In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three
years. OMB requests that the agency consult with up to nine outside
entities once every renewal, even if the collection of information
has not changed. To estimate the burden hours in future renewals,
NIGC should consider providing ranges in the collection’s annual
burden, historic data from stakeholders to support changes in
collection burden, and/or proxies from other federal agencies with
similar collections or respondents in the renewal.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
05/31/2023
36 Months From Approved
05/31/2020
723
0
931
127,489
0
406,905
35,033,688
0
34,349,884
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
governs the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. IGRA created the
National Indian Gaming Commission to carry out the Act's goals.
This collection allows NIGC to perform its statutory
duties.
US Code:
25
USC 2701 Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
It should be noted at the
outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices
are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many local,
state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size
and complexity and range from small truck stops to world-class
casino resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes
expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and
is further complicated by their varying levels of investment in,
and adoption of, new technologies and technical expertise. For
these reasons, estimates provided by a statistically insignificant
group of rotating tribal contacts has limited value and it would be
improper to claim to be able to extrapolate from this feedback any
definitive trends. It should also be noted that, in previous years,
the NIGC did not calculate and include wage costs in its data but
it does so now and will continue doing this in all future renewals.
As mentioned in item number 8 of the Supplementary Statement, the
Commission consulted with 6 tribal gaming financial directors
and/or tribal gaming commissioners and based on this tribal
feedback, the Commission made the adjustments to its estimated
burdens: It should be noted that the method for calculating the
total annual responses for §571.12 was changed. In prior years, the
NIGC had determined that the number of total annual responses
equaled the total number of Indian gaming operations. Because
tribes negotiate contracts for an independent audit on a tribal
level (and not at the gaming operational level), the number of
total annual responses was now set as equal to the number of gaming
tribes (241), and not gaming operations. This decrease in the total
annual responses was offset by the slight increase in average
annual hours as reported by the consulted tribes so that, in sum,
there was no dramatic change in estimated annual hours for this
specific requirement from the last renewal cycle. The estimated
annual burden hour total has been significantly revised downwards
from 406,905 to 127,489. This decrease continues the trend from the
last renewal estimate cycle and, as before, is also primarily due
to the decrease in the average hours per response for compliance
with regulation §571.7. In looking at this trend, it is possible to
surmise that, over time, as accounting practices in tribal gaming
operations have become more established, tribal financial directors
increasingly attribute their operation’s accounting practices less
as a response to any one NIGC regulatory requirement and more as
simply part of their customary business practices.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.