Class II and Class III/Background Investigation Tribal Licenses
Revision of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
Approved without change
04/29/2026
06/07/2023
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three years. For the next renewal, OMB requests that the agency describe the input provided from their outside consultations for the ICR. Additionally, to estimate the burden hours in future renewals, NIGC should consider providing ranges in the collectionâs annual burden, historic data from stakeholders to support changes in collection burden, and/or proxies from other federal agencies with similar collections or respondents in the renewal. OMB notes that this ICR was erroneously submitted as a revision but did not contain any changes from the previously approved collection; thus, OMB approves this information collection as an extension without change only.
table that charts list comparision
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
04/30/2029
36 Months From Approved
04/30/2026
225,484
0
220,461
489,089
0
972,378
3,264,177
0
1,287,967
This information is used by the Commission to approve ordinances and regulate licensing under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act in accordance with its statutory authority.
US Code:
25 USC 2701
Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
It should be noted at the outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many local, state, cultural, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size and complexity and range from small truck stops to world-class casino resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and is further complicated by their varying levels of investment in, and adoption of, new technologies and technical expertise. For these reasons, estimates provided by a statistically insignificant group of rotating tribal contacts will necessarily have limited value and it would be improper to claim to be able to extrapolate from this feedback any definitive trends. Nevertheless, the Commission makes the following observations:
⢠The number of respondents appears to have risen, however, this dramatic increase can be attributed to the fact that, in prior cycles, the number of respondents under regulations 556.6(a) and 558.3(e) were quantified at the tribal level (241). In contrast, this cycle, the Commission was able assess at a more granular level - by individual applicants processed by tribes (43,644). When this increase is taken into consideration and accounted for, a comparison with the previous cycle actually shows an overall decrease in respondents this cycle.
⢠The estimated amount of burden hours for this cycle decreased approximately 50% and the estimated amount of wage expenditures also decreased approximately 52%. This would make sense in context of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Indian gaming operations and the temporary closures of Indian gaming operations during the pandemic lock-downs.
⢠Despite the decrease in time and wage burdens, the amount of non-wage costs significantly increased. The primary cause for this increase can be directly attributed to the NIGC fee rate increase for processing applicant fingerprints, from $22 to $45.This increase was necessary in order to upgrade the NIGC fingerprint processing system in compliance with Federal security requirements. There is also anecdotal evidence that Indian gaming operations are also making such security upgrades in tandem with the NIGC..
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.