorphous layer and an outer crystal layer), that contains no more than the indicated
amounts of the following environmental hormones: 1 mg/kg BADGE (BisPhenol—A Di‐glycidyl Ether), 1
mg/kg BFDGE (BisPhenol—F Di‐glycidyl Ether), and 3 mg/kg BPA (BisPhenol—A).
Purchaser.‐‐Any firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in purchasing
TCCSS from another firm that produces, imports, or otherwise distributes TCCSS.
Reporting of information.‐‐ If information is not readily available from your records, provide carefully
prepared estimates. If your firm is completing more than one questionnaire in connection with this
proceeding (i.e., a producer, importer, and/or purchaser questionnaire), you need not respond to
duplicated questions.
Confidentiality.‐‐The commercial and financial data furnished in response to this questionnaire that
reveal the individual operations of your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the
extent that such data are not otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may
be required by law (see 19 U.S.C. § 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a
manner that will reveal the individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of
numerical business proprietary information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential
business information only at the request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Verification.‐‐The information submitted in this questionnaire is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission. To facilitate possible verification of data, please keep all of your files, worksheets, and
supporting documents used in the preparation of the questionnaire response. Please also retain a copy
of the final document that you submit.
Release of information.‐‐The information provided by your firm in response to this questionnaire, as
well as any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative
protective order provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1677f) and section 207.7 of the
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 5
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and
other authorized individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection
with this proceeding or other import‐injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or
similar merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were
divulged to unauthorized individuals.
I‐1.
OMB statistics.‐‐Please report the actual number of hours required and the cost to your firm of
completing this questionnaire.
I‐2.
Hours
Dollars
The questions in this questionnaire have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that
issues of concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful,
and as limited as possible. Public reporting burden for this questionnaire is estimated to average
40 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, and
completing and reviewing the questionnaire.
We welcome comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate, suggestions for
reducing the burden, and any suggestions for improving this questionnaire. Please attach such
comments to your response or send to the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E St. SW,
Washington, DC 20436.
Establishments covered.‐‐Provide the name and address of establishment(s) covered by this
questionnaire, if different from that listed on the cover page. Firms operating more than one
establishment should combine the data for all establishments into a single response.
“Establishment”‐‐Each facility of a firm involved in the purchase of TCCSS, including auxiliary
facilities operated in conjunction with (whether or not physically separate from) such facilities.
I‐3.
Ownership.‐‐Is your firm owned, in whole or in part, by any other firm?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Extent of ownership
Firm name
Address
(percent)
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
I‐4.
I‐5.
I‐6.
Page 6
Related importers/exporters.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or
foreign, that import TCCSS into the United States or that export TCCSS to the United States?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name
Country
Affiliation
Related producers.‐‐Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or foreign, that
produce TCCSS?
No
Yes‐‐List the following information.
Firm name and country
Country
Affiliation
Business plan.‐‐Does your company or any related firm have a business plan or any internal
documents that describe, discuss, or analyze expected market conditions for TCCSS?
No
If yes, please provide these documents. If you are not providing the
Yes requested documents, please explain why not.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 7
This questionnaire only applies to TCCSS covered by these investigations. Please do not report
information for the excluded products listed on pages 2‐4.
PART II.‐‐PURCHASES
Contact information.‐‐Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which Commission
staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted in this questionnaire.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
II‐1. Purchases.—
(a)
Please estimate your firm’s total U.S. purchases of TCCSS in 2016. (Do not include
imports for which your firm was the importer of record; such imports should be
reported in your U.S. importer’s questionnaire.)
Quantity (short tons)
(b)
Estimate the percentage of the quantity of your firm’s purchases of TCCSS in 2016 that
were produced in each of the specified countries.
Item
TCCSS produced in:
United States
%
Japan
%
All other countries1
%
Sources unknown
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
1
Please identify these countries:
Share of quantity of 2016 purchases
(percent)
0.0 %
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
II‐3.
Page 8
Changes in purchasing patterns.‐‐Please indicate how the shares of your firm’s purchases of
TCCSS from different sources have changed since January 1, 2012.
Did not
Source of purchases purchase Decreased Increased Constant Fluctuated
Explanation for trend
United States
Japan
All other countries
Sources unknown
II‐4.
