Table 1a: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Small Foundries – NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundry Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ) (Proposed Amendments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries taken for NAICS 331500: Foundries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2018 |
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_331500.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.33 |
123.71 |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burden item |
(A) Person hours per occurrence |
(B) No. of occurrences per respondent per year |
(C) Person hours per respondent per year (C=AxB) |
(D) Respondents per year a |
(E) Technical person- hours per year (E=CxD) |
(F) Management person hours per year (Ex0.05) |
(G) Clerical person hours per year (Ex0.1) |
(H) Total Cost per year b |
ERG comment on changes |
RTI Comment |
|
Occupation Code |
Title |
Mean Hourly Rate |
Estimated Total Pay with Benefits |
1. Applications |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't use full compensation rates and then add burden. Either use straight rates and add burden or use full compensation rates. |
|
11-0000 |
Mgmt Occup |
58.91 |
123.71 |
2. Surveys and Studies |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-2081 |
Envir Engr |
38.73 |
81.33 |
3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43-0000 |
Office and Admin Support |
20.38 |
42.8 |
4. Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirementsa |
0.5 |
1 |
0.5 |
315 |
158 |
7.9 |
15.8 |
$14,458 |
added respondent burden and referenced footnote a, but decreased this burden from 4 to 1 hr for ongoing burden |
Estimate only 0.5 hours for small foundries - not much there for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
B. Required activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repeat performance tests for opacity |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable for large foundries only. |
|
|
|
|
|
Scrap specificationsc |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly emission averaging calculation |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do not see rolling average in rule, just emission averaging; monthly basis |
Applicable for large foundries only. |
|
|
|
|
|
No methanol binder formulation d |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Create information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gather existing information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Write report |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial notification of applicabilityc |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of compliance statusc |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of construction/reconstructionc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of actual startupc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of foundry reclassificatione |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Request for compliance extensionc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of repeat performance test |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this was the line item for footnote E which talks about opacity and lack of need for separate notification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site specific test plan |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of performance evaluation |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality assurance plan for CEMS/COMS |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NESHAP waiver requestc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan/reports |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new footnote H since we did not assume any small sources would have to write this report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of performance test (through CEDRI using ERT) c |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiannual compliance reports |
4 |
2 |
8 |
315 |
2520 |
126 |
252 |
$231,325 |
new footnote H since we did not assume any small sources would have to write this report |
Deleted deviations report - just do semiannual report. Adding here. |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
3,079 |
$245,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirements |
See 4A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Plan activitiesf |
2 |
1 |
2 |
105 |
210 |
11 |
21 |
$19,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Implement activities f |
2 |
1 |
2 |
105 |
210 |
11 |
21 |
$19,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Develop record system f |
1 |
1 |
1 |
105 |
105 |
5 |
11 |
$9,639 |
added footnote g since this is one-time |
Assigning these for initial cost of rule revisions |
|
|
|
|
|
E. Time to enter informationg |
0.1 |
52 |
5.2 |
315 |
1,638.0 |
81.90 |
163.80 |
$150,361.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to transmit or disclose information |
0.25 |
2 |
0.5 |
315 |
158 |
7.88 |
15.75 |
$14,457.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time to adjust existing ways f |
1 |
1 |
1 |
105 |
105 |
5 |
11 |
$9,639 |
|
Assigning these for initial cost of rule revisions |
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to train personnel f |
2 |
1 |
2 |
105 |
210 |
10.5 |
21.0 |
$19,277 |
added training time |
Assigning these for initial cost of rule revisions |
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time for audits |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
3,031 |
$241,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)h |
|
|
|
|
6,110 |
$488,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded)h |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL (rounded)h |
|
|
|
|
6,110 |
$488,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a This table is specific to area source foundries classified as small iron and steel foundries. A total of 315 of the 390 area source foundries are small foundries and 75 are large foundries. No new area source foundries are projected during the 3-year term of this ICR. We assume all respondents will have to spend time familiarizing themselves with regulatory requirements each year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b This ICR uses the following labor rates from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2018, mean labor rates for Foundries (NAICS 331500) for Management Occupations (11-0000), Environmental Engineer (17-2081) and Office and Administrative Support (43-0000) . The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. Fully burdened hourly rates are: $123.71 for management; $81.33 for technical; and $42.80 for clerical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c One-time only costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d We have assumed that no burden would be incurred for this requirement because all small area source foundries are already meeting the no methanol requirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e We have assumed that no small foundries will be reclassified as large foundries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f We have assumed that all small foundries would review record keeping system, adjust methods and train employees during the first year of the rule amendments. Subsequent years, these activities would not be needed. Therefore, the average number of respondents per year is (315+0+0)/3 = 105. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g We have assumed that small foundries must record information to demonstrate compliance with pollution prevention management practices for metallic scrap and binder formulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Small foundries are not assumed to incur any capital or O&M costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1b: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Large Foundries – NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundry Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ) (Proposed Amendments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries taken for NAICS 331500: Foundries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2018 |
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_331500.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.33 |
123.71 |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burden item |
(A) Person hours per occurrence |
(B) No. of occurrences per respondent per year |
(C) Person hours per respondent per year (C=AxB) |
(D) Respondents per year a |
(E) Technical person- hours per year (E=CxD) |
(F) Management person hours per year (Ex0.05) |
(G) Clerical person hours per year (Ex0.1) |
(H) Total Cost per year b |
ERG comment on changes |
RTI Comment |
|
Occupation Code |
Title |
Mean Hourly Rate |
Estimated Total Pay with Benefits |
1. Applications |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't use full compensation rates and then add burden. Either use straight rates and add burden or use full compensation rates. |
|
11-0000 |
Mgmt Occup |
58.91 |
123.71 |
2. Surveys and Studies |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-2081 |
Envir Engr |
38.73 |
81.33 |
3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43-0000 |
Office and Admin Support |
20.38 |
42.8 |
4. Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirementsa |
1 |
1 |
1 |
75 |
75 |
3.8 |
7.5 |
$6,885 |
Added this as an ongoing burden per OMB requirement, but decreased hours from 8 to 1 for re-familiarization of rule |
OK |
|
|
|
|
|
B. Required activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-going Performance Test for PMc |
70 |
0.2 |
14 |
75 |
1050.0 |
52.50 |
105.00 |
$96,385 |
|
Increased the hours to do test, consistent with 40 CFR 63 subpart EEEEE |
|
|
|
|
|
On-going Performance Test for Opacityd |
3 |
2 |
6 |
75 |
450.0 |
22.50 |
45.00 |
$41,308 |
|
Increased the hours to do test, one observation spot |
|
|
|
|
|
Scrap material specificationse |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare operation & maintenance plane |
8 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No methanol binder formulation e |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
This essentially a one time requirement. Once change system, no real on-going burden. |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial performance tests e |
70 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial and periodic inspections of PM control devices, monthly inspection of capture systems f |
2 |
12 |
24 |
75 |
1800 |
90 |
180 |
$165,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly emissions averaging calculations g |
0.25 |
12 |
3 |
37.5 |
112.5 |
5.625 |
11.25 |
$10,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Create information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gather existing information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Write report |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial notification of applicabilitye |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of compliance statuse |
8 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of construction/reconstructione |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of actual startupe |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of foundry reclassificationh |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Request for compliance extensionc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of repeat PM performance test c |
1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
75 |
15.0 |
0.75 |
1.50 |
$1,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site specific test plan e |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of performance evaluatione |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality assurance plan for CEMS/COMSe |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NESHAP waiver requeste |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan/reports |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote j |
no longer required |
|
|
|
|
|
Report of performance test (through CEDRI using ERT) c |
8 |
0.2 |
1.6 |
75 |
120.0 |
6.00 |
12.00 |
$11,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiannual compliance reports i |
8 |
2 |
16 |
75 |
1200 |
60.0 |
120.0 |
$110,155 |
added footnote j |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
5,546 |
$442,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirements |
See 4A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Plan activities j |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
100 |
5 |
10 |
9180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Implement activities j |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
100 |
5 |
10 |
9180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Develop record system j |
2 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
50 |
3 |
5 |
4590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Time to enter information k |
0.5 |
52 |
26 |
75 |
1,950 |
97.5 |
195.0 |
$179,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to transmit or disclose information k |
0.25 |
2 |
0.5 |
75 |
38 |
1.9 |
3.8 |
$3,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time to adjust existing waysj |
2 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
50 |
3 |
5 |
$4,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to train personnel j |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
100 |
5.0 |
10.0 |
$9,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time for audits |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
2,746 |
219,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)l |
|
|
|
|
8,290 |
662,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded)l |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL (rounded)l |
|
|
|
|
8,290 |
$662,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a This table is specific to area source foundries classified as large iron and steel foundries. There are an estimated 390 area source foundries, 75 of which are expected to be classified as large foundries. No new area source foundries are projected during the 3-year term of this ICR. We assume all respondents will have to spend time familiarizing themselves with regulatory requirements each year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b This ICR uses the following labor rates from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2018, mean labor rates for Foundries (NAICS 331500) for Management Occupations (11-0000), Environmental Engineer (17-2081) and Office and Administrative Support (43-0000) . The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. Fully burdened hourly rates are: $123.71 for management; $81.33 for technical; and $42.80 for clerical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c We have assumed that large area source foundries will implement subsequent performance tests required by the rule for each metal melting furnace subject to a PM or total metal HAP limit in §63.10895(c) at least every 5 years (or 0.2 averaged on a yearly basis) and will not implement a performance test due to a change to an operating limit or a process change likely to increase HAP emissions over the period of this ICR. A notification is required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d We have assumed that all foundries would need to conduct performance tests to demonstrate compliance with the opacity limit in §63.10895(e) at least every 6 months and will not implement a process change likely to increase fugitive emissions over the 3 year period of this ICR. Opacity performance tests should be conducted over 3-hour period as specified in §63.6(h)(5)(ii). Assume one observation location can be used per foundry. No separate notification required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e One-time only costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f We have assumed that all large foundries must conduct inspection of control device and capture system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g We assumed half of the large area source foundries (75/2 = 37.5) would use the emissions averaging provisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h We have assumed that no foundries will be reclassified as small foundries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i We have assumed all large foundries will have to submit semi-annual compliance reports. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j We have assumed that all large foundries would review record keeping system, adjust methods and train employees during the first year of the rule amendments. Subsequent years, these activities would not be needed. Therefore, the average number of respondents per year is (75+0+0)/3 = 25. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new footnote i |
|
|
|
|
|
k We have assumed that large foundries must record information to demonstrate compliance with pollution prevention management practices for metallic scrap and binder formulations and information to demonstrate compliance with monitoring; inspection; operation and maintenance; startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions; and other requirements of the General Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A). In addition, record to record information to demonstrate compliance with the PM and opacity standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote j |
|
|
|
|
|
l Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Large foundries are not assumed to incur any capital or O&M costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relabeled to k |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundry Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ) (Renewal) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019: |
$49.44 |
$66.62 |
$26.75 |
|
Activity |
(A) EPA person-hours per occurrence |
(B) No. of occurrences per plant per year |
(C) EPA person hours per plant per year (AxB) |
(D) Plants per year a |
(E) Technical person-hours per year (CxD) |
(F) Management person-hours per year (Ex0.05) |
(G) Clerical person-hours per year (Ex0.1) |
(H) Cost, $ b |
Report Review: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial notification of applicability c |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Notification of compliance statusc |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
Notification of performance testd |
1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
75 |
15.0 |
0.75 |
1.50 |
$831.70 |
Performance test reportd |
2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
75 |
30.0 |
1.50 |
3.00 |
$1,663.39 |
Semiannual compliance report - smalla |
1 |
2 |
2 |
315 |
630 |
31.5 |
63.0 |
$34,931.23 |
Semiannual compliance report - largea |
2 |
2 |
4 |
75 |
300 |
15.0 |
30.0 |
$16,633.92 |
TOTAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)e |
|
|
|
|
1,121 |
$54,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Taking into account shutdown data for foundries, we have assumed that there are 390 existing iron and steel foundries that are area sources. No new sources are projected during the 3-year term of this ICR. A total of 315 of the 390 facilities are small foundries and 75 are large foundries. All foundries have to submit semiannual compliance reports. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b This cost is based on the following 2019 labor rates which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $66.62 Managerial rate (GS-13, Step 5), $49.44 Technical rate (GS-12, Step 1), and $26.75 Clerical rate (GS-6, Step 3). These rates are calculated from the hourly rates included in the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 2019 General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay; the rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for benefit packages available to government employees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c One-time only costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d We have assumed that large area source foundries will implement subsequent performance tests required by the rule for each metal melting furnace subject to a PM or total metal HAP limit in §63.10895(c) at least every 5 years (or 0.2 averaged on a yearly basis) and will not implement a performance test due to change to an operating limit or a process change likely to increase HAP emissions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency Worker Rates |
Labor Rates, $/hr a |
60% Overhead |
Total, $/hr |
|
|
|
|
|
Managerial (GS-13, step 5) |
$41.64 |
$24.98 |
$66.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical (GS-12, step 1) |
$30.90 |
$18.54 |
$49.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Clerical (GS-6, step 3) |
$16.72 |
$10.03 |
$26.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
a https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2019/GS_h.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective January 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1a: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Small Foundries – NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundry Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ) (Renewal) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries taken for NAICS 331500: Foundries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2018 |
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_331500.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.33 |
123.71 |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burden item |
(A) Person hours per occurrence |
(B) No. of occurrences per respondent per year |
(C) Person hours per respondent per year (C=AxB) |
(D) Respondents per year a |
(E) Technical person- hours per year (E=CxD) |
(F) Management person hours per year (Ex0.05) |
(G) Clerical person hours per year (Ex0.1) |
(H) Total Cost per year b |
ERG comment on changes |
RTI Comment |
|
Occupation Code |
Title |
Mean Hourly Rate |
Estimated Total Pay with Benefits |
1. Applications |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't use full compensation rates and then add burden. Either use straight rates and add burden or use full compensation rates. |
|
11-0000 |
Mgmt Occup |
58.91 |
123.71 |
2. Surveys and Studies |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-2081 |
Envir Engr |
38.73 |
81.33 |
3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43-0000 |
Office and Admin Support |
20.38 |
42.8 |
4. Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirementsa |
0.5 |
1 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
$0.00 |
added respondent burden and referenced footnote a, but decreased this burden from 4 to 1 hr for ongoing burden |
Estimate only 0.5 hours for small foundries - not much there for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
B. Required activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repeat performance tests for opacity |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable for large foundries only. |
|
|
|
|
|
Scrap specificationsc |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly emission averaging calculation |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do not see rolling average in rule, just emission averaging; monthly basis |
Applicable for large foundries only. |
|
|
|
|
|
No methanol binder formulation d |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Create information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gather existing information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Write report |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial notification of applicabilityc |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of compliance statusc |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of construction/reconstructionc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of actual startupc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of foundry reclassificatione |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Request for compliance extensionc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of repeat performance test |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this was the line item for footnote E which talks about opacity and lack of need for separate notification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site specific test plan |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of performance evaluation |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality assurance plan for CEMS/COMS |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NESHAP waiver requestc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote g since this is one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan/reports |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new footnote H since we did not assume any small sources would have to write this report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of performance test (through CEDRI using ERT) c |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiannual compliance reports |
4 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
new footnote H since we did not assume any small sources would have to write this report |
Deleted deviations report - just do semiannual report. Adding here. |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirements |
See 4A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Plan activitiesf |
2 |
1 |
2 |
105 |
210 |
11 |
21 |
$19,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Implement activities f |
2 |
1 |
2 |
105 |
210 |
11 |
21 |
$19,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Develop record system f |
1 |
1 |
1 |
105 |
105 |
5 |
11 |
$9,639 |
added footnote g since this is one-time |
Assigning these for initial cost of rule revisions |
|
|
|
|
|
E. Time to enter informationg |
0.1 |
52 |
5.2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to transmit or disclose information |
0.25 |
2 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time to adjust existing ways f |
1 |
1 |
1 |
105 |
105 |
5 |
11 |
$9,639 |
|
Assigning these for initial cost of rule revisions |
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to train personnel f |
2 |
1 |
2 |
105 |
210 |
10.5 |
21.0 |
$19,277 |
added training time |
Assigning these for initial cost of rule revisions |
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time for audits |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
966 |
$77,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)h |
|
|
|
|
970 |
$77,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded)h |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL (rounded)h |
|
|
|
|
970 |
$77,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a This table is specific to area source foundres classified as small iron and steel foundries. A total of 315 of the 390 area source foundries are small foundries and 75 are large foundries. No new area source foundries are projected during the 3-year term of this ICR. We assume all respondents will have to spend time familiarizing themselves with regulatory requirements each year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b This ICR uses the following labor rates from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2018, mean labor rates for Foundries (NAICS 331500) for Management Occupations (11-0000), Environmental Engineer (17-2081) and Office and Administrative Support (43-0000) . The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. Fully burdened hourly rates are: $123.71 for management; $81.33 for technical; and $42.80 for clerical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c One-time only costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d We have assumed that no burden would be incurred for this requirement because all small area source foundries are already meeting the no methanol requirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e We have assumed that no small foundries will be reclassified as large foundries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f We have assumed that all small foundries would review record keeping system, adjust methods and train employees during the first year of the rule amendments. Subsequent years, these activities would not be needed. Therefore, the average number of respondents per year is (315+0+0)/3 = 105. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g We have assumed that small foundries must record information to demonstrate compliance with pollution prevention management practices for metallic scrap and binder formulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Small foundries are not assumed to incur any capital or O&M costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1b: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost for Large Foundries – NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundry Area Sources (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ) (Renewal) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries taken for NAICS 331500: Foundries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2018 |
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_331500.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.33 |
123.71 |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burden item |
(A) Person hours per occurrence |
(B) No. of occurrences per respondent per year |
(C) Person hours per respondent per year (C=AxB) |
(D) Respondents per year a |
(E) Technical person- hours per year (E=CxD) |
(F) Management person hours per year (Ex0.05) |
(G) Clerical person hours per year (Ex0.1) |
(H) Total Cost per year b |
ERG comment on changes |
RTI Comment |
|
Occupation Code |
Title |
Mean Hourly Rate |
Estimated Total Pay with Benefits |
1. Applications |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't use full compensation rates and then add burden. Either use straight rates and add burden or use full compensation rates. |
|
11-0000 |
Mgmt Occup |
58.91 |
123.71 |
2. Surveys and Studies |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-2081 |
Envir Engr |
38.73 |
81.33 |
3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43-0000 |
Office and Admin Support |
20.38 |
42.8 |
4. Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirementsa |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
$0.00 |
Added this as an ongoing burden per OMB requirement, but decreased hours from 8 to 1 for re-familiarization of rule |
OK |
|
|
|
|
|
B. Required activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-going Performance Test for PMc |
70 |
0.2 |
14 |
|
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Increased the hours to do test, consistent with 40 CFR 63 subpart EEEEE |
|
|
|
|
|
On-going Performance Test for Opacityd |
3 |
2 |
6 |
|
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Increased the hours to do test, one observation spot |
|
|
|
|
|
Scrap material specificationse |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare operation & maintenance plane |
8 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No methanol binder formulation e |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
This essentially a one time requirement. Once change system, no real on-going burden. |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial performance tests e |
70 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial and periodic inspections of PM control devices, monthly inspection of capture systems f |
2 |
12 |
24 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly emissions averaging calculations g |
0.25 |
12 |
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Create information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gather existing information |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Write report |
See 4B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial notification of applicabilitye |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of compliance statuse |
8 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of construction/reconstructione |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of actual startupe |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of foundry reclassificationh |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Request for compliance extensionc |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of repeat PM performance test c |
1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site specific test plan e |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notification of performance evaluatione |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality assurance plan for CEMS/COMSe |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NESHAP waiver requeste |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote h, one-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan/reports |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote j |
no longer required |
|
|
|
|
|
Report of performance test (through CEDRI using ERT) c |
8 |
0.2 |
1.6 |
75 |
120.0 |
6.00 |
12.00 |
$11,015.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiannual compliance reports i |
8 |
2 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
$0.00 |
added footnote j |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements |
|
|
|
|
138 |
$11,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Familiarization with Regulatory Requirements |
See 4A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Plan activities j |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
100 |
5 |
10 |
9180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Implement activities j |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
100 |
5 |
10 |
9180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Develop record system j |
2 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
50 |
3 |
5 |
4590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Time to enter information k |
0.5 |
52 |
26 |
|
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
$0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to transmit or disclose information k |
0.25 |
2 |
0.5 |
|
0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
$0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time to adjust existing waysj |
2 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
50 |
3 |
5 |
$4,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Time to train personnel j |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
100 |
5.0 |
10.0 |
$9,179.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Time for audits |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements |
|
|
|
|
460 |
36,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)l |
|
|
|
|
600 |
48,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded)l |
|
|
|
|
|
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL (rounded)l |
|
|
|
|
600 |
$48,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a This table is specific to area source foundries classified as large iron and steel foundries. There are an estimated 390 area souce foundries, 75 of which are expected to be classified as large foundries. No new area source foundries are projected during the 3-year term of this ICR. We assume all respondents will have to spend time familiarizing themselves with regulatory requirements each year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b This ICR uses the following labor rates from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2018, mean labor rates for Foundries (NAICS 331500) for Management Occupations (11-0000), Environmental Engineer (17-2081) and Office and Administrative Support (43-0000) . The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. Fully burdened hourly rates are: $123.71 for management; $81.33 for technical; and $42.80 for clerical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c We have assumed that large area source foundries will implement subsequent performance tests required by the rule for each metal melting furnace subject to a PM or total metal HAP limit in §63.10895(c) at least every 5 years (or 0.2 averaged on a yearly basis) and will not implement a performance test due to a change to an operating limit or a process change likely to increase HAP emissions over the period of this ICR. A notification is required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d We have assumed that all foundries would need to conduct performance tests to demonstrate compliance with the opacity limit in §63.10895(e) at least every 6 months and will not implement a process change likely to increase fugitive emissions over the 3 year period of this ICR. Opacity performance tests should be conducted over 3-hour period as specified in §63.6(h)(5)(ii). Assume one observation location can be used per foundry. No separate notification required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e One-time only costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f We have assumed that all large foundries must conduct inspection of control device and capture system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g We assumed half of the large area source foundries (75/2 = 37.5) would use the emissions averaging provisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h We have assumed that no foundries will be reclassified as small foundries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i We have assumed all large foundries will have to submit semi-annual compliance reports. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
j We have assumed that all large foundries would review record keeping system, adjust methods and train employees during the first year of the rule amendments. Subsequent years, these activities would not be needed. Therefore, the average number of respondents per year is (75+0+0)/3 = 25. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new footnote i |
|
|
|
|
|
k We have assumed that large foundries must record information to demonstrate compliance with pollution prevention management practices for metallic scrap and binder formulations and information to demonstrate compliance with monitoring; inspection; operation and maintenance; startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions; and other requirements of the General Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A). In addition, record to record information to demonstrate compliance with the PM and opacity standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added footnote j |
|
|
|
|
|
l Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Large foundries are not assumed to incur any capital or O&M costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relabeled to k |
|
|
|
|
|