Sample TIP Plan - Wichita Area MPO Plan 2019-2022

Transportation
Improvement
Program
Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2019-2022
Adopted by the WAMPO Transportation Policy Body on October 9, 2018

271 W. 3rd Street, Ste. 208 - Wichita, KS 67202 | 316.779.1313 | www.wampo.org
Andale - Andover - Bel Aire - Bentley - Butler County - Cheney - Clearwater - Colwich - Derby - Eastborough - Garden Plain - Goddard - Haysville
Kechi - Maize - Mount Hope - Mulvane - Park City - Rose Hill - Sedgwick - Sedgwick County - Sumner County - Valley Center - Viola - Wichita

Electronic copies of this document are available online at www.wampo.org.
Hard copy versions will be provided upon request. For more information please contact:

Wichita Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 
271 W 3rd St, Second Floor, Wichita, KS 67202 
Office: (316) 268-4315 | Fax: (316) 858-7765
[email protected] | www.wampo.org
The preparation of this report has been financed in part through funds from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of Title 23, U.S. Code. The
contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
The Wichita Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WAMPO) hereby gives public notice that it is the policy of the agency to assure
full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Executive Order 12898 on
Environmental Justice, Executive Order 13166 on Limited English Proficiency, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and
activities.
Title VI requires that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from
the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which
WAMPO receives federal financial assistance. Requests for special accommodation and/or language assistance should be made to
[email protected] or by calling (316) 268-4315.
Any persons who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI has a right to file a formal
complaint with WAMPO. Any such complaint must be in writing and filed with WAMPO’s Title VI Coordinator within one hundred eighty
(180) days following the date of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. For more information, or to obtain a Title VI Discrimination
Complaint Form, please visit www.wampo.org or call (316) 268-4315.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Table of Contents
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
The WAMPO Region ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Metropolitan Transportation Plan .................................................................................................................................................................. 9
Project Selection: WAMPO Funded Projects ............................................................................................................................................. 18
TIP Project List ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34
Congestion Management Process ................................................................................................................................................................ 35
Financial Plan .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39
TIP Amendments.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 54
Looking Forward ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 56
Appendix A: List of Acronyms and Abbreviations.................................................................................................................................... 58
Appendix B: Self Certification ..................................................................................................................................................................... 61
Appendix C: Public Comments ..................................................................................................................................................................... 62
Appendix D: Project Scoring ........................................................................................................................................................................ 63 

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Introduction
What is a TIP?
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a short-range program that identifies transportation
projects to be implemented in the Wichita Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WAMPO) region.
This TIP covers the next four years Federal Fiscal (FFY) years 2019 through 2022. The FFY starts
October 1st and ends September 30th of each year.
The TIP is a federal requirement for a metropolitan area to receive federal transportation funds. It
documents the regional transportation priorities and the financial resources available for the various
transportation needs of the region. Demonstrating a planned approach, all regionally significant
and/or federally funded transportation projects in the WAMPO region are required to be included in
the TIP. These projects may include:






Capital construction projects
Compliance activities
Operations and maintenance
Equipment purchases
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

The TIP also includes a financial summary that shows how the projects and programs will be funded in
a fiscally constrained manner. A “fiscally constrained” TIP is one that does not program more funds
than are reasonably expected to be available.
The 2019 TIP is one of many tools used to consistently implement the vision and goals of the longrange Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). The current MTP, called MOVE 2040, was approved
in July of 2015. All projects listed in the 2019 TIP come from the MOVE 2040 list of projects. The TIP
document includes:

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022






Fiscally constrained financial summary
Programmed project lists, background, and location maps
Funding summaries and cost estimates
Other information related to public participation, Environmental Justice, and emerging issues

The TIP Project List chapter contains a listing of programmed projects for the 2019 TIP. The project listing provides information about
the projects, including a description of the proposed work, location, costs and funding breakdowns. The listing also includes the names
of the agencies responsible for the project and the FFY the project is proposed to begin. In addition, The WAMPO project tracker
website at, https://projecttracker.wampo.org/, is the most up to date source to view and learn about the current TIP projects. It shows
current project scopes, locations, cost estimates, and maps, as well as includes which governmental entity is implementing the project.
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
MPOs are regional policy making bodies
for transportation planning in urbanized
areas with populations over 50,000.
An urbanized area like WAMPO, which is
home to over 200,000 people is
designated a Transportation Management
Areas (TMA).
A TMA is responsible for transportation
plans and programs based on a continuing,
cooperative and comprehensive (3-C)
planning process in cooperation with the
State of Kansas and transit operators.

Who develops the TIP?
The Transportation Policy Body (TPB): is the decision-making authority for WAMPO. The TPB
is responsible for determining what projects are selected to receive program funds from
WAMPO funding programs, takes final action the program and amendments, and has the
overall authority to include or remove any projects in the TIP.
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): reviews and recommends projects to be included
in the TIP and TIP amendments.
Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT): serves as a cooperative partner and
oversight agency for WAMPO. KDOT provides information that is used in the development
and maintenance of the TIP.

US Department of Transportation (USDOT): serves as a cooperative partner and oversight agency to WAMPO and KDOT. The
primary federal agencies which WAMPO works with include the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA).
Project Sponsors: are responsible for submitting projects to be included in the TIP. Projects sponsors also coordinate with WAMPO,
KDOT, resource protection agencies and others. Ultimately, project sponsors are responsible for the completion of their projects once

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

included in the TIP. Project sponsors are typically a governmental entity that is responsible for the local share of a project’s cost.
Paratransit providers may also be a project sponsor if their project is funded with federal dollars.
The Public: provides project sponsors, elected officials, and WAMPO with input on projects in the WAMPO region. There are a variety
of opportunities for the public to provide input on TIP projects, detailed in Chapter 8 of this document and in WAMPO’s Public
Participation Plan (PPP), which can be found electronically at www.wampo.org under the “Get Involved” tab.
Once adopted, the TIP is sent to the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) for incorporation into the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), which is approved by the US Department of Transportation. The processes for TIP development and
amendments is identified in the WAMPO TIP Policy. This policy can be found electronically at www.wampo.org under the “Our Work”
tab.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

The WAMPO Region
Regional Profile
The WAMPO region contains 21
jurisdictions, including all of
Sedgwick County and portions of
Butler County and Sumner
County. A map of the region,
along with each community’s
2010 Census population is shown
here. The WAMPO boundary is
reviewed after each decennial
Census.
2010 Census Population
Approximately 520,000 people live in the
WAMPO region today. Since 2000, the
population growth rate has experienced a slow,
steady increase (approximately 1% per year).
Projections suggest this trend will continue.

An extensive exploration of the
WAMPO region’s relevant
characteristics was conducted as
part of the long range planning
process. Of the many areas and
trends examined, a few

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

conditions and anticipated changes are especially significant for the 2019 TIP, these are:
 In general, the regional transportation system is in good condition.
 Except for a few bottlenecks, the public can travel freely and reliably on the region’s roads, with no meaningful delay under
normal conditions.
 Slow growth in jobs and population is expected.
 Over the next 30 years, the population is expected to age, household size to shrink, and generational preferences to shift in
favor of greater transportation mode choice.
 A dramatic increase in freight shipping activity is expected, including multimodal activity.
 There is a growing awareness of the health benefits and other values of active transportation methods such as walking and
bicycling.
 Safety remains an ongoing concern.
 Transit should be stabilized in the short term and expanded in the long term.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Metropolitan Transportation Plan

MOVE 2040

MOVE 2040 is WAMPOs Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). This plan lays out long-range
strategies for the next twenty-five years. These strategies are intended to lead to the development
of an integrated, intermodal transportation system that moves people and goods in the WAMPO
region. Ultimately, all transportation planning efforts and activities are meant to arise from and be
consistent with the MTP.
The MTP process assesses existing conditions and needs to develop an overall vision and goals for
the region’s future transportation system. The plan document lists projects, strategies, and
recommendations that would be used to fulfill the vision and meet the identified goals.

To provide a regional multimodal
transportation system that is safe,
permits equitable opportunity for
its use, and advances the region’s
ongoing vitality through cost
conscious strategic investments. 

Projects in the MOVE 2040 MTP were selected for their consistency with the vision and goals, and
are therefore eligible for inclusion in the TIP.

Investment Strategy
The MOVE 2040 investment strategy is to “Preserve and maintain the current system and conditions. This will include functionality of
infrastructure, stabilization of transit service and fleet condition, use of technology to reduce delays and improve safety, and
compliance with federal, state, and local laws.” The primary focus areas are to:




Maintain good condition of current highways, roads, and streets. Improvements should address both the condition and the
purpose of the infrastructure.
Stabilize transit service in the near term; increase transit service in the mid-term by providing for service between urban centers.
Address air quality, bottlenecks, choice, connectivity, functionality, and user safety.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

MOVE 2040 Goals & Performance Targets
Choice and Connectivity

Economic Vitality

• Support the connection of
all modes of transportation
for people and goods,
including equitable access
to alternate modes of
transportation.

• Support and encourage the
region's economic
prosperity and economic
competitiveness.

Infrastructure Condition

Quality of Life

• Ensure that the significant
transportation infrastructure
assets of the WAMPO
region remain in good
repair and/or operation.

MTP Vision &
Goals

Adopted October 2018

• Enhance the quality of life
through transportation
investments that provide
convenient access to
employment, residential
development, commercial
activity, medical care
• Encourage healthy
transportation choices
• Respond to the growing
diversity of household
compositions.

Performance
Targets

Freight Movement
• Improve the national and
international freight
network within the region
through targeted
investments and strengthen
access to domestic and
international markets.

Safety
• Maintain and improve the
safety of the transportation
system component networks.

Evaluation Criteria
(WAMPO Funded)

Imrpoving Air Quality
• Improve air quality and
compliance with federal
and state regulations.

Reliability and Bottlenecks
• Maintain system
performance and make
targeted investments to
provide for predictable
travel time.
• Reduce time delays and
improve safety at regional
bottlenecks.

TIP

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

MOVE 2040 - TIP Connections
The TIP is one of several tools for implementing the MTP. MOVE 2040 and the TIP
are connected in four essential ways:
1. Any project proposed or included in the TIP must come from the fiscally
constrained list of projects in MOVE 2040.

Needs Assessment: Overall, the Wichita area
transportation system has a dependable,

2. Detailed information including, project scope, cost, and funding sources is
evaluated in all projects proposed for the TIP to ensure they are consistently
aligned with the MTP. Those projects that have significant differences are
determined to be ineligible or require an MTP amendment request.
3. Sub-allocated funds: WAMPO is awarded approximately $12 million per
year in funding for transportation projects through several federal funding
programs, including the Surface Transportation Program (STP) block grant,
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), and Transportation
Alternatives (TA) programs. These projects address a wide variety of
bicycle and pedestrian, road, transit, and paratransit needs. Selection
criteria applied to these projects are derived from the goals found in the
MTP.

reliable, uncongested, and predictable
highway and arterial system that is in good
condition, and it is well positioned to
accommodate new people and jobs that locate
here in the future.
Issues to Address: bottlenecks, delays due to
traffic incidents and bad weather (i.e., nonrecurring delay), the condition of some lower
volume streets and bridges, and safety issues
at at-grade rail and road crossings.
People in the region support: preserving and

Projects may be proposed for the MTP by any of WAMPO’s member jurisdictions,
the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT), or WAMPO itself. These projects
may be funded with a variety of federal, state, and/or local sources of funds, or
they maybe be proposed as prospects for reasonably anticipated WAMPO suballocated funds.

maintaining the current system, continuing to
improve safety, addressing bottlenecks on
highway interchanges.
Alternative transportation options should be
improved. Quality of local roads, bridges, and
buses needs to be addressed. Technology
investments are a top priority.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Project Selection

Goal Statements


Maintain the condition of the region’s existing
infrastructure (preserve and maintain).



Invest in transportation that improves choice and
connectivity.



Focus on investments that eliminate existing and
future bottlenecks.



Invest in transportation improvements that
maintain and enhance economic vitality.



Allow for the consistent and effective movement of
freight throughout the region.



Invest in transportation improvements that
encourage safe travel.



Invest in a transportation system whose air quality
complies with federal and state requirements.



Invest in a transportation system that encourages
reliability in travel time.

Invest in a transportation system that maintains the
quality of life of the WAMPO region.  



In order to be eligible for federal funding, a project must be listed in the MTP.
MOVE 2040 included an extensive plan-based screening process for selecting
projects for inclusion in its project list. Six steps led to the development of the
final project list in MOVE 2040:
1. The Plan Advisory Committee and Transportation Advisory Committee
developed goal statements (see panel).
2. WAMPO staff developed project evaluation criteria for each of the
goal statements.
3. Member jurisdictions proposed projects.
4. Projects were scored against the evaluation criteria.
5. Using information from the evaluation process, fiscally constrained
projects were reviewed by the Plan Advisory Committee and TAC
before being finalized and approved by the TPB.

MOVE 2040
Project Proposal

Project Selected
(MOVE 2040)

TIP Project
Proposal

The TIP Process Overview
Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

The 2019-2022 TIP is WAMPO’s second TIP developed under the guidance of MOVE 2040. MOVE 2040 creates a much closer
connection between the TIP and the MTP. For instance, the project selection process for WAMPO funded projects leverages the MOVE
2040 investment strategy and goal statements for project selection criteria. The 2019-2022 TIP also adheres much more strictly to the
MOVE 2040 project list than TIPs under the previous MTP.

Process Step Highlights
Funding Type

To

Purpose

Project Solicitation

WAMPO Funded &
Non-WAMPO
Funded

Project Sponsors

Informs project sponsors of the availability of funds and the new TIP
process.

Electronic
communication

Project Submission

WAMPO Funded &
Non-WAMPO
Funded

WAMPO

Project sponsors submit potentially eligible projects and required
information to WAMPO for consideration

Electronic submission

Project Screening

WAMPO Funded &
Non-WAMPO
Funded

WAMPO Staff

WAMPO staff administers a quality check of project submissions to
ensure that the relevant requirements are met

WAMPO internal
process

Project Scoring

WAMPO Funded

WAMPO Staff

WAMPO funded projects that have passed the quality review are
assigned descriptive ratings by WAMPO staff

WAMPO Internal
process

Project Selection

WAMPO Funded

Project
Selection
Committee

Project scores and supporting information are submitted to the
selection committee to aid in decision making

Committee process

Project Listing

WAMPO Funded &
Non-WAMPO
Funded

Public (review &
comment)

Recommended projects are combined into a single list for
consideration by the members, stakeholders and the general public

Electronic, print, inperson presentation

Endorsement & Final
Decision-making

WAMPO Funded &
Non-WAMPO
Funded

TAC & TPB

The TAC and TPB review documentation from each step of the TIP
process before making an official endorsement (TAC) and final
decision (TPB)

Public meeting

Approved TIP
Processing

WAMPO Funded &
Non-WAMPO
Funded

KDOT

The approved TIP is submitted to KDOT for inclusion in the  
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), which is then
forwarded to FHWA and FTA for final approval

Electronic
communication

Process Step

Adopted October 2018

Method

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Project Eligibility
As mentioned previously, only projects listed in MOVE 2040 are eligible for inclusion in the 2019-2022 TIP. The MOVE 2040 plan
incorporates two project lists:
1. WAMPO funded projects submitted by project sponsors and selected by the MOVE 2040 Project Selection Committee
2. Non-WAMPO funded projects submitted by the project sponsors
Please Note: All projects that were included the 2015-2018 TIP at the time MOVE 2040 was adopted were incorporated into
the appropriate project list. The WAMPO funded project list was divided into three time bands: 2015-2018 (based on the
2015-2018 TIP), 2019-2025, and 2026-2040 (the non-WAMPO funded project list does not use uniform time bands, instead
listing the year or range of years submitted by the project sponsor).
As described below, projects’ eligibility criteria for the 2019-2022 TIP were slightly different depending on which of three categories
a project was in: existing TIP projects, new WAMPO funded projects, and new non-WAMPO funded projects.

Existing TIP Projects
To provide stability and emphasize the nature of the TIP as an ongoing program, all of the existing projects falling into fiscal years
2019 and 2020 were automatically rolled over into the 2019 TIP.

New WAMPO Funded Projects
To be considered for WAMPO funding in the 2019-2022 TIP, a new project had to be listed on the WAMPO funded project list in
MOVE 2040 in the 2019-2025 time band. This provided a “universe” of 29 projects (totaling approximately $59 million) that could
be submitted to receive WAMPO funding in fiscal years 2021 and 2022.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

New non-WAMPO Funded Projects
In order to be listed in the 2019 TIP, a new project must be listed in MOVE 2040
and the initiation year of the project must be consistent with the year listed in the
MTP.

2019 TIP Process Summary
Project Solicitation
WAMPO funded projects in the 2019 TIP for FY 2019 and 2020 were included
automatically in the 2019 TIP, unless the project sponsor wanted to remove the
project or to change the year. Projects in the current TIP which were funded over
multiple years and not projected to be fully paid for by FY 2020 were
automatically be included in FY 2021.
Projects eligible for WAMPO funding included anything in the 2017-2020 TIP and
the projects listed in the 2019-2025 time band in MOVE 2040. If a project sponsor
wanted to nominate a project not listed in the 2017-2020 TIP or the 2019-2025
time band, it had to be amended into MOVE 2040 before it could be included in the
final adopted TIP. The project solicitation period for the 2017-2020 TIP ran from
April 16, 2018 through May 18, 2018.
In addition to basic information about the project, the project solicitation material
also asked sponsors for information on funding, project readiness, and, for WAMPO
funded projects, information related to the project selection criteria (see below). If a
project sponsor nominated more than one project for WAMPO funding they were
asked to rank their projects based on their priority. Project sponsors were also required to certify that they will have funds available to
meet the local match requirement.

Project sponsors submitted a total of 91 projects for the 2019-2022 TIP.
15 of these projects were submitted for WAMPO funding, which totaled approximately $24 million.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Project Screening
After the close of the project solicitation period WAMPO staff worked extensively with project sponsors to ensure the completeness and
correctness of their application materials. Project development cycles can cause fluctuations in costs and even project scopes, and it is
necessary to ensure that projects being programmed are sufficiently similar to projects approved in WAMPO’s MTP. Projects with
changes in capacity (number of lanes) were flagged for later resolution, as were projects with total cost escalations in excess of 25%.
Some flexibility in costs is desirable because fluctuations in the cost of materials and small obstacles encountered during the process of
early project development make it inevitable. Where significant inconsistencies were discovered, WAMPO inquired into the reasons
and worked with project sponsors to determine the appropriate course of action, which could include TIP and MTP amendments.
WAMPO also coordinated additional consistency checks with KDOT Local Projects and solicited their feedback on any potential issues
with project readiness.

TIP Development Timeline
TIP Development Phase

Adopted October 2018

Timeline

Project Solicitation for WAMPO Funding

April - May

Project Screening for Potential WAMPO
Funded Projects
Project Rating for Potential WAMPO Funded
Projects
Public Comment

May - June

Project Selection for WAMPO Funded
Projects
Non-WAMPO Funded Project Submission

July - August

Non-WAMPO Funded Project Assessment

August

Project Slate Evaluation

August

Prepare TIP Document

August - September

TIP Recommendation

September

Public Comment

September

June
July

August

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

TPB Approval

October

Include in STIP

November

STIP Approval

November

Non-WAMPO Funded Project Submission
Project sponsors submitted information on non-WAMPO funded transportation projects. All federally funded transportation projects in
the WAMPO region and all regionally significant projects must be included in the TIP, regardless of funding source. Making sure we
include all of these projects takes on an added importance in the event that the Wichita region becomes an air quality non-attainment
area. This would prevent any federally funded or regionally significant projects from proceeding if they are not included in the TIP.
While non-WAMPO funded projects were not required to go through the project selection process, project sponsors were required to
submit information required for WAMPO to comply with federal requirements and to conduct the project slate evaluation (see below).
Sponsors were also be asked to certify that the project has funding available and meets all applicable eligibility requirements.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Project Selection: WAMPO Funded Projects
Project Selection Group
The Project Selection Group (PSG) for the 2019-2022 TIP was formed to evaluate and prioritize WAMPO-funded
projects and to recommend a project slate to the TAC and TPB. It was composed of five individuals appointed by the
Chair of the Transportation Policy Body (TPB). Membership includes representatives from the TPB, local member
jurisdiction engineering and/or planning staff, and one Community representative focused on equity considerations.
The PSG met three times in July and August of 2018. At these meetings the PSG rated the projects on their regional
significance, on the technical project selection criteria, and on their consistency with the MOVE 2040 Investment
Strategy, heard presentations from project sponsors, and selected the recommended list of projects. At the conclusion
of the project selection process the total amount of funding available to be allocated to WAMPO projects in 2021
and 2022 was $23,029,000.
WAMPO awards a total of approximately $12 million in federal funding each year. This funding is made available
through three FHWA programs – Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ), and Transportation Alternatives (TA) in the amounts listed in the table below. Federal legislation directs the
STP and the TA programs to all large MPOs (e.g., over 200,000 population), and KDOT also shares a portion of its
own state CMAQ and STP dollars with WAMPO for WAMPO to award. KDOT projects future annual funding amounts,
and then provides this information to WAMPO to use in its programming process. In addition to the annual allocation
amount, the total available to program also includes any projected carryover from the previous year.
Some of the funding that WAMPO anticipates being available in fiscal year 2021 is already allocated towards
completing the reimbursement of advance construction projects from fiscal year 2019 and 2020.
The table below shows the distribution of the funds available for new WAMPO funded projects between federal fiscal
years 2021and 2022, and among the various federal funding programs.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

FFY

STP

CMAQ

TA

Total

2021 $8,570,000

$1,900,000

$725,000

$11,195,000

2022 $9,170,000

$2,000,000

$725,000

$11,895,000

Total $17,740,000

$3,900,000

$1,450,000

$23,029,000

Project Selection Criteria
The project selection criteria for the 2019-2022 TIP were divided into four “Tiers”. All of the criteria tie back to MOVE 2040.
For each criteria, every project was rated on a scale of Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Unacceptable, and Not Applicable. Detailed
descriptions of the criteria and the grading rubric used to assign the ratings can be found in Appendix D.
Two new components were added to the rating process.
 Equity profiles were developed using data and maps generated from the EPAs web-based EJSCREEN tool. The equity profiles
were designed to be used by the PSC to support decision making for the WAMPO Tier III project scoring criteria that reflect the
goals of MOVE 2040.
 A new category of assessment was added to the Project Selection Criteria – Tier IV. This category was added to assess how
well the candidate projects are meeting the issues posed by the socio-demographic trends taking place in the region.
The sole Tier I project selection criteria was consistency with the MOVE 2040 Investment Strategy. The ratings for each project’s
consistency with the MOVE 2040 investment strategy are given in the following table.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

MOVE 2040 Project Name
159th Street East (US‐54/400 to 
Central Ave in Andover)  
Bicycle & Pedestrian Path 
(Andover Rd from Central to 
US‐54 in Andover) 
North Main Street 
Reconstruction  
Oliver and Kechi Road 
Intersection 
61st St North (Broadway to the 
Wichita‐Valley Center 
Floodway) 
Meridian, from Ford (77th St. 
N.) to Seward (69th St. N.) in 
Valley Center 
Pawnee, Webb to Greenwich  
Pedestrian Bridge (Meridian 
over the Wichita‐Valley Center 
Floodway) 
MTP Project Planning 
Assistance for Member 
Jurisdictions 
Paratransit Replacement 
Vehicles 

Adopted October 2018

Project
Sponsor

Type of
Project

Investment
Strategy

Andover 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Excellent 

Andover 

Ped/Bike 

Acceptable 

Haysville 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Good 

Kechi 

Intersection 

Acceptable 

Park City 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Excellent 

Valley Center 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Good 

Wichita 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Acceptable 

Sedgwick Co. 

Ped/Bike 

Good 

WAMPO 

Planning & 
Outreach 

Good 

Wichita 
Transit 

Transit 

Good 

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Bridge on 159th St. E. over the 
Kansas Turnpike 
SW Butler Rd. / SW 150th St. 
(47th St. S.) Intersection 
17th Street, I‐135 to Broadway 
Mt. Vernon, Broadway to 
Southeast Blvd 
Redbud Path, K‐96 to 159th St. 
E. 

Andover 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Acceptable 

Butler Co. 

Intersection 

Good 

Wichita 
Wichita 
Wichita 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 
Road ‐ Other 
Road 
Ped/Bike 

Excellent 
Good 
Good 

The Tier II criteria is the regional significance of the project. The project selection group was provided with both the definition of
regional significance in MOVE 2040 and supplemental guidance on regional significance that went out to the project sponsors. The
ratings on the regional significance for each project are in the table below.

MOVE 2040 Project Name

Project
Sponsor

Type of Project

Regional
Significance

159th Street East (US‐54/400 to Central 
Ave in Andover)  

Andover 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Good 

Bicycle & Pedestrian Path (Andover Rd 
from Central to US‐54 in Andover) 

Andover 

Ped/Bike 

Acceptable 

North Main Street Reconstruction  

Haysville 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Good 

Oliver and Kechi Road Intersection 

Kechi 

Intersection 

Excellent 

61st St North (Broadway to the Wichita‐
Valley Center Floodway) 

Park City 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Excellent 

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Meridian, from Ford (77th St. N.) to 
Seward (69th St. N.) in Valley Center 

Valley Center 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Good 

Pawnee, Webb to Greenwich  

Wichita 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Acceptable 

Pedestrian Bridge (Meridian over the 
Wichita‐Valley Center Floodway) 

Sedgwick Co. 

Ped/Bike 

Excellent 

MTP Project Planning Assistance for 
Member Jurisdictions 

WAMPO 

Planning & 
Outreach 

Excellent 

Paratransit Replacement Vehicles 

Wichita Transit 

Transit 

Good 

Andover 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 

Good 

Butler Co. 

Intersection 

Excellent 

Bridge on 159th St. E. over the Kansas 
Turnpike 
SW Butler Rd. / SW 150th St. (47th St. 
S.) Intersection 
17th Street, I‐135 to Broadway 

Wichita 

Mt. Vernon, Broadway to Southeast 
Blvd 

Wichita 

Redbud Path, K‐96 to 159th St. E. 

Wichita 

Road ‐ Other 
Road 
Road ‐ Other 
Road 
Ped/Bike 

Excellent 
Acceptable 
Excellent 

The Tier III project selection criteria are based on the MOVE 2040 Goal Statements.

Tier III Project Selection Criteria:



Choice and connectivity – does the project provide more options for non-auto modes of transportation (bicycle/pedestrian and
transit)?
Economic vitality – Does the project improve connectivity to centers of employment or freight movement?

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022







Freight movement – Does the project improve the WAMPO freight network (as defined in the WAMPO Freight Plan)?
Infrastructure condition – Does the project address a roadway, bridge, or transit vehicles that are in poor condition?
Quality of life – Does the project provide new bicycle/pedestrian or transit service to destinations such as employment centers,
health care, or recreational facilities?
Safety – Does the project incorporate safety improvements, particularly at locations with a history of serious crashes?
System reliability and bottlenecks – Is the project intended to increase system reliability?

