ADMINISTRATION ON COMMUNITY LIVING
STATE COUNCILS ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
REQUEST FOR OMB APPROVAL
SUPPORTING STATEMENT, AS REQUIRED UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
AND 5 CFR 1320
A. Justification
Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary
The State Councils on Developmental Disabilities (Councils) are authorized in Subtitle B, of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (DD Act), as amended, [42 U.S.C. 15001 et seq.] (The DD Act). They are required to submit a five-year State plan. Section 124(a) [42 U.S.C. 15024(a)], states that:
Any State desiring to receive assistance under this subtitle shall submit to the Secretary, and obtain approval of, a 5-year strategic State plan under this section.
The requirement for a State plan is also further emphasized in the regulations in 45 CFR Part 1326.30:
(a) In order to receive Federal financial assistance under this subpart, each State Developmental Disabilities Council must prepare and submit to the Secretary, and have in effect, a State Plan which meets the requirements of sections 122 and 124 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 6022 and 6024) and these regulations.
Additionally, data is collected in the State Plan and submitted to the Office on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (OIDD) for compliance with the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA). In the State Plans, the Councils provide to OIDD future year targets for outcome performance measures. These targets are reported to Congress under GPRAMA.
.
Purpose and Use of the Information Collection
As required by the statute, the Council is responsible for the development and submission of the State plan, and is then responsible for implementation of the activities described in the plan. Further, the Council updates the Plan annually during the five years. The State plan provides information on individuals with developmental disabilities in the State, and a description of the services available to them and their families. The plan further sets forth the goals and specific objectives to be achieved by the State in pursuing systems change and capacity building in order to more effectively meet the service needs of this population. It describes State priorities, strategies, and actions, and the allocation of funds to meet these goals and objectives.
The State Plan is used in three ways. First, it is used by the individual Council as a planning document to guide it’s planning and execution processes. Secondly, it provides a mechanism in the State whereby individual citizens, as well as the State government, are made aware of the goals and objectives of the Council and have an opportunity to provide comments on them during its development. Finally, the State plan provides to the Department a stewardship tool; the staff of the Department provides some technical assistance to Councils and monitor compliance with Subtitle B of the DD Act, as an adjunct to on-site monitoring. The stewardship role of the State plan is useful both for providing technical assistance during the planning process, during the execution process, and also during program site visits.
Additionally, data is collected in the State Plan and submitted to OIDD for compliance with the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA). In the State Plans, the Councils provide to OIDD future year targets for outcome performance measures. These targets are reported to Congress under GPRAMA.
Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction
The State Plan is submitted electronically, and has been so submitted for over ten years. Prior to that, Plans were submitted by hard copy only. A major benefit of the move to electronic submission of the State Plan is increased ease and uniformity of reporting, enhanced ability to review the State Plans, and improved ability to manage the data that the States submit.
Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information
A careful review of the Council Program Performance Report (PPR) submitted by the State Councils was conducted to avoid any duplication of program elements submitted. The Financial Status Report (SF 425) was also reviewed for duplication.
For each of the above two information collections (PPR and SF 425), there is no overlap, since the State Plan is prospective (what the State plans to do), while the other two (the PPR and SF 425) are retrospective (what the State actually did).
After efforts were made to identify duplication, described above, no similar information was found to exist to provide insight into the programmatic and fiscal planning of the Councils.
Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities
The information collected does not involve, nor result in assignment of burden to any small business or other small entity. It is collected from 56 State agencies.
Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently
Subtitle B, Section 124 of the Developmental Disabilities Act of 2000 (DD Act) requires a full revision of the State plan at least once every five years and annual reviews of the plans thereafter. Less frequent collection of data than that prescribed by the requirements of the DD Act, Section 124, would violate statutory requirements.
Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5
There are no special circumstances governing the collection of data that are inconsistent with the established guidelines pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5.
Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside the Agency
A 60-day Federal Register Notice published in the Federal Register on November 12, 2019 in 84 FR 61059 pages 61059-61060. ACL received 18 comments. These comments were reviewed and were not germane to the reporting template.
A 30 day Federal Register Notice published on January 30, 2020. In 85 FR 5443.
Explanation of Any Payment or Gift to Respondents
No payments or gifts to respondents are planned.
Assurance of Confidentiality Provided to Respondents
There are no assurances of confidentiality.
Justification for Sensitive Questions
The DD Act requires information on the Disability and Race/ethnicity status of Council members and staff. The race/ethnicity categories used in this notice complies with the OMB standards on race and ethnicity that were published in the Federal Register in 1997.
Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
The following table summarizes the burden hour estimate for this information collection:
No. of States |
No. of Responses Per State |
Average Burden Hours Per State |
Total Hours |
56 |
1 |
367 |
20,552 |
The “56 States” funded under this program include the 50 states, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. The State’s estimates of their annual burden hours for this information collection varies very greatly from State to State, influenced by factors such size of the State and program complexity. Councils provided public comment during a previous cycle and calculated a nation-wide estimate for burden hours. The current approximation of annual burden hours for this information collection was derived from the Council input. According to this feedback an average of burden hours per state per year is 367 hours, which works out to 20,552 hours nationwide (i.e., 56 x367). These figures are consistent with the burden estimates in prior data collection packages administered by the Administration for Community Living. The template is a continuation of the template that was approved previously by OMB.
This State plan data collection for 2022-2026 will continue to use the performance measures previously incorporated and OMB approved for the 2017-2021 state plan cycle.
The annualized cost of the hour burden, expressed in dollars is:
Average Cost/Hour |
Average Burden Hours/State |
Average Annual Cost/State |
Total Annual Cost |
61.08 1 |
367 |
$22,416 |
X 56
$1,255,296 |
1 https://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/social-and-community-service-managers.htm
Estimates of Other Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents and Record Keepers
There is no annual cost burden or startup cost to respondents resulting from collection of information for the State Plan.
Annualized
Cost to the Federal Government
This
computation is based on an estimated $43.71 per hour for the efforts
of a Program Specialist (GS12, step 1), doubled to account for
fringe benefits and overhead.
Program specialists will devote an estimated 400 hours every year to organize and review the Program Performance Reports and to generate analyses of the information therein for monitoring and reporting purposes.
Total Estimated Federal Costs: $34,968
Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments
There are no program changes or adjustments.
16. Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule
The State plans are prepared by the Councils, made available to the States for public comment, and submitted to OIDD for review and approval. Program personnel in OIDD also aggregate the data, do national analyses (sum, average, etc.), and use the data to support monitoring and development of program priorities. Once the State Plan is approved, it is posted on the ACL website. In addition, the information collected within the State plan is mandated by legislation and, once acquired, becomes public information following approval by OIDD.
Additionally, data is collected in the State Plan and submitted to OIDD for compliance with the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA). In the State Plans, the Councils provide to OIDD future year targets for outcome performance measures. These targets are used to monitor accountability of the State Councils for their plans, and to maintain quality control for data in development of reports to Congress under GPRA. The GPRA data on DDC’s output and outcomes are posted on the ACL website as part of budget justifications at https://acl.gov/about-acl/budget.
The data is also summed to show national totals for inclusion in reports. Analysis and reporting of the data may include pie charts, bar charts, and other tabular presentations of the information.
The States submit the State plan once every five years, with annual review and amendments.
17. Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate
Not applicable.
18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
Not applicable.
B. Statistical Methods (used for collection of information employing statistical methods)
This information collection does not employ statistical methods.
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| Author | ACF |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2021-01-14 |