Subpart P of 40 CFR 51, Protection of
Visibility, also known as the regional haze rule, is the subject of
this clearance request. In the next three years, activities
conducted by the states, Federal Land Managers (FLMs), and the EPA
will focus on submitting SIP revisions and progress reports for
regional haze. 40 CFR 51.308 (f) requires states to develop
regional haze implementation plan revisions evaluating and
reassessing reasonable progress goals, calculations of baseline and
natural visibility conditions, the long-term strategy, the
monitoring strategy and other implementation plan requirements.
There are similar reporting requirements under 40 CFR 51.309, a
section of the regional haze rule in which three states (Utah,
Wyoming, and New Mexico) elected to submit their SIPs. Under
section 309, these states adopted regional haze strategies for the
period from 2003 to 2018 for sulfur dioxide emissions. These
strategies are based on recommendations from the Grand Canyon
Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) for protecting the 16 Class
I areas in the Colorado Plateau area. During the next three years,
fourteen states will also be responsible for submitting progress
reports. 40 CFR 51.308 (g) requires states to develop periodic
reports evaluating progress towards the reasonable progress goals
for improving visibility in Class I areas inside the state and in
neighboring states, and 40 CFR 51.309(d)(10) requires similar
actions on the part of the 3 states that submitted regional haze
SIPs under 40 CFR 51.309.
Final changes to the regional
haze rule include: a 3-year extension of the deadline for state
submittal of periodic comprehensive SIP revisions (from July 31,
2018 to July 31, 2021); a change in submission deadlines for
progress reports and removal of the requirement that progress
reports be submitted as SIP revisions; discontinuance of the
1980s-era requirement for 36 states and territories with Class I
areas to submit SIP revisions every 10 years that assess whether
reasonably attributable visibility impairment (RAVI) is occurring
and removal of the obligation for the EPA to periodically assess
RAVI for the 20 states that never committed to meet this
requirement; extension to the remaining 16 states the ability of a
FLM to certify to a state that RAVI is occurring and thereby
trigger a requirement for a responsive SIP revision; and
clarification of several terms in the current rule text and
updating of cross references. Under the final rule, the SIPs
revisions for all states due by July 31, 2018 will instead be due
by July 31, 2021. As a result, activities conducted by the states,
Federal Land Managers (FLMs), and the EPA will shift from focusing
on actual submittal of SIP revisions to focusing on early analysis
to support SIP revision development, although some states
(particularly eastern states) may still elect to submit on or near
the current 2018 deadline. Under the pre-existing and final rules,
40 CFR 51.308(g) also requires states to develop periodic reports
evaluating progress towards the reasonable progress goals for
improving visibility in Class I areas inside the state and in
neighboring states. The timing of these progress reports due during
the period 2016-2019 will not change under the final rule. There
are similar reporting requirements under 40 CFR 51.309, a section
of the regional haze rule in which three states (Utah, Wyoming, and
New Mexico) elected to submit their SIPs, and its requirements for
the period 2016-2019 are being altered by the final rule in that
the progress reports that would otherwise have been due in 2018 are
being eliminated. Other sections of 40 CFR 51 relate to reasonably
attributable visibility impairment (RAVI). Under the final rule,
all states will potentially be subject to FLM certifications of
RAVI, as opposed to the current 36. The historical rarity of a RAVI
certification implies that no additional RAVI certifications would
occur during the 3-year period at issue and likely no RAVI
certifications even if the pre-existing rule were to have remained
in place. With all of these final changes considered, the overall
burden on states represents a reduction compared to what would
otherwise occur if the provisions of the pre-existing rule were to
have stayed in place. See Table 7.1 for an estimate of these
reductions, as had been presented in the proposed rule ICR
supporting statement.
$343,408
No
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Chris Werner 919
541-5133
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.