More detailed explanations of the criteria and the grading rubric that was used to develop the ratings for each project are included in
the Appendix. The ratings for each project are in the table below:

MOVE 2040
Project Name
159th Street
East (US54/400 to
Central Ave in
Andover)
Bicycle &
Pedestrian Path
(Andover Rd
from Central to
US-54 in
Andover)
North Main
Street
Reconstruction
Oliver and Kechi
Road
Intersection

Project
Sponsor

Type of
Project

Choice &
Connectivity

Economic
Vitality &
Quality
Freight Infrastructure
of Life Movement Condition

Safety

System
Reliability
&
Bottlenecks

Andover

Road Other
Road

Acceptable

Acceptable

Not
Applicable

Good

Good

Not
Applicable

Andover

Ped/Bike

Good

Excellent

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Good

Not
Applicable

Haysville

Road Other
Road

Acceptable

Good

Not
Applicable

Acceptable

Good

Not
Applicable

Kechi

Intersection Acceptable

Good

Not
Appliable

Acceptable

Acceptable

Not
Applicable

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

61st St North
(Broadway to
the WichitaValley Center
Floodway)
Meridian, from
Ford (77th St.
N.) to Seward
(69th St. N.) in
Valley Center
Pawnee, Webb
to Greenwich
Pedestrian
Bridge
(Meridian over
the WichitaValley Center
Floodway)
MTP Project
Planning
Assistance for
Member
Jurisdictions
Paratransit
Replacement
Vehicles
Bridge on 159th
St. E. over the
Kansas Turnpike
SW Butler Rd. /
SW 150th St.
(47th St. S.)
Intersection

Park City

Road Other
Road

Acceptable

Good

Excellent

Good

Excellent

Not
Applicable

Valley
Center

Road Other
Road

Acceptable

Not
Applicable

Good

Acceptable

Acceptable

Not
Applicable

Wichita

Road Other
Road

Excellent

Excellent

Not
Applicable

Acceptable

Good

Acceptable

Good

Excellent

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Good

Not
Applicable

Sedgwick
Ped/Bike
Co.

WAMPO

Planning &
Outreach

Not Applicable

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Wichita
Transit

Transit

Not Applicable

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Acceptable

Acceptable

Not
Applicable

Andover

Road Other
Road

Acceptable

Acceptable Acceptable

Acceptable

Good

Not
Applicable

Butler
Co.

Intersection Acceptable

Not
Applicable

Acceptable

Excellent

Good

Adopted October 2018

Not
Applicable

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

17th Street, I135 to
Broadway
Mt. Vernon,
Broadway to
Southeast Blvd
Redbud Path, K96 to 159th St.
E.

Wichita
Wichita
Wichita

Road Other
Road
Road Other
Road
Ped/Bike

Excellent

Excellent

Good

Excellent

Excellent

Acceptable

Good

Excellent

Not
Applicable

Acceptable

Excellent

Acceptable

Excellent

Excellent

Not
Applicable

Not
Applicable

Acceptable

Not
Applicable

The Tier IV criteria is Addressing Trends. The project selection group was provided with the applicant’s response on how well the
project would address the sociodemographic trends. The ratings on the regional significance for each project are in the table below.

MOVE 2040 Project Name
159th Street East (US-54/400
to Central Ave in Andover)

Project
Sponsor

Addressing
Trends

Road - Other
Road

Good

Bicycle & Pedestrian Path
(Andover Rd from Central to US- Andover
54 in Andover)

Ped/Bike

Good

North Main Street Reconstruction

Haysville

Road - Other
Road

Acceptable

Oliver and Kechi Road
Intersection

Kechi

Intersection

Good

61st St North (Broadway to the
Wichita-Valley Center
Floodway)

Park City

Road - Other
Road

Not
Applicable

Road - Other
Road

Acceptable

Andover

Meridian, from Ford (77th St. N.)
to Seward (69th St. N.) in Valley Valley Center
Center

Adopted October 2018

Type of
Project

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Pawnee, Webb to Greenwich

Wichita

Road - Other
Road

Good

Pedestrian Bridge (Meridian
over the Wichita-Valley Center
Floodway)

Sedgwick Co.

Ped/Bike

Good

WAMPO

Planning &
Outreach

Excellent

Wichita
Transit

Transit

Good

Andover

Road - Other
Road

Acceptable

SW Butler Rd. / SW 150th St.
(47th St. S.) Intersection

Butler Co.

Intersection

Not
Applicable

17th Street, I-135 to Broadway

Wichita

Road - Other
Road

Not
Applicable

Mt. Vernon, Broadway to
Southeast Blvd

Wichita

Road - Other
Road

Not
Applicable

Redbud Path, K-96 to 159th St.
E.

Wichita

Ped/Bike

Good

MTP Project Planning Assistance
for Member Jurisdictions
Paratransit Replacement
Vehicles
Bridge on 159th St. E. over the
Kansas Turnpike

Selected Projects
The project selection group ultimately selected fourteen projects to recommend for WAMPO funding in the 2019-2022 TIP. These
projects were recommended to receive a total of $23,195,400 in WAMPO funding in federal fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, or
2022. All of these projects received the full amount of WAMPO funding that they requested. The recommended projects are listed
below.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

MOVE 2040 Project Name
159th Street East (US-54/400
to Central Ave in Andover)

Type of
Project

WAMPO
Funding
Recommendation

Road - Other
Road

$4,485,000

Bicycle & Pedestrian Path
(Andover Rd from Central to US- Andover
54 in Andover)

Ped/Bike

$588,211

North Main Street Reconstruction

Haysville

Road - Other
Road

$1,743,664

Oliver and Kechi Road
Intersection

Kechi

Intersection

$1,524,224

61st St North (Broadway to the
Wichita-Valley Center
Floodway)

Park City

Road - Other
Road

$2,242,960

Meridian, from Ford (77th St. N.)
to Seward (69th St. N.) in Valley Valley Center
Center

Road - Other
Road

$3,418,131

Pawnee, Webb to Greenwich

Wichita

Road - Other
Road

$3,593,000

WAMPO

Planning &
Outreach

$120,000

Wichita
Transit

Transit

$1,493,472

Andover

Road - Other
Road

$395,874

Butler Co.

Intersection

$778,342

MTP Project Planning Assistance
for Member Jurisdictions
Paratransit Replacement
Vehicles
Bridge on 159th St. E. over the
Kansas Turnpike
SW Butler Rd. / SW 150th St.
(47th St. S.) Intersection

Adopted October 2018

Project
Sponsor
Andover

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

17th Street, I-135 to Broadway

Wichita

Road - Other
Road

$907,618

Mt. Vernon, Broadway to
Southeast Blvd

Wichita

Road - Other
Road

$747,291

Redbud Path, K-96 to 159th St.
E.

Wichita

Ped/Bike

$1,157,613

Performance Based Planning
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) placed a large emphasis on performance based planning, an
emphasis which has been carried over into the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). The United States Department of
Transportation released final regulations implementing this aspect of the act in May 2016 and new Transportation Improvement Plans
adopted after May 27, 2018 are required to comply with the updated rule.
WAMPO has adopted targets for the federally mandated safety performance measures and transit asset management. We will be
required to adopt targets for the system performance and pavement and bridge performance measures by November 14, 2018.
In addition to the federally mandated performance measures, WAMPO has independently been implementing elements of
performance based planning in our planning and programming processes. MOVE 2040 contains a set of performance measures.
WAMPO has adopted targets for many of these measures, including measures related to safety, congestion, freight, and bridge
condition. The MOVE 2040 performance measures influenced the development of the project selection criteria used in selecting
WAMPO-funded projects for the 2019-2022 TIP.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Federal Safety Performance Measures
The Federal Highway Administration has established five safety performance
measures based on the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act
(MAP-21). These are fatalities, fatality rate, serious injuries, serious injury
rate, and non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. Each of these
performance measures are tracked using a five-year rolling average. Based
on safety trends in our region, the WAMPO Transportation Policy Body has
adopted targets for these five measures for the five-year period from 20142018.

Fatalities
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Fatalities and Fatality Rate
2008‐2012
2009‐2013
2010‐2014
The number of fatalities in the WAMPO region has been climbing, from a low
Fatalities (5 year rolling average)
of 45.2 fatalities per year for the 2008-2012 period up to 49.6 fatalities
per year for 2012-2016 (the most recent period for which data are
available). The WAMPO target for the 2014-2018 period is no more than 54 fatalities per year.

2011‐2015

2012‐2016

2018 Target

The fatality rate per 100 million vehicle miles traveled has also been on the rise, though the increase has been less consistent. From
2012 to 2016 there were 1.07 fatalities per 100 million VMT per year. The WAMPO target for the 2014-2018 period is no more
than 1.13 fatalities per 100 million VMT per year. Based on the most recent data available WAMPO is on track to meet the target for
this measure.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Serious Injuries
250
200
150
100
50
0
2008‐2012

2009‐2013

2010‐2014

2011‐2015

Seriuous Injuries (5 year rolling average)

2012‐2016

Serious Injuries
In contrast to fatalities, the number of serious injuries in the WAMPO
region has been consistently declining in recent years, dropping from 230
per year in the 2008-2012 period to 171.8 per year for 2012-2016.
The WAMPO target for the 2014-2018 period is no more than 138
serious injuries per year. Based on the most recent data available
WAMPO is on track to meet the target for this measure.

2018 Target

Serious Injury Rate
6

Serious Injury Rate
The serious injury rate per 100 million VMT has declined as
well, dropping from 5.37 per 100 million VMT per year in the
2008-2012 period to 3.73 per 100 million VMT per year for
2012-2016. The WAMPO target for the 2014-2018 period
is no more than 2.85 serious injuries per 100 million VMT per
year. Based on the most recent data available WAMPO is on
track to meet the target for this measure.

5
4
3
2
1
0
2008‐2012

2009‐2013

2010‐2014

2011‐2015

Serious Injuries per 100 million VMT (5 year average)

Adopted October 2018

2012‐2016
2018 Target

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Non‐Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries
Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

40
30
20
10
0
2008‐2012

2009‐2013

2010‐2014

2011‐2015

2012‐2016

Non‐Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries (5 year rolling average)

Non-motorized (bicycle and pedestrian) fatalities and serious
injuries declined over the 2008-2012, 2009-2013, and 20102014 periods, but began to climb in 2011-2015, reaching 29
per year in 2012-2016. The WAMPO target for the 20142018 period is no more than 35 non-motorized fatalities and
serious injuries per year. Based on the most recent data
available WAMPO is on track to meet the target for this
measure.

2018 Target

The Effect of the TIP on Performance Measures
The TIP supports the achievement of WAMPO’s safety performance measure targets through projects that provide safety benefits.
These projects, and the benefits they provide, can be grouped into several broad categories. Projects marked with a single asterisk (*)
received “Good” rating on our safety project selection criteria during the 2019-2022 TIP project selection process. Projects marked
with a double asterisk (**) received an “Excellent” rating, which mean these projects will incorporate meaningful safety improvements at
locations where accidents have happened.
Safety Projects
We have one dedicated safety project in the current TIP:
● Railroad Safety Crossing Improvements
Intersection Reconstructions
Several projects will reconstruct intersections to make them safer, potentially lessening the chance of collisions:
● SW Butler Rd/SW 150th St Intersection (conversion to roundabout)**
● Oliver and Kechi Road Intersection*
● 45th St and Hillside

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Bicycle Facilities
Many project include bike lanes or multi-use paths to get bicyclists out of the stream of traffic and make accidents involving bicyclists
less likely. These include projects dedicated solely to bike/ped infrastructure:
● Andover Rd Bicycle Pedestrian Path 13th St - 21st St.
● Aviation Pathway Phase 2
● Bicycle & Pedestrian Path (Andover Road from Central to US-54 in Andover)*
● Meridian Pedestrian Bridge*
● Redbud Path, K96 to 159th St E
● 17th and 18th St Bikeway
● Derby to Mulvane Pathway
Many of our roadway projects also include multi-use paths or bike lanes, including:
● KTA Bridge -159th St. East*
● Woodlawn: 45th St to 37th St. N
● Bridge over Chisholm Creek on 61st St North
● Mt. Vernon, Broadway to S.E. Blvd**
● 17th Street, I-135 to Broadway**
● 143rd St. E.: Kellogg to Central
● 17th St., Hillside to Oliver
● 13th, 119th-135th
● 159th St East (US54/400 to Central Ave in Andover)*
● North Main Street Reconstruction*
● 61st St North (Broadway to the Wichita-Valley Center Floodway)**
● Meridian, from Ford to Seward in Valley Center
● Pawnee, Webb to Greenwich*
● Andover Road.: Four Mile Creek Bridge to SW 120th St.
● Pawnee: Hydraulic to I-135
● 127th St. E.: 13th St. N. to 21st St. N.
● Greenwich: Pawnee to Harry

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Technology / Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Projects
Several Intelligent Transportation Systems projects will improve safety by decreasing clearance times and reducing secondary
accidents:
● US-54 Fiber to Traffic Management Center and Downtown Wichita Signal Upgrades
● K15 Corridor ITS Deployment
● Wichita TMC Phase 4
Interchange Reconstruction
The reconstruction of a major interchange in the Wichita region will increase merge distances and eliminate tight ramps with low
advisory speed limits:
1. I-235/US-54 & I-235 & Central - Phase I

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

TIP Project List

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-13-001

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 4) 19-00

127th St. E.:13th St. N. to 21st St. N. (2016, 2017, 2018)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita 3162684393 [email protected]
Scope:
Construct a 3-lane facility including appropriate right turn decel lanes. Drainage improvements, including bridge extension at 127th & Edgewood to accomodate
on-street bike lanes and sidewalk, will be included. 6' sidewalk will be constructed on each side of the road where space is available. Space is limited on the east
side of 127th Street north of 13th Street.
Infaltion Assumptions:
Recent cost estimate provided by design consultant
Explain Funding Source: 60% federal funding, 40% city-issued General Obligation bonds
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (087 N0615-01)
Limits: 127th St. E.: 13th St. N. to 21st St. N
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

R-19-14

UT
$0

PE
$260,000

ROW
$50,000

CON
$5,200,000

CE

Prior

$500,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$260,000

$50,000

$5,200,000

$500,000

$0

FED FY
<2019

Revenue Source

OP

TOTAL
$6,010,000
$6,010,000

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

143rd St. E., Kellogg-Harry (2022, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Construct 5-lane roadway with sidewalk, ped/bike and drainage improvements
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Limits: 143rd St E from Kellogg to Harry
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

2022

Local

$0

>2022

Future

$0

$0

$0

$4,050,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$300,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$300,000

$0

$4,050,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$300,000

$0

$0

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$300,000

$450,000

$0

$4,500,000

$0

$0

$300,000

$450,000

$0

$4,800,000

Page 1 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-05

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

159th St. East, from US-54/400 to Central Ave. (2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Andover
Contact(s): Les Mangus City of Andover (316)733-1303 [email protected]
Scope:
Improve the existing two-lane road with ditches to three-lane urban curb and gutter with adjacent 10' bicycle/pedestrian path from the intersection of US-54/400 to
Central Avenue.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Road - Other Road

County: Butler

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

Y

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Limits: 159th St East from US-54/400 to Central Ave
County, Sedgwick County

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2021

Local

$180,000

$487,500

$333,000

$0

$0

$0

$1,000,500

2022

Local

$0

$0

$0

$975,000

$146,250

$0

$1,121,250

2022

MPO-STP

$4,485,000

R-19-04

$0

$0

$0

$3,900,000

$585,000

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$180,000

$487,500

$333,000

$4,875,000

$731,250

$0

$6,606,750

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$180,000

$487,500

$333,000

$4,875,000

$731,250

$0

$6,606,750

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

159th St. East - KTA to Central
Lead Agency: City of Andover
Contact(s): Les Mangus City of Andover (316)733-1303 [email protected]
Scope:
Construct a three-lane concrete pavement section beginning at the south end of the 159th St. KTA Bridge Project 8 N-0655-01 with a 10-foot bicycle pedestrian
path on the east side and a 5-foot pedestrian sidewalk on the west side of the street. The 10-foot bicycle pedestrian path on the east side of the street will be
extended north from the north end of the bridge project to 13th St.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:

Road - Other Road

Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Limits: 159th Street East from Central to KTA Bridge (Central to 13th Street for 10 foot multiuse path)
County, Sedgwick County
UT
FED FY
Revenue Source
PE
ROW
CON
CE

Primary Mode:

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

County: Butler

2019

OP

TOTAL

Local

$50,000

$140,000

$50,000

$2,175,000

$250,000

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$50,000

$140,000

$50,000

$2,175,000

$250,000

$0

$2,665,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$50,000

$140,000

$50,000

$2,175,000

$250,000

$0

$2,665,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$2,665,000

Page 2 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-17-03

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 4) 19-00

17th Street, I-135 to Broadway (2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita 3162684393 [email protected]
Scope:
The project will re-construct the existing 2-lane asphalt mat street to provide a 3-lane curb and gutter section to facilitate truck traffic. Drainage improvements will
be made. In addition, bicycle improvements will be made to connect the Midtown Multi-use path (near 15th & Broadway) to the McAdams Multi-use path (at
McAdams Park). Sidewalk improvements will also be made.
Infaltion Assumptions:
Based on recent bids received on previous projects and 2% inflation per year
Explain Funding Source: The project is funded with $4,800,000 of local GO $s from 2019-2021 in the 2015 - 2024 Capital Improvement Program.
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (087 N0662-01)
Limits: 17th Street, I-135 to Broadway
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$3,237,382

$250,000

$0

$3,487,382

2019

Local AC

$0

$0

$0

$2,613,716

$0

$0

$2,613,716

2019

MPO-STP

$0

$0

$0

$1,668,902

$0

$0

$1,668,902

2020

MPO-CMAQ ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$793,665

$0

$0

$793,665

2020

MPO-STP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$765,886

$0

$0

$765,886

2021

MPO-CMAQ ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$414,165

$0

$0

$414,165

2021

MPO-STP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$380,000

$0

$0

$380,000

2022

MPO-STP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$260,000

$0

$0

$260,000

<2019

Prior

$0

$0

$0

$725,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$525,000

$200,000

$0

$0

$0

$7,520,000

$250,000

$0

$7,770,000

$525,000

$200,000

$7,520,000

$250,000

$0

$8,495,000

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 3 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-10

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

2nd St., Main to Washington (2018, 2022, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Preservation project - curb extensions, streetscaping improvements
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: 2nd St., Main to Washington
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2022

Local

$0

<2019

Prior

$0

$0

$0

>2022

Future

$0

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$350,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

B-19-04

$0

$350,000

$350,000

$0

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$350,000

$2,250,000

$250,000

$0

$2,500,000

$3,200,000

$375,000

$0

$3,575,000

$0

$0

$0

$350,000

$0

$6,425,000

$0

$0

$5,450,000

$625,000

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

2nd Street N at Brookside bridge (2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Replace/Rehabilitate bridge
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Primary Mode: Bridge - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: 2nd Street from Brookside St to Brookside St
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$675,000

$75,000

$0

$750,000

<2019

Prior

$0

$100,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$100,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$675,000

$75,000

$0

$750,000

$0

$850,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$0

$100,000

$0

$675,000

$75,000

Page 4 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-12

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

37th St N., Hydraulic to Hillside (2022, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Construct 30lane roadway with right turn decal lanes, improve drainage, sidewalk
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: 37th St N from Hydraulic to Hillside
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2022

Local

$0

>2022

Future

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

INT-14-001

$300,000

$0

CE

CON
$0

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$300,000

$0

$0

$500,000

$500,000

$0

$300,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$300,000

$300,000

$500,000

$0

$0

$0

$800,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

45th St. & Hillside (2016, 2017)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman 3162684393 [email protected]
Scope:
Improve the intersection to include left turn lanes and traffic signalization. The project limits will include the railroad crossing on the east and south legs of the
intersection. The west leg will include the 254 & Hillside off ramp.
Infaltion Assumptions:
Recent cost estimate provided by design consultant
Explain Funding Source: 50% federal funding, 50% City-issued General Obligation bonds.
KDOT ID: (087 N0616-01)
Primary Mode: Intersection
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: 45th & Hillside - improvements on the east and south legs will include the railroad crossings
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

UT
$0

PE
$300,000

ROW
$50,000

CON
$5,250,000

CE

Prior

$350,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$300,000

$50,000

$5,250,000

$350,000

$0

FED FY
<2019

Revenue Source

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

OP

TOTAL
$5,950,000
$5,950,000

Page 5 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

T-17-04

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

5310 Capital (2017)
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Capital and Project Administration projects for 5310 program
Scope:
Title:

Contact(s):

Michelle Stroot WichitaTransit (316)352-4808 [email protected]

Infaltion Assumptions:
Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Butler

Project Type:

County, Sedgwick

FED FY

T-17-03

IMP

Revenue Source

<2019

Bike/Ped:

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Limits:
WAMPO
Area
County,
Sumner
County

Prior

$0

PE
$0

ROW
$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

CAP

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$771,400

$0

$0

$771,400

$0

$771,400
$771,400

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

5310 Operating (2017)
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Operating activities for 5310
Scope:
Title:

Contact(s):

Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]

Infaltion Assumptions:

5310 funding is apportioned

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Butler

Project Type:

County, Sedgwick

FED FY
<2019

Bike/Ped:

N

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Limits:
WAMPO
Area
County,
Sumner
County

Revenue Source

IMP

Prior

$0

$0

ROW
$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

PE

CAP

CON

OP

$0

$0

$241,146

$0

$0

$241,146

TOTAL
$241,146
$241,146

Page 6 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-13-005

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

5th St.: Bridge over Floodway to Fiddler's Creek (2017, 2018)
Lead Agency: City of Valley Center
Contact(s): Scott Hildebrand City of Valley Center (316)755-7310 SHildebrand@valleycenterks
Improvements to the road base, repaving the road, sidewalk, addition of turn lanes at Seneca intersection, and improvements to sight distance.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
Inflation assumptions used are those applied to MOVE 2040 for this project in order to remain consistent.
Explain Funding Source: Debt financing, general fund/CIP.
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
KDOT ID: (087 N0650-01)
Limits: Wichita-Valley Center Floodway Bridge to Fiddler's Creek on 5th St. (85th St.).
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

R-19-06

UT
$0

PE
$200,000

ROW
$100,000

CON
$2,035,000

CE

Prior

$200,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$200,000

$100,000

$2,035,000

$200,000

$0

FED FY

Revenue Source

<2019

OP

TOTAL
$2,535,000
$2,535,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

61st Street North, Broadway to the Wichita Valley Center Floodway Bridge (2020, 2021)
Lead Agency: City of Park City
Contact(s): Jack Whitson City of Park City (316)744-2026 [email protected]
Construct an urban three lane road and intersection improvements to Broadway and 61st with additions of pedestrian/bike pathways.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Road - Other Road

County: Sedgwick

County

FED FY

Project Type:
Limits:

Bike/Ped:

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2020

Local

$100,000

$150,000

$100,000

2021

Local

$0

$0

$0

2021

MPO-STP

$0

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$100,000

$150,000

$100,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$100,000

$150,000

$100,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

N

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

61st St N, from Broadway west 1/2 mile to the WVCF bridge
CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$487,600

$73,140

$0

$560,740

$1,950,400

$292,560

$0

$2,242,960

$2,438,000

$365,700

$0

$3,153,700

$2,438,000

$365,700

$0

$3,153,700

$0

$350,000

Page 7 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

BP-19-03

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Academy Sidewalk (2019)
Lead Agency: City of Maize
Contact(s): Jolene Graham City of Maize (316)722-7561 [email protected]
Scope:
The project would construct a 8 foot sidewalk along Academy (formerly Central Ave) from Khedive St. to King Street to complete sidewalk previously constructed.
The City of Maize will look at including this as part of the Academy Street repaving project in 2019.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Ped/Bike

County: Sedgwick

R-11-014

Limits:

County

FED FY
2019

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

Y

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Academy from Khedive St to King St

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

CE

OP

TOTAL

Local

$0

$0

$0

$130,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$130,000

$0

$0

$0

$130,000

$0

$0

$130,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$130,000

$0

$0

$130,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Andover Rd.: Four Mile Creek Bridge to SW 120th St. (2016, 2017)
Lead Agency: City of Andover
Contact(s): Leslie E. Mangus City of Andover 3167331303 lmangus @andoverks.com
Scope:
Improve to 4-lanes with curb and gutter, median, dedicated turn lanes, and 10 ft. bicycle/pedestrian sidewalk from the south end of the Butler County Four Mile
Creek Bridge project through the SW 120th St. intersection.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% annual
Explain Funding Source: The project is programmed for funding the the adopted City CIP. The CIP is funded by a local 1% retailer's sales tax dedicated to street
improvements.
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (008 N0635-01)
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Limits: Andover Rd.: Four Mile Creek Bridge to SW 120th St.
County: Butler County
Title:

UT
$0

PE
$208,826

ROW
$182,228

CON
$5,558,773

CE

Prior

$495,882

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$208,826

$182,228

$5,558,773

$495,882

$0

FED FY
<2019

Revenue Source

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

OP

TOTAL
$6,445,709
$6,445,709

Page 8 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

BP-19-02

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Andover Rd. Bicycle/Pedestrian Path, from Central to US-54 (2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: City of Andover
Contact(s): Les Mangus City of Andover (316)733-1303 [email protected]
Remove existing 5' sidewalk and replace with 10' bicycle/pedestrian path to complete the north/south connection between Central Ave. and US-54
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Ped/Bike

County: Butler

Project Type:
Limits:

County

FED FY

Bike/Ped:

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2019

Local

$0

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

2020

MPO-CMAQ

$0

$0

2020

MPO-TA

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$63,936

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

TA-17-01

Y

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Andover Road from Central to US-54

$0

$63,936

$63,936

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$236,736

$127,872

$19,181

$0

$147,053

$0

$102,655

$76,723

$0

$179,378

$0

$408,833

$0

$0

$408,833

$172,800

$639,360

$95,904

$0

$972,000

$0

$972,000

$172,800

$172,800

$0

$639,360

$95,904

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Andover Rd. Bicycle Pedestrian Path, from 13th St. - 21st St. (2020, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Andover
Contact(s): Leslie E. Mangus City of Andover 3167331303 lmangus @andoverks.com
Scope:
Remove existing 5' sidewalk and replace with 10' bicycle /pedestrian path to complete the North- South bike /ped connection between existing 10' bike/ped facilities
at 21st St. and the Redbud Trail
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% annual
Explain Funding Source: The project is included in the adopted local CIP and the PE, R/W acquisition, utility relocation, and 20% local match are to be funded by the
existing 1% local retailers sales tax that is dedicated to street improvements.
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Primary Mode: Ped/Bike
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Limits:
Andover
Rd.
From
approximately
750'
south
of
21st
St.
to
north
end
of
KTA
Bridge
north
of
13th
St.
County: Butler County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2020

Local

$0

$69,120

$144,000

$0

$0

$0

$213,120

2022

Local

$0

$0

$0

$138,240

$41,472

$0

$179,712

2022

MPO-CMAQ

$0

$0

$0

$552,960

$62,208

$0

$615,168

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$69,120

$144,000

$691,200

$103,680

$0

$1,008,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$69,120

$144,000

$691,200

$103,680

$0

$1,008,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 9 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

P-18-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Asset Management Phase 2
Lead Agency: WAMPO
Contact(s): Phil Nelson WAMPO (316)268-4408 [email protected]
Scope:
Building on the Regional Asset Inventory, WAMPO will develop an approach to managing regionally significant transportation assets. The approach will be
developed cooperatively with our planning partners and member jurisdictions; it may include a WAMPO program to conduct standardized condition assessments of
regionally significant assets, making asset management software available to member jurisdictions to who are interested in using it to for their own decision
making, and incorporating asset management practices into the WAMPO planning process.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Planning & Outreach

County: Butler

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Limits:
WAMPO
region
County, Sedgwick County,
Sumner
County

FED FY

Revenue Source

IMP

PE

CE

CON

Local

2021

MPO-STP

$220,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$275,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$275,000

$0

$0

$0

TA-14-017

$55,000

ROW

2021

$0

$0

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$55,000

$0

$0

$0

$220,000

$0

$0

$0

$275,000

$0

$0

$275,000

$0

FEDERAL

(Ver 5) 19-00

Aviation Pathway Phase 2 (2016, 2017, 2018)
Lead Agency: Sedgwick County - Public Works
Contact(s): James Weber Sedgwick County Public Works (316)660-1773 [email protected]
Scope:
Construction of a 10 foot wide multi-use pathway, street crossings, railroad crossings, drainage structures and amenities. Begins on the southwest corner of 47th
St. South and Oliver (terminus of phase 1) and extends west along 47th St. South to Clifton, north along Clifton to the intersection of Clifton and Cumberland Way
and includes an extension south along Clifton from 47th St. South to serve the Oaklawn School.
Infaltion Assumptions:
Estimate based on 2016 dollars. Inflation factor of 3% for each succeeding year.
Explain Funding Source: The local share of the project cost will be split by Sedgwick County and Derby. The local funds will come from local sales tax or general funds of
each community.
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Primary Mode: Ped/Bike
KDOT ID: (087 TE0433-01)
Title:

County: Sedgwick

County

FED FY
<2019

Begins on the southwest corner of 47th St. South and Oliver (terminus of phase 1) and extends west along 47th, north
along Clifton to Cumberland Way and includes an extension south along Clifton from 47th St. South to serve the Oaklawn
School.
UT
Revenue Source
OP
TOTAL
PE
ROW
CON
CE
Limits:

Prior

$0

$40,000

$40,000

$1,250,000

$125,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$40,000

$40,000

$1,250,000

$125,000

$0

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$1,455,000
$1,455,000

Page 10 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

BP-19-01

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Bike Enhancement Projects (2019, 2021, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Various bicycle improvements including those recommended by the Wichita Bicycle and pedestrian Advisory board.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Ped/Bike
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: City of Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

CE

OP

TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$200,000

$0

$1,400,000

$200,000

$0

$1,800,000

2021

Local

$0

$200,000

$0

$1,800,000

$200,000

$0

$2,200,000

>2022

Future

$0

$200,000

$0

$1,800,000

$200,000

$0

$2,200,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$400,000

$0

$3,200,000

$400,000

$0

$4,000,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$600,000

$0

$5,000,000

$600,000

$0

$6,200,000

B-19-03

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Bridge #012 on I-135 in Sedgwick County (2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Bridge Repair: Replace strip seals, concrete surface repair, substrate waterproofing at hinges, patch deck. concrete surface repair and barrier repair
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: NHPP and State
KDOT ID: (KA-5043-01)
Primary Mode: Bridge - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: I-135: Bridge #012 located 0.02 miles North of K-15 (Northbound)
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

CE

OP

TOTAL

2019

NHPP

$0

$0

$0

$517,500

$45,000

$0

$562,500

2019

State

$0

$60,000

$0

$57,500

$5,000

$0

$122,500

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$60,000

$0

$575,000

$50,000

$0

$685,000

$0

$685,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$0

$60,000

$0

$575,000

$50,000

Page 11 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

B-19-02

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Bridge #290 on I-135 in Sedgwick County (2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Bridge Repair- Polymer Overlay repair with deck patching, replace strip seal joints, hinge repairs, concrete surface repair, clean and paint bearing and full TMP
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: ACNHPP and State Funds
Primary Mode: Bridge - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (KA-4910-02)
Limits: Located at 19th St. North and I-135
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2019

State

$0

2019

State AC

$0

$0

$0

2020

NHPP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$450,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$450,000

$450,000

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$450,000

$4,100,000

$450,000

$0

$4,550,000

$3,280,000

$360,000

$0

$3,640,000

$0

$4,100,000

$450,000

$0

$5,000,000

$0

$4,100,000

$450,000

$0

$5,000,000

$0

$0

*ACCP is not part of Total

B-17-04

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Bridge #321 & #323 Repair on K-96 in Sedgwick County (2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Scope:
Bridge Repair- Reset and paint bearings (#321), replace abutment bearings (#323), paint girder ends, replace the first segment of each approach slab, install
abutment aggregate drains, patch deck and replace expansion joints.
Infaltion Assumptions:
0%
Explain Funding Source: Federal NHPP and State funds
Primary Mode: Bridge
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (087 KA-4868-01)
Title:

County: Sedgwick

County

FED FY

Bridge #321 (K-96 EB exit ramp) on K-96 located 0.89 miles east of North West St, Bridge #323 on K-96 located 0.94
miles East of North West St.
UT
Revenue Source
OP
TOTAL
PE
ROW
CON
CE
Limits:

2019

NHPP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$589,600

$59,200

$0

$648,800

<2019

Prior

$0

$148,000

$0

$737,000

$74,000

$0

$959,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$148,000

$0

$737,000

$74,000

$0

$959,000

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 12 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

B-19-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Bridge #496 on US-54 in Sedgwick County (2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Bridge Repair- Strip seal replacements, relief slot joint replacements and deck patching as needed
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: NHPP and State
Primary Mode: Bridge - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: 2.362 miles west of junction US-54/I-235 over Tyler Rd in Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

KDOT ID:

(KA-5044-01)

OP

TOTAL

2019

NHPP

$0

2019

State

$0

$35,000

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$35,000

$0

$225,000

$20,000

$0

$280,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$35,000

$0

$225,000

$20,000

$0

$280,000

B-19-08

$0

$0

$180,000
$45,000

$16,000

$0

$196,000

$4,000

$0

$84,000

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Bridge Inspections - Wichita (2019, 2021, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Inspect bridges in Wichita.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Bridge - Other Road
Project Type:
Limits: City of Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

Contact(s):

Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]

Bike/Ped:

UT

PE

ROW

2019

Local

$0

2021

Local

$0

$150,000

$0

>2022

Future

$0

$150,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

N

KDOT ID:

CE

CON

OP

(N/A)
TOTAL

$0

$0

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$300,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$300,000

$450,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$450,000

$150,000

$0

$0

Page 13 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

B-19-06

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Bridge Rehabilitation/Repair - Wichita (2021, 2022, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Bridge repair, if needed, for bridged identified in the biennial bridge inspection
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: Wichita 2018-2027 CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Bridge - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: City of Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2021

Local

$0

2022

Local

$0

$100,000

$0

>2022

Future

$0

$100,000

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$150,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$250,000

B-18-01

$50,000

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$50,000

$0

$800,000

$900,000

$100,000

$0

$1,100,000

$900,000

$100,000

$0

$1,100,000

$0

$1,600,000

$150,000

$0

$1,900,000

$0

$2,500,000

$250,000

$0

$3,000,000

$0

$700,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Bridge Repair (#291) on I-135 in Sedgwick County (2018, 2020, 2021)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Overlay repair with deck patching, replace strip seal joints, hinge repairs, concrete surface repair, clean and paint bearings, replace bearings and full TMP
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: ACNHP and State
KDOT ID: (KA-4910-03)
Primary Mode: Bridge - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: Bridge #291 on I-135 in SG County located at 19th St N and I-135
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2020

State

$0

$0

$0

$1,200,000

$120,000

$0

$1,320,000

2020

State AC

$0

$0

$0

$4,480,000

$480,000

$0

$4,960,000

2021

NHPP ACCP

$0

$0

$480,000

$0

$4,960,000

<2019

Prior

$0

$400,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$400,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$5,680,000

$600,000

$0

$6,280,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$400,000

$0

$5,680,000

$600,000

$0

$6,680,000

$0

$4,480,000

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 14 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

B-17-03

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 4) 19-00

Bridge Replacement of bridges #079 & #080 on I-235 in Sedgwick County
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Bridge Replacement
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.8% 2014 Base Year Cost
Explain Funding Source: NHPP and State Funds
Primary Mode: Bridge - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
Title:

County: Sedgwick

County

FED FY

KDOT ID:

(087 KA3895-01)

I-235: Bridge #079 (South Bound) Located 0.26 Miles North West of West Street. Bridge #080 (North Bound) Located 0.25
Miles North West of West Street (Mopac RailRoad)
UT
Revenue Source
OP
TOTAL
PE
ROW
CON
CE
Limits:

2019

NHPP

$0

$0

$0

$7,912,615

$593,446

$0

$8,506,061

2019

State

$90,000

$0

$0

$879,179

$65,938

$0

$1,035,117

<2019

Prior

$0

$0

$0

$1,082,000

B-17-01

$902,000

$180,000

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$90,000

$0

$0

$8,791,794

$659,384

$0

$9,541,178

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$90,000

$902,000

$180,000

$8,791,794

$659,384

$0

$10,623,178

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

Bridge on 159th St. E. over the Kansas Turnpike (I-35) (2017, 2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: City of Andover
Contact(s): Leslie E. Mangus 3167331303 lmangus @andoverks.com
Reconstruct bridge and approaches to four-lane width with 10' bicycle/pedestrian path to meet current functional and structural requirements.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% annual
Explain Funding Source: The project is included in the adopted local CIP and the PE, R/W acquisition, utility relocation, and 20% local match are to be funded by the
existing 1% local retailers sales tax that is dedicated to street improvements. The preliminary engineering, righ
Primary Mode: Bridge - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (008 N0655-01)
Limits: 159th St. East approximately 1/2 mile south of 13th St. North
County: Butler County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

2019

EARMARK

$0

2019

Local

$0

2019

MPO-STP

<2019

Prior
2019-2022 TOTAL
2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

ROW
$0
$0

$0

CE

CON
$759,161

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$759,161
$951,893
$2,010,561

$0

$884,573

$67,320

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,741,281

$269,280

$0

$50,000

$220,839

$50,000

$0

$0

$0

$320,839

$0

$0

$0

$3,385,015

$336,600

$0

$3,721,615

$50,000

$220,839

$50,000

$3,385,015

$336,600

$0

$4,042,454

Page 15 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

B-17-02

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Bridge over Chisholm Creek on 61st Street North (2017, 2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: City of Park City
Contact(s): Daniela Rivas 3167442026 [email protected]
Replace a deficient bridge, construct a new 300 foot bridge meeting all current standards. The bridge will have 10 foot sidewalks on both sides of the bridge.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
3yrs @ 1.5%/Yr.=4.5%
Explain Funding Source: State/Federal 80%, Local 20%.
Primary Mode: Bridge - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (087 N0654-01)
Limits: 555 feet west of the centerline of I-135.
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$1,000,000

$150,000

$0

$1,150,000

2019

MPO-STP

$0

$0

$0

$4,000,000

$600,000

$0

$4,600,000

<2019

Prior

$50,000

$150,000

$50,000

$0

$0

$0

$250,000

2019-2022 TOTAL
2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

B-19-05

$0

$0

$0

$5,000,000

$750,000

$0

$5,750,000

$50,000

$150,000

$50,000

$5,000,000

$750,000

$0

$6,000,000

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Delano @ Westlink Bridge (2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Replace/Rehabilitate Bridge
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Bridge - Other Road
Project Type:
Limits: Delano and Westlink
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

Contact(s):

Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]

Bike/Ped:

UT

PE

ROW

N

KDOT ID:

CE

CON

OP

(N/A)
TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$100,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$100,000

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

$751,500

$83,500

$0

$835,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$100,000

$0

$751,500

$83,500

$0

$935,000

$0

$935,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$0

$100,000

$0

$751,500

$83,500

Page 16 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

TA-15-002

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 5) 19-00

Derby to Mulvane Pathway (2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021)
Lead Agency: Sedgwick County - Public Works
Contact(s): James Weber Sedgwick County Public Works (316)660-1773 [email protected]
Scope:
Construction of a 10 foot wide multi-use pathway and amenities along the west side of Rock Road from the existing pathway at Woodbrook and Rock in Derby to
the existing pathways at 103rd St. S. and Rock Road in Mulvane.
Infaltion Assumptions:
Estimate based on 2016 dollars. Inflation factor of 3% for each succeeding year.
Explain Funding Source: The local share will be split by Derby, Mulvane and Sedgwick County. The local funds will come from local sales tax or general funds of each
community.
KDOT ID: (087 TE0434-01)
Primary Mode: Ped/Bike
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Title:

County: Sedgwick

County

FED FY

Running south along Rock Road from the intersection of Rock Road and Woodbrook in Derby to the intersection of Rock
Road and 103rd St. S. in Mulvane.
UT
Revenue Source
OP
TOTAL
PE
ROW
CON
CE
Limits:

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$190,962

$19,096

$0

$210,058

2019

MPO-TA

$0

$0

$0

$286,115

$76,385

$0

$362,500

2020

MPO-TA ACCP

$0

$16,167

2021

MPO-TA ACCP

<2019

Prior

$0

$16,167

$0

$0

$0

$0

$461,566

$0

$0

$461,566

$60,000

$40,000

$60,000

$477,733

$0

$0

$637,733

$0

$0

$0

$477,077

$95,481

$0

$572,558

$0

$1,210,291

2019-2022 TOTAL
2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$60,000

$40,000

$60,000

$954,810

$95,481

*ACCP is not part of Total

R-19-13

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Douglas, Washington to Grove (2022, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Preservation project - curb extensions, streetscaping improvements
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: Douglas from Washington to Grove
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

CE

OP

2022

Local

$0

$300,000

$0

$2,400,000

>2022

Future

$0

$0

$0

$3,000,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$300,000

$0

$2,400,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$300,000

$0

$5,400,000

$300,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

TOTAL

$300,000

$0

$3,000,000

$0

$0

$3,000,000

$300,000

$0

$3,000,000

$0

$6,000,000

Page 17 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

B-19-07

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Douglas at Brookside bridge (2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Replace/Rehabilitate Bridge
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Bridge - Other Road
Project Type:
Limits: Douglas and Brookside
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Contact(s):

Bike/Ped:

UT

Revenue Source

PE

2019

Local

$0

<2019

Prior

$0

ITS-18-04

Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]

ROW
$0

$0

$100,000

$0

N

KDOT ID:

CE

CON
$675,000

OP

(N/A)
TOTAL

$75,000

$0

$750,000

$0

$0

$100,000

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$675,000

$75,000

$0

$750,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$100,000

$0

$675,000

$75,000

$0

$850,000

STATE

(Ver 2) 19-00

East Side DMS
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Tom Hein KDOT (316)660-4990 [email protected]
Scope:
Install dual Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) at K96 and the Redbud Trail and on US-54 east of 143rd St E.
Title:

MTP IDs: 40-113, 40-120
4% per year.

Infaltion Assumptions:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Technology

County: Sedgwick

Limits:

County

FED FY
<2019

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

Revenue Source

UT
$0

$0

ROW
$0

CON
$673,400

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$673,400

Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

K96 and the Redbud Trail and US-54 east of 143rd St E

Prior

WAMPO Project Listing

N

PE

CE

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$673,400
$673,400

Page 18 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

T-19-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

FTA 5310 (FFY17 and FFY18) (2019)
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Contact(s): Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]
Capital, operating and program administration dollars aimed at transportation services for the elderly and persons with disabilities.
Scope:
Title:

Infaltion Assumptions:

5310 funds are apportioned to the urbanized area annually

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Butler

Project Type:

County, Sedgwick

FED FY

Bike/Ped:

Revenue Source

IMP

PE

ROW

CAP

CON

2019

FTA 5310

$0

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

R-15-003

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Limits:
Urbanized
area
County,
Sumner
County

$0

$0

OP

TOTAL

$514,516

$277,047

$791,563

$128,629

$277,047

$405,676

$0

$643,145

$554,094

$1,197,239

$0

$643,145

$554,094

$1,197,239

$0

FEDERAL

(Ver 7) 19-00

Greenwich, Pawnee to Harry (2017, 2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman Wichita Public Works 3162684393 [email protected]
Scope:
Reconstruct current 2-lane roadway to a 3-lane roadway w/drainage improvements, sidewalk, and multi-use path. Right turn decel lanes will be constructed at
appropriate side streets. The intersection of Pawnee & Greenwich will be improved to include left turn lanes and traffic signalization.
Infaltion Assumptions:
Estimate is based on most recent similar projects and 2% inflation per year.
Explain Funding Source: 70% federal funding, 30% city-issued general obligation bonds
KDOT ID: (087 N0663-01)
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Limits: Greenwich, Pawnee to Harry
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

2019

MPO-CMAQ ACCP

$0

PE
$0

ROW
$0

CON
$100,000

2019

MPO-STP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$380,416

<2019

Prior

$0

$150,000

$250,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$150,000

$250,000

CE

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$100,000
$380,416

$4,821,742

$281,700

$0

$5,503,442

$4,821,742

$281,700

$0

$5,503,442

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 19 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

B-13-008

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 4) 19-00

I-235/I-135/K-254 Interchange (North Junction) Green Phase (KA-3110-01)
Lead Agency:
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
KDOT2017, 2019, 2021)
(2013, 2016,
Scope:
Green Phase of North Junction Project. Reconstruct I-235 from east of Meridian Avenue to west of I-135, replace bridges, add continuous auxiliary lanes, improve
the interchange at Broadway Avenue, and construct a connector road from Seneca Street to Meridian Avenue north of I-235.
Infaltion Assumptions:
All KDOT estimates are based on a 4.5% inflation factor per year extended to the letting date of the project.
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Road - Highway

County: Sedgwick

Project Type:
Limits:

County

FED FY

Bike/Ped:

N

KDOT ID:

(087 KA3110-01)

I-235, from east of Meridian Avenue to west of I-135

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

NHPP

$0

$0

$0

$66,681,450

$4,785,750

$0

$71,467,200

2019

State

$0

$0

$0

$7,409,050

$531,750

$0

$7,940,800

2021

NHPP ACCP

$3,600,000

$2,520,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$6,120,000

<2019

Prior

$4,000,000

$2,800,000

$7,600,000

$0

$0

$0

$14,400,000

$0

$0

$0

$74,090,500

$5,317,500

$0

$79,408,000

$0

$93,808,000

2019-2022 TOTAL
2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$4,000,000

$2,800,000

$7,600,000

$74,090,500

$5,317,500

*ACCP is not part of Total

ICH-12-008

FEDERAL

(Ver 6) 19-00

I-235/US-54 & I-235/Central - Phase I (KA-0161-04) (2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Scope:
Phase 1 reconstruction of the I-235/US-54 interchange includes construction of flyover ramps to replace the existing loop ramps for the NB I-235 to WB US-54 and
SB I-235 to EB US-54 movements, construction of auxiliary lanes on I-235 from US-54 to the Central interchange, and reconstruction of the West Street
interchange.
Infaltion Assumptions:
All KDOT estimates are based on a 4.5% inflation factor per year extended to the letting date of the project.
Explain Funding Source: Federal funds used by KDOT, state KDOT funds, and Sedgwick County
Primary Mode: Interchange
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
KDOT ID: (087 KA0161-04)
Limits: I-235 and the interchanges at I-235/US-54 (Kellogg)
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY
<2019

Revenue Source

UT

CE

OP

TOTAL

Prior

$5,481,442

PE
$8,850,795

ROW
$15,800,991

CON
$104,448,147

$8,715,682

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$5,481,442

$8,850,795

$15,800,991

$104,448,147

$8,715,682

$0

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$143,297,057
$143,297,057

Page 20 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

ITS-19-01

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Intelligent Transportation System (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Updating traffic signals and install other related ITS equipment along selected corridors.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: Wichita 2018 - 2027 CIP, adopted Aug 2018
Primary Mode: Technology
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: City of Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2019

Local

$0

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

2021

Local

$0

$0

2022

Local

$0

$0

INT-17-002

$0

CON

CE

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$750,000

$500,000

$0

$0

$500,000

$0

$500,000

$0

$0

$500,000

$0

$500,000

$0

$0

$500,000

$0

$750,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$2,250,000

$0

$0

$2,250,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$2,250,000

$0

$0

$2,250,000

STATE

(Ver 5) 19-00

Intersection Improvements at US-54 and Barber Dr. (2020)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Nelda Buckley KDOT (785) 368-7099 [email protected]
Intersection Improvements in Goddard
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4%
Explain Funding Source: State Corridor Management Funds
Primary Mode: Intersection
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: US-54 and Barber Dr. in Goddard
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY
2020

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

CE

KDOT ID:

OP

(087 KA-4362-01)
TOTAL

State

$0

$0

$0

$1,400,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$1,400,000

$0

$0

$1,400,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$1,400,000

$0

$0

$1,400,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$1,400,000

Page 21 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

S-18-02

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

K-96 in Sedgwick County Guardrail Upgrade (2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Guardrail Upgrade
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: NHPP
Primary Mode: Road - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: From the East End of the Arkansas River Bridge East to K-96/I-235
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

2019

NHPP

$0

<2019

Prior

$0

ROW
$0

$0

$13,063

$0

CE

CON
$261,250
$0

KDOT ID:

OP

(KA-4685-02)
TOTAL

$13,063

$0

$274,313

$0

$0

$13,063

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$261,250

$13,063

$0

$274,313

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$13,063

$0

$261,250

$13,063

$0

$287,376

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 22 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

ITS-17-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

K15 Corridor ITS Deployment (2017)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Scope:
K-15 Corridor
Retrofit the existing signals along K-15/Southeast Blvd. with new controllers, GPS clocks, Ethernet/Fiber capable switches, PTZ cameras with modem
connections. Investigate coordination and timing needs. Controller will need to support automated signal performance measures and perform high definition data
logging. Two arterial Digital Message Signs (DMS) and two camera sites are planned in addition to the signal upgrades. All cameras and fiber will be connected into
the WICHway Center. Modems will connect the switches to the respective city or county that requires access. GPS clocks will synch the clocks to run time of day
programs.
Intersections are expected to include:
US-54 & Washington Ramps
Washington & Southeast Blvd.
Harry & Southeast Blvd.
Mt. Vernon & Southeast Blvd.
Hydraulic & Southeast Blvd.
Pawnee & Southeast Blvd.
Wassel & Southeast Blvd.
31st & K-15
MacArthur & K-15
47th & K-15
63rd/Patriot & K-15
71st Street/Meadowlark & K-15
Buckner & K-15
Madison & K-15
Market & K-15
A DMS is planned near Patriot and near I-135 for northbound traffic. Two additional cameras are planned for either side of 55th Street South due to curves in K-15.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Technology

County: Sedgwick

Limits:

County

FED FY
<2019

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

Revenue Source

UT
$0

$0

ROW
$0

CON
$645,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$645,000

Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

KDOT ID:

(087 N0673-01)

K15/Southeast Blvd/Washington St from Market to US-54

Prior

WAMPO Project Listing

Y

PE

CE

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$645,000
$645,000

Page 23 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

P-19-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

MTP Planning Assistance
Lead Agency: WAMPO
Contact(s): Chris Upchurch WAMPO (316)268-4457 [email protected]
Scope:
As part of the development of the next MTP, WAMPO will issue a call for projects to member jurisdictions and planning partners in mid-2019. These projects will
be evaluated using project selection criteria that reflect the vision, goals, and investment strategy developed as part of the MTP process. During the call for
projects, WAMPO would like to work more cooperatively with local and state transportation agencies to help identify and scope regional transportation projects so
that they better align and are responsive to the project selection criteria (and ultimately, better reflect the MTP vision, goals, and investment strategy). However,
there would not be sufficient time during the project solicitation period for WAMPO staff to work closely with every potential project sponsor. Therefore, WAMPO
would like to augment its staff capacity with consultant assistance. WAMPO staff and consultants would assist project sponsors in identifying regionally significant
projects that best fit with the goals and objectives of the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) for submission in response to the plan’s call for
projects. The end result will be the submittal of projects that have the best possible chance of being selected because they are responsive to selection criteria and
line up with the MTP vision, goals, and investment strategy.
Title:

Potentially activities would include:
Reviewing member jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans and CIPs for projects that align with the MTP’s goals, objectives, and selection criteria
Brainstorming project ideas with sponsors that fit the goals and objectives of the MTP
Narrowing down project ideas to pursue
Scope development
Project limits
Cost estimates
Providing information in response to the project selection criteria
Infaltion Assumptions:
None, project is in current year.
Explain Funding Source: WAMPO's cash account will provide the local match, it is composed of member dues and TIP fees.
Primary Mode: Planning & Outreach
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits:
WAMPO
region
County: Butler County, Sedgwick County,
Sumner
County
FED FY

Revenue Source

IMP

ROW

CE

CON

Local

2019

MPO-CMAQ

$120,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$150,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$30,000

PE

2019

$0

$0

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$30,000

$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$0

$0

$150,000

$0

Page 24 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-15

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Maple, 135th Street W to 151st Street W (2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Construct 3-lane roadway with right turn decal lanes, improve drainage, sidewalk
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: Wichita 2018-2027 CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: Maple St., from 135th St W to 151st St W
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

R-19-07

UT

Revenue Source

2022

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

Local

$0

$250,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$250,000

$0

$250,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$250,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$250,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$250,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

Meridian, from Ford (77th St. N.) to Seward (69th St. N.) (2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Valley Center
Contact(s): Scott Hildebrand City of Valley Center (316)755-7310 [email protected]
Scope:
Reconstruct and pave Meridian from 0.25MI south of 69th Street to RR Tracks, just North of Ford Street. Project has a 10' sidewalk, which connects as part of
City's bike / ped plan. Storm sewer inlet adjustment as necessary with spot curb and gutter replacement in areas that have settled. Existing lane configuration will
be maintained.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Road - Other Road

County: Sedgwick

County

FED FY

KDOT ID: (N/A)
Y
Meridian, from 0.25-mi south of Seward (69th St N) to the railroad crossing north of Ford Street (77th St N).
Project Type:

Limits:

Revenue Source

Bike/Ped:

UT

CE

TOTAL

ROW

Local

$0

$371,536

$50,000

$0

$0

$0

2022

Local

$0

$0

$0

$743,072

$111,461

$0

$854,533

2022

MPO-STP

$0

$0

$0

$2,972,288

$445,843

$0

$3,418,131

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$371,536

$50,000

$3,715,360

$557,304

$0

$4,694,200

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$371,536

$50,000

$3,715,360

$557,304

$0

$4,694,200

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

CON

OP

PE

2021

$421,536

Page 25 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

TA-18-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Meridian Pedestrian Bridge
Lead Agency: Sedgwick County - Public Works
Contact(s): Jim Weber Sedgwick County (316)660-1777 [email protected]
Construction of a 16 foot wide pedestrian bridge, 10 foot connecting pathways, lighting and amenities.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
None, project is taking place in current year.
Explain Funding Source: Segwick County
Primary Mode: Ped/Bike
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (087 TE-0432-01)
Limits: Bridge over the Wichita-Valley Center Flood Control Project at Meridian
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

R-17-05

UT
$0

PE
$200,000

ROW
$0

CON
$3,300,000

CE

Prior

$330,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$200,000

$0

$3,300,000

$330,000

$0

FED FY
<2019

Revenue Source

OP

TOTAL
$3,830,000
$3,830,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

Mt. Vernon, Broadway to S.E. Blvd (2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman 3162684393 [email protected]
Scope:
The project will re-construct the existing street to provide a 3-lane roadway with on-street bike lanes. 6' sidewalks will be constructed on each side of Mt. Vernon.
Traffic signal upgrades will be made at existing signalized intersections and crosswalks.
Infaltion Assumptions:
2% inflation per year
Explain Funding Source: The project is funded with $4,300,000 of local GO $s in 2019 and 2020 in the 2015 - 2024 Capital Improvement Program.
KDOT ID: (087 N0660-01)
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Limits: Mt. Vernon, Broadway to S.E. Blvd
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$1,002,709

$250,000

$0

$1,252,709

2019

Local AC

$0

$0

$0

$1,967,291

$0

$0

$1,967,291

2019

MPO-CMAQ

$0

$0

$0

$1,780,000

$0

$0

$1,780,000

2020

MPO-CMAQ ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$1,000,000

$0

$0

$1,000,000

2021

MPO-CMAQ ACCP

$0

$847,291

2022

MPO-CMAQ ACCP

$0

$120,000

<2019

Prior

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$847,291

$0

$0

$0

$0

$120,000

$0

$0

$500,000

$200,000

$0

$0

$0

$700,000

$0

$0

$4,750,000

$250,000

$0

$5,000,000

$500,000

$200,000

$4,750,000

$250,000

$0

$5,700,000

$0

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 26 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

INT-19-03

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Mt Vernon & Hillside Intersection (2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Provide left turn lanes on all approaches, bike/ped facilities, and upgrade traffic signals.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: Wichita 2018-2027 CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Intersection
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: Mt Vernon & Hillside
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$1,665,000

$185,000

$0

$1,850,000

<2019

Prior

$0

$400,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$400,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$1,665,000

$185,000

$0

$1,850,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$400,000

$0

$1,665,000

$185,000

$0

$2,250,000

ICH-17-01A

LOCAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

North Junction Gold Phase Right of Way Acquisition (2019)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita/Sedgwick County
Contact(s): Gary Janzen City of Wichita (316)268-4450 [email protected]
Acquisition of strategic right of way for the Gold Phase of the North Junction project
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
None, current year
Explain Funding Source: City of Wichita CIP (2018-2027) and Sedgwick County (Interlocal agmt authorized by BOCC 7/11/18)
Primary Mode: Interchange
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: I-235/I-135/K-254/K-96 interchange in North Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY
2019

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

Local

$0

$0

$1,000,000

$0

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$1,000,000

$0

$0

$0

$1,000,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$1,000,000

$0

$0

$0

$1,000,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$1,000,000

Page 27 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

ICH-17-01

85 Projects Listed

STATE

(Ver 4) 19-00

North Junction Preliminary Engineering Project (I-135, I-235, K-254, K-96) (KA-3232-01) (2016)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT 7852968593 [email protected]
Scope:
Preliminary engineering for Gold, Orange and Purple Phases of the North Junction Project. This project will review specific lane configurations on all ramp
movements, identify constructible segments for the ultimate interchange configuration and review their mpacts of adjacent projects. PE also includes the necessary
Break-in-Access study for the project.
Infaltion Assumptions:
All KDOT estimates are based on a 4.5% inflation factor per year extended to the letting date of the project
Explain Funding Source: STP, NHPP, & State
Primary Mode: Interchange
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (087 KA3232-01)
Limits: I-235/I-135/K-254/K-96 interchange in North Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

R-19-08

UT

Revenue Source

<2019

Prior

$0

PE
$6,000,000

ROW
$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$6,000,000

$0

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$6,000,000
$6,000,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

North Main Street Reconstruction (2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Haysville
Contact(s): Zach McHatton City of Haysville (316)529-5900 [email protected]
Scope:
Reconstruct and pave North Main Street in Haysville, maintain the existing 4-lane arterial roadway with curb and gutter from Grand Ave. to the Valley Center
Floodway Bridge. This project includes a 10' sidewalk along the west side of North Main St and a signalized pedestrian crossing at Karla Ave.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Road - Other Road

County: Sedgwick

Limits:

County

FED FY

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

Y

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

North Main Street, from Grand Avenue to the Valley Center Floodway Bridge

Revenue Source

UT

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

PE

ROW

2020

Local

$0

$172,900

$20,000

$0

$0

$0

$192,900

2021

Local

$0

$0

$0

$379,057

$56,859

$0

$435,916

2021

Local AC

$0

$0

$0

$272,899

$0

$0

$272,899

2021

MPO-STP

$0

$0

$0

$1,243,331

$227,434

$0

$1,470,765

2022

MPO-STP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$272,899

$0

$0

$272,899

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$172,900

$20,000

$1,895,287

$284,293

$0

$2,372,480

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$172,900

$20,000

$1,895,287

$284,293

$0

$2,372,480

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 28 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

INT-19-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Oliver and Kechi Rd. Intersection (2020, 2021)
Lead Agency: City of Kechi
Contact(s): Robert Conger City of Kechi (316)744-9287 [email protected]
Scope:
Reconstruction of the intersection of Oliver and Kechi Road to current standards with improved geometry, dedicated turn lanes, traffic signals, curb and gutter, and
storm sewer. Project includes a 10-foot wide multi-use path along the north side of Kechi Road and the west side of Oliver. It includes 6-foot wide sidewalk on the
south side of Kechi Road and the east side of Oliver. It includes design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, construction, and construction engineering.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Intersection

County: Sedgwick

Project Type:
Limits:

County

FED FY

Bike/Ped:

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Oliver and Kechi Road Intersection

Revenue Source

UT

2020

Local

$20,000

2021

Local

$0

2021

MPO-STP

R-19-02

Y

PE

ROW

$175,000

$20,000

$0

CE

CON

$0

$374,845

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$215,000

$239,291

$0

$614,136
$1,524,224

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,499,379

$24,845

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$20,000

$175,000

$20,000

$1,874,224

$264,136

$0

$2,353,360

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$20,000

$175,000

$20,000

$1,874,224

$264,136

$0

$2,353,360

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Patching on I-135 in Sedgwick County (2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Patching
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: NHPP and State
Primary Mode: Road - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits:
I-135
from
the
Viaduct
Bridges
north
to
the
south
end
37th
St
Bridges
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

2019

NHPP

$0

2019

State

$0

$1,000

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$1,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$1,000

$0

$1,454,953

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$0

$0

CE

KDOT ID:

OP

(KA-5130-01)
TOTAL

$65,473

$0

$145,495

$7,275

$0

$153,770

$1,454,953

$72,748

$0

$1,528,701

$72,748

$0

$1,528,701

$1,309,458

$1,374,931

Page 29 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

INT-17-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Patriot Ave.: WB Right Turn Lane to K15 NB (2017, 2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: City of Derby
Contact(s): Dan Squires 3167886632 [email protected]
Scope:
Design, land acquisition, utility relocation, signal modifications and construction of a right turn lane from westbound Patriot Ave. (63rd St. S.) to northbound K-15
Highway. Turn Lane will extend from K-15 to Commerce Drive and will be constructed to an urban standard including curb & gutter.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% inflation annually for 5 years
Explain Funding Source: The City will incorporate the project into the 5 year CIP upon award of funding. It is anticipated that the City portion of the project costs will be
paid through the issuance of general obligation bonds.
Primary Mode: Intersection
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (087 N0674-01)
Limits: North side of Patriot Ave. (63rd St. S.) between Commerce Dr. and Highway K-15
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

2019

Local

$50,000

2020

Local

$0

2020

MPO-STP

<2019

Prior
2019-2022 TOTAL
2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

INT-19-02

ROW
$0

CE

CON

$50,000

$0

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$100,000
$63,480

$0

$0

$55,200

$8,280

$0

$0

$0

$0

$220,800

$33,120

$0

$253,920

$0

$50,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$50,000

$50,000

$0

$50,000

$276,000

$41,400

$0

$417,400

$0

$467,400

$50,000

$50,000

$50,000

$276,000

$41,400

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Pawnee & 127th Street intersection
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Geometric improvements to the intersection. Possible left turn lanes with signalization or roundabout.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4%
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted Aug 2018
Primary Mode: Intersection
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
Limits:
Pawnee
&
127th
Street
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

2021

Local

$0

2022

Local

<2019

Prior

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

$1,200,000

$0

$0

$1,200,000

$0

$200,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$200,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$150,000

$1,200,000

$0

$0

$1,350,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$200,000

$150,000

$1,200,000

$0

$0

$1,550,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 30 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-09

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Pawnee, Webb to Greenwich (2018, 2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Scope:
Re-construct the existing 2-lane asphalt mat street with a 3/5 lane street with curb and gutter on Pawnee from Webb to Greenwich. Final lane configuration will be
determined as initial concepts are developed and traffic data has been updated from the recent construction/opening of the Southeast High School located at
Pawnee & 127th Street. The intersections of Webb and Greenwich will have been improved with left turn lanes on all approaches. However, ADA improvements
may be needed at the intersection of Webb Road to be sure wheelchair ramps and pedestrian signals are compliant. The project will include drainage
improvements and a minimum of a 6' sidewalk on each side of Pawnee. The Bicycle Master Plan will be reviewed to determine what bicycle facility is most
appropriate to connect existing paths along Greenwich and Pawnee.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Title:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Road - Other Road

County: Sedgwick

Limits:

County

FED FY

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

Y

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Pawnee from Webb to Greenwich

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2020

Local

$0

2021

Local

$0

$0

$0

2021

Local AC

$0

$0

$0

2021

MPO-STP

$0

$0

$0

2022

MPO-STP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

<2019

Prior

$0

$350,000

$0

$0

$150,000

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$150,000

$70,000

$0

$907,000

$260,949

$0

$0

$260,949

$3,087,051

$245,000

$0

$3,332,051

$260,949

$0

$0

$260,949

$0

$0

$0

$350,000

$0
$837,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$150,000

$4,185,000

$315,000

$0

$4,650,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$350,000

$150,000

$4,185,000

$315,000

$0

$5,000,000

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 31 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

P-17-03

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

Planning Walkable Places Program
Lead Agency: WAMPO
Contact(s): Kristen Zimmerman WAMPO (316)352-4862 [email protected]
WAMPO oversees small walkability-focused planning projects in the region
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4%
Explain Funding Source: Year-end balance funds
Primary Mode: Planning & Outreach
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (087 N0671-17)
Limits:
MPO
Area
County: Butler County, Sedgwick County,
Sumner County
Title:

FED FY
<2019

S-17-01

Revenue Source

IMP

Prior

$1,664,081

PE
$0

ROW
$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$1,664,081

$0

$0

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,664,081
$1,664,081

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

Railroad Safety Crossing Improvements (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT 7852968593 [email protected]
Provide 3 railroad safety improvements in the WAMPO region per year.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
All KDOT estimates are based on a 4.5% inflation factor per year extended to the letting date of the project
Explain Funding Source: State Funds (AC-HSIP)
Primary Mode: Safety
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
Limits:
Various
locations
to
be
determined
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

KDOT ID:

CE

OP

(N/A)
TOTAL

2019

HSIP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$1,500,000

$0

$0

$1,500,000

2019

State AC

$0

$0

$0

$1,500,000

$0

$0

$1,500,000

2020

HSIP ACCP

$0

$0

$0

$1,500,000

$0

$0

$1,500,000

2020

State AC

$0

$0

$0

$1,500,000

$0

$0

$1,500,000

<2019

Prior

$0

$0

$0

$4,750,000

$0

$0

$4,750,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$3,000,000

$0

$0

$3,000,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$7,750,000

$0

$0

$7,750,000

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 32 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

TA-17-02

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 5) 19-00

Redbud Path, K-96 to 159th (2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman 3162684393 [email protected]
Scope:
Construct a 10' path along the old railroad corridor. This project will connect the recently completed Redbud Path east of 159th that City of Andover constructed to
the K-96 path.
Infaltion Assumptions:
Based on recent bids received on previous projects and 2% inflation per year
Explain Funding Source: The project is funded with $1,000,000 of local GO $s from 2018-2020 in the 2015 - 2024 Capital Improvement Program.
Primary Mode: Ped/Bike
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (087 TE0451-01)
Limits: Redbud Path, K-96 to 159th
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2019

Local

$0

2019

Local AC

$0

$0

$0

2019

MPO-TA

$0

$0

$0

2020

MPO-TA ACCP

$0

$0

2021

MPO-CMAQ ACCP

$0

2021

MPO-TA ACCP

$0

2022

MPO-TA ACCP

$0

$0

$0

<2019

Prior

$0

$329,000

$0

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$200,000

$0

$929,887

$1,457,613

$0

$0

$1,457,613

$362,500

$0

$0

$362,500

$0

$300,000

$0

$0

$300,000

$0

$0

$169,179

$0

$0

$169,179

$0

$0

$263,434

$0

$0

$263,434

$725,000

$0

$0

$725,000

$0

$0

$0

$329,000

$0

$0

$729,887

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$2,550,000

$200,000

$0

$2,750,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$329,000

$0

$2,550,000

$200,000

$0

$3,079,000

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 33 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

P-17-02

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 5) 19-00

Regional Asset Inventory (2019)
Lead Agency: WAMPO
Contact(s): Phil Nelson (316)268-4408 [email protected]
Scope:
WAMPO will develop a regional asset inventory showing the current condition of potentially regionally significant roads and bridges and the locations of ITS and
bike/ped facilities in the WAMPO region. This will include developing a database and website that will make this information publicly accessible for the use of
WAMPO planning partners, member jurisdictions and other stakeholders; populating the database with current condition and location information on these assets
from our planning partners and member jurisdictions; and developing procedures for updating the database on an ongoing basis.
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year.
Explain Funding Source: The WAMPO cash account includes the annual dues collected from the member jurisdictions
Primary Mode: Planning & Outreach
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: WAMPO Region
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

IMP

PE

CE

CON

Local

2019

MPO-STP

$180,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$225,000

$0

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$225,000

$0

$0

$0

P-19-02

$45,000

ROW

2019

$0

$0

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$45,000

$0

$0

$0

$180,000

$0

$0

$0

$225,000

$0

$0

$225,000

$0

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Regional Transit Plan / WAMPO Planning Assistance
Lead Agency: WAMPO
Contact(s): Phil Nelson WAMPO (316)268-4408 [email protected]
Scope:
Consultant assistance to assess feasibility and develop options for providing public transit service across the WAMPO planning area and also provide general
planning assistance to WAMPO staff.
Infaltion Assumptions:
None, project is in current year.
Explain Funding Source: Local match source is the WAMPO's cash account, which is composed of member dues and TIP fees.
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Primary Mode: Planning & Outreach
Limits:
WAMPO
region
County: Butler County, Sedgwick County, Sumner
County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

2019

Local

2019

IMP

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$65,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$65,000

MPO-STP

$260,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$260,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$325,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$325,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$325,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$325,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 34 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-15-005

85 Projects Listed

STATE

(Ver 4) 19-00

Right of Way Acquisition for Northwest Wichita Bypass - (K-8235-02, K-8234-03, K-8234-04)
Lead Agency:
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT 7852968593 [email protected]
(2016) KDOT
Right of Way Acquisition for a 4-Lane Freeway Section
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
All KDOT estimates are based on a 4.5% inflation factor per year extended to the letting date of the project
Explain Funding Source: 11/4/15 Agreement between KDOT, Goddard, Maize, and SEdgwick County, effective 2016-2020.
Primary Mode: Road - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: Northwest Wichita Bypass: From approx. 3.5 miles north of US-54 northeast to K-96 near 45th St.
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY
<2019

R-17-01

Revenue Source

UT

Prior

$0

PE
$120,000

ROW
$5,945,402

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$120,000

$5,945,402

CE

CON

KDOT ID:

OP

(N/A)
TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$6,065,402
$6,065,402

FEDERAL

(Ver 4) 19-00

SW Butler Rd/SW 150th St Intersection (2018, 2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: Butler County
Contact(s): Darryl C. Lutz, P.E. 3163224101 [email protected]
Scope:
Reconstruct the SW Butler Rd/SW 150th St intersection and the SW Butler Rd approaches from SW 155th St. to SW 145th St from its existing rural 2-lane
roadway with a 2-way STOP controlled intersection to a 2-lane roundabout intersection with roadway improvements of 4-lane arterial standard with curb & gutter,
raised median to the north and no median south. Project will include geometry for a 10' wide multi-use path that will eventually connect to an existing path at SW
120th St. and in Rose Hill.
Infaltion Assumptions:
2% per year increase.
Explain Funding Source: Local matching funds from Butler County-Funding Source: Local Ad Valorem Property Taxes and Special City County Highway Funds. A copy of
the 2016 adopted budget and CIP is available on-line at http://www.bucoks.com/DocumentCenter/View/2848. The CIP begi
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Primary Mode: Intersection
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Limits: SW Butler Rd beginning 0.5 miles south of SW 150th St., thence north 1 mile.
County: Butler County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

Local

2020

HIP

$0

$0

$0

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

2020

MPO-STP

$0

$0

$0

<2019

Prior

$0

$165,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$300,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$300,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$300,000

ROW

2019

$100,000

$0

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$400,000

$1,669,726

$0

$0

$1,669,726

$1,300,000

$100,000

$0

$1,400,000

$3,530,274

$400,000

$0

$3,930,274

$0

$0

$415,000

$0

$250,000

$0

$100,000

$0

$6,500,000

$500,000

$0

$7,400,000

$265,000

$250,000

$6,500,000

$500,000

$0

$7,815,000

Page 35 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Surfacing on I-135 in Sedgwick County (2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Patching/Grinding on I-135 in Sedgwick County
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: NHPP and State
Primary Mode: Road - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (KA-5128-01)
Limits: I-135 Beginning at the South End of Route at KTA thence North to the South End of the Pawnee Avenue Overpass
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

CE

OP

TOTAL

2019

NHPP

$0

$0

$0

$1,645,875

$82,294

$0

$1,728,169

2019

State

$0

$1,000

$0

$182,875

$9,144

$0

$193,019

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$1,000

$0

$1,828,750

$91,438

$0

$1,921,188

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$1,000

$0

$1,828,750

$91,438

$0

$1,921,188

R-19-03

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Surfacing on I-135 in Sedgwick County (2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
2" cold mill, 1.5"overlay and ultra thin bonded asphalt surfacing
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: NHPP and State
Primary Mode: Road - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (KA-5129-01)
Limits: I-135 Beginning at the North End of the Pawnee Ave Overpass thence North to the South End Viaduct Bridges
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CON

CE

OP

TOTAL

2019

NHPP

$0

$0

$0

$1,309,458

$65,473

$0

$1,374,931

2019

State

$0

$1,000

$0

$145,495

$7,275

$0

$153,770

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$1,000

$0

$1,454,953

$72,748

$0

$1,528,701

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$1,000

$0

$1,454,953

$72,748

$0

$1,528,701

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 36 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-17-08

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 4) 19-00

Surfacing on K-96 in Sedgwick County
Lead Agency: KDOT
Surfacing
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4%
Explain Funding Source: Federal NHPP
Primary Mode: Road - Highway
Title:

County: Sedgwick

Limits:

County

FED FY

Contact(s):

Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

KDOT ID:

(087 KA4685-02)

From the East End of the Arkansas River Bridge East to K-96/I-235

Revenue Source

UT

2019

NHPP ACCP

$0

PE
$0

ROW
$0

CON
$1,018,548

<2019

Prior

$0

$2,005

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$2,005

$0

CE

OP

TOTAL

$50,927

$0

$1,069,475

$1,273,200

$63,659

$0

$1,338,864

$1,273,200

$63,659

$0

$1,338,864

*ACCP is not part of Total

R-17-09

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Surfacing on US-81 in Sedgwick County
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
UBAS & Asphalt Patching
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4%
Explain Funding Source: Federal NHPP
Primary Mode: Road - Highway
Project Type:
Bike/Ped:
Limits: US-81: from the Sumner /Sedgwick County Line North 5.91 Miles
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

2019

NHPP ACCP

$0

PE
$0

ROW
$0

CON
$374,458

<2019

Prior

$0

$1,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$1,000

$0

CE

KDOT ID:

OP

(087 KA4689-01)
TOTAL

$18,723

$0

$393,181

$468,072

$23,404

$0

$492,476

$468,072

$23,404

$0

$492,476

*ACCP is not part of Total

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 37 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

T-15-005

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 5) 19-00

Transit: Bus Purchase (2017, 2018)
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Contact(s): Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit 3163524808 [email protected]
Purchase 7 new all accessible electric buses to replace the downtown trolleys.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
Gillig uses PPI 1413
Explain Funding Source: Wichita Transit will use local General Obligation Bonds to match Federal Funds. CMAQ funds will be matched at 20%. Sections 5339 funds will
be matched at 15%.
Primary Mode: Transit
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: NA
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

T-18-01

IMP

Revenue Source

<2019

Prior

$0

PE
$0

ROW
$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

CAP

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$5,207,687

$0

$0

$5,207,687

$0

$5,207,687
$5,207,687

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Transit Vehicle Replacement
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Replace six buses with electric buses.
Scope:
Title:

Contact(s):

Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]

Infaltion Assumptions:

Wichita Transit plans to replace 13 buses with 13 electric buses. T-15-005 is part of funding mix.

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Sedgwick

Project Type:

County

FED FY
<2019

Limits:

Bike/Ped:

Revenue Source

IMP

Prior

$0

$0

ROW
$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Y

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Wichita Bus Routes
PE

CAP

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$6,908,000

$0

$0

$6,908,000

$0

$6,908,000
$6,908,000

Page 38 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-17-07

85 Projects Listed

STATE

(Ver 3) 19-00

US-54/400/Kellogg & Greenwich Interchange (2017)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Scope:
Expand Kellogg to 6-lane freeway, grade-separate Kellogg & Greenwich and Kellogg & Zelta with new ramp connections to KTA (EB Kellogg to NB/SB KTA, SB
KTA to WB Kellogg). (Project is administered by KTA.)
Infaltion Assumptions:
4%
Explain Funding Source: State, City of Wichita, KTA
Primary Mode: Interchange
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (087 KA2389-01)
Limits: US-54: just west of Greenwich Rd, east to 127th St.
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY
<2019

R-11-005

Revenue Source

UT

CE

OP

TOTAL

Prior

$3,000,000

PE
$12,680,500

ROW
$40,500,000

CON
$90,447,465

$9,500,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$3,000,000

$12,680,500

$40,500,000

$90,447,465

$9,500,000

$0

$156,127,965
$156,127,965

FEDERAL

(Ver 4) 19-00

US-54/400/Kellogg & Webb Interchage (KA-2382-01)
Lead Agency:
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT 7852968593 [email protected]
KDOT2016, 2017)
(2011, 2015,
Scope:
Expand Kellogg to 6-lane freeway, grade-separate Kellogg & Webb. Existing access to KTA will be modified to be local access to Webb via the south frontage
road.
Infaltion Assumptions:
All KDOT estimates are based on a 4.5% inflation factor per year extended to the letting date of the project.
Explain Funding Source: Project funded with federal funds awarded by KDOT, State KDOT funding, and City of Wichita funidng.
KDOT ID: (087 KA2382-01)
Primary Mode: Interchange
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: Cypress East to Wiedemann, with interchange(s) at Webb Road and the Kansas Turnpike Authority (KTA).
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY
<2019

Revenue Source

UT

CE

OP

TOTAL

Prior

$6,515,000

PE
$6,000,000

ROW
$21,000,000

CON
$97,874,000

$8,500,000

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$6,515,000

$6,000,000

$21,000,000

$97,874,000

$8,500,000

$0

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$139,889,000
$139,889,000

Page 39 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

ITS-18-01

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

US-54 Fiber to TMC and Downtown Wichita Signal Upgrades
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Scope:
Fiber optic installation in the central Wichita area to provide a redundant connection to the WICHway TMC, connections to Wichita City Hall and the Segwick
County Courthouse, and provide connections for future fiber installation along US-54 going east from Hillside and west from Sycamore.Traffic signals along the fiber
path through downtown will be upgraded with new controllers.
Title:

MTP IDs: 40-202, 40-205
4% per year.

Infaltion Assumptions:

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Technology

County: Sedgwick

County

FED FY
<2019

S-18-01

Project Type:

KDOT ID:

Bike/Ped:

(087 N0684-01)

US-54 from West Street to Oliver, connecting link from US-54 to the WICHway Traffic Management Center through
downtown Wichita.
UT
Revenue Source
OP
PE
ROW
CON
CE
Limits:

Prior

$0

$0

$0

$1,564,192

$0

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$1,564,192

$0

$0

TOTAL
$1,564,192
$1,564,192

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

US-81 Sedgwick County Guardrail Upgrade (2018, 2019)
Lead Agency: KDOT
Contact(s): Rene Hart KDOT (785)296-8593 [email protected]
Guardrail Upgrade
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4.5%
Explain Funding Source: NHPP
Primary Mode: Safety
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
Limits: US-81 from the Sumner/Sedgwick Line North 5.91 miles
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

KDOT ID:

OP

(087 KA4689-02)
TOTAL

2019

KDOT-STP

$0

$0

$0

$114,950

$5,748

$0

<2019

Prior

$0

$5,747

$0

$0

$0

$0

$120,698
$5,747

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$114,950

$5,748

$0

$120,698

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$5,747

$0

$114,950

$5,748

$0

$126,445

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 40 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-11

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

West 47th-MacArthur (2020, 2021, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Construct 5 lane roadway with pedestrian, signal upgrades, and drainage improvements
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: Wichita 2018-2027 CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: N
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: West St from 47th St S to MacArthur
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

2020

Local

$0

2021

Local

$0

$0

$150,000

>2022

Future

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$400,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

R-19-17

$0

$400,000

$400,000

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$0

$400,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

$0

$3,600,000

$400,000

$0

$4,000,000

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

$550,000

$0

$4,550,000

$0

$150,000

$0

$3,600,000

$400,000

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

West I-235-MacArthur (2021, 2022, 2023)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Construct 5 lane roadway with pedestrian, signal upgrades, and drainage improvements
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopated August 2018
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
Limits: West St from I-235 to MacArthur
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2021

Local

$0

$300,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

2022

Local

$0

$0

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

$150,000

>2022

Future

$0

$0

$0

$3,600,000

$400,000

$0

$4,000,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$300,000

$150,000

$0

$0

$0

$450,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$300,000

$150,000

$3,600,000

$400,000

$0

$4,450,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$300,000

Page 41 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-19-16

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

West St., Kellog to Pawnee (2018, 2019, 2020, 2021)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Contact(s): Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]
Construct 5 lane roadway with pedestrian, signal upgrades, and drainage improvements
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: West Street from Kellogg to Pawnee
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

PE

ROW

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$2,313,000

$257,000

$0

$2,570,000

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

$1,350,000

$150,000

$0

$1,500,000

2021

Local

$0

$0

$0

$3,915,000

$435,000

$0

$4,350,000

<2019

Prior

$0

$600,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

$600,000

S-19-01

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$7,578,000

$842,000

$0

$8,420,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$600,000

$0

$7,578,000

$842,000

$0

$9,020,000

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Wichita Rail Crossing Improvements (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Various improvements to grade crossings
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: Wichita 2018-2027 CIP, adopted Aug 2018
Primary Mode: Safety
Project Type:
Limits: City of Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

Contact(s):

Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]

Bike/Ped:

UT

PE

ROW

CON

N

KDOT ID:

CE

OP

(N/A)
TOTAL

2019

Local

$0

$15,000

$0

$120,000

$15,000

$0

$150,000

2020

Local

$0

$15,000

$0

$120,000

$15,000

$0

$150,000

2021

Local

$0

$15,000

$0

$150,000

2022

Local

$0

$150,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$60,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$15,000

$0

$120,000

$15,000

$0

$120,000

$15,000

$0

$60,000

$0

$480,000

$60,000

$0

$600,000

$0

$480,000

$60,000

$0

$600,000

Page 42 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

ITS-19-02

85 Projects Listed

LOCAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Wichita Traffic Signalization (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022)
Lead Agency: City of Wichita
Install signals at intersections that meet warrants.
Scope:
Infaltion Assumptions:
4% per year
Explain Funding Source: 2018-2027 Wichita CIP, adopted August 2018
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Limits: City of Wichita
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Contact(s):

Bike/Ped:

UT

Revenue Source

Paul Gunzelman City of Wichita (316)268-4393 [email protected]

PE

ROW

2019

Local

$0

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

2021

Local

$0

$0

2022

Local

$0

$0

T-19-04

$0

N

KDOT ID:

CE

CON

OP

(N/A)
TOTAL

$0

$0

$525,000

$525,000

$0

$0

$525,000

$0

$525,000

$0

$0

$525,000

$0

$525,000

$0

$0

$525,000

$0

$525,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$2,100,000

$0

$0

$2,100,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$2,100,000

$0

$0

$2,100,000

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Wichita Transit 5339 Capital (2019, 2020) (2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Contact(s): Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]
Vehicle and non-vehicle capital purchased with 5339 formula funding.
Scope:
Title:

Infaltion Assumptions:

Section 5339 funding is formula funding apportioned to the urbanized area annually.

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Butler

Project Type:

KDOT ID:

Bike/Ped:

(N/A)

Limits:
NA County
County, Sedgwick County,
Sumner

FED FY

Revenue Source

IMP

PE

ROW

CAP

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

FTA 5339

$0

$0

$0

$0

$700,000

$0

$700,000

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$0

$175,000

$0

$175,000

2020

FTA 5339

$0

$700,000

$0

$700,000

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

$0

$175,000

$0

$175,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,750,000

$0

$1,750,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,750,000

$0

$1,750,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

$0

$0

$0

Page 43 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

T-17-05

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 3) 19-00

Wichita Transit: Section 5339 Capital
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Contact(s): Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]
Section 5339 is eligible for bus, bus related and bus facility purchases. The FFY 2017 Section 5339 funds will be used for bus purchase or farebox purchase.
Scope:
Title:

Infaltion Assumptions:
Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Sedgwick

Project Type:

County

FED FY

Bike/Ped:

Y

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

City of Wichita generally
IMP

Revenue Source

<2019

T-19-02

Limits:

Prior

$0

PE
$0

ROW
$0

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

CAP

CON

OP

TOTAL

$0

$606,965

$0

$0

$606,965

$0

$606,965
$606,965

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Wichita Transit Operating (2019, 2020) (2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Operating dollars to support ongoing operations
Scope:
Title:

Contact(s):

Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]

Infaltion Assumptions:

Formula funds are from annual urabnized area apportionments

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Butler

Project Type:

County, Sedgwick

FED FY

Bike/Ped:

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Limits:
Urbanized
area
County,
Sumner
County

Revenue Source

IMP

CAP

OP

TOTAL

2019

FTA 5307

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$2,000,000

$2,000,000

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$2,000,000

$2,000,000

2020

FTA 5307

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$2,000,000

$2,000,000

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$2,000,000

$2,000,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$8,000,000

$8,000,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$8,000,000

$8,000,000

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

PE

ROW

CON

Page 44 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

T-19-03

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Wichita Transit Other Capital (2019, 2020) (2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Contact(s): Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]
Scope:
Non-vehicle capital items including, but not limited to preventive maintenance, ADA services, project administration, training, hardware/software, and facility and
equipment improvements.
Title:

Infaltion Assumptions:

Formula funds are annually apportioned to the urbanized area

Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Butler

Project Type:

Bike/Ped:

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Limits:
NA County
County, Sedgwick County,
Sumner

FED FY

IMP

Revenue Source

PE

ROW

CAP

CON

OP

TOTAL

2019

FTA 5307

$0

$0

$0

$0

$3,600,000

$0

$3,600,000

2019

Local

$0

$0

$0

$0

$900,000

$0

$900,000

2020

FTA 5307

$0

$0

$0

$0

$3,600,000

$0

$3,600,000

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

$0

$900,000

$0

$900,000

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$9,000,000

$0

$9,000,000

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$9,000,000

$0

$9,000,000

T-19-05

FEDERAL

(Ver 1) 19-00

Wichita Transit Replacement Paratransit Vehicles
Lead Agency: Wichita Transit
Contact(s): Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit (316)352-4808 [email protected]
Scope:
Replace paratransit vans that are beyond their useful life. Replacement vehicles would be 12-14 passenger paratransit vehicles with various seating configurations.
The total amount, including local and federal funds, is expected to replace 22 or 23 of the 27 vehicle fleet.
Title:

Infaltion Assumptions:
Explain Funding Source:
Primary Mode:

Transit

County: Sedgwick

Project Type:
Limits:

County

FED FY

Bike/Ped:

N

KDOT ID:

(N/A)

Wichita Urbanized Area

Revenue Source

IMP

PE

ROW

2021

Local

$0

2021

MPO-CMAQ

$0

$0

$0

2022

Local

$0

$0

2022

MPO-CMAQ

$0

$0

$0

CAP

CON

OP

TOTAL

$142,341

$0

$142,341

$0

$569,365

$0

$569,365

$0

$0

$231,027

$0

$231,027

$0

$0

$924,107

$0

$924,107

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,866,840

$0

$1,866,840

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,866,840

$0

$1,866,840

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 45 of 47

Amendment 19-00 WAMPO

Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year 2019 - 2022

R-17-02

85 Projects Listed

FEDERAL

(Ver 2) 19-00

Woodlawn: 45th St to 37th St. N (2019, 2020)
Lead Agency: City of Bel Aire
Contact(s): Anne Stephens, P.E. 3167442451 [email protected]
Scope:
Reconstruct and pave Woodlawn from the existing two lane section to a three-lane section with curb and gutter from 37th to 45th Streets. The project will include a
10' hike and bike path that connects with the hike and bike path proposed for 37th Street from Oliver to Woodlawn that will be constructed in 2016. The intersection
of 45th and Woodlawn will also be reconstructed as a part of this project.
Infaltion Assumptions:
KDOT's Inflation Rate Table was utilized to provide the estimate in YOE dollars.
Explain Funding Source: The City's portion of the project will be 100% debt financed.
Primary Mode: Road - Other Road
Project Type:
Bike/Ped: Y
KDOT ID: (N/A)
Limits: Woodlawn, beginning at the north return of 37th Street and continuing through the intersection of 45th Street.
County: Sedgwick County
Title:

FED FY

Revenue Source

UT

CE

CON

OP

TOTAL

PE

ROW

2019

Local

$570,000

$527,500

$20,000

$0

$0

$0

$1,117,500

2020

Local

$0

$0

$0

$1,054,980

$791,200

$0

$1,846,180

2020

MPO-STP

$4,219,920

$0

$0

$0

$4,219,920

$0

$0

2019-2022 TOTAL

$570,000

$527,500

$20,000

$5,274,900

$791,200

$0

$7,183,600

2019-2022 + (Prior & Future Years) TOTAL

$570,000

$527,500

$20,000

$5,274,900

$791,200

$0

$7,183,600

WAMPO Project Listing
Printed on Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Page 46 of 47

Completed Projects
8/31/2018

 Project Tools

WAMPO - Report

 Reports

TIP Listing     
WAMPO ID   TIP   PROJECT TITLE   LEAD AGENCY  
R-13-004     19-00   143rd St. E.:
City of Wichita  
Kellogg to Central
(2016, 2017,
2018) Completed   
R-14-002     19-00   37th St.: Oliver to City of Wichita  
Woodlawn (2015,
2016, 2017) Completed   
R-11-015     19-00   Pawnee:
City of Wichita  
Hydraulic to I-135
(2015, 2016,
2017) Completed   
TA-14-016     19-00   17th and 18th St. City of Wichita  
Bikeway Completed   
ITS-15-003     19-00   Wichita TMC
KDOT  
Phase 4 (KA3602-01) (2016,
2018) Completed   
B-13-007     19-00   Bridge
KDOT  
Replacements on
I-235 (KA-310901) (2013, 2015,
2016, 2018) Completed   

*ACCP is not part of the Total
CONTACT WAMPO 

    
92

 Other Tools

1

Search Project ID...

6 PROJECTS LISTED
TYPE  
FED  
Road - Other $2,836,971  
Road  

    Advanced      
PRINTER FRIENDLY  

STATE  
LOC   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   TOTAL YEAR   IMP   CAP   OP  
$0   $2,873,029  
$0   $0   $0   $0   $0   $5,710,000   $0   $0   $0  

EXPORT TO EXCEL
UT  
PE  
ROW  
CON  
CE  
$0   $260,000   $50,000   $4,426,050   $973,950  

Road - Other $2,071,264  
Road  

$0   $2,748,736  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$4,820,000   $0  

$0   $0  

Road - Other $3,068,000  
Road  

$0   $2,932,000  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$6,000,000   $0  

$0   $0   $300,000   $108,160   $50,000   $5,273,240   $268,600  

Ped/Bike  

$0  

$23,400  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$93,600   $0  

$0   $0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$93,600  

$0  

Technology  

$0   $1,014,000  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$1,014,000   $0  

$0   $0  

$0   $180,000  

$0  

$770,000  

$64,000  

Bridge Highway  

$0   $25,768,378  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0   $25,768,378   $0  

$0   $0   $360,000   $2,000,000  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0  

$0   $43,405,978   $0  

$0   $0   $660,000   $2,818,160   $150,000   $36,173,719   $3,604,099  

$70,200  

   $8,046,435   $26,782,378  

1.48s

$8,577,165  

$0   $270,000   $50,000   $3,835,593   $664,407  

$0   $21,775,236   $1,633,142  

EMAIL [email protected] 

https://projecttracker.wampo.org/secure/report_mtip4.asp?CMD=report&FFY_TYPE=&PUBLIC_FILTER=&MC_GROUP=&ONLYTOTALS=&EXPANDED=&ONLY_AWP=False&inc_awp=False&inc_stip=False&i…

1/1

Congestion Management Process

The WAMPO Congestion Management Process is based on three congestion-related
performance measures laid out in MOVE 2040: measurement of delay across the system,
measurement of travel time uncertainty at identified areas of concern, and measurement of
travel time uncertainty across the system.

Each of these measures is intended to quantify different aspect of congestion in the WAMPO
region. Delay across the system provides a big-picture view across the entire region. While
delay across the entire system sums up the experience of the average commuter in a single
performance measure, this big picture approach could obscure congestion that is concentrated
in particular places or at particular times. The travel time at identified areas of concern
zooms in from the big picture and concentrates on those areas where issues have been noted
in the past. Finally, travel time uncertainty looks at how well the system performs on its worst
days, when it suffers from weather events, major accidents, special events, etc. These three
performance measures give a multifaceted view of the any potential congestion issues on the
roadway system in the WAMPO region.
Since the adoption of MOVE 2040, WAMPO has worked to develop specific metrics to
quantify each performance measure, to gather baseline data about the performance of the
system using those metrics, and to identify recommended targets for each measure. These
efforts are laid out below.

Delay across the system
The measurement of delay across the system was selected as a congestion-related
performance measure in MOVE 2040. Of the measures identified in MOVE 2040, delay
across the system provides the best view of the performance of the entire system in a single
measure.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

This performance measure uses data from the WAMPO Travel Demand Model. Of the available data sources, the model provides the
broadest view of the transportation system in the WAMPO region and, unlike other options, it allows future system performance to be
forecast. The WAMPO Travel Demand Model uses the 4-step modeling process that has dominated travel models in small and mediumsized communities in the U.S. for several decades. It uses inputs such as roadway and transit networks, traffic counts, population data,
and jobs data to assess current year and future year demand on the regional transportation system. The model uses a baseline year of
2010 and is set up to forecast out to 2040. More detail on the model can be found in MOVE 2040 Appendix 6.
The metric for this performance measure is the average delay per trip during the afternoon peak period (5-6pm). This is calculated by
summing the total delay for all trips in the model and dividing by the number of trips. In the 2010 baseline year, the average delay
was 26 seconds. In the 2040 forecast year the delay would be 45 seconds (if we build all of the projects included in MOVE 2040) or
49 seconds (if we only build the projects that were existing or committed to in the 2015 TIP). For reference, the average trip time is
approximately 10 minutes, so during the afternoon peak period delay only accounts for about 5% of the travel time (rising to 7.5% in
2040).
To define the level of congestion considered acceptable in the region, WAMPO has adopted a target of 60 seconds for this metric.
Because the current (and forecast) values for this metric are lower (better) than the target, this metric indicates that the WAMPO region
does not have an unacceptable level of congestion at the system level.

Delay across identified areas of concern
In order to add some geographic specificity to the congestion related performance measures, MOVE 2040 also selected measurement
of delay across identified areas of concern as one of the measures. These “identified areas of concern” are the sites of potential
bottlenecks. They are essentially the parts of the system where we would expect performance to be the worst.
This measure currently uses a set of bottlenecks identified in the WAMPO 2010 Freight Plan. WAMPO tentatively plans to update this
list of bottlenecks as part of an update of the freight plan or a separate effort. The primary data source for this measure is the
National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS). This is a dataset of average travel times on roadway segments, in
5 minute increments, covering the entire National Highway System. The data is gathered from cellphones and in-vehicle navigation
systems by HERE Inc. under contract from FHWA and made available to MPOs and state DOTs. The baseline data used for the
analysis below runs from February 2015 through January 2016.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

The metric for this performance measure is the Travel Time Index within a half-mile of the bottleneck points identified in the 2010
Freight Plan. The Travel Time Index is the ratio of peak-hour travel time (5-6pm) to free flow travel time. A Travel Time Index of 2
would indicate that a bottleneck that normally takes one minute to traverse would take two minutes during the peak period.
WAMPO has grouped the 13 bottlenecks from the 2010 Freight Plan into 3 categories: freeways, interchanges, and highways (the
latter are on the non-freeway sections of Kellogg/US-54).
For the freeway bottlenecks the Travel Time Index ranges from 1.05-1.13. To define the acceptable level of congestion for this metric
WAMPO has adopted a target of no more than 1.2 (roughly equivalent to 55 mph). For the interchange bottlenecks, the Travel Time
Index ranges from 1.05-1.19. The adopted target is no more than 1.4 (equivalent to 45 mph). Changes to the NPMRDS have resulted
in the removal of the non-freeway portions of Kellogg/US-54 from the dataset, so no data is currently available for the two highway
bottlenecks.
Because the baseline values for this metric are lower (better) than the targets, this metric indicates that the WAMPO region does not
have an unacceptable level of congestion, even in the areas where we would expect the worst system performance.

Travel time uncertainty
MOVE 2040 also identified travel time uncertainty across the system as a performance measure related to congestion. Travel time
uncertainty is driven by the difference between how the system performs on its worst days compared to normal conditions. The
performance on these worst days plays a significant role in the public perception of the transportation system and its usefulness for
moving freight.
This measure also uses NPMRDS data. See the Delay across identified areas of concern section, above, for a discussion of NPMRDS.
The metric for travel time uncertainty is the Planning Time Index during the PM peak hour (5-6pm) on all freeway segments in the
WAMPO region. The Planning Time Index is the ratio of the 95th percentile travel time during the peak period compared to the free
flow travel time. The 95th percentile travel time is essentially the travel time on the worst weekday of the month. This makes the
measure very sensitive to disruptions to the regular travel patterns, including weather events, accidents, and other special events. A
Planning Time Index of 2 means that a trip that takes 10 minutes outside of rush hour would take 20 minutes on the worst weekday PM
peak hour of the month.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

For the time period from August 1, 2017 to July 31, 2018 (the most recent data available) the Planning Time Index for the WAMPO
region’s freeways is 1.40. This means on the worst day of the month congestion only adds about 4 minutes to the average 10 minute
trip. WAMPO adopted a target Planning Time Index of no more than 1.75.
Because the baseline values for this metric are lower (better) than the target, this metric indicates that the WAMPO region does not
have an unacceptable level of congestion, even during exceptional events like accidents, severe weather, etc.

Conclusions
Based on these performance measures, their associated metrics, and proposed targets, the WAMPO region does not suffer from an
unacceptable level of congestion. Accordingly, WAMPO is not proposing any congestion management strategies for implementation as
part of this TIP.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Financial Plan

The primary goal of this financial plan is to demonstrate how the total estimated costs of the projects in this TIP plus the estimated cost
of adequately operating and maintaining the federal aid transportation system relates to estimated revenues that are expected to be
available for spending on the regional transportation system in the short term. It is not to show project-specific funding information.
That information can be found on the project summary sheets. Rather, it is to show how the region can afford all of the projects in the
TIP while adequately maintaining the federal aid system. This concept is also called fiscal constraint. It is premised on the following
three assumptions:




The revenues projected are “reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the TIP.” (23 CFR 450.324)
The estimated costs account for expected inflation and represent the dollar amounts that will be actually incurred.
If the construction phase is not explicitly programmed in this TIP, funding can reasonably be expected to be available for full
construction (or operating) of any project that is included in the TIP.

By demonstrating that the region can afford the projects in the TIP while adequately maintain the existing federal aid system, the TIP
becomes a program of committed projects designed to achieve the vision for the regional transportation system that is laid out in the
region’s long range metropolitan transportation plan – MOVE 2040. In effect, the TIP serves as the region’s agreed-upon spending
plan for maintaining and improving the regional transportation system with federal, state, and local government funding over the next
four years.

Available Revenue Sources
Funding for the transportation projects in this region comes from a variety of sources and programs. Broadly speaking these can be
categorized by the level of government that provides the funds:


Federal Government Funding: Funding programs that are made available through legislation passed by Congress and signed
by the President. These programs are administered by the Federal Highway Administration or the Federal Transit
Administration, which are part of the larger U.S. Department of Transportation cabinet agency. Funding for these programs
comes from the national Highway Trust Fund (HTF). When the national Highway Trust Fund was originally established in 1956, it
was intended to be exclusively funded with federal motor fuel taxes. However, over the last several years, Congress has
approved over $50 billion transfers from the General Fund to ensure the fund’s solvency.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022



State of Kansas Funding: Funding programs that are made available by the State of Kansas through approval by the State
Legislature. These programs are usually administered by the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT). These include the
State’s Motor Fuel Tax Sharing Program (also known as the Special City County Highway Fund) and the state funding in the
current State transportation program – T-WORKS. State provided sources in the T-WORKS program include state motor fuel
taxes, vehicle registration and permits, bond proceeds, and state sales taxes.



Local Government Funding: Funding made available by local governments, including counties and cities in the WAMPO region.
These include local sales taxes, property taxes, general fund, special assessments, and special taxing districts.



Private/Non-Profit Funding: Funding made available by private or non-profit organizations in the region for transportation.

Most transportation projects programmed in the TIP are funded by a combination of federal, state and/or local government funding.
For example, when local governments or the State of Kansas use federal funding to pay for a portion of a project, they usually
contribute at least 20% of the cost of the project. Federal funds are typically reimbursed; local and state governments must pay for
the project and then are reimbursed up to the federal funding limit for the project.

Federal Government Funding
Total projected federal revenues expected to be available for spending on the regional transportation system between FFY 2019 and
FFY 2022 equal $87.6 million. The revenue projections used in this TIP are derived from the MOVE 2040 Financial Plan; these
projections assume federal funding will remain flat in nominal dollars (based on 2015 funding levels) over the course of the MOVE
2040 planning horizon (2015-2040.).
Federal funding programs are established by legislation approved by Congress. The current legislation is called the Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. It was passed in 2015, and it will expire in 2020. The programs are administered by either the
Federal Highway Administration or the Federal Transit Administration, and, in the WAMPO region are awarded by KDOT, WAMPO,
and Wichita Transit. See the table below for a breakdown on which agency awards which funding program. Eligible uses for federal
funding are typically limited to capital type projects, such as road construction, transit vehicle purchases, or construction of a bike
facility. Federal funding is typically not eligible to be used to pay for routine maintenance and operations of the system.
The following federal funding programs are funding projects in this TIP:

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Federal Highway Administration Programs
 National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) provides funding for preservation of existing highways and roads on the
National Highway System (NHS) and for construction of new facilities on the NHS. In the WAMPO region, the NHS is composed
of all Interstate and U.S. highways, state highways, and approximately 5 miles of the City of Wichita’s arterial street network.


Surface Transportation Program (STP) is the most flexible federal program available. It can be used to fund projects on any
Federal-aid highway, road, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and planning.



Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) provides funding for improvements intended to reduce traffic fatalities and
injuries.



Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): assists urbanized areas in meeting the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These areas are designated as non-attainment for a criteria pollutant. In states which
do not have any areas that do not meet the NAAQS, CMAQ funding can be spent on any project eligible for STP funds. This is
currently the case in the state of Kansas. If Wichita or other areas in Kansas end up violating the NAAQS, some of this money
will need to be directed towards transportation projects aimed specifically at improving air quality.



Transportation Alternatives (TA): funds are a subset of the STP program. TA funding is for non-highway and non-road
projects including bicycle/pedestrian facilities, increasing accessibility for non-drivers, community improvement, and
environmental mitigation.



Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP): funds are used to construct capital road and bridge projects.



Earmark: funds are set aside by Congress for specific projects.

Federal Transit Administration Programs



Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5307): supports urban transit systems, like Wichita Transit, in communities of over
50,000 people. These funds are allocated to urban areas based on a formula that takes into account population, population
density, and performance evaluations of the transit system. Wichita Transit is the designated recipient for these funds in the
WAMPO region.



Formula Grants for the Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310): provides funding for
transit services that are focused on serving the elderly and people with disabilities.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022



Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants (Section 5339): provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses
and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities.

Federal Program Awarding Agency
Federal Program
NHPP
STP
HSIP
CMAQ
TA
HIP
FTA Section 5307
FTA Section 5310
FTA Section 5339

Awarding Agency
KDOT




***



WAMPO

Wichita Transit

*
**






*80% of WAMPO’s STP program is provided to WAMPO by Congressional legislation. The other 20% is made up of a portion of
KDOT’s STP program that it chooses to pass through to WAMPO.
**KDOT chooses to pass through a portion of its CMAQ funding to WAMPO to award.
***KDOT chooses to spend its TA funding in areas of that the state that are outside of the metro Wichita and Kansas City areas.

State of Kansas Funding
Total projected state revenues expected to be available for spending on the regional transportation system between FFY 2019 and
FFY 2022 equal $278 million. The revenue projections used in this TIP are derived from the MOVE 2040 Financial Plan; these
projections assume that state transportation funding will remain flat in nominal dollars over the course of the MOVE 2040 planning
horizon (2015-2040.). The average per-year spending over the 10 year span of T-WORKS was used as a base for this long-term
funding assumption, rather than the spending in the remaining years of the plan because T-WORKS spending in this region is somewhat
back-loaded.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

This funding is provided through two State programs – T-WORKS and the State’s Motor Fuel Tax Program. State provided funding is
typically used for both capital type projects, such as road construction, transit vehicle purchases, or construction of a bike facility and
routine maintenance and operations of the system.
T-WORKS
The Kansas Legislature passed Transportation Works for Kansas (T-WORKS) in May, 2010. T-WORKS is a 10 year, $8 billion
transportation program. Of the $8 billion total, approximately $4.2 billion will be spent on preservation of the state highway system,
$1.8 billion on modernization and expansion of state highways, $1.6 billion on local roads, and $174 million on public transit, aviation,
and railroads. T-WORKS will run through 2019. Since it was passed, the State Legislature has transferred tens of millions of dollars
from this program to the State’s general fund for other purposes.
Motor Fuel Tax Program (also known as the Special City County Highway Fund)
KDOT receives funding from state motor fuel taxes, motor carrier property taxes, motor vehicle registration fees, and a 4/10 cent sales
tax. State statute calls for KDOT to transfer some of these funds to cities and counties through the Special City and County Highway
Fund (SCCHF) to be used for construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, and maintenance (including payment of bonds and
associated interest) of the streets and highways in each city.

Local Government Funding
Total projected local revenues from cities and counties in the WAMPO region are expected to be available for spending on the
regional transportation system between FFY 2019 and FFY 2022 equal $385 million. The revenue projections used in this TIP are
derived from the MOVE 2040 Financial Plan and are based on the following assumptions:
 General funds and personal property taxes will remain flat in nominal dollars (based on the average annual amount spent
between 2009 and 2013) over the course of the MOVE 2040 planning horizon (2015-2040.).
 Revenue from the 1-cent transportation sales taxes in Sedgwick County will rise at 1% per year based on the actual growth
trends observed during the period 2009 through 2013.
 Sales tax and developer impact fees in the cities of Andover and Haysville will rise at 2.5% to 3% per year based on the
actual growth trends observed during the period 2009 through 2013.
Local governments fund transportation improvements through a wide mix of property taxes, sales and use taxes, and other local tax
revenue. It is typically used for both capital type projects, such as road construction, transit vehicle purchases, or construction of a bike
facility and routine maintenance and operations of the system.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Financing Methods
A combination of cities, counties, and the state government own and operate the regional transportation system in the WAMPO region.
These entities are responsible for implementing the projects that are in this TIP and operating and maintaining the regional
transportation system. Local and state governments in the WAMPO region use one of the following three methods to pay for (or
finance) transportation projects they implement.
 Cash: The sponsoring entity (e.g., a local city or county or the state government) pay for the work with cash on hand that is
collected through some sort of taxes (e.g., sales tax, income tax, or property tax).


Credit: Government bonds, usually municipal bonds, are issued and sold to investors, and the proceeds from the sale are used
to pay for the project. In turn, the sponsoring jurisdiction pays the investors back what they paid for the bond plus some level of
interest at some agreed-upon point in the future.



Advance Construction: This financing technique is used for many large scale, expensive, multi-year projects that are fully or
partially funded with federal funds. It is a financing technique that allows state or local government to initiate a project using
non-federal funds while preserving eligibility for future federal funds. In practice, it allows the sponsoring entity to start a
project under the assumption that federal funding will be made available to reimburse the sponsoring agency in the future.
Reimbursements in the future are planned to take place under either current federal legislation or some future out year after the
current legislation is expired. Approximately $19 million of state and local government funding is being advanced during this
TIP period.

How were projected revenues determined? Projected revenues were drawn from WAMPO’s MOVE 2040 Long Range
Transportation Plan Financial Plan. The MOVE 2040 Financial Plan divides total projected revenues into three time bands over the
course of the Plan’s 25 year planning horizon: 2015 – 2018, 2019 – 2025, and 2026 – 2040. In order to demonstrate financial
consistency between this TIP and the MOVE 2040 Financial Plan, revenues across each funding source (federal, state, local, and
private/nonprofit) in each time band were divided by the total number of years in that band. Then, four years of the 2019 – 2025
time band were added together to estimate the 2019 – 2022 revenue projection.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

MOVE 2040 Financial Plan Revenue Projections
2015 - 2018
MOVE 2040
Revenue Projection*

2019 - 2025
MOVE 2040
Revenue Projection*

2026- 2040
MOVE 2040
Revenue Projection*

2015 - 2040
MOVE 2040
Revenue Projection*

2019 - 2022*
MOVE 2040 Based
Revenue Projection*

Federal
$110,754,247
$153,329,862
$328,563,990
$592,648,099
$87,617,064
State
$434,000,000
$486,878,000
$1,043,310,000
$1,964,188,000
$278,216,000
Local
$366,794,624
$674,896,970
$1,542,128,090
$2,583,819,684
$385,655,411
Private/Non Profit
$144,000,000
$252,000,000
$540,000,000
$936,000,000
$144,000,000
Total
$1,055,548,871
$1,567,104,832
$3,454,002,080
$6,076,655,783
$895,488,475
*All revenue projections are shown in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars. That is, the revenue projections account for assumptions made in the rate of
growth/stability/decline in each revenue source.

