CMS-10393-SupportingStatement-PartB 6-25-20

CMS-10393-SupportingStatement-PartB 6-25-20.docx

Beneficiary and Family Centered Data Collection (CMS-10393)

OMB: 0938-1177

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf

Supporting Statement – Part B


Beneficiary and Family Centered Information Collection (CMS-10393) Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods

Submitted for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services June 25, 2020

Table of Contents

  1. Respondent universe and sampling methods 1

  2. Information collection procedures 2

  3. Methods to maximize response rates 3

  4. Tests of procedures 4

  5. Statistical consultants 4

List of Exhibits

Exhibit 1: Annual Sampling Approach Experience Survey 1

Exhibit 2: Annual Sampling Approach Direct Follow-Up 1

Exhibit 3: Annual Sampling Approach General Feedback Web Survey 2

Exhibit 4: Statistical Consultants 4

  1. Respondent universe and sampling methods


The target populations for the information collection initiatives are Medicare beneficiaries and their representatives who have used the services of the Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Quality Improvement Organization (BFCC QIO). Sampling for each of the information collection initiatives varies based on respondent populations and primary purposes. Universe, sample, expected response rate, and total number of respondents for each of the three initiatives are provided in tables 1a-c for the Experience Survey, Direct Follow-up, and General Feedback Web Survey respectively.


Data are currently being collected for the three initiatives as approved under OMB NO. 0938- 1177, expiration date February 28, 2021. Current telephone/mail data collection efforts are yielding a 60 percent response rate.


Exhibit 1: Annual Sampling Approach Experience Survey:

Respondent received case support from QIO – data used for QIO contract evaluation


Sample Component


Appeal

Complaint Medical Record Review

Complaint Immediate Advocacy

Total

Universe*

100,000

1,500

4,000

105,500

Sample

9,000

1,500

4,000

14,500

Response Rate

60%

Respondents

5,400

900

2,400

8,700

*Based on March 2020 case volumes


Exhibit 2: Annual Sampling Approach Direct Follow-Up:

Respondent called QIO help desk – data used for internal quality improvement

Sample Component

Help Desk Calls

Universe*

6,800

Sample

340

Response Rate %

60

Respondents

200

*Based on March 2020 call volumes

Exhibit 3: Annual Sampling Approach General Feedback Web Survey:

Respondent received a QIO letter – data used to ensure every beneficiary is given an opportunity to provide feedback about experience with QIO

Sample Component

Beneficiaries receiving a final determination letter

Universe*

101,500

Sample

101,500

Response Rate %

N/A

Respondents

200

*Based on March 2020 case volumes


  1. Information collection procedures


The information collection procedures for each of the three initiatives is described in turn.


Experience Survey: The population is comprised of Medicare beneficiaries who received support from a QIO with an appeal or complaint case. The sample will be stratified, analyzed, and reported by case type:

    • Appeal stratum – A simple random sample will be drawn of approximately 9 percent (9,000) of the annual universe (n=100,000). No sub-stratum oversampling will be used. This is expected to yield sufficient data to support quarterly analytic and evaluation reporting.

    • Complaint medical record review stratum - Given the relatively small annual volume (n=1,500), a census will be drawn in order to yield sufficient data for quarterly analytic and evaluation reporting.

    • Complaint immediate advocacy stratum - Given the relatively small annual volume (n=4,000), a census will be drawn in order to yield sufficient data for quarterly analytic and evaluation reporting.


Information collection will be conducted via telephone with paper surveys sent by mail upon request, and for those who do not respond by telephone. Data will be collected monthly with the annualized sample and burden hours allocated evenly across 12 months.


Direct Follow-up: The population is comprised of Medicare beneficiaries who called the QIO help desk. A simple random sample will be drawn of approximately 5 percent (340) of the universe of help desk calls (n=6,800). No stratum or oversampling will be used. This is expected to yield sufficient national data to support quarterly quality improvement efforts and program adjustments. Information collection will be conducted via telephone. Data will be collected quarterly with the annualized sample and burden hours allocated evenly across quarters.

General Feedback Web Survey: The population is comprised of Medicare beneficiaries who receive a final determination letter from the QIO program. Rather than implementing an active information collection, CMS will make available a web survey for all letter recipients. As part of the final determination letter, beneficiaries will be informed that they are invited to provide feedback about their experience and will be directed to the web survey URL. No

non-response follow-up will be initiated. The goal of this collection is to ensure that all Medicare beneficiaries who have received a final determination letter are able to provide feedback to CMS about their experience (a voice for all beneficiaries). Resulting data are used to monitor on-going quality and identify possible areas in need of improvement.


The information collection activities as described above have no unusual problems requiring specialized sampling procedures.


Less frequent information collection would not allow CMS to use data for quarterly analysis, reporting, and QIO contract evaluation as well as on-going quality improvement efforts.


  1. Methods to maximize response rates


Methods to maximize response rates for the Experience Survey and Direct Follow-up are described in turn. No response rate initiatives are implemented for the General Feedback Web Survey as CMS uses this low burden initiative strictly as a way for Medicare beneficiaries to report about their experiences at will, with resulting data being used for quality improvement where appropriate.


Experience Survey: The survey methodology will maximize response rates by following-up with sampled members soon after their interaction with the QIO program. We will complete sampling and initiate monthly data collection within two weeks of case closure. We will place up to 15 calls to each sampled case, with calls made on different days of the week, and during different times of day. To the extent possible, specific interview appointments will be set with respondents to facilitate completion of the survey in a beneficiary-centered manner. Bilingual telephone interviewers will be available to complete the survey in Spanish, if needed. Upon request and for cases we are unable to reach by telephone, we will provide papers surveys by mail. Paper surveys will be available in English, Spanish, and large print. The mixed-mode approach will both augment response rates and improve the representativeness of the information collection.


Direct Follow-up: The survey methodology will maximize response rates by following-up with sampled members soon after their call to the QIO help desk. We will complete sampling and initiate quarterly data collection within 2 days of the help desk inquiry. We will place up to 15 calls to each sampled case, with calls made on different days of the week, and during different times of day. To the extent possible, specific interview appointments will be set with respondents to facilitate completion of the survey in a beneficiary-centered manner.

Bilingual telephone interviewers will be available to complete the survey in Spanish, if needed.

  1. Tests of procedures


Each of the information collection instruments underwent expert review and testing at the time of development. Cognitive testing was used to:


  1. Determine if the survey wording is clear and unambiguous;

  2. Verify respondent’s ability to recall interactions pertaining to their complaints and appeals cases;

  3. Ensure appropriate and consistent flow question wording and overall survey administration; and

  4. Ensure data capture and data output are functioning flawlessly.


Response rates and item missing rates are monitored regularly to ensure instruments and methodology are functioning as expected. Further testing is not being proposed.


  1. Statistical consultants


The following individuals were consulted in the development of the information collection instruments, sampling, and methodology.


Exhibit 4: Statistical Consultants

Organization

Name

Contact Information

Avar Consulting

Z. Joan Wang

301-977-6553, ext. 222

[email protected]

Wendy Gary

337-385-2144

[email protected]

Thomas Jackson

909-451-3074

[email protected]

Westat

Stephanie Fry

301-294-2872

[email protected]

File Typeapplication/octet-stream
File TitleCMS-10393 Supporting Statement Part B
SubjectSupporting Statement Part B
AuthorAvar Consulting
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-13

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy