60 Day Notice

3235-0574 60 Day Notice.pdf

Rule 3a-8 under the Investment Company Act; Certain Research and Development Companies

60 Day Notice

OMB: 3235-0574

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
55562

Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 8, 2020 / Notices

Exchange Commission, c/o Cynthia
Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549, or send an email to: PRA_
[email protected].
Dated: September 1, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–19722 Filed 9–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–516; OMB Control No.
3235–0574]

Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

Extension: Rule 3a–8

Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit the existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
17 CFR 270.3a–8 (rule 3a–8 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. 80a) (the ‘‘Act’’)), serves as a
nonexclusive safe harbor from
investment company status for certain
research and development companies
(‘‘R&D companies’’).
The rule requires that the board of
directors of an R&D company seeking to
rely on the safe harbor adopt an
appropriate resolution evidencing that
the company is primarily engaged in a
non-investment business and record
that resolution contemporaneously in its
minute books or comparable
documents.1 An R&D company seeking
to rely on the safe harbor must retain
these records only as long as such
records must be maintained in
accordance with state law.
Rule 3a–8 contains an additional
requirement that is also a collection of
information within the meaning of the
PRA. The board of directors of a
company that relies on the safe harbor
under rule 3a–8 must adopt a written
policy with respect to the company’s
capital preservation investments. We
expect that the board of directors will
base its decision to adopt the resolution
1 Rule

3a–8(a)(6) (17 CFR 270.3a–8(6)).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:32 Sep 04, 2020

Jkt 250001

discussed above, in part, on investment
guidelines that the company will follow
to ensure its investment portfolio is in
compliance with the rule’s
requirements.
The collection of information
imposed by rule 3a–8 is voluntary
because the rule is an exemptive safe
harbor, and therefore, R&D companies
may choose whether or not to rely on it.
The purposes of the information
collection requirements in rule 3a–8 are
to ensure that: (i) The board of directors
of an R&D company is involved in
determining whether the company
should be considered an investment
company and subject to regulation
under the Act, and (ii) adequate records
are available for Commission review, if
necessary. Rule 3a–8 would not require
the reporting of any information or the
filing of any documents with the
Commission.
Commission staff estimates that there
is no annual recordkeeping burden
associated with the rule’s requirements.
Nevertheless, the Commission requests
authorization to maintain an inventory
of one burden hour for administrative
purposes.
Commission staff estimates that
approximately 29,999 R&D companies
may take advantage of rule 3a–8.2 Given
that the board resolutions and
investment guidelines will generally
need to be adopted only once (unless
relevant circumstances change),3 the
Commission believes that all the R&D
companies that existed prior to the
adoption of rule 3a–8 adopted their
board resolutions and established
written investment guidelines in 2003
when the rule was adopted. We expect
that R&D companies formed subsequent
to the adoption of rule 3a–8 would
adopt the board resolution and
investment guidelines simultaneously
with their formation documents in the
ordinary course of business.4 Therefore,
we estimate that rule 3a–8 does not
impose additional burdens.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
2 See National Science Foundation, National
Center for Science and Engineering Statistics,
Business R&D and Innovation Survey: 2016 (results
published May 13, 2019).
3 In the event of changed circumstances, the
Commission believes that the board resolution and
investment guidelines will be amended and
recorded in the ordinary course of business and
would not create additional time burdens.
4 In order for these companies to raise sufficient
capital to fund their product development stage,
Commission staff believes that they will need to
present potential investors with investment
guidelines. Investors generally want to be assured
that the company’s funds are invested consistent
with the goals of capital preservation and liquidity.

PO 00000

Frm 00155

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Cynthia
Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549; or send an email to: PRA_
[email protected].
Dated: September 1, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–19723 Filed 9–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89723; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2020–64]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Modify
Rules 971.1NY and 971.2NY
September 1, 2020.

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on August
19, 2020, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify
Rules 971.1NY and 971.2NY regarding
its Customer Best Execution (‘‘CUBE’’)
auction to provide optional all-or-none
functionality for larger-sized orders. The
proposed rule change is available on the
1 15

U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15

E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM

08SEN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2020-09-07
File Created2020-09-07

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy