FERC-919A,(Order of 8/2021 in RM16-17-000) Refinements to Policies & Procedures for Market Based Rates for Wholesale Sales of Electric Energy, Capacity & Ancillary Services by Public Utilities

ICR 202108-1902-004

OMB: 1902-0317

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2021-09-14
Supplementary Document
2021-09-14
Supporting Statement A
2021-09-14
Supplementary Document
2021-08-31
Supplementary Document
2021-08-31
Supplementary Document
2021-08-31
ICR Details
1902-0317 202108-1902-004
Received in OIRA 201911-1902-003
FERC FERC-919A
FERC-919A,(Order of 8/2021 in RM16-17-000) Refinements to Policies & Procedures for Market Based Rates for Wholesale Sales of Electric Energy, Capacity & Ancillary Services by Public Utilities
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular 09/14/2021
  Requested Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved 10/31/2022
3,106 2,666
61,000 60,999
0 0

This is a regular submittal (not an emergency) for a rulemaking. [See more details in the previous ICR for FERC-919A.] In order to describe it as a regular submittal, we are including the rulemaking information for the previous final rule in the metadata field for 60-day notice, and the information for the current August 2021 final rule in the metadata field for the 30-day notice. (That was done so that the ROCIS system doesn't require it to be an 'emergency' submittal.) The RIN is 1902-AF22. In this August 2021 order, FERC adopts a proposal to collect additional data from certain market-based rate sellers with ultimate upstream affiliates that have been granted blanket authorization to acquire the securities of those sellers or those sellers’ upstream affiliates. The adopted proposal involves certain revisions to the data dictionary and XML schema that accompany the relational database established in Order No. 860. Specifically, the Commission proposed revising the MBR Data Dictionary [attached to order] to require that Sellers whose ultimate upstream affiliate(s) own their voting securities pursuant to a section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization provide, in the relational database, three additional data fields: the docket number of the section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization, the Utility_ID_Type_CD of the utility whose securities were acquired under the corresponding section 203(a)(2) blanket authorization docket number, and the Utility ID of that utility. In this order, we revise the MBR Data Dictionary as proposed in the March Notice. There is no net change to burden due to offsetting decreases. Compliance with Federal Power Act (FPA) sections 205 and 206 make the FERC-919A information collection necessary. Specifically, section 205 of the FPA requires just and reasonable rates and charges. Section 206 allows the Commission to revoke a seller’s market-based rate authorization if it determines that the seller may have gained market power since its original authorization to charge market-based rates. The information collection requirements for FERC-919A (prior to the modifications made by the final rule, Order No. 860, in Docket No. RM16-17-000 as well as the information collection revisions adopted in the Order) are: • Initial market power analyses to qualify for authority to charge market-based rates • Triennial market