Costs
What types of costs are accounted for in the TIP? The TIP includes two broad categories of costs: costs to adequately operate
and maintain the federal aid transportation system in this region and costs associated with programmed projects. For this TIP period,
these costs total $421 million.

Estimated Expenditures* on the Regional Transportation System
2019
2020
2021
2022
2019 - 2020
System Operations
$44,071,036
$45,833,877
$47,667,232
$49,573,922
$187,146,067
and Maintenance
Projects Programmed
$153,668,427
$37,704,784
$23,305,382
$19,653,928
$234,332,521
in the TIP
Total
$197,739,463
$83,538,661
$70,972,614
$69,227,850
$421,478,588
*All projected expenditures are shown in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars. That is, the projected expenditures account for future inflation.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

System Operations and Maintenance
How much is it projected to cost to adequately maintain the federal aid transportation system in this region over the
course of this TIP? $187 million. This amount is the projected year of expenditure cost that cities, counties, and the State will
spend in aggregate maintaining and operating the federal aid transportation system in the region over the course of this TIP. The
federal aid transportation system in this region includes all the interstates, state highways, most of the major roads, and Wichita
Transit’s operations.
These projections were calculated by applying a 4% annual inflation rate to the 2015 estimate of operations and maintenance
expenditures for the portion of the federal aid transportation system that is contained within each jurisdiction per jurisdiction and
calculating the sum total per TIP year (e.g., 2019 – 2022). Depending on the accounting method used by each jurisdiction, the 2015
estimate was either a 5-year average from the previous five years or the self-reported actual expenditure amount.

System Level Operations and Maintenance Cost Breakdown
Actual
Expenditures
2015

Projected
Expenditures*
2019

Projected
Expenditures*
2020

Projected
Expenditures*
2021

Projected
Expenditures*
2022

Projected
Expenditures*
2019 - 2022

Interstates & State
$3,511,529
$4,101,915
$4,265,992
$4,436,632
$4,614,097
$17,418,636
Highways
Arterials &
Collectors that
are on the
$21,541,092
$25,162,752
$26,169,262
$27,216,033
$28,304,674
$106,852,722
Federal Aid
System
Public Transit
$12,675,296
$14,806,368
$15,398,623
$16,014,568
$16,655,151
$62,874,709
System**
Total O & M
$37,727,917
$44,071,036
$45,833,877
$47,667,232
$49,573,922
$187,146,067
Costs
*All projected expenditures are shown in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars. That is, the projected expenditures account for future inflation.
**The public transit system is defined as Wichita Transit’s operations.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

What type of expenses are considered maintenance and operating costs?
Highways and Roads: Salaries, fringe benefits, materials and equipment needed to deliver roadway and bridge maintenance
programs. Basic maintenance activities include minor surface treatments, such as sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching,
mowing right of way, snow removal, sign replacement, striping, guardrail repairs, and traffic signals repairs. These maintenance
activities require employees, vehicles and other machinery, and facilities to house equipment and materials such as salt, asphalt and
fuel.

Public Transit: Administrative costs (personnel expenses, office supplies and expenses, computer and computer supplies, copies,
postage, mileage, meals, registration fees, and uniforms) and the following operations costs: Advertising, Vehicle Insurance, Personnel
expenses for drivers, dispatchers, and mechanics, fuel, maintenance, repairs, lubrication, parts, labor, Storage paid, Contracted services
(taxi vouchers), Communications (telephone, cell phones), Maintenance facility costs, License & tags, KPTA membership dues and annual
meeting expenses, RTAP driver’s training and manager’s training, KCC registration fees, and DOT driver’s physicals.

How do we know this is enough to adequately maintain the federal aid transportation system?
We don’t definitively. This is the amount that state and local government spend to maintain their respective portions of the system.
This region has not yet defined what “adequate” means for itself. There is currently not a consistent approach to measure the condition
of the components of the regional transportation system. This analysis assumes that each jurisdiction makes its own decisions during its
annual budget development process to determine the amount to budget for maintaining and operating its portion of the federal aid
transportation system.

Projects Programmed in the TIP
A total of $234 million of projects is programmed in the TIP over the four year TIP period. Because it’s important to use the most
accurate estimates for the cost of these projects based on the year that the project costs will actually be expended, each project
sponsor took future inflation into account when developing their cost estimates. Most costs are inflated 4% annually to be consistent
with the cost estimates that were developed for MOVE 2040, however, some project sponsors chose to use the Producer Price Index
derived cost or costs of recent bids. Since the project sponsor is financially contributing to the project, they have a vested interest in

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

ensuring the cost estimate is reasonable. The costs shown for the projects are called, Year of Expenditure (YOE) costs meaning they
take inflation into account and represent the best estimate of the cost that will actually be incurred.

Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
Total

TIP Years
$153,668,427
$37,704,784
$23,305,382
$19,653,928
$234,332,521

The first year of the TIP generally
has the most funding programmed,
with each subsequent year programmed
less than the year before.

Although this TIP covers four years, many of the projects in the TIP have financial activity in previous years or projected for future years.
For example, preliminary engineering and its associated costs may be incurred during this TIP period (e.g., FFY 2019 – 2022),
however, construction isn’t scheduled until the year after this TIP period ends (e.g,. FFY 2023). In other cases, the project is complete
with construction, however the sponsoring agency is waiting on future year federal funds to convert. After accounting for all of the costs
(both previously incurred and projected in the future), this TIP includes a total of $832 million in project costs, with $234 million
expected during this TIP cycle (FFY 2019 – 2022). Below are some tables showing the breakdown of projects in the TIP.

Projects by Type
Project Type
Highways (including bridges)
Highway Interchanges
Roads
Intersections
Bridge (non-highway roads)
Transit
Bike/Ped
Safety
Technology
Planning & Outreach
Total

Adopted October 2018

Total TIP
Commitment
% of Total
$156,546,062
18.8%
$446,314,022
53.6%
$121,289,881
14.6%
$21,785,760
2.6%
$16,127,454
1.9%
$35,549,277
4.3%
$17,977,891
2.2%
$8,476,445
1.0%
$6,146,592
0.7%
$2,639,081
0.3%
$832,852,465

Construction work at
highway interchanges
along US54/400/Kellogg at
Webb, Greenwich,
and I-235 account for
the largest share of
committee costs
($446 million).

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Projects by Work Phase

 Construction costs and right of way acquisition costs are the most expensive work
phases.

Project Development Phase
Utilities
Prelim Engineerging
Right of Way Acquisition
Const Engineering
Construction
Planning & Outreach
Transit Operating
Transit Capital
Total

Total TIP
Commitment
% of Total
$21,176,442
2.1%
$52,295,427
5.1%
$95,298,219
9.3%
$50,643,503
5.0%
$575,250,516
56.4%
$2,639,081
0.3%
$8,795,240
0.9%
$26,754,037
2.6%
$832,852,465

Projects by Awarding Entity
KDOT awards the most dollars in the region, by far.

Awarding Agency
KDOT
(not including Wichita
Transit)
WAMPO
Wichita Transit
Partnership
Total

Adopted October 2018

Total TIP
Commitment
% of Total
$612,917,529
73.6%
$61,125,000
$119,177,499
$28,474,750
$11,157,687
$832,852,465

7.3%
14.3%
3.4%
1.3%

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Is the TIP Fiscally Constrained?
Yes. After accounting for the total projected revenues reasonably expected to be available for spending on the programmed projects
between FFY 2019 and FFY 2022 ($243 million), there is a balance of $840,000 over the course of the TIP period after accounting for
all of the programmed projects. The table below shows the dollar totals by funding program, revenues available, total programmed,
and the balance by year and for the total TIP period.

Is there enough federal, state, local, and private/non-profit revenues that are reasonably expected to be available
over the course of the TIP Plan (2019 – 2022) to pay for the projects in the TIP in total AND adequately maintain
and operate the federal aid transportation system in this region?
Yes. After accounting for the total projected revenues reasonably expected to be available for spending on the regional
transportation system between FFY 2019 and FFY 2022 ($895 million) and the amount estimated to be spent to adequately maintain
the system ($187 million), the amount available for programming in the TIP equals $708 million, which is approximately $474 million
greater than the total amount programmed in this TIP.
Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Fiscal Constraint Analysis Using
MOVE 2040 Revenue Projections
Years: 2019 - 2022
MOVE 2040 Based Revenue Projection
Federal
State
Local
Private / Non Profit

$895,488,475
$87,617,064
$278,216,000
$385,655,411
$144,000,000

<$187,146,067>

Total Amount Projected to be Available for Programming

$708,342,408

Total Programmed

$234,332,521

It is likely this gap between projected revenues and planned projects is due to two factors. One, the revenue projections include
revenues set aside for non-regionally significant projects that aren't routine operations and maintenance projects. This is because the
accounting systems for most local governments' revenue projections do not separate out the revenues and expenditures based on the
road classification type (e.g., federal aid or local). Therefore, the data from the local government is not as granulated as this analysis
would ideally require. Two, the state and local governments not submitting projects or project phases to WAMPO to include in the TIP,
either because they are not yet internally authorized or the project is not yet sufficiently scoped out yet.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Communication Plan
June
Public Review and
Comment announcement
via the public distribution
list for Candidate Projects
for WAMPO Funding.
Annoucement was
comprised of an email
blast containing interactive
information linking further
detail on the TIP, MTP and
the WAMPO public
meeting calendar.
The Annoucemnent also
included TIP related
background, helpful info,
and notable dates
associated with
opportunities for public
review and comment

Adopted October 2018

July
Public review and comment
is officially open for
Candidate Projects for
WAMPO funding.
Public review and comment
annoucement is made via
news release (webpage),
WAMPO quarterly
newsletter and through
social media platforms
(Twitter & Facebook).

September
The September TAC
meeting is designated
as the first public
meeting where the
public and stakeholders
can be updated and
engage in discussion.
The proposed TIP is
posted on the WAMPO
website at
www.wampo.org.
A public review and
comment reminder will
be sent via the public
distribution list.

October
The October TPB
meeting is a designated
as the final public
meeting where the
public and stakeholders
can be updated and
engaged in discussion
surrounding the TIP.
The opportunity for
public review and
comment is set to close
by the end of business
October 5th

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Outreach and Environmental Justice
WAMPO conducts significant Public Participation activities and Environmental Justice analysis as part of the MTP/TIP process.
For information about Public Participation plans and activities, please see our website at http://www.wampo.org/Pages/default.aspx
and click “Get Involved”.
An environmental justice analysis of all of the projects in MOVE 2040 was completed as part of the needs assessment phase of MOVE
2040. The projects were categorized as either preservation, modernization, or expansion type projects, and the analysis assessed the
benefits and burdens of the planned projects on minority and low income population groups. Analysis of the project distribution by
category in identified environmental justice (EJ) areas showed that they contained a larger share of the preservation and modernization
categories when compared to the expansion project category. This difference was largely attributed to the geographic locations of the
identified EJ areas, which tended to lie in older more developed sections of the region where expansion projects are less appropriate.
Additionally, the percentage of the population living in EJ areas is not equal to the percentage of investments in the preservation and
modernization categories. It is important to note that this indicator alone is not predictive of a potential EJ concern. In some cases
increased investment has resulted in unintended consequences or EJ concerns for the area. It is the policy of this organization to use all
indicators to enhance the information collected from other sources (including most importantly public involvement activities) in
determining whether or not there is an EJ concern. Based on this examination there did not appear to be an EJ concern. For information
about Environmental Justice, please see our Metropolitan Transportation Plan, also on our website. Just click “Our Work” then “MOVE
2040”

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

TIP Amendments
The 2019 TIP will be amended regularly three times per year, although special amendments may occur when deemed necessary by the
TPB or WAMPO director. The TIP amendment process is similar to the TIP development and approval process. First, a Request for
Amendments application period is opened. The Request for Amendments application period allows project sponsors to submit
applications for changes to existing projects in the TIP or to request the addition of new non-competitive projects.
All TIP amendments must maintain fiscal constraint. If a project sponsor is applying for a new project or significant cost increase to an
existing project, the funding source must be identified.
There are two types of changes that may be made to the TIP: amendments and administrative adjustments.

Amendments – A TIP amendment is necessary when one or more of the following will occur:





A change to the design or scope of a project
Addition or removal of a funding source or change in amount greater than 25% of the total project cost
 If funds from WAMPO funding programs are involved, the funds must be available, and the TIP must maintain fiscal
constraint; only a project which has not yet been obligated may receive increased federal funds
Addition or remove of a project from the TIP; fiscal constraint must be maintained

The TAC will review a draft TIP amendment and may provide the following recommendations to the TPB: approve the TIP amendment
as-is; approve the amendment with specific changes; do not approve the TIP amendment. Follow the TAC’s recommendation, the TPB
will take action on the proposed amendment. It may:






Approve the amendment as proposed
Make changes to the amendment as deemed appropriate
Table the item for further discussion
Not approve the amendment
Request further TAC review before taking action

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Before TPB action on any amendment, a public review and comment period will be held. Guidelines for public review and comment
may be found in the WAMPO Public Participation Plan (http://www.wampo.org/Involved/Pages/PPP.aspx).

Administrative Adjustments – this is for changes to the TIP that do not reach any of the thresholds for an amendment. These changes

may include:
 Programming of additional funding limited to the lesser of 25 percent of the total project cost or $5 million
 Minor editorial changes that result in no change to project scope or design
 Change in the programmed Federal Fiscal Year
Administrative adjustments will be reflected in the TIP once a new amendment is processed. If an amendment period is opened and all
of the changes requested qualify as administrative adjustments, TAC recommendation and TPB action will not be sought. WAMPO staff
reviews all requested changes to determine whether they are eligible to proceed.
After the TPB approves a new TIP, WAMPO submits a letter to KDOT requesting inclusion of the new TIP into the STIP by reference.
KDOT then processes an amendment to the STIP and request USDOT approval of the STIP amendment. Once USDOT approves the STIP
amendment, KDOT and WAMPO are notified.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Looking Forward
Air Quality
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are set by the federal government for six
pollutants, and air quality is measured across the county to determine whether or not the NAAQS
have been exceeded. The WAMPO region is currently in attainment status because the air quality
in the region does not violate the standards for any of the regulated pollutants. It is reasonable and
foreseeable that the WAMPO region could be designated as a non-attainment area in the near
future. If it happens, his will require significant investment in monitoring the impacts of transportation
investment choices on air quality and place added constraints on how funds from certain federal
programs may be used.

Attainment:
Means that the air quality
in the region meets the
National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for a
specific air pollutant such
as ground level ozone.

Non-WAMPO Funded Projects
WAMPO traditionally has not collected detailed information about projects not funded with WAMPO competitive funds. For this TIP, a
much greater level of information was collected, and a thorough check for consistency with the MTP was conducted for all projects. The
next TIP will extend this process further, incorporating more evaluation and analysis of these non-WAMPO funded projects, as well. In
this way, WAMPO will provide a forum for guiding the regional transportation system as a whole. One way we will accomplish this will
be to pursue more active participation by regional partners in the MTP process, giving them greater input into setting goals and
priorities, We will move toward aligning all federally funded and regionally significant projects with MTP performance targets, and the
TIP will be a product of that alignment.

Project Development
Between the development of this TIP and the next, WAMPO hopes to begin providing additional support to project sponsors as they
move through the project development process. Although most project sponsors have some experience with this process, there are
certain new laws and policies at the state and federal level that have repeatedly caused delays in project development. We hope to
target new guidance at these recurring difficulties and provide it to project sponsors early in the development process. We also hope
to help streamline communications between WAMPO, KDOT, and project sponsors, establishing communication standards and policies.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Public comment period begins.

TAC recommends TIP to TPB.

TPB takes action on TIP.

If approved by TPB, TIP is sent to KDOT
for approval.

Approval by FHWA and FTA.

TIP Approval Process
Public involvement opportunities begin prior to any recommendation of the TIP, and
public comments are reported to the TAC and TPB before any action is requested. The
TAC receives the draft TIP and is asked to recommend it to the TPB, with the same
options outlined in the “TIP Amendments” chapter, above. The TPB receives the draft
document along with the TAC’s recommendation and is asked to approve the TIP, also
with the same options they have for an amendment. Both bodies first receive the draft
document at the meeting prior to the request for action so that there will be adequate
time for consideration.
After the TPB approves the TIP, it is then submitted to the Kansas Secretary of
Transportation (as the official representative of the Governor) for approval to amend
into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) by reference. The
Kansas Secretary of Transportation is charged with requesting FHWA and FTA approval
of any amendments to the STIP. Each agency charged with approving the TIP or STIP
verifies that the TIP is consistent with WAMPO’s MTP. Once the TIP is incorporated into
the STIP, WAMPO and KDOT are notified. At this point, the projects listed in the TIP are
considered “agreed to,” and no further project selection process will be required for
project implementation.

Incorporated by reference in the STIP.

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Appendix A: List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADA

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

HOV

High Occupancy Vehicle

AQ

Air Quality

HPP

Congressional High Priority Project

AQITF

Air Quality Improvement Task Force

HRRRP

High Risk Rural Road Program

ATMS

Advanced Transportation Management System

HSIP

Highway Safety Improvement Program

BR

Bridge

ITS

Intelligent Transportation System

CAA

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

JARC

Job Access & Reverse Commute

CE

Construction Engineering

KDOT

Kansas Department of Transportation

CFR

Code of Federal Regulations

KTA

Kansas Turnpike Authority

CIP

Capital Improvement Program

LOS

Level of Service

CMAQ

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

MAP-21

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act

CMP

Congestion Management Process

MPO

Metropolitan Planning Organization

Co.

County

MPOCMAQ

MPO Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality funds

Const.

Construction

MPO-STP

MPO Surface Transportation Program
funds

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Co-BR

County Bridge funds

MPO-TA

MPO Transportation Alternatives
program funds

Co-STP

County Surface Transportation Program funds

MSA

Metropolitan Statistical Area

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

MTP 2035

Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2035

FFY

Federal Fiscal Year

NAAQS

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

FHWA

Federal Highway Administration

NEPA

National Environmental Policy Act of
1970

FTA

Federal Transit Administration

NHS

National Highway System

GIS

Geographic Information Systems

PAC

Project Advisory Committee

ppm

Parts Per Million

TMA

Transportation Management Area

PPP

Public Participation Plan

TPB

Transportation Policy Body

PSC

Project Selection Criteria

UPWP

Unified Planning Work Program

ROW

Right-of-Way

USC

United States Code

RPSP

Regional Pathway System Plan

TDM

Travel Demand Model

RRCP

Railroad Crossing Plan

USDOT

United States Department of
Transportation

SAFETEA-LU

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users

VMT

Vehicle Miles Traveled

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

SCAC

Sedgwick County Association of Cities

V/C Ratio

Volume over Capacity Ratio

FTA Section
5307

FTA — Capital and Operating

WAMPO

Wichita Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization

FTA Section
5309

FTA — Fixed Guideway Modernization

WT

Wichita Transit

FTA Section
5310

FTA — Elderly and Disabled

STP

Surface Transportation Program

FTA Section
5311

FTA — Rural Capital and Operating

TAC

Technical Advisory Committee

FTA Section
5316

FTA — Job Access & Reverse Commute (JARC)

TA

Transportation Alternatives

FTA Section
5317

FTA — New Freedom

TIP

Transportation Improvement Program

SIP

State Implementation Plan

SRTS

Safe Routes to Schools

STIP

Statewide Transportation Improvement Program

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Appendix C: Public Comments

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

Public Review and Comment Results

Candidate Projects
Outreach:
 Survey Information released to the public via the WAMPO Engagement Hub
- Electronic surveys by project: released 6/26/18
- Target: 735 person distribution list
- 205 people opened notice
- The map to the right highlights the geographic
location of some of the survey *respondents.
 Partner Consultation Notice: 7/5/18
- EPA (Region 7)
- Sedgwick County Emergency Management
- US Army Corps of Engineers
- KDHE
- MAPD
- US Fish & Wildlife Service.

Results:
 Number of comments received: 192
*Includes Coordinated Plan responses
 Projects generating the most attention:
- Meridian Pedestrian Bridge over Big Ditch: 42% of comments
- Oliver and Kechi Road Intersection in Kechi: 27%
- North Main Street Reconstruction in Haysville: 21%

Findings:
The below summary gives a short overview of the comments and/or themes found within
the survey comments. For further detail please review the attached results report.
City of Andover 159th Street Upgrade to Arterial Standards
 Number of Comments: 3
 Comment Themes/Summary: All respondents were generally supportive of this
project. The majority also expressed interest in active transportation investment.

City of Andover Bike/Ped Path along Andover Road
 Number of Comments: 3
 Comment Themes/Summary: All comments were supportive. One respondent
suggested that a phase 2 option should be to redesign Andover in order to give
all modes space to travel.
City of Haysville North Main Street Reconstruction
 Number of Comments: 41
 Comment Themes/Summary: 40 out of 41 respondents supported this
project. Themes associated with comments fell in 4 major areas. Please note
the following number do not reflect individual comments, but rather the number
of times the themes appeared within the comments:
 17 Flooding
 14 Active Transportation
 12 Maintenance & Repair
 7 Safety
City of Kechi Intersection at Oliver and Kechi Road
 Number of Comments: 52
 Comment Themes/Summary: Some concern expressed about potential negative
impacts like gentrification and adversity to the Playhouse. Themes associated
with comments fell in 3 major areas. Please note the following number do not
reflect individual comments, but rather the number of times the themes
appeared within the comments:
 54 Active Transportation
 15 Safety
 5 Students/Children
City of Park City: 61st Street North Lane, intersection and bike/ped pathways
(Broadway to the Wichita Valley Center Floodway bridge)
 Number of Comments: 7
 Comment Themes/Summary: The majority of the comments were supportive of
the project. Many requested and/or supported active transportation
elements. One requested public transit considerations.

2

Sedgwick County Pedestrian Bridge on Meridian over the Big Ditch
 Number of Comments: 81
 Comment Themes/Summary: 79 out of 81 respondents were
supportive. Themes associated with comments fell in 3 major areas. Please
note the following number do not reflect individual comments, but rather the
number of times the themes appeared within the comments:
 135 Active Transportation
 55 Safety
 45 Students/Children
City of Valley Center Reconstruct/Pave Meridian from Ford to Seward (69th St N)
 Number of Comments: 1
 Comment Themes/Summary: Neutral comment. Respondent requested how this
project will support future transit systems.
WAMPO Planning Assistance
 Number of Comments: 0
 Comment Themes/Summary: N/A
City of Wichita Reconstruct Pawnee from Webb to Greenwich
 Number of Comments: 2
 Comment Themes/Summary: Mixed reviews. 1 respondent was not supportive
of this project as is and suggested considerations related to future maintenance,
safety, and active transportation. The other respondent was supportive and felt
that it addressed safety concerns.
Wichita Transit Paratransit Van Replacements
 Number of Comments: 2
 Comment Themes/Summary: Both respondents were supportive of this
project. One stated that a bigger priority would be the expansion of services
and accessibility.

Survey results reports by project may be found on the following pages.

3

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2928&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Andover - 159th Street East
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

26

3

0

3

Please share any thoughts, comments or feedback you have related to the Andover project
159th Street.
3 Comments
I would be interested to see if the proposed implementation suggests giving cyclists their own designated space. If
the 10 foot path to the side is intended as THE space for cyclists, then it will likely lead to conflicts for everyone
involved. As a cyclist, if my only options are the street and a side path that is designed only as a 10 foot sidewalk, I will
continue to use the street instead. So that I am not a problem for pedestrians, and to avoid the 4 way intersection at
every curb cut.
Also would suggest not designing the traffic lanes to highway specs. 11 foot lanes would most likely be preferable to
14 foot+.
7 days ago

Agree

Needed!
one month ago

Agree

Brian Lindebak This project has been needed for a long time. I hope to seed cyclist needs integrating into the
project.
one month ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2928&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/1

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2968&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Andover - Bicycle/Pedestrian Path
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

37

3

0

3

Please share any thoughts, comments or feedback you have related to the City of
Andover Bicycle and Pedestrian project
3 Comments
Brian Lindebak Looking forward to seeing this much-needed improvement completed.
one month ago

1 Agree

Clayton Pearson Excellent start to a much needed redesign of Andover Road from Harry to 21st street.
Would suggest a phase 2 could be a redesign Andover Road itself in order to give cars, pedestrians, AND cyclists their
own designated road space. In particular, suggest studying if the extra space in the 5 lanes could be reconfigured to
provide a pair of bike lanes. Particularly space from the two outside lanes and center turn lane.
7 days ago

Agree

Kim Excited to have the final portion completed! I like to ride with friends from Wichita to Andover and have started
seeing a lot more residents out walking and riding along this area.
13 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2968&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/1

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Haysville - Main Street
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

175

34

0

41

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/4

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Please share any thoughts, comments or feedback you have related to the City of
Haysville project
41 Comments
Debbie Coleman WAMPO, please give consideration to the north Main St. reconstruction in Haysville. Main St. is a
much used artery in and out of town and gives access to Haysville's neighborhoods and businesses. When we
experience heavy rain Main St. fills with water impeding traffic flow. We have a large youth and senior citizen
population that utilizes both Main St. and the sidewalk on the east side. It would be wonderful to also have a sidewalk
on the west side of Main St. to allow citizens easy access to the businesses and neighborhoods. We are a growing
community and proud of our little town. This project would enable us to continue on our path to greatness! Thank
you.
22 days ago

2 Agree

K Baldridge I think this is such a great idea! With the growing number of people that are using public transit and
walking/biking in the area, this will be a safe way for people to get around.
23 days ago

2 Agree

Cathy Y. Hurley Businesses and the population are growing. This is one of the main arteries into town. The flooding
cuts the lanes down to one lane each way. It makes it difficult for traffic, especially during rush hour.
23 days ago

2 Agree

Lori Coykendall This is a much needed project in an area that has been an issue for many years. This project is
extremely important for the safety of residents and for proper drainage to prevent increased flooding and water
damage. Having the fire station downtown has been wonderful. That alone has resulted in a great deal of additional
“heavy weight “ traffic, which the road is not able to handle in the current condition. In addition, the walkway is vital in
protecting residents who are on foot or bike, as well as for wheelchair accessibility. Thank you for your attention to
this much needed project!
23 days ago

2 Agree

I moved to Haysville 21 years ago and N Main Street has continuously flooded during moderate to heavy rainfall. This
has reduced traffic lanes to two every time. The pot holes have been increasing and I know the City has tried to keep
up with slurry seals but, it seems that this has reached a point where it is no longer effective.
23 days ago

2 Agree

The continued growth and increased traffic has had a burden on the road.
23 days ago

2 Agree

Loretta Scott WAMPO, please consider making these improvements to Main St in Haysville, it’s a busy and
important road, very heavily used.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Loretta Scott WAMPO. Please consider making these improvements to Main St in Haysville. It’s a heavily used and
important road in our community.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Dan Benner Please consider funding this improvement and maintenance project for North Main Street in Haysville.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Brandyn Ritthaler Money well spent, if we can get these roads fixed!
22 days ago

1 Agree

The infrastructure of this street is deteriorating. Without the proper drainage, it is only going to deteriorate more.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Shirley mccutchen This is badly needed! We are a growing city, with a lot of youth and elderly. We want to keep
them safe as possible.
22 days ago

1 Agree

WM Much needed!!
22 days ago

1 Agree

Janet Parton This is a much needed project that would improve the road and improve drainage.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Thomas Gallegos As we continue to grow here in Haysville, the improvements of N. Main St. are imperative to
helping us move forward. The nicer the city looks the more people will want to live and open businesses here.
22 days ago

1 Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

2/4

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
I'm all for any improvements for this small town.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Lynette Brown This is a project that will improve the main north south street in Hays vile.
22 days ago

1 Agree

This will be a big improvement
3 days ago

Agree

OK Go for it!!
3 days ago

Agree

Great idea needed!
3 days ago

Agree

Great idea!
3 days ago

Agree

It does flood if we ever get any rain.
3 days ago

Agree

Michelle Price Thank you for reviewing the Haysville Main Street project. Our Main St. is thriving with new
businesses and, as you’ve read in earlier comments, a new fire station. We have flooding issues that impact all of us
in this community and complicates traffic for emergency vehicles. We are proud of our town and all are working hard
to make it a safe, convenient place to live. Please consider Haysville Main St. project as the first choice.
4 days ago

Agree

Everett Price Dear WAMPO
Please consider Haysville a canadate for this new proposed construction project. The flooding on Main St. is an
problematic issue. With our new fire station in place, Main street would benefit from the new construction due to the
use of our heavy fire trucks. Our community is becoming bicycle friendly and could benefit from this project. We
currently have bike and walk access to the south side of the floodway bridge. The proposed construction would help
connect our community and make it safer for those on bicycles and walking to businesses and other functions. Thank
you so much for your consideration in our community.
4 days ago

Agree

Not necessary at this time- no pedestrians It's always nice to have "new" roadways, but how many people walk
across this bridge to warrant a side walk on the west side of the bridge. Heading north to 63rd- no one is repairing
the "cracks" across Seneca/main currently. If proper maintenance can not be provided why add more projects? Very
few people walk on the bridge.
10 days ago

Agree

Boyd & Vivi-Ann Hiveley Yes my husband and I agree that this project would be advantageous and create less of a
problem area with water if the drainage issue is taken care of. Also the sidewalk would be a great addition to that
area since it is limited access for crossing.
11 days ago

Agree

I know it is getting bad and it need to be done so I am in favor of it to be done. It needs to be done before the
weather makes it worse.
14 days ago

Agree

Need better drainage. Road is in dire need of repair.
14 days ago

Agree

Heavy traffic- rain causes problems
14 days ago

Agree

I am a resident of Haysville and travel North Main Street. Main Street is heavily traveled and has poor drainage. I
drive on this street everything. It is in need of being replaced.
15 days ago

Agree

I'm for improving Haysville. Hopefully, our taxes won't be raised.
17 days ago

Agree

Kristen McDaniel Main Street would benefit greatly to improve this roads. When we receive any substantial about
of rain this road is affected highly. For the safety of our citizens this project needs to be done.
18 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

3/4

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
WAMPO this is a project that Haysville desperately needs !
Agree

20 days ago

We need this before we start losing young people.
Agree

20 days ago

Much needed improvement!
Agree

21 days ago

JA Main Street is in need of repair to remain a safe means of travel. Morning and evening commuter traffic is heavy
along this route, in addition to daily in-town travel, and cannot be sustained without upgrades to the failing state of
the roadway. Adding a sidewalk would improve the safety of this route for children walking to and from school and
pedestrians moving along the main retail corridor of the city. During even the slightest rain, water floods the outside
lanes on Main Street, making travel by car unsafe at times, and causes water to splash onto the existing sidewalk. I've
witnessed vehicles hydroplaning around the corner when turning onto Main Street from side roads due to the pooled
water in the lane, causing near accidents with vehicles already on Main. There is a safety issue with the current state
of the streets and lack of guttering and sidewalks.
Agree

22 days ago

please pick
Agree

22 days ago

Street in need of repair please help out.
Agree

22 days ago

Comments Hidden by Filters or Admin:

Bernice Wray This is a great idea to replace road it is very rough.
3 days ago

Agree

This needs to happen.
3 days ago

Agree

Paul kinderknecht The street does need work badly, would also express that the biggest problem in my view is
regular maintenance and curb cleanliness. We have Trees growing in our storm drains.(Fager and Main)
10 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2967&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

4/4

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Kechi
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

203

52

0

52

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/5

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Please share any thoughts, comments or feedback you have related to the City of
Kechi project
52 Comments
Erin Sidewalks on all sides of the streets would vastly improve this intersection! I would be much more inclined to
walk my dog around town if the sidewalks were improved. We're proud of our artistic community and giving our little
town a much needed facelift would possibly attract more artists to the area!
12 days ago

4 Agree

Jen I think it would be a
Wonderful improvement! I run Kechi daily and it’s surprising I haven’t spranged an ankle or gave my kid whiplash in
the jogging stroller!
12 days ago

4 Agree

Matt Staub That would be an awesome opportunity for our little town. More foot traffic, safe places to walk to the
local businesses, helps out everyone. Keeps kids, pedestrians, and cyclists safer on those two busy streets.
10 days ago

3 Agree

Pam and Todd. Much needed and very deserving. Kechi is a great community. Highlighting these necessary
improvements will benefit people who call Kechi home and visitors checking out our artisans area.
12 days ago

3 Agree

In addition to improving the look of our main intersection, it would also make it safer for drivers, bikers and
pedestrians.
12 days ago

3 Agree

Great! This project will provide needed parking to get people out of their cars to connect to places using actual
sidewalks. Let's do this!
12 days ago

3 Agree

Jeff Boone While a great project and one that certainly fills a need, I hope this project is doable without adversely
affecting the Playhouse.
one month ago

3 Agree

I think this is a critical project for the City of Kechi. The expansion and reworking of the intersection and addition of
the wider sidewalks will really help not only the Kechi citizens, but others in the nearby areas.
one month ago

3 Agree

Patrick Wilson Please, Please! Don't gentrify this great little town! Don't make it look like an extension of Wichita!
Keep it's nice, small town feel with only small businesses (no franchise or corporate owned stores or restaurants) that
look like a small town in Kansas. So many places have tried this but ended up just a trendy suburb of it's big city
neighbor. Please keep it small and down home.
8 days ago

2 Agree

ML Kechi is the spot to find the perfect “ungettable get” whether it be a handcrafted trinket or unique local treasure.
Improving the intersection of Kechi Rd & Oliver will not only keep pedestrians safe, but also increase foot-traffic for
the highly-sought local businesses. These local shops give visitors a rare peek at the vibrant and cozy lifestyle our
town exudes and easy, welcoming pathways are a must to achieve return visits. A project like this can only improve
the livability and growth of this wonderful town!
10 days ago

2 Agree

AP Kechi’s undeniable charm and artisan draw continue to make it a wonderful place to call home, but there is a
growing need for improvements at our main intersection of Oliver and Kechi Road that can no longer be ignored.
From increased walkability for families during Kechi Fair days, to easy access to local businesses and shops, this grant
would foster a greater sense of community for years to come. Please consider funding this. Our little town is long
overdue for safe pathways that will connect our residents to the places they love most.
10 days ago

2 Agree

LB Awesome! Make Kechi unique. This city has potential and will be unique for Wichita area. Provide an art village
where artists with low budget can exhibit and sell their art work. It will attract a lot of people to come to Kechi to buy
art works or just to visit this unique small town. That will also affect other businesses like restaurants and shops.
12 days ago

2 Agree

Stephanie My husband and I walk with our dog and two small children along Kechi road, from the post office to the
intersection of Kechi road and Oliver. From there we finish out our walk along Oliver street until we get to Kechi park.
It would make our nightly walks so much safer and easier if there were improved sidewalks.
12 days ago

2 Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

2/5

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
Doug and Michele The upgrade looks great. Perhaps it would attract some new businesses. When would it begin?
12 days ago

2 Agree

Amy Jane Miller I wish we could have a sidewalk that goes all the way to Park City. I would love for my kiddo to ride
her bike to the Library.
7 days ago

1 Agree

Timber My wife and I would love to see sidewalks and bike lanes from Woodlawn to Park City and from Bel Aire to
69th street. This project sounds like a great start to someday having that.
8 days ago

1 Agree

Mary Trotter Andresen I don’t live in Kechi, but have absolutely fallen in love with this quaint little town. I think
sidewalks would be fabulous, but like Patrick ^^^^^ please do your best to keep the quaint vacation esque feel to this
precious little town.
8 days ago

1 Agree

Debra Gadbury Our small but growing town needs this so bad! The children need this worse! Please and Thank
You!
12 days ago

1 Agree

Tammy I would love to see this improvement for Kechi. Our little town is very special and unique. This upgrade
would help others to see the beauty of our town. It would also help with safety when walking around that area.
12 days ago

1 Agree

Angela LeSage Please consider Kechi for this very much needed project. Turning right off 61st to go north on Oliver
is tricky, as the intersection is configured such that you must make an extremely tight turn or you end up in the
southbound lane. I believe the angles are not correct for a safe turn. Additionally we use the sidewalks, but they are
also in need of repair. Kechi has high traffic on both Oliver and 61st streets. This project would serve the community
well. Thank you
12 days ago

1 Agree

J I am excited about the possibility of this project for Kechi. For someone who is starting to bike more, but is not
comfortable riding on busier streets like Kechi Rd. or Oliver, (that don’t really have a shoulder) a bike path is very
appealing. While I say these streets are busier I don’t think that it is so busy that the intersection warrants a traffic
signal. Kechi is a great little community that I enjoy calling home.
12 days ago

1 Agree

Barbara Edminster Sideways would be nice in order to walk from business to business
6 days ago

Agree

Lynn Broz Was there last night ...love the park
6 days ago

Agree

Joe O. Removal of Soutern Flag, as Kansas fought for the north. If Kechi wants to look more like a modern town, then
all people should feel welcome. That would be including minorities who were oppressed under the southern flag.
6 days ago

Agree

I think this idea or even a round a bout instead of stop lights seems great.
7 days ago

Agree

Mathew Johnson I don't live there, and try to avoid it as much as possible, but honestly I'd be trying to get off
ramp/on ramp south of there built. Alot easier it would seem. Safer for the community as you wouldn't have that
much high traffic going through. Maybe I'm wording it wrong. Good luck with whatever is chosen. The town will
benefit I'm sure.
7 days ago

Agree

Peter I love living here because of the unique small town sort of feel you get here. I think this would be a wonderful
improvement to the city.
8 days ago

Agree

Karen & Trent The improvements would make the corner so much more accessible for everyone and make the area
look great!
8 days ago

Agree

Roy Riggs The city of Kechi has a great opportunity to grow and expand on the growth and add to the culture of
surrounding communities and expand small business opportunities with this street Improvement project
8 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

3/5

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
Jeremy Ryan Johnson George Lay Signs Inc. could do the signage and would love the opportunity to. Looks like
some great work for a great City
8 days ago

Agree

Pattie Speer I think this project is GREATLY needed. Both for improvement of entrance & exiting Kechi, but also to
increase safety for both bicyclers & pedestrians. Our main intersection isn't easy to navigate for either walking or bike
riding. I think this project will be a huge improvement.
Thank you for consideration of this project.
9 days ago

Agree

Brian Cozine Please approve and move forward with this project. This intersection is in need of rehabilitation. New
sidewalks and traffic controls will be a great improvement.
9 days ago

Agree

This would be such a wonderful addition to the community for residents and visitors and is a much needed project.
10 days ago

Agree

I agree this project is necessary for safety and aesthetics. It is also important to remember the high number of
bicycles that use this intersection regularly. Since the bikers use the street rather than the sidewalks, has adequate
lane width been included in the planning?
10 days ago

Agree

For many years Kechi has been the go to spot for that special unique gift or artisan craft. Improving the intersection
of Kechi Rd & Oliver would improve the overall walkability of the city. Funding for this large of a project would be
hard to accomplish with ONLY money from the taxpayers. Partnering with WAMPO to accomplish this project is a win
for everyone. I am excited about the designs concept for the artisan community and look forward to Kechi being the
art & collectable niche for generations to come.
10 days ago

Agree

Kechi is the gateway to Sedgwick County, enhancing this intersection will benefit commerce in Kechi and nearby
cities.
10 days ago

Agree

I am really encouraged by this grant for our city, Kechi. Sidewalks will assist in activities hosted by our town, and help
keep pedestrians safe and off the 61st street. This also will help local business along the 61st street area, increased
foot traffic to all businesses nestled along 61st, as well as Oliver. Please pick Kechi a great little town.
10 days ago

Agree

Shabree Smalley I like this!
10 days ago

Agree

Loretta Canlapan I love this idea!
10 days ago

Agree

Beth Pettibone I think it’s great. It’s just frustrating that the route to every post office local will be under
construction. Why is every road always under construction?
10 days ago

Agree

Maggie Ortiz Sidewalks would be amazing! We moved here a few years ago and walk with our kids and our dog all
over town almost every evening. Not only would it improve daily living, but it would also have a big impact for the
Kechi Fair.
11 days ago

Agree

CK Yes looks like a great idea ! I too enjoy yding the sidewalks we have to walk or bike in this town. And it will
upgrade the area for future business.
11 days ago

Agree

Gwen M. The city of Kechi needs improved parking and sidewalks, please! The current conditions are notorious and
potentially dangerous for pedestrians!
11 days ago

Agree

In addition to improving visually this would assist with day to day pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle flow.
11 days ago

Agree

CDT Will be great for all the businesses to have sidewalks to reach them easier. Excited as a resident to have better
sidewalks on all side for safer running/walking route. I grew up in Kechi and it's really exciting to hear a traffic light is
going in. That is going to be excellent! Look at us getting fancy big city things ;)
11 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

4/5

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
Kechi is such a wonderful place. My wife and I have lived in this small town for the past 3 years and are happy to call
this place home. We love to take our dog and 5 month old daughter on walks throughout the city. This grant would
do so much good not just for people are considering buying a home in kechi, but also for those who love this city so
much and enjoy being out and about visiting stores, going to the park and even just walking through the
neighborhoods. I hope kechi gets this grant and by doing so it will make kechi even a better place to call home.
11 days ago

Agree

Maddie I think that this will help bring more business and patrons to our area. It will also be easier and more
enjoyable to walk my dog in the area.
12 days ago

Agree

Robert Cillessen This project would provide for a much safer intersection in the heart of Kechi. The intersection
currently has line-of-sight issues and the addition of turn lanes and better sidewalks will help the City move towards
it's goal of having a safe, walkable Arts & Business District.
12 days ago

Agree

Charlotte Kechi needs this area improved greatly! Extra parking in addition to sidewalks. Please. Our growing
artistic community is a great place to call home....and visit!
12 days ago

Agree

We love our little town and this would greatly improve the look and safety! We have so many pedestrians and
bicyclists. I won't let my kids ride their bikes out of our neighborhood area because of the high traffic on Oliver and
kechi roads. This would give us that capability in a safer way!
12 days ago

Agree

Lee Please consider Kechi street project. Kechi is a great small town with artaisan atmosphere. This project will
improve the community and keep Kechi safe for all citizens. I run in th mornings, and have to use the street due to no
sidewalks on 61st street.
12 days ago

Agree

Direct access to the highways! Yay!
one month ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2965&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

5/5

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2974&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Park City
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

54

7

0

7

Please share any thoughts or comments on the Park City Project.
7 Comments
Kim This project is definitely needed! Excited for the bike/pedestrian improvements. I like to ride from Wichita to
Park City (and on to Newton) and this area is a big barrier. THANKS!
13 days ago

1 Agree

Gina Add the walking bridge.
23 days ago

1 Agree

Anita Saindon These are Badly needed upgrades...I’m glad they are being considered...I hope they get done!!!🌻
25 days ago

1 Agree

Bill Great idea! Thank you!
12 days ago

Agree

Sheryl Yes please create/expand a pedestrian and bike lane. It would be nice to be able to commute safely by
walking/biking to and from the residential areas to the businesses around 61st & Broadway.
13 days ago

Agree

Millions of pounds of freight move on this road every day. Up grade is past due.
24 days ago

Agree

B.R.

B.R.Will this upgrade help to make the street user-friendly for a future public transit system to utilize? The WTA
(Wichita Transit Authority) has claimed that storm drainage systems on many major streets they might like to use is
inadequate to support public transit busses. Employers today need employees to be able to use public transit to get
to Park City, Valley Center, etc. This future goal needs to be kept in mind for the local economy.
one month ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2974&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/1

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Sedgwick County - Pedestrian Bridge
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

352

73

0

81

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/7

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Please share any thoughts, comments or feedback you have related to the
Sedgwick County pedestrian bridge project
81 Comments
Tim Norton This project was scraped several years ago because of bids higher than estimates. Still a critical need for
safety, connectivity, bike/ped usage and growth on the westside of Haysville.
22 days ago

11 Agree

Paige Crum This footbridge is absolutely essential to the safety of our students walking to and from Campus High
School. With the current situation, people have to walk in the lanes of traffic to get across the bridge. As well, turning
south on Meridian Ave from 63rd street south has a very poor visual path. It is far to easy to not see walkers in the
road and cause injuries. We have sidewalks on both sides of the bridge, but our walkers have to step into the
roadway at the most dangerous point. Haysville and southwest Sedgwick County need this footbridge. It is a priority
one need for the safety of our students.
22 days ago

10 Agree

Mark Eastman Mark Eastman this is a crucial project for the safety of children going to and from Campus High on
foot from Haysville. Many people walk or ride bikes along those paths and are then forced to do so on the bridge in
order to cross the drainage ditch. This is hazardous and counter productive for those people/students who commute
in that way. Being able to safely commute across the ditch is important in order to connect Haysville to South Wichita.
It will extend significant benifits to those wanting to walk their dogs as well as bringing south wichita residents and
Haysville residents closer together.
23 days ago

7 Agree

K Baldridge This idea is my favorite! I live off of 63rd and I have always pictured having more walkways around
Haysville. People are becoming more active these days and it is a great appeal to others looking to move to the
community.
23 days ago

5 Agree

Lori Coykendall This project is an absolute necessity for the safety of residents, and most directly for our Campus
High students & faculty! The sidewalks that were installed along the east side of Meridian, were greatly needed.
However, they did not fix the problem of connecting the areas on each side of the bridge. Many people walk or ride
bikes along those paths and are then forced to do so on the bridge in order to cross the drainage ditch. This is
hazardous and counter productive for those people/students who commute in that way. Being able to safely
commute across the ditch is important in order to connect Haysville to Sourh Wichita.
23 days ago

5 Agree

Amy Driskill I currently live off Meridian between 63rd and 71st. I travel this road every single day more than once.
My husband and I teach at Ruth Clark, and I also coach cross country at Campus. This is an area that really needs a
safe place to run/walk/ride bikes. No one can safely use this bridge without fear of being run over. It would be perfect
for our cross country runners to run from school to the football fields/track instead of using a bus. I see kids
everyday walking to school or riding their bikes over the bridge daily. Too many adults and teens are constantly
staring at their phones instead of focusing on pedestrians. In my opinion this is a safety issue that needs attention.
Thank you for your consideration.
22 days ago

4 Agree

Debbie Coleman WAMPO, please consider supporting the pedistrian bridge on south Meridian over the Floodway.
Haysville School District Campus High School is located at the corner of south Meridian and 55th St. south - north of
Haysville. High school students living in Haysville sometimes walk to and from school. With no pedestrian bridge the
students have to walk alongside of vehicles traveling at least 40 mph (usually faster). For the safety of the students of
USD 261 please approve the funding of the pedistrian bridge project. Thank you.
22 days ago

4 Agree

Kristen Bedell This is a must. The current situation is extremely dangerous to pedestrians (many of which are
children on their way to and from school) who have to walk in the road to cross the bridge.
22 days ago

3 Agree

Cathy Y. Hurley This is a much needed project. There is no safe way to cross the floodway. Pedestrians run the risk
of injury by traffic. It would also encourage a new hike/bike path.
23 days ago

3 Agree

Something needs to be done about this bridge to ensure the safety of our students!! It needs to be done soon. It has
gone been this way for far too long.
22 days ago

2 Agree

Carolyn D Brown With the state becoming stricter with transportation reimbursement, more students are walking.
When there was construction on the bridge driving without pedestrians was very dangerous. For the safety of
pedestrians please funs this NOW
22 days ago

2 Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

2/7

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
This bridge is clearly old. It used to be a two lane bridge with pedestrians and cyclists having the capabilities to cross
it moderately safely. Ever since they changed it to a 4 lane bridge there has been no safe way for cyclists or
pedestrians to cross the bridge. With students going to Campus or anyone trying to walk or cycle to Haysville this
bridge is deadly mistake waiting to happen.
23 days ago

2 Agree

this needs to be done..safety issue
22 days ago

1 Agree

Tim Long A bridge of this sort should have been built a long time ago. This would connect a school back with its
town for all ages.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Brian Townson The need for a footbridge at this location has been a safety concern for years. Please make this
project a high priority for the safety of our community's youth along with drivers trying to avoid bicycles and
pedestrians while driving on the bridge.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Shirley mccutchen This has been needed for a long time. We have youth that have to walk around there, and very
unsafe, no lights. This needs to be addressed quickly, so our citizens can be safe!
22 days ago

1 Agree

It would clearly be safer if students had a side walk that helped them get to the school, instead of worrying about
getting hit by a car or walking through mud or ice after it rains or snows
22 days ago

1 Agree

This bridge/sidewalk is a much needed project for the safety of our children who only have this one option to get to
Campus HS. Children use this bridge twelve months of the year to get to and from school and school activities. They
bike and walk daily and it is not safe.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Audra and Ashlynn Key This is a MUST!!! Our children deserve a safe way to get to school at Campus. Our
residents deserve the connection to Wichita without cars. Crossing that bridge is very very dangerous on foot/bicycle.
22 days ago

1 Agree

This would be a great project to complete for the community. It was be very beneficial to be able to provide a safe
path for pedestrians to utilize the bridge. It would be great to connect the Haysville community to their High School.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Janet Parton This is essential for the safety of those who walk to and from Campus. Also for our students who run
cross country. Also for those who would like to have a longer biking trail.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Thomas Gallegos Undoubtedly something that should have been done years ago. I understand there is a cost to
everything but building this is a foregone conclusion. Safety of all in getting to the other side of the floodway without
having to walk in traffic.
22 days ago

1 Agree

This bridge is much needed for safe pedestrian and cycling connectivity between the 2 cities and Haysville and its
highschool.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Students use that bridge daily with no safe space to walk. There are longer routes from Haysville to Campus High, but
they require walking a mile to Seneca Street and there is also no safe place to walk along 55th street. With a school
sitting right at 55th and Meridan the county has done very little to provide a safe way for students to travel to and
from school.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Brian Schremmer This sidewalk would be crucial for the safety of those traveling to and from Campus High School
you go by there at some of the busiest times of the day and their students walking to and from school and there is no
sidewalk that goes across that bridge so this project would be very very beneficial for the safety of those traveling to
and from
22 days ago

1 Agree

Vicki Bazil Please make this the highest priority. This bridge is a much needed connection to Campus. Protect the
walkers!, joggers, students! We have waited a long time for this,, please make this happen- before a tragedy! Thank
you in adavace!
22 days ago

1 Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

3/7

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
Terri Gray This project is desperately needed to keep our students safe. We have kids walking to and from school
on a very dangerous road even during the summer for sports practice and other activities. It is a miracle none have
been hit by cars yet. The walking and bike path would also be a great asset to Haysville Healthy Innitiatives.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Lynette Brown This is a safety issue, not just infrastructure. Children cross over this bridge almost in the path of
traffic between Campus High School and Haysville. The pedestrian bridge is needed.
22 days ago

1 Agree

Lena Heflin This has been needed for years!!!
22 days ago

1 Agree

We do need to join Haysville and Wichita.
3 days ago

Agree

Don't know how many will use it.
3 days ago

Agree

Do not know how much use it would get. Have we EVER considered assisted living so our long term Haysvilians don't
have to move away from everyone and everything familiar!
3 days ago

Agree

Great idea
3 days ago

Agree

Needed with campus so close
3 days ago

Agree

Danielle Blount As a teacher and runner in the Haysville community, I strongly believe this project being funded
would provide numerous benefits to the community.
First off- there are many students that travel to Campus High School and choose to walk or bike to school. There is no
safe path for these students to take that does not require them to travel on the street for part of the time. A
pedestrian bridge would improve student safety and accessibility. Secondly, as a runner who advocates for healthy
habits in a community, I believe that a bridge would provide more routes for those being active in the community.
More routes for running, walking, and biking promotes better community health.
I feel this project would provide safety, more options for those that walk, run, and bike, and will connect the
community and should be funded.
6 days ago

Agree

Nicole Franken I think this project is absolutely necessary. While the Main Street bridge would also improve safety,
this bridge would allow a direct connection for students to get to school without walking in the road near cars going
+40 mph. Students coming from near Main St. and Grand Ave. would have to continue west anyways, while if only
Main St. had a bridge, students living near Meridian would have to go east to the bridge crossing and the back west
to get to Campus.
6 days ago

Agree

Gary O'neal Agree with Tim Norton.
7 days ago

Agree

Kim Awesome project to help improve connections between Wichita and Haysville! I love to ride and walk in this
area and would appreciate the safety improvements.
10 days ago

Agree

Not necessary at this time- no pedestrians This bridge was just recently reopened after being closed for over a
year. Now what? More closures to put a pedestrian bridge? I drive that stretch every day when school is open and
have not seen once bicycle in 2 years. NOT even a pedestrian. Totally unnecessary at this point. Kids drive up to
Campus. We don't even have bus service.
10 days ago

Agree

Boyd & Vivi-Ann Hiveley We think that this project is a good idea. That area needed some place safe for people to
cross over either walking or by bike. You also have kids from the high school that may walk between the school up
into Haysville and have to cross over some where that is safe.
It would also be nice to have street lights instead of the 4 way stop at the intersection of Meridian and 55th by the
high school too. Some people still haven't learned how a 4 way stop works!
11 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

4/7

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
This is a good idea for pedestrians to have a bridge because drivers are sometimes distracted by using their cell
phones and aren't concentrating on their driving.
14 days ago

Agree

Need a walkway for pedestrians and bicycles.
14 days ago

Agree

A safe bridge would be wonderful for walkers and bikers.
14 days ago

Agree

As a Haysville resident, Meridian street is used extensively. Pedestrians and bicycle users need a pedestrian bridge
and pathways with lighting. Safety is very much needed for everyone.
15 days ago

Agree

I'm for improving Haysville. Hopefully, our taxes won't be raised.
17 days ago

Agree

Carl Bazil I drive over this bridge every day, and all I'm seeing is its only getting more and more kids walking and
riding bikes daily. If you want to keep them safe there needs to be a pedestrian bridge for them.
17 days ago

Agree

It’s only common sense to provide a safe route for pedestrians
17 days ago

Agree

Cheryl This is something that is desperately needed. After watching students, walkers, runners and a broken down
bicycle rider try to get across safely, it was terrifying! The speed limit is 40 and the is nowhere for a pedestrian to go
when both lanes have cars in them. The high school running club, and just the students like to walk. I will not allow
my students because there is no safe way but in a vehicle to cross that area. I seen a elderly gentleman riding a bike
about a month ago, he fell on the bridge, cars going across not even slowing down. I called the police and turned to
try and block for him to get up and across. We had people blowing their horns and some other not nice jesters, I
wondered what would of happened if I had not turned around. This is a major road to several other towns. Our
community needs safe walking areas as we are growing.
18 days ago

Agree

Yes, please we need this!
18 days ago

Agree

I travel this bridge every morning during the school year. Numerous times I have seen students walking or riding
their bikes across it. This simply isn't safe.
18 days ago

Agree

Yes! we need this bridge it would be so much safer for our high school students who walk to and from school.
18 days ago

Agree

Kristen McDaniel This project is crucial in protecting pedestrians going across this bridge. This project is absolutely
essential in the safety of citizens walking and/or riding bikes in this area. Haysville would benefit highly from this
project.
18 days ago

Agree

Dan Benner Please fund this project that should have been done years ago. It is a clear safety issue, and also in
keeping with the long range WAMPO connectivity plans.
18 days ago

Agree

Ben Woodworth It really needs to be done before someone (probably a student) gets hurt. It is a safety concern. I
have seen too many 'close calls' along that bridge of someone getting hit by a passing vehicle. In addition, it will
provide everyone, who doesn't have a vehicle and can't make bus times due to activities, an alternative solution by
SAFELY riding or walking to Campus High School.
19 days ago

Agree

Holly Easterby Campus High school does not have a safe route for students to bike or walk to school because of
this road not having a pedestrian bridge. It is a HUGE concern to me and the community members to establish safe
paths for our students, and the community. Please consider helping Haysville to connect to Wichita over the
floodway off of Meridian for SAFETY.
19 days ago

Agree

Add the bridge please
20 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

5/7

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
Rhonda Miller Please make this project a reality! This is so needed.
20 days ago

Agree

This should have been done years ago! This is a big need for safety.
20 days ago

Agree

Tricia Robello As a parent and a former Campus High School Grad 1985, I remember running to the track by the
middle school from Campus. It was two lane and we had nice road shoulders to run on when cars were coming, that
included the bridge where there was not a traffic lane like there is now. Also living in Timberlane they would not bus
us because we were to close to the school (less than 2 ½ miles). I do believe more kids would walk, run or ride
bicycles if they felt safe and their parents felt safe for them. This is a must do!
20 days ago

Agree

Let’s not wait for an accident to happen before this is addressed. Please add this pedestrian bridge. It is truly needed.
20 days ago

Agree

I think this is a great idea.
20 days ago

Agree

Too many children try to walk or ride to campus and it's just not safe for them to share the bridge. Does someone
have to die for this to be a real life issue?
20 days ago

Agree

Teresa Edwards A pedestrian bridge is definitely needed to keep our kids and everyone else safe. It's a major need
with the traffic that runs daily on this road and the amount of space there currently is.
20 days ago

Agree

Yes Haysville needs this. This is the most direct root to the High School.
20 days ago

Agree

Michele Bazil Needs to happen! Campus is right down the street!
20 days ago

Agree

Sheryl Weldon YES PLEASE!! We need this to happen to keep the kids safe.
20 days ago

Agree

It would be so beneficial for so many. As mine ran Cross Country for a couple years it would have been nice to have
them to be able to run safe on all of their team runs. And I've seen so many more walking and it's not safe.
21 days ago

Agree

Carolyn D Brown One year ago today (7-12) I experienced the worse day of my life. While returning from
volunteering, I drove through Park Estates Mobile Home Park on Kay (a through street). 3 girls on bike ages 8,10 and
2 pulled out into the road and collided with my car. The 8 year old was standing on the pegs was thrown off and
critically hurt. The insurance company found NO Negligence on my part. To this day I have panic attacks when I see
pedestrians or people on bikes. I could not eat for 4 days and cried for a week straight. I NEVER WANT ANY DRIVER to
go through that experience. I have attempted to imagine what the parents went through.. I imagined it was worse for
them than me. I remember seeing the girl lying unconscious and repeated to myself "Just keep breathing" and
continued to watch for the rise and fall of her chest. I cannot fathom what the 10 yr old driving the bike has
experience emotionally. Safety of our citizens and drivers is IMPERATIVE. I Ure you to approve this project for the
safety of Campus students, and all citizens using this route.
21 days ago

Agree

This project is badly needed!
21 days ago

Agree

I would encourage anyone that thinks this is not an immediate necessity to load up your most precious cargo beloved pets, kids, family members - and go for a lovely walk together during the school year from 3:30-5:00 across
the bridge in question. If that doesn't help you see the need for this then perhaps camp out all day near the bridge
and have your precious cargo walk repeatedly back and forth and watch the cars traveling at 40 MPH so close to
them that you feel the anxiety and horror that those of us that deal with this daily are faced with. This is not rocket
science people. There is LITERALLY NOT ONE safe way for a kid to walk from Campus to Haysville, NOT ONE!!! I
sincerely hope someone does something before we have a tragedy on our hands and anyone who decided that this
was not a priority will have to live with the knowledge that they had the power to prevent it and didn't.
21 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

6/7

8/3/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…
JA Due to the high traffic that passes through this area for commuters and Campus High School students, and poor
visibility at the 63rd Street intersection, traveling over this bridge on foot or bicycle is exceptionally dangerous. It is
terrifying to witness a pedestrian on the bridge any time of day due to cars zooming past in both directions, not
always moving entirely out of the lane to pass. Adding a walkway to this bridge is critical before there is a deadly
pedestrian accident.
21 days ago

Agree

Lacey Shoeneman We really need the bridge to have a walking area for the safety of our kids! Many don’t yet drive
and have working parents and have to walk daily home from after school activities! It’s not safe and taking an
alternate route takes much longer!
22 days ago

Agree

This is a way past due project that needs to happen. With the high school being on the north side of the bridge, a lot
of students live to the south of the bridge. I have witnessed kids (and even adults) try to walk/bike across it and it is
extremely unsafe, especially when it is dark. I feel it is CRUCIAL to make this a priority.. it is a major safety concern
and needs to be dealt with before someone gets hurt!!
22 days ago

Agree

Kim Cooley This pedestrian bridge is needed for the safety of our children that walk and bicycle to Campus HS
22 days ago

Agree

This is important for our students. I see students walking home after practice on the bridge with no path.
22 days ago

Agree

Dawn We need a safe way for the children who have to walk to and from campus. Currently they have to share the
road with vehicles and that is dangerous. A sidewalk would be ideal.
22 days ago

Agree

Loretta Scott This is such a necessary project! Right now there is no safe path from Haysville proper to Campus
High School. Walking or riding a bike is extremely dangerous!
22 days ago

Agree

Sean Girard Kids need a safe way to walk and ride bikes to Campus high school. This is very important for the kids
of Haysville.
22 days ago

Agree

TJ Blount Do this. It is very much needed. Without it those walking or biking run the risk of being hit.
22 days ago

Agree

Dan Benner Please give highest consideration to the construction of the pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the
floodway on south Meridian. In addition to addressing the hazardous conditions noted here by others, the addition
of the footbridge would support the future transportation and connectivity goals of the surrounding area, not just
Haysville. The bridge as it is now is extremely dangerous for anyone walking or biking, and with Campus High school
immediately to the north, it is practically impossible for students in Haysville who would like to walk or bike to school
safely.
22 days ago

Agree

Something needs to be done about this bridge to ensure the safety of our students. Something needs to be done
soon. It has been this way far too long.
22 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2964&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

7/7

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2971&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Valley Center - Meridian
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

30

1

0

1

Please share any thoughts or comments on the Valley Center project
1 Comment
B.R. Will this upgrade help to make the street user-friendly for a future public transit system to utilize? The WTA
(Wichita Transit Authority) has claimed that storm drainage systems on many major streets they might like to use is
inadequate to support public transit busses.
one month ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2971&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/1

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2966&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Wichita - Pawnee
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

27

2

0

2

Please share any thoughts, comments or feedback you have related to the City of
Wichita Pawnee project
2 Comments
Clayton This stretch of road has low density housing and relatively low traffic. This seems like a project to
accommodating speculative housing developments. Before I would approve of this, I would like to see a study done
to demonstrate how the homes and businesses in the 1 mile area surrounding the project would be able to pay for
construction and maintenance costs of road expansion within a 30 year life span.
The main problem I see with the existing stretch of road is that is a car-only design, with a priority of making the cars
move as fast as possible. It is not safe for cyclists or pedestrians, because it was never designed for them.
I feel it would be better to correct the original design by narrowing up the lanes and use the remaining existing
asphalt as a safety shoulder. Then add something to accommodate cyclists and pedestrians. And to do so in a way
that the existing tax base using the road could reasonably expect to pay for themselves.
7 days ago

Agree

Kim These projects are extremely important for improving safety! I see students walking and riding their bikes to
and from school, dodging fast traffic. Improvements need to help slow down traffic, not just move it through the
area. Traffic is moving way too fast!
13 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2966&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/1

8/6/2018

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2970&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCom…

Wichita Transit Vehicles
Digital Public Input Results
VIEWS

PARTICIPANTS

RESPONSES

COMMENTS

28

2

0

2

Please share any thoughts, comments or feedback you have related to the Wichita
Transit project
2 Comments
Sharon Ailslieger I think this a great idea. Wichita's rapid transit system is minimal--at best. Anything that can be
done to improve it is going in the right direction. As the outgoing Co-President of the League of Women Voters
Wichita-Metro, i have spoken in favor of a stronger and more efficient bus system in Wichita. Studies show that a
strong transportation system is an economical plus for a community. There needs to be a push for a dedicated
financial source of funding for the Wichita bus system or it is going to die!!
one month ago

2 Agree

I would support this but what I would support more is the expansion of services to outlying areas, better service
hours, and accessibility. Transportation is a big barrier to people looking to better themselves.
25 days ago

Agree

https://publicinput.com/Reporting/PrintWindow?custId=1149&projId=2970&showEngagementSummary=true&showComments=true&isCompact=false&…

1/1

Appendix D: Project Scoring

Adopted October 2018

Transportation Improvement Program | FFY 2019 – 2022

WAMPO Funding Project Selection Criteria
2018 WAMPO Funding Award Cycle
WAMPO TPB Approved, 4/10/18

Tier 1 -- Consistency with the MOVE 2040 Investment Strategy
The MOVE 2040 Investment Strategy is:
“Preserve and maintain the current system and conditions. This will include functionality of
infrastructure, stabilization of transit service and fleet condition, use of technology to reduce
delays and improve safety, and compliance with federal, state, and local laws.”
As part of this strategy, three transportation components were selected to best identify the
primary focus areas:




Maintain good condition of current highways, roads, and streets. Improvements should
address both the condition and the purpose of the infrastructure.
Stabilize transit service in the near term; increase transit service in the mid-term time band
by focusing on improving service in the urban core, and in the long term expand service to
provide for service between urban centers.
Address air quality, bottlenecks, choice, connectivity, functionality, and user safety.1

Selection Criteria Rating
Excellent – The project is entirely dedicated to preserving and maintaining condition and
functionality, stabilizing transit service, addressing system reliability, expanding mode choices,
and/or safety.
Good – Preserving and maintaining condition and functionality, stabilizing transit service,
addressing system reliability, expanding mode choices, and/or safety represent a substantial
portion of the project.
Acceptable – The project includes elements preserving and maintaining condition and
functionality, stabilizing transit service, addressing system reliability, expanding mode choices,
and/or safety.
Unacceptable – The project does not address preserving and maintaining condition and
functionality, stabilizing transit service, addressing system reliability, expanding mode choices,
and/or safety.

1

Ordered alphabetically.

Page 1 of 6

Tier II - Regional Significance
The Transportation Policy Body adopted the following definition of Regional Significance in
August 2016:
Road Facilities
A project on a road which is functionally classified as a major collector or higher is presumed to
be regionally significant. This may also include establishment or use of “single purpose buckets”
for some project types, e.g. safety, ITS, special programs.
A minor collector may be regionally significant if it serves a major activity center (such as a large
concentration of employment, retail, a large sports facility, a higher education institution or a
transportation terminal). A project on a minor collector serving major activity centers is presumed
to be regionally significant.
A project on a minor collector that does not serve a major activity center is presumed not to be
regionally significant.
A project to build a new road or which upgrades a road to the point where it would be in a
higher functional classification should be evaluated using the functional classification the project
will have when completed.
Maintenance activities, up to and including 2” mill and overlay, are not considered to be
regionally significant, even if they are on a regionally significant roadway.
Bridge projects on regionally significant roads are considered regionally significant.
Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities
A project that includes a minimum of a 10’ off-street path or a dedicated on-street bicycle facility
that has demonstrated impacts on the region’s economic activity (access to employment centers,
higher education institution, entertainment or retail activity hubs, or government service centers),
population concentrations and connectivity between communities will be presumed to be
regionally significant.
Freight/Cargo/Goods Movement Facilities
Projects that would not otherwise meet the definition of regional significance may be regionally
significant if they provide significant benefits to freight movement, as described below:
As noted in a previous section, a minor collector may be regionally significant if it serves a major
activity center. Freight-related major activity centers include goods production and
collection/distribution facilities (e.g. Spirit plant, Cargill facility, grain elevator, warehousing,
aviation operation facility or intermodal freight facility). Minor collectors that serve such facilities
are presumed to be regionally significant.
In addition, projects to improve freight movement by doing any of the following would be
presumed to be regionally significant:



Build or upgrade rail access to a freight-related major activity center.
Improve safety at a grade crossing on a regionally significant road.
Page 2 of 6






Provide grade separation along a major rail line in order to improve the flow of freight
traffic on that rail line.
Build or upgrade an intermodal freight facility.
Build or upgrade a road to provide operational improvements that result in greater
system operational velocity or resiliency for freight operations.
Introduce intelligent/smart technology within freight corridors or improve or upgrade
existing technology.

Transit
A project that supports, expands, or enhances overall existing transit services or introduces new
service(s) within the WAMPO region is presumed to be regionally significant.
Facility/Terminal
A project is presumed to be regionally significant if it constructs, rehabilitates or replaces existing
structures; is used for intercity transportation of goods or people; is an intermodal transfer
facility; or supports expansion of transportation services.
Selection Criteria Rating
Excellent – The project meets the definition of regional significance and is of major importance to
the transportation system of the WAMPO region as a whole.
Good – The project meets the definition of regional significance and is of significant importance
to the transportation system of the WAMPO region as a whole or is of major importance to a
significant subset of the WAMPO region.
Acceptable – The project meets the definition of regional significance.
Unacceptable – The project does not meet the definition of regional significance.

Tier III – MOVE 2040 Goals
Choice and connectivity
Excellent – The project provides a major increase in the population within 1 mile of a bicycle
facility or 1/4 mile of a transit line or fills a major gap in the bicycle or pedestrian network.
Good – The project provides a significant increase in the population within 1 mile of a bicycle
facility or 1/4 mile of a transit line or fills a gap in the bicycle or pedestrian network.
Acceptable – The project includes bicycle, pedestrian, or transit features.
Unacceptable – The project substantially diminishes the extent or connectivity of the transit,
bicycle, or pedestrian networks.
Not applicable – The project does not include any change in transit service, bicycle, or pedestrian
features.

Page 3 of 6

Economic vitality and Quality of Place*
*Note: MOVE 2040 goal refers to “Quality of Life;” the wording change is not meant to deviate
from the original intent. .
Excellent – The project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection to a
major employment center, health care facility, or school to the roadway, transit, bicycle, or
pedestrian network.
Good – The project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection to a
significant employment center, health care facility, or school to the roadway, transit, bicycle, or
pedestrian network.
Acceptable – The project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection to an
employment center or a freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility to the roadway,
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian network.
Unacceptable – The project disconnects or substantially diminishes the quality of the connection to
a significant employment center, health care facility, or school to the roadway, transit, bicycle, or
pedestrian network.
Not applicable – The project does not affect connectivity to or the quality of the connection to an
employment center, health care facility, or school to the roadway, transit, bicycle, or pedestrian
network.

Freight movement
Excellent – The project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection to a
major freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility or makes a major improvement to
the condition or suitability for freight traffic on the WAMPO Multimodal Freight Network (see the
WAMPO Freight Plan, page 19).
Good – The project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection to a
significant freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer or makes a significant improvement to
the condition or suitability for freight traffic on the WAMPO Multimodal Freight Network.
Acceptable – The project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection to a
freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility or makes an improvement to the condition
or suitability for freight traffic on the WAMPO Multimodal Freight Network.
Unacceptable – The project disconnects or substantially diminishes the quality of the connection to
a major or significant freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility or substantially
diminishes the condition or suitability for freight traffic on the WAMPO Multimodal Freight
Network.
Not applicable – The project does not affect connectivity to or the quality of the connection to a
freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility and is not on the WAMPO freight
network.

Infrastructure condition
For highway/road projects:
Excellent – The project will bring an existing roadway which is in poor condition and does not
meet current design standards up to good condition and into compliance with modern standards.
Page 4 of 6

Good – The project will bring an existing roadway which is in poor condition or does not meet
current design standards up to good condition or into compliance with modern standards.
Acceptable – The project will prevent an existing roadway which is in fair condition from
deteriorating into poor condition.
Not applicable – The project does not involve an existing roadway or it does not affect the
condition or design standards of that roadway.
For bridge projects:
Excellent – The project will repair or replace an existing bridge which is structurally deficient (per
the National Bridge Inventory).
Good – The project will repair or replace an existing bridge which is functionally obsolete (per
the NBI).
Acceptable – The project will prevent an existing bridge in danger of deteriorating to the point
where it is structurally deficient or it will repair or replace the deck of a bridge with a deck in
poor condition.
Not applicable – The project does not involve an existing bridge or it does not affect the
condition or functionality of the bridge.
For bus replacement projects:
Excellent – The project will replace a bus which will be at least three years beyond its useful life
as defined by the FTA at the time of replacement and is required for the operation of the existing
transit route network.
Good – The project will replace a bus which will be at least 18 months beyond its useful life as
defined by the FTA at the time of replacement and is required for the operation of the existing
transit route network.
Acceptable – The project will replace a bus which will exceed its useful life as defined by the FTA
at the time of replacement and is required for the operation of the existing transit route network.
Unacceptable – The project will replace a bus which will not yet have exceed its useful life as
defined by the FTA at the time of replacement or is not required for the operation of the existing
transit route network.
Not applicable – The project is intended to increase the bus fleet to allow for expanded service
(see Choice and connectivity and Quality of life).
For other projects:
Not applicable – This is not a road, bridge, or bus replacement project.

Safety
Excellent – The project incorporates safety improvements at a location that has been the site of a
significant number of fatality or serious injury crashes.
Good – The project incorporates safety improvements at a location that has been the site of a
significant number of fatality or serious injury crashes.
Page 5 of 6

Acceptable – The project incorporates safety improvements.
Unacceptable – The project would increase the risk of fatality or serious injury crashes.
Not applicable – The project does not include any safety improvements.

System reliability and bottlenecks
Excellent – The project is completely dedicated to increasing system reliability through
appropriate design or technological features.
Good – Design or technological features intended to increase system reliability represent a
significant portion of the project.
Acceptable – The project incorporates design or technological features intended to increase
system reliability.
Unacceptable – The project will result in a substantial decrease in system reliability.
Not applicable – The project has no features that will affect system reliability.

Tier IV – Addressing Trends
How does this project help address one or more of the trends following that the Wichita metro
area will face in the coming years?
 Aging population
 Increasing proportion of millennials and Generation Z
 Low population growth
 More single person and childless households
 Out-migration of people ages, 18 - 54
Selection Criteria Rating
Excellent – The project will make a significant impact on one or more of the listed trends.
Good – The project will help address one or more of the listed trends.
Acceptable – The project has some elements that address one or more of the listed trends.
Not Applicable – The project does not address any of the listed trends.

Page 6 of 6

WAMPO Funding Grading Rubric
Tier III – MOVE 2040 Goals

2018 WAMPO Funding Award Cycle
WAMPO TPB Approved, 4/10/18
Note: If the project meets the criteria for two different positive ratings (Excellent, Good,
Acceptable) under the same project selection criteria, give it the higher of the two ratings. If the
project meets the criteria for both, one (or more) of the positive ratings and the Unacceptable
rating for the same project selection criteria, rate it as Unacceptable. If the project meets the
criteria for both Not Applicable and another rating for the same project selection criteria, give it
the other rating.
Choice and connectivity
For transit projects that change the fixed route transit network:
If the project increases the percentage of the population within 1/4 mile of a transit line by 1%
or more, rate it as Excellent.
If the project increases the percentage of the population within 1/4 mile of a transit line by 0.5%
- 1%, rate it as Good.
If the project includes transit features, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project decreases the percentage of the population within 1/4 mile of a transit line by
0.5% or greater, rate it as Unacceptable.
For projects with bike/ped elements:
If the project increases the percentage of the population within 1 mile of a bicycle facility by 1%
or more, rate it as Excellent.
If the project connects two separate portions of the bicycle network that were previously
unconnected (and at least 2 miles long), rate it as Excellent.
If the project adds a new connection to the bicycle network that eliminates a detour of at 3 or
more miles, rate it as Excellent.
If the project increases the percentage of the population within 1 mile of a bicycle facility by
0.5% - 1%, rate it as Good.
If the project connects two separate portions of the bicycle network that were previously
unconnected (and at least 0.5 miles long), rate it as Good.
If the project adds a new connection to the bicycle network that eliminates a detour of at 1 mile
or more, rate it as Good.

If the project includes bicycle or pedestrian features, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project decreases the percentage of the population within 1 mile of a bicycle facility line by
0.5% or greater, rate it as Unacceptable.
For projects which do not change the fixed route transit network or have any bike/ped elements:
Rate it as Not Applicable.
Economic vitality and Quality of Life
If the project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection via the road,
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian network to an employment center of 750 or more employees, a
listed hospital, or a school with more than 700 students, rate it as Excellent.
If the project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection via the road,
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian network to a health care facility, an employment center of 350 or
more employees, or a school with more than 350 students, rate it as Good.
If the project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection via the road,
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian network to an employment center of 50 or more employees, or a
school with more than 50 students, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project disconnects or substantially diminishes the quality of the connection via the road,
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian network to an employment center of 350 or more employees, or a
school with more than 350 students, rate it as Unacceptable.
If the project does not affect the connectivity or quality of connection via the road, transit, bicycle,
or pedestrian network to an employment center, rate it as Not Applicable
Freight Movement
If the project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection via the road
network to a freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility with traffic of 25 or more
truckloads per day, rate it as Excellent.
If the project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection via the road
network to a freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility with traffic of 10 or more
truckloads per day, rate it as Good.
If the project provides connectivity to or enhances the quality of the connection via the road
network to a freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility rate it as Acceptable.
If the project provides disconnects or reduces the quality of the connection via the road network to
a freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility rate it as Unacceptable.
If the project does not affect the connectivity or quality of the connection via the road network to
a freight shipper, receiver, or intermodal transfer facility with traffic of 25 or more truckloads per
day, rate it Not Applicable.
If the project is on the WAMPO freight network and it eliminates a condition that would make it
very difficult or impossible for a freight truck to use the facility, rate it as Excellent.

If the project is on the WAMPO freight network and the existing roadway is in poor condition and
the project would bring the road up to good condition rate it as Excellent.
If the project is on the WAMPO freight network and it eliminates a condition that would make it
difficult for a freight truck to use the facility, rate it as Good.
If the project is on the WAMPO freight network and that roadway is in fair condition and it will
prevent the roadway from deteriorating into poor condition, rate it as Good.
If the project is on the WAMPO freight network and it makes it easier for a freight truck to use
the facility, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project is on the WAMPO freight network and implementing the project would make it
difficult for a freight truck to use the facility, rate it as Unacceptable.
If the project does not include any freight components, rate it as Not Applicable.
Infrastructure Condition
For Highway Projects:
If the project is on an existing roadway and that roadway is in poor condition and it does not
meet current design standards and the project would bring the road up to good condition and
into compliance with modern standards, rate it as Excellent.
If the project is on an existing roadway and that roadway is in poor and the project would bring
the road up to good condition, rate it as Good.
If the project is on an existing roadway and it does not meet current design standards and the
project would bring into compliance with modern standards, rate it as Good.
If the project is on an existing roadway and that roadway is in fair condition and it will prevent
the roadway from deteriorating into poor condition, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project does not involve an existing roadway or it does not affect the condition or design
standards of that roadway, rate it as Not Applicable.
For Bridge Projects:
If the project will repair or replace an existing bridge which is structurally deficient, rate it as
Excellent.
If the project will repair or replace an existing bridge which is functionally obsolete, rate it as
Good.
If the project will prevent an existing bridge in danger of deteriorating to the point where it is
structurally deficient, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project will repair or replace the deck of a bridge where the deck is in poor condition, rate
it as Acceptable.
If the project does not involve an existing bridge or it does not affect the condition or functionality
of the bridge, rate it as Not Applicable.

For Bus Replacement Projects:
If the project will replace a bus required to operate the existing transit route network and that
bus will be at least three years beyond its useful life when it is replaced, rate it as Excellent.
If the project will replace a bus required to operate the existing transit route network and that
bus will be at least 18 months beyond its useful life when it is replaced, rate it as Good.
If the project will replace a bus required to operate the existing transit route network and that
bus will be beyond its useful life when it is replaced, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project will replace a bus required to operate the existing transit route network and that
bus will not be beyond its useful life when it is replaced, rate it as Unacceptable.
If the project does not involve replacing an existing bus or that bus is not required to operate the
existing transit route network, rate it as Not Applicable.
For other projects:
If this is not a road, bridge, or bus replacement project, rate it as Not Applicable.
Safety
For Road Projects
If the project incorporates meaningful safety improvements and is at a location with 30 or more
accidents from 2008 to 2014, rate it as Excellent.
If the project incorporates meaningful safety improvements and is at a location with 10 or more
accidents from 2008 to 2014, rate it as Good.
If the project incorporates meaningful safety improvements, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project would increase the risk of fatality or serious injury crashes, rate it as Unacceptable.
If the project does not include any safety improvements, rate it as Not Applicable.
For Bike/Ped Projects
If the project incorporates meaningful safety improvements and is at a location with 1 or more
bike/ped fatalities or serious injuries from 2008 to 2016, rate it as Excellent.
If the project incorporates meaningful safety improvements and is at a location with 10 or
bike/ped more accidents from 2008 to 2014, rate it as Good.
If the project incorporates meaningful safety improvements, rate it as Acceptable.
If the project would increase the risk of fatality or serious injury crashes, rate it as Unacceptable.
If the project does not include any safety improvements, rate it as Not Applicable.
For all projects
If a project begins or ends at an intersection, but does not incorporate any meaningful safety
improvements to that intersection, crashes at the intersection will not be considered in the analysis.

System Reliability and Bottlenecks
If the project is solely devoted to ITS or other design features intended to increase travel time
reliability, rate it as Excellent.
If at least 50% of the project budget is devoted to ITS or other design features intended to
increase travel time reliability, rate it as Good.
If the project includes ITS or other design features intended to increase travel time reliability, rate
it as Acceptable.
If the project would decrease travel time reliability, rate it as Unacceptable.
If the project has no features that would affect system reliability, rate it as Not Applicable.