In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three
years. OMB requests that the agency consult with up to nine outside
entities once every renewal, even if the collection of information
has not changed. To estimate the burden hours in future renewals,
NIGC should consider providing ranges in the collection’s annual
burden, historic data from stakeholders to support changes in
collection burden, and/or proxies from other federal agencies with
similar collections or respondents in the renewal.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
06/30/2023
36 Months From Approved
06/30/2020
220,461
0
202,509
972,378
0
1,121,341
1,287,967
0
3,070,189
This information is used by the
Commission to approve ordinances and regulate licensing under the
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act in accordance with its statutory
authority.
US Code:
25
USC 2701 Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
It should be noted at the
outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices
are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many local,
state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size
and complexity and range from small truck stops to world-class
casino resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes
expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and
is further complicated by their varying levels of investment in,
and adoption of, new technologies and technical expertise. For
these reasons, estimates provided by a statistically insignificant
group of rotating tribal contacts has limited value and it would be
improper to claim to be able to extrapolate from this feedback any
definitive trends. It should also be noted that, in previous years,
the NIGC did not include wage costs in its data but it does so now
and will continue doing this in all future renewals. As mentioned
in item number 8 of the Supplementary Statement, the Commission
consulted with five tribal gaming tribal gaming executive directors
and/or tribal attorneys. Based on this tribal feedback, the
Commission has made adjustments to its estimated burdens. The
estimated total annual burden hours have been revised downward by
approximately 17%. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease
(across the board) of the average hours per response for complying
with the regulation requirements. It is likely that these decreases
(in the average hours per response) are due to the maturation of
the Indian gaming industry. For example, comparatively few tribes
are just now breaking into the gaming industry and seeking approval
of a new gaming ordinance. Instead, most tribes are simply
submitting amendments to a previously approved ordinance and the
process of approving an amending ordinance will generally be far
less time intensive and costly than approving one that has been
newly created. The estimated annual total cost estimate has been
adjusted downward by almost 60%. This appears to be primarily due
to the fact that the previous estimates included large sub-estimate
costs associated with the applicant background investigation
process. It is suspected that these sub-estimates may have been
wage labor costs that are now being captured in that proper (“wage
cost”) designated category. Indeed, all the tribes consulted
confirmed that they conducted applicant background checks using
internal resources and did not sub-contract the investigative
labor. In fact, the only category of costs that our consultants
flagged (besides outsourcing legal assistance for ordinance
submissions) was the cost of submitting applicant fingerprints for
criminal history checks.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.