Consolidated State Performance Report Part I and II

Consolidated State Performance Report Renewal (Part 1 and Part 2)

SY2021_CSPR_PART_II_1810-0724

Consolidated State Performance Report Part I and II

OMB: 1810-0724

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf




CONSOLIDATED STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT

PART II



School Years 2020-21







Due February 10, 2022


The Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) is the required annual reporting tool for each State, the Bureau of Indian Education, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico as authorized under Section 83031 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015(ESSA)2.



Paperwork Burden Statement


According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1810-0724. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 35.00 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202.




2.5 PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH WHO ARE NEGLECTED, DELINQUENT, OR AT RISK


This section collects data on programs and facilities that serve students who are neglected, delinquent, or at risk under Title I, Part D, and characteristics about and services provided to these students.


Throughout this section:

  • Report data for the program year of July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021.

  • Count programs/facilities based on how the program was classified to ED for funding purposes.

  • Do not include programs funded solely through Title I, Part A.

  • Use the definitions listed below:

    • Adult Corrections: An adult correctional institution is a facility in which persons, including persons 21 or under, are confined as a result of conviction for a criminal offense.

    • At-Risk Programs: Programs operated (through LEAs) that target students who are at risk of academic failure, dependency adjudication, or delinquency adjudication, have a drug or alcohol problem, are pregnant or parenting, have been in contact with the juvenile justice or child welfare system in the past, are at least 1 year behind the expected age/grade level, are English learners, are gang members, have dropped out of school in the past, or have a high absenteeism rate at school.

    • Juvenile Corrections: An institution for delinquent children and youth that is a public or private residential facility other than a foster home that is operated for the care of children and youth who have been adjudicated delinquent or in need of supervision. Include any programs serving adjudicated youth (including non-secure facilities and group homes) in this category.

    • Juvenile Detention Facilities: Detention facilities are shorter-term institutions that provide care to children who require secure custody pending court adjudication, court disposition, or execution of a court order, or care to children after commitment.

    • Neglected Programs: An institution for neglected children and youth is a public or private residential facility, other than a foster home, that is operated primarily for the care of children who have been committed to the institution or voluntarily placed under applicable State law due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardians.

    • Other: Any other programs, not defined above, that receive Title I, Part D funds and serve non-adjudicated children and youth.



2.5.1 State Agency Title I, Part D Programs and Facilities – Subpart 1


The following questions collect data on Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 programs and facilities.


2.5.1.1 Programs and Facilities - Subpart 1


In the table below, provide the number of State agency Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 programs and facilities that serve neglected and delinquent students and the average length of stay by program/facility type, for these students. Report only programs and facilities that received Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 funding during the reporting year. Count a facility once if it offers only one type of program. If a facility offers more than one type of program (i.e., it is a multipurpose facility), then count each of the separate programs. The total number of programs/facilities will be automatically calculated. Below the table is a FAQ about the data collected in this table.


State Program/Facility Type

# Programs/Facilities

Average Length of Stay in Days

Neglected programs



Juvenile detention



Juvenile corrections



Adult corrections



Other



Total

(Auto calculated)



FAQ on Programs and Facilities - Subpart I:

How is average length of stay calculated? The average length of stay should be weighted by number of students and should include the number of days, per visit, for each student enrolled during the reporting year, regardless of entry or exit date. Multiple visits for students who entered more than once during the reporting year can be included. The average length of stay in days should not exceed 365.

2.5.1.2 Programs and Facilities That Reported - Subpart 1


In the table below, provide the number of State agency Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 programs/facilities that reported data on neglected and delinquent students.


The total row will be automatically calculated.


State Program/Facility Type

# Reporting Data

Neglected programs


Juvenile detention


Juvenile corrections


Adult corrections


Other


Total

((Auto calculated))


2.5.3 LEA Title I, Part D Programs and Facilities – Subpart 2


The following questions collect data on Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 programs and facilities.

2.5.3.1 Programs and Facilities – Subpart 2



In the table below, provide the number of LEA Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 programs and facilities that serve neglected and delinquent students and the yearly average length of stay by program/facility type for these students. Report only the programs and facilities that received Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 funding during the reporting year. Count a facility once if it offers only one type of program. If a facility offers more than one type of program (i.e., it is a multipurpose facility), then count each of the separate programs. The total number of programs/ facilities will be automatically calculated. Below the table is an FAQ about the data collected in this table.


LEA Program/Facility Type

# Programs/Facilities

Average Length of Stay (# days)

At-risk programs



Neglected programs



Juvenile detention



Juvenile corrections



Other



Total

(Auto calculated)



FAQ on average length of stay:

How is average length of stay calculated? The average length of stay should be weighted by number of students and should include the number of days, per visit for each student enrolled during the reporting year, regardless of entry or exit date. Multiple visits for students who entered more than once during the reporting year can be included. The average length of stay in days should not exceed 365.

2.5.3.2 Programs and Facilities That Reported - Subpart 2


In the table below, provide the number of LEA Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 programs and facilities that reported data on neglected and delinquent students.


The total row will be automatically calculated.


LEA Program/Facility Type

# Reporting Data

At-risk programs


Neglected programs


Juvenile detention


Juvenile corrections


Other


Total

(Auto calculated)



2.6   STUDENT SUPPORT AND ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT GRANTS (TITLE IV, PART A)


2.6.1  Funds Spent Under Title IV, Part A


This section collects data on the amount of funds spent by LEAs on the three content areas under Title IV, Part A of the ESEA. The data are reported through the Annual Performance Reporting Tool.


Content Area

Amount of Funds Spent

Well-Rounded


Safe and Healthy Students


Effective Use of Technology



2.6.2  LEAs Who Spent Funds Under Title IV, Part A


This section collects data on the number of LEAs who spent funds by the content areas under Title IV, Part A of the ESEA. For the “Any” category, report the number of LEAs that spent funds in any of the three content areas. An LEA should be included in the count of each content area it spent funds on (i.e. an LEA may be represented in more than one content area in the table below). The data are reported through the Annual Performance Reporting Tool.


Content Area

Number of LEAs Spending Funds

Well-Rounded


Safe and Healthy Students


Effective Use of Technology


Any Content Area




2.7   FUNDING TRANSFERABILITY FOR STATE AND LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (TITLE V, PART A)


2.7.1  State Transferability of Funds


In the table below, indicate whether the State transferred funds under the state transferability authority.


Did the State transfer funds under the State Transferability authority of Section 5103(a) during

SY2020-21?

YES

NO

Yes                

No


2.7.2  Local Educational Agency (LEA) Transferability of Funds


In the table below, indicate the number of LEAs that notified the State that they transferred funds under the LEA transferability authority.


LEA Transferability of Funds

#

LEAs that notified the State that they were transferring funds under the LEA Transferability authority of Section 5103(b).





2.7.3      LEA Funds Transfers


In the table below, provide the total number of LEAs that transferred funds from an eligible program to another eligible program.


Program

# LEAs Transferring Funds FROM Eligible Program

# LEAs Transferring Funds TO Eligible Program

Supporting Effective Instruction (Title II, Part A)

[1.1.]

[1.2.]

Student Support and Enrichment Grants (Title IV, Part A)

[2.1.]

[2.2.]

Improving Basic Programs Operated by LEAs (Title I, Part A)


.]

Education of Migratory Children (Title I, Part C)



Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk (Title I, Part D)



English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act (Title III, Part A)


[5.2.]

Rural Education Initiative (Title V, Part B)




In the table below provide the total amount of FY 2020 appropriated funds transferred from and to each eligible program.


Program

Total Amount of Funds Transferred FROM Eligible Program

Total Amount of Funds Transferred TO Eligible Program

Supporting Effective Instruction (Title II, Part A)

[1.1.]

[1.2.]

Student Support and Enrichment Grants (Title IV, Part A)

[2.1.]

[2.2.]

Improving Basic Programs Operated by LEAs (Title I, Part A)


.]

Education of Migratory Children (Title I, Part C)



Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk (Title I, Part D)



English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act (Title III, Part A)


[5.2.]

Rural Education Initiative (Title V, Part B)





2.8 RURAL EDUCATION ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM (REAP)

This section collects data on the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) Title V, Part B, Subparts 1 and 2.


2.8.1 LEA Use of Rural Low-Income Schools Program (RLIS) (Title V, Part B, Subpart 2) Grant Funds

In the table below, provide the number of eligible LEAs that used RLIS funds during SY2020-21 for each of the listed purposes.


Purpose

# LEAs


Activities authorized under Part A of Title I



Activities authorized under Part A of Title II



Activities authorized under Title III



Activities authorized under Part A of Title IV



Parental involvement activities



2.8.2 RLIS Objectives and Outcomes


In the space below, describe the progress the State has made in meeting the objectives and outcomes for the Rural Low-Income School (RLIS) Program as described in the State’s most current Consolidated State Application. If providing quantitative data along with your narrative, please ensure all data is converted to text format.



The response is limited to 8,000 characters.



2.8.3 RLIS Technical Assistance


In the space below, describe the progress the State has made in providing technical assistance for RLIS LEA sub-grantees as described in the State’s most current Consolidated State Application. If providing quantitative data along with your narrative, please ensure all data is converted to text format.

Response is limited to 8,000 characters.

Shape1







2.8.4 RLIS Subgrant Award Determination


Please report the method the SEA used to award grants to eligible LEAs. If the SEA used a competitive process, please describe that process and include a description of the methods and criteria the SEA used to review applications, award funds to LEAs, and how the LEAs were notified of the process. If the SEA used a formula besides one based on the number of students in average daily attendance served by eligible LEAs in the State, please describe that formula, including an explanation of how this alternative formula enables the SEA to allot grant funds in a manner that serves equal or greater concentrations of children from families with incomes below the poverty line, relative to the concentration that would be served if the SEA used a formula based on the number of students in average daily attendance served by eligible LEAs in the State.


Response is limited to 8,000 characters.

Shape2







2.8.5 RLIS State Administrative Funds


In the table below, provide information on state administrative funds.


Question

Percentage

What percentage of the RLIS grant funds were retained for State-level administration?


What percentage of those funds retained for State-level administration were used specifically for technical assistance?




2.8.6 RLIS LEAs Awarded Funds

Please list the NCES LEA ID and name of each LEA that received RLIS funds and the amount each received. This information will be collected from SEAs outside of the CSPR collection tool.


NCES LEA ID

LEA Name

RLIS Award Amount
























1 SEC.8303. Consolidated Reporting – (a) In general: In order to simplify reporting requirements and reduce reporting burdens, the Secretary shall establish procedures and criteria under which a State educational agency, in consultation with the Governor of the State, may submit a consolidated State annual report. (b) Contents: The report shall contain information about the programs included in the report, including the performance of the State under those programs, and other matters as the Secretary determines are necessary, such as monitoring activities. (c) Replacement: The report shall replace separate individual annual reports for the programs included in the consolidated State annual report.

2 All citations to the ESEA in this document are to the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSY2019-20_CSPR_PART_II_FINAL 10092020
AuthorNewman, Sarah
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-10-24
© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy