DGL REVISED 2021 9b-1 Justification DGL REVISED

SUPPORTING STATEMENT
for the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
Rule 9b-1
(OMB Control No. 3235-0480)
A.

JUSTIFICATION
1. Necessity of Information Collection

In February 1979, the Commission published the Report of the Special Study of the Options
Market (“Options Study”), which identified several problems arising from efforts to accommodate
listed options trading within the existing framework for registering securities under the Securities
Act. The Options Study found that the requirements to provide information on the mechanics and
risks of options trading, as well as information about the issuer, made the prospectus lengthy and
complicated and did not meet the needs of options investors, many of whom may lack the financial
background needed to understand the relatively technical descriptions presented in the registration
statement. The Options Study concluded that information relating to options and the trading
markets for options should be separated from information about the issuer and that the information
concerning listed options should be presented in a “readily understandable” manner to a reader
without a financial background.
Based on these findings, the Options Study recommended that a specifically tailored
Exchange Act disclosure document be developed into which certain of the information currently in
the options prospectus would be moved. It was contemplated that this disclosure document would
present a description of the risks and uses of options trading in a manner that would be intelligible to
unsophisticated investors. Rule 9b-1 (17 CFR 240.9b-1), which was adopted in 1982 in conjunction
with two other rules, implemented this Options Study recommendation.
Rule 9b-1 requires that prior to purchasing or selling a contract for a standardized option, or
having its account approved for options trading, an investor must receive a copy of the options
disclosure document (“ODD”). Under this options disclosure system, the ODD, rather than a
traditional prospectus, is an investor’s primary source of information about standardized options.
Rule 9b-1 also sets forth the specific categories of information required to be disclosed in the ODD
and requires the ODD to be filed with the Commission 60 days prior to the date it is distributed to
investors. In addition, Rule 9b-1 provides that the ODD must be amended if the information in the
document becomes materially inaccurate or incomplete and that amendments must be filed with the
Commission 30 days prior to the distribution to customers.
2. Purpose and Use of the Information Collection
The information in the ODD is intended to enhance investor understanding of standardized
options by presenting all essential information about such options in a readable form. The ODD,
rather than a traditional prospectus, is an investor’s primary source of information about
standardized options.

3. Consideration Given to Information Technology
In May 1996, the Commission issued an interpretive release that permits the use of
electronic media to deliver, among other things, the ODD to investors.
4. Duplication
Rule 9b-1 permits two or more options markets to work together in formulating a single
disclosure document covering options traded on each participating options market.
5. Effect on Small Entities
Some of the broker-dealers that are subject to Rule 9b-1 are small entities. The staff,
however, believes that the rule requirements are not unduly burdensome on smaller broker-dealers.
The information contained in the ODD is in a standardized format prepared by the options markets
and, therefore, does not need to be generated internally by the broker-dealer. The broker-dealer is
required to deliver the ODD and any amendments only once with respect to each customer. The
expense of providing this information would be limited to delivery, either through postal mail or
electronically.
6. Consequences of Not Conducting Collection
The ODD furnished to customers is a substitute for a prospectus. If such disclosure were
less frequent, customers might not have the information necessary to properly understand
standardized options prior to purchase.
7. Inconsistencies with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)
There are no special circumstances. This collection is consistent with the guidelines in 5
CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
8. Consultations Outside the Agency
The required Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments
on this collection of information was published. No public comments were received.
9. Payment or Gift
The respondents receive no payments or gifts.
10. Confidentiality
There is no assurance of confidentiality provided by Rule 9b-1.

2

11. Sensitive Questions
The information collection does not collect personally identifiable information. The agency
has determined that a SORN and PIA are not required in connection with the collection of
information.
12. Information Collection Burden
Reporting
There are 16 options markets1 that must comply with Rule 9b-1. These respondents work
together to prepare a single ODD covering options traded on each market, as well as amendments to
the ODD. The respondents file approximately 3 amendments per year. The ODD is generally filed
on behalf of the options markets by the Options Clearing Corporation (“OCC”). The OCC also
works on the drafts and submits the ODD amendments to the Commission.2 The staff calculates
that the preparation and filing of amendments should take no more than 8 hours per options market.
Thus, the total time burden for all options markets per year is approximately 384 hours (16 options
markets x 8 hours per amendment x 3 amendments).
Third Party Disclosure
In addition, the staff estimates that there are approximately 1,020 broker-dealers subject to
Rule 9b-1, and that each of these firms will process an average of 3 new customers for options each
week. Thus, each respondent will have to furnish approximately 156 ODDs per year (3 new
customers x 52 weeks per year). The staff calculates that the furnishing of the ODD should take no
more than 30 seconds per customer, resulting in a total time burden for each broker-dealer of 78
minutes or 1.3 hours. Thus, the total time burden for all broker-dealers per year is approximately
1,326 hours (1,020 broker-dealers x 1.3 hours).
Therefore, the aggregate time burden for all respondents (both options markets and brokerdealers), is approximately 1,710 hours per year (384 hours for options markets + 1,326 hours for
broker-dealers).
1

The sixteen options markets are as follows: BOX Exchange LLC, Cboe BZX Exchange,
Inc., Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc., Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc., Cboe Exchange, Inc., Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC, MIAX Emerald, LLC, MIAX PEARL, LLC,
Nasdaq BX, Inc., Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq ISE, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC, Nasdaq
PHLX LLC, the Nasdaq Options Market (NOM), NYSE Arca, Inc., and NYSE American
LLC.

2

While the OCC assists the options exchanges in preparing ODD amendments and
submitting them to the Commission, these hours are not included in the burden estimate
because the OCC is not a “respondent” for purposes of PRA. Instead, the hours that the
Commission staff estimates that the OCC spends on behalf of the options exchanges in
preparing and submitting ODD amendments are incorporated in the total estimated
burden hours for the options exchanges.
3

The estimated internal cost of compliance for options markets is $420 per hour for an inhouse attorney, 3 for a total internal cost of compliance of approximately $161,280 per year. The
estimated internal cost of compliance for broker-dealers is $63 per hour for a general clerk,4 for a
total internal cost of compliance of approximately $83,538 per year. The sum of the internal
compliance costs for all respondents (both options markets and broker-dealers), is approximately
$244,818 per year. These figures were computed in the following manner:
384

hours of legal work of the options exchanges
(attorney)

@ $420 per hour = $161,280

1,326 hours of administrative work of broker-dealers
(general clerk)

@ $63 per hour = $83,538
$244,818

The table below summarizes the total time burdens for the options exchanges and the
broker-dealers in complying with the requirements of Rule 9b-1.
Burden
Type

Reporting

Category of
Respondents

Number of
Respondents

Options
Markets
BrokerDealers

16

Third
Party
Disclosure
Total Aggregate Burden

1,020

A

Number of
Annual
Reponses
Per
Respondent
3

B

156 5

Time Per
Response

Total Burden
Hours

C
8 hours

D=A*B*C
384

30
seconds

1,326
1,710

3

SIFMA did its last annual survey in 2013 and will not resume the survey process.
Accordingly, the $420 figure is based on the 2013 figure ($380) adjusted for inflation.
See Item 15. Changes in Burden. The $380 per hour figure for an Attorney is from
SIFMA’s Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013, modified
by Commission staff to account for an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to
account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.

4

The $63 figure is based on the 2013 figure ($57) adjusted for inflation. The $57 per hour
figure for a General Clerk is from SIFMA’s Office Salaries in the Securities Industry
2013, modified by Commission staff to account for an 1800-hour work-year and
multiplied by 2.93 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.

5

156 responses = 3 new customers per week processed by each broker-dealer * 52 weeks
per year.
4

13. Costs to Respondents
Not applicable; (a) it is not anticipated that respondents will have to incur any capital and
start up costs to comply with Rule 9b-1; (b) it is not anticipated that the respondents will have to
incur any additional operational or maintenance costs (other than provided for in Item No. 12
above) to comply with the Rule.
14. Costs to Federal Government,
There are no costs to the federal government. Work devoted to assuring compliance by
broker-dealers with the requirements of the Rule and reviewing any ODDs and amendments filed
by the OCC on behalf of the options markets is done by existing Commission staff as part of their
regular duties. The Commission does not anticipate any contracting, IT, or development costs, and
does not anticipate hiring new employees in connection with the information collection.
15. Changes in Burden
The estimated net decrease in the time burden is the result of two factors: an increase in the
reporting burden for the options exchanges and a decrease in the broker-dealers’ burden of
furnishing the ODD to customers.
The increase in the reporting burden for the options exchanges is due to an increase in the
estimated number of options markets that must comply with Rule 9b-1, which increased from 15 to
16. It is estimated that each options market will file approximately three amendments per year and
spend approximately eight hours on the preparation and filing of each amendment. The previous
compliance burden estimate was 360 hours (15 options markets x 8 hours per amendment x 3
amendments per year). This compliance burden has increased by 14 hours to a total compliance
burden of 384 hours (16 options markets x 8 hours per amendment x 3 amendments per year).
The burden for furnishing the ODD to customers decreased because the number of brokerdealers that must comply with Rule 9b-1 decreased from 1,144 to 1,020. 6 It is estimated that each
broker-dealer will process an average of 3 new customers for options each week, requiring it to
deliver approximately 156 ODDs per year (3 new customers x 52 weeks per year). Based on the
staff estimate that the furnishing of the ODD should take no more than 30 seconds per customer, the
total time burden for each broker-dealer should be 1.3 hours. The previous burden estimate was
1,487 hours (1,144 broker-dealers x 1.3 hours). The total time burden for all broker-dealers per year
has decreased to 1,326 hours (1,020 broker-dealers x 1.3 hours).
As a result, the overall time burden decreased from 1,847 hours (360 hours for options
markets + 1,487 hours for broker-dealers) in 2017 to 1,710 hours per year (384 hours for options
markets + 1,326 hours for broker-dealers) in 2020.
6

The estimate of 1,020 broker-dealers required to comply with Rule 9b-1 is derived from
Item 12 of the Form BD (OMB Control No. 3235-0012). This estimate may be high as it
includes broker-dealers that engage in only a proprietary business, and as a result are not
required to deliver an ODD, as well as those broker-dealers subject to Rule 9b-1.
5

16. Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes
Not applicable. The information collection is not used for statistical purposes.
17. Approval to Omit OMB Expiration Date
The Commission is not seeking approval to omit the expiration date.
18. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
This collection complies with the requirements in 5 CFR 1320.9.
B.

COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS
The collection does not involve statistical methods.

6