Country knowledge.‐‐Please indicate the countries of origin with which your firm has
experience or information in the TCCSS market.
United
States
II‐5.
Japan
Other
countries
Other countries (specify)
Supplier identification.‐‐Please list your firm’s FIVE largest suppliers for TCCSS since January 1,
2012. Also, provide the share of the quantity of your firm’s total purchases of TCCSS that each of
these suppliers accounted for in 2016.
No.
Supplier’s name
City and state
Share of quantity of
2016 purchases
1
%
2
%
3
%
4
%
5
%
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 9
This questionnaire only applies to TCCSS covered by these investigations. Please do not report
information for the excluded products listed on pages 2‐4.
PART III.‐‐MARKET CHARACTERISTICS AND PURCHASING PRACTICES
III‐1. Firm type.‐‐Which of the following best describes your firm as a purchaser of TCCSS (check all
that apply)?
End user (indicate the products that your firm manufactures)
Food
cans
Pet food Aerosol
cans
cans
Paint
cans
Other
List other products
Distributor
Other (Describe:
)
If your firm is a distributor of TCCSS, please answer questions III‐2 and III‐3.
III‐2. Competition for sales.‐‐Do you compete for sales to your customers with the manufacturers or
importers from which you purchase TCCSS?
No
Yes If yes, please describe.
III‐3.
Types of customers.‐‐What are the major types of consumers to which you sell TCCSS?
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 10
If your firm is an end user of TCCSS, please answer questions III‐4 and III‐5.
III‐4. End uses.—
(a) List the top 3 products you make using TCCSS and estimate the percent of your total
production cost that is accounted for by TCCSS and by other inputs (such as labor,
energy, and other raw materials).
Share of total cost in each of the product(s) your
Total
firm produces accounted for by
(should
sum to
Product(s) your firm
100.0%
produces
across)
TCCSS
Other inputs
%
+
% =
0.0 %
%
+
% =
0.0 %
%
+
% =
0.0 %
(b)
Have there been any changes in the end uses of TCCSS since January 1, 2012? Do you
anticipate any future changes?
Changes in end uses No
Changes since
January 1, 2012
Anticipated changes
Yes
Explain
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
III‐5.
Page 11
Demand for end use products.‐‐
(a)
Has the demand for your firm’s final products incorporating TCCSS changed since
January 1, 2012?
Increased
No change
(b)
III‐6.
Decreased
Fluctuated
Has this had any effect on your firm’s demand for TCCSS?
No
Yes
Explain
Substitutes.—
(a)
Can other products be substituted for TCCSS?
No
Yes‐‐Please fill out the table.
End use in which this
substitute is used
Substitute
Have changes in the price of this substitute
affected the price for TCCSS?
No Yes
Explanation
1.
2.
3.
(b)
Have there been any changes in the number or types of products that can be
substituted for TCCSS since January 1, 2012? Do you anticipate any future changes?
Changes in substitutes No Yes
Changes since January
1, 2012
Anticipated changes
Explain
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
III‐7.
Page 12
Demand trends.‐‐ Indicate how demand within the United States and outside of the United
States (if known) for TCCSS has changed since January 1, 2012, and how you anticipate demand
will change in the future. Explain any trends and describe the principal factors that have
affected, and that you anticipate will affect, these changes in demand.
Fluctuate
Overall
No
Overall
with no
increase change decrease clear trend
Market
Explanation and factors
Demand since January 1, 2012
Within the United States
Outside the United States
Anticipated future demand
Within the United States
Outside the United States
III‐8.
III‐9.
Market studies.‐‐Please provide as a separate attachment to this request any studies, surveys,
etc. that you are aware of that quantify and/or otherwise discuss TCCSS supply (including
production capacity and capacity utilization) and demand in (1) the United States, (2) each of
the other major producing/consuming countries, including Japan, and (3) the world as a whole.
Of particular interest is such data from 2012 to the present and forecasts for the future.
Country preferences.‐‐Do you or your customers ever specifically order TCCSS from one country
in particular over other possible sources of supply?
No
Yes
If yes, identify the countries and explain.
III‐10. Importance of purchasing domestic product.‐‐Please fill out the table below, estimating the
percentage of your firm’s total 2016 purchases of TCCSS that required TCCSS produced in the
United States.
Estimated percentage of
your firm’s total 2016
purchases of TCCSS
Purchases that did not require domestic product
%
Purchases that were required by law or regulation to be domestic
product (e.g., government purchases under “Buy American” provisions)
%
Purchases that were not required by law or regulation, but were
required by your customers to be domestic product
%
Purchases that were required to be domestic product for other reasons
(explain: )
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
0.0 %
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 13
III‐11. Conditions of competition.‐‐
(a) Is the TCCSS market subject to business cycles (other than general economy‐wide
conditions) and/or other conditions of competition distinctive to TCCSS?
Check all that apply.
Please describe.
No
Skip to question III‐12.
Yes‐Business cycles (e.g.
seasonal business)
Yes‐Other distinctive
conditions of competition
(b) If yes, have there been any changes in the business cycles or conditions of competition for
TCCSS since January 1, 2012?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
III‐12. Decisions based on producer and country‐of‐origin.‐‐How often does your firm, and if you
know, do your customers, make purchasing decisions involving TCCSS based on its producer or
country of origin?
Item
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
If at least sometimes, explain.
Decision based on producer
Your firm
Your customers
Decision based on country of origin
Your firm
Your customers
III‐13. Purchases from U.S. mills.—Are there any advantages to purchasing from U.S. mills?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 14
III‐14. Availability of supply.‐‐Has the availability of TCCSS in the U.S. market changed since January 1,
2012? Do you anticipate any future changes?
Availability in the U.S.
Please explain, noting the countries and reasons for the
market
No Yes changes.
Changes since January 1, 2012:
U.S.‐produced product
Imports from Japan
Imports from all other
countries
U.S.‐produced product
Imports from Japan
Imports from all other
countries
Anticipated changes:
III‐15. Availability of specific product types.‐‐Are certain grades/types/sizes of TCCSS only available
from certain country sources?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify the countries and the grade/type/size.
III‐16. Supply constraints.‐‐Has any firm refused, declined, or been unable to supply your firm with
TCCSS since January 1, 2012 (examples include placing customers on allocation or “controlled
order entry,” declining to accept new customers or renew existing customers, delivering less
than the quantity promised, being unable to meet timely shipment commitments, etc.)?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 15
III‐17. Purchasing frequency.‐‐
(a)
How frequently do you make purchases of TCCSS (check one)?
Daily Weekly
(b)
Monthly
Quarterly Annually
Other If other, specify
Do you expect this purchasing frequency to change in the next two years?
No
Yes If yes, explain.
III‐18. Number of suppliers contacted.‐‐How many suppliers do you generally contact before making a
purchase? Between and firms.
III‐19. Supplier negotiations.‐‐Do your firm’s purchases of TCCSS usually involve negotiations between
supplier and purchaser?
No
If yes, explain the factors you generally negotiate and note whether
Yes your firm quotes competing prices during negotiations.
III‐20. Change in suppliers.‐‐Has your firm changed suppliers since January 1, 2012?
No
If yes, please list the supplier(s), whether the firm was added or
Yes dropped, and the reasons for the change.
III‐21. New suppliers.‐‐
(a)
Are you aware of any new suppliers, either foreign or domestic, that have entered the
market since January 1, 2012?
No
(b)
Yes If yes, please identify the firms.
Do you expect new TCCSS suppliers to enter the U.S. market?
No
Yes If yes, please explain.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 16
III‐22. Supplier qualification.‐‐Do you require your suppliers to be or to become certified or qualified
to sell TCCSS to your firm?
If yes, provide the following information.
The number of days to qualify a new supplier.
A general description of the certification or qualification process. Also, a brief
description of the factors that you consider when qualifying a new supplier (e.g., quality
of product, reliability of supplier, etc.).
No
Yes
Number
of days Process and factors
III‐23. Failure to certify.‐‐Since January 1, 2012, have any domestic or foreign producers failed in their
attempts to certify or qualify their TCCSS with your firm or have any producers lost their
approved status?
No
Yes
If yes, please identify these firms, the countries where they are located, and
the reasons why they failed the certification/qualification.
III‐24. Major purchasing factors.‐‐ Please list, in order of their importance, the three major factors
your firm considers in deciding from whom to purchase TCCSS (examples include availability,
extension of credit, contracts, price, quality, range of supplier’s product line, traditional supplier,
etc.).
1.
2.
3.
Please list any other factors that are very important in your purchase decisions:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 17
III‐25. Purchasing factors.‐‐Please rate the importance of the following factors in your firm’s
purchasing decisions for TCCSS.
Very
important
Factor
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Availability
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Extension of credit
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Price
Product consistency
Product range
Quality meets industry standards
Quality exceeds industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
U.S. transportation costs
III‐26. Quality characteristics.‐‐What characteristics does your firm consider when determining the
quality of TCCSS?
III‐27. Minimum quality.‐‐How often does TCCSS from the following countries meet minimum quality
specifications for your uses or your customers’ uses?
Rarely or
Don’t
Source
Always
Usually
Sometimes
never
know
United States
Japan
Other:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 18
Reminder: Please only report information for TCCSS covered by these investigations. Please do not
report information for the excluded products listed on pages 2‐4.
III‐28. (a) How many different TCCSS product specifications did you purchase in 2016?
Source
Number of specifications
TCCSS from all sources
TCCSS produced in the United States
TCCSS produced in Japan
TCCSS produced in other countries
(b) If you purchased fewer specifications from any source compared to other sources, please
explain.
(c) List the following information for any TCCSS specifications for which your purchasing
options were limited only to TCCSS from a single country.
Percentage of total
quantity of TCCSS
purchased from all
sources
Source
Number of
specifications
TCCSS specifications
purchased exclusively
from U.S. sources
TCCSS specifications
purchased exclusively
from Japanese sources
TCCSS specifications
purchased exclusively
from other countries
List the specifications
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 19
III‐29. Frequency of decisions based on price.‐‐How often does your firm purchase the TCCSS that is
offered at the lowest price?
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Never
III‐30. Price leaders.‐‐A price leader is defined as (1) one or more firms that initiate a price change,
either upward or downward, that is followed by other firms, or (2) one or more firms that have a
significant impact on prices. A price leader is not necessarily the lowest‐priced supplier.
Please list the names of any firms you considered price leaders in the TCCSS market since
January 1, 2012.
Firm(s)
Describe how the firm(s) exhibited price leadership
III‐31. Changes in U.S. industry.‐‐
(a)
Please identify and discuss any improvements/changes in the U.S. TCCSS industry since
January 1, 2012 and explain the factors, including the order(s) under review, that were
responsible for each improvement/change.
Please discuss any improvements/changes that you anticipate in the future in the U.S.
TCCSS industry. Identify the time period and causes for these improvements/changes.
(b)
III‐32. Effect of revocation of orders.‐‐ What do you think will be the effects on your firm and on the
U.S. market of any revocation of the antidumping duty order on imports of TCCSS from Japan?
III‐33. Date of delivery.‐‐Do you provide suppliers with a desired date of delivery to your facility at the
time the purchase order is placed?
No
Yes
If yes, how and when is the date of delivery specified?
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 20
III‐34. Delivery delays.‐‐Has your firm experienced delivery delays from any suppliers of TCCSS since
2012?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe, noting the supplier, the dates, whether or not the
delay caused your plant to shutdown, and any other relevant information.
III‐35. Supply issues.‐‐Since 2012, has your firm had any difficulty in acquiring the needed levels of
TCCSS?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
III‐36. Processing facilities.‐‐Does your firm have processing facilities on the grounds of any U.S.
producer?
No
Yes—Please answer the following questions.
(a) Are there separate negotiations for consumption at these facilities?
No
Yes
(b) Are other suppliers allowed to compete for this business?
No
Yes
If yes, identify these suppliers.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 21
This questionnaire only applies to TCCSS covered by these investigations. Please do not report
information for the excluded products listed on pages 2‐4.
PART IV.‐‐PRODUCT COMPARISIONS
IV‐1. Interchangeability.‐‐Is TCCSS produced in the United States and in other countries
interchangeable (i.e., can they physically be used in the same applications)?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = the products from a specified country‐pair are always interchangeable
F = the products are frequently interchangeable
S = the products are sometimes interchangeable
N = the products are never interchangeable
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
United States
Japan
Japan
Other countries
For any country‐pair producing TCCSS which is sometimes or never interchangeable, please
identify the country‐pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude interchangeable use:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
IV‐2.
Page 22
Factors other than price.‐‐Are differences other than price (e.g., quality, availability,
transportation network, product range, technical support, etc.) between TCCSS produced in the
United States and in other countries a significant factor in your firm’s purchases of the
products?
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = such differences are always significant
F = such differences are frequently significant
S = such differences are sometimes significant
N = such differences are never significant
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country‐pair
Country‐pair
United States
Japan
Japan
Other countries
For any country‐pair for which factors other than price always or frequently are a significant
factor in your firm’s purchases of TCCSS, identify the country‐pair and report the advantages
or disadvantages imparted by such factors:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
IV‐3.
Page 23
Factor country comparisons.‐‐For the factors listed below, please rate how TCCSS produced in
each country you identified in your response to the first question in Part IV compares with
TCCSS produced in each of the other countries you identified.
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
Superior
Comparable
Inferior
If you are unfamiliar with the product from a particular country, please leave the boxes for those
country comparisons blank.
Product from
Product from
United States
Product from
United States
compared to
Japan compared to
compared to
product from
product from
product from
Nonsubject
Nonsubject
Japan
countries
countries
Availability
Delivery terms
Delivery time
Discounts offered
Extension of credit
Minimum quantity requirements
Packaging
Price1
Product consistency
Product range
Quality meets industry standards
Quality exceeds industry standards
Reliability of supply
Technical support/service
U.S. transportation costs1
Factor
1
A rating of superior on price and U.S. transportation costs indicates that the first country generally has lower
prices/U.S. transportation costs than the second country.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
IV‐4.
Page 24
Change in price.‐‐
(a)
Since January 1, 2012, has there been a change in the price of TCCSS? If so, has the
price of U.S.‐produced TCCSS changed more or less than the price of imported TCCSS
from Japan?
No change in price. (skip to question V‐1)
Prices have changed by the same amount. (skip to question V‐1)
Price of U.S.‐produced TCCSS has changed relative to the price of TCCSS
from Japan. (answer part b)
(b)
If the price of U.S.‐produced TCCSS has changed relative to the price of TCCSS from
Japan, the price of U.S.‐produced TCCSS is now relatively
Higher
Lower
than those from Japan.
PART V.—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
V‐1. Other explanations.‐‐If your firm would like to further explain a response to any question that
did not provide a narrative response box, please note the question number and the explanation
in the space provided below.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Purchasers’ Questionnaire ‐ TCCSS
Page 25
HOW TO FILE YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
This questionnaire is available as a “fillable” form in MS Word format on the
Commission’s website at:
https://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2017/tin_and_chromium_coated_ste
el_sheet_japan/third_review_full.htm
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the questionnaire
document. Please submit the completed questionnaire using one of the methods noted
below. If your firm is unable to complete the MS Word questionnaire or cannot use one
of the electronic methods of submission, please contact the Commission for further
instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.—Upload the MS Word questionnaire along with a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/
Pin: TCCSS
• E‐mail.—E‐mail the MS Word questionnaire to [email protected]; include a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1). Submitters are strongly encouraged to encrypt nonpublic documents
that are electronically transmitted to the Commission to protect your sensitive information from
unauthorized disclosure. The USITC secure drop‐box system and the Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140‐2 cryptographic algorithms to
encrypt data in transit. Submitting your nonpublic documents by a means that does not use these
encryption algorithms (such as by email) may subject your firm’s nonpublic information to unauthorized
disclosure during transmission. If you choose a non‐encrypted method of electronic transmission, the
Commission warns you that the risk of such possible unauthorized disclosure is assumed by you and not
by the Commission.
If your firm does not purchase this product, please fill out page 1, print, sign, and submit a scanned
copy to the Commission.
Parties to this proceeding.—If your firm is a party to this proceeding, it is required to serve a copy of the
completed questionnaire on parties to the proceeding that are subject to administrative protective
order (see 19 CFR § 207.7). A list of such parties may be obtained from the Commission’s Secretary (202‐
205‐1803). A certificate of service must accompany the completed questionnaire you submit (see 19 CFR
§ 207.7). Service of the questionnaire must be made in paper form.
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Microsoft Word - US Purchaser questionnaire (Draft) |
Author | robert.casanova |
File Modified | 2017-11-17 |
File Created | 2017-11-17 |