OMB files this
comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11( c ). This OMB action is
not an approval to conduct or sponsor an information collection
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This action has no
effect on any current approvals. If OMB has assigned this ICR a new
OMB Control Number, the OMB Control Number will not appear in the
active inventory. For future submissions of this information
collection, reference the OMB Control Number provided.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
01/31/2020
01/31/2020
01/31/2021
21
0
21
1,940
0
1,940
6,000
0
6,000
The National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Surface Coating of Metal Cans
were proposed on January 15, 2003, promulgated on November 13,
2003, and most recently amended on January 6, 2006. The NESHAP is
codified at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart KKKK. This supporting statement
addresses information collection activities that will be imposed by
the NESHAP for Surface Coating of Metal Cans, including activities
proposed to be added based on the residual risk and technology
review (RTR) required under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The NESHAP for
Surface Coating of Metal Cans applies to each new and existing
affected source of HAP emissions at facilities that are major
sources and are engaged in the surface coating of metal cans and
ends (including decorative tins) and metal crowns and closures. New
facilities include those that commenced construction or
reconstruction after January 15, 2003. As part of the RTR for the
NESHAP for Surface Coating of Metal Cans, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is not proposing to revise the emission
limit requirements. The EPA is proposing to require periodic air
emissions testing to measure organic HAP destruction or removal
efficiency at the inlet and outlet of the add-on control device, or
control device outlet concentration of organic HAP, once every five
years for existing and new surface coating affected sources using
the emission rate with add-on controls compliance option. The EPA
is proposing to revise the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM)
provisions of the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) rule
and proposing the use of electronic data reporting for future
performance test data submittals, notifications, and reports. This
information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart KKKK. In general, all NESHAP standards require
initial notifications, performance tests (if sources are using
add-on controls to demonstrate compliance), and periodic reports by
the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also
required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any
deviation from an emission limitation (either a numerical emission
limit, an operating limit, or an equipment or work practice
standard), or any period during which the monitoring system is
inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are
essential in determining compliance, and are required of all
affected facilities subject to the NESHAP.
There is an increase in the
labor hours per respondent in this ICR as compared to the previous
ICR. This situation is due to four considerations: 1) increased
time in year one to become familiar with the amended rules, 2)
increased time in year one to re-evaluating previously developed
SSM record systems, 3) increased time in year one to become
familiar with CEDRI and the electronic reporting form for the
semiannual report, and 4) time required for conducting a
performance test and reporting the results in year three. There is
an increase in the capital/startup costs as calculated in section
6(b)(iii) compared with the costs in the previous ICR. The
requirement for periodic performance testing requires one existing
facility to conduct a performance test. This facility is not
currently required to perform testing as a condition of their part
70 operating permit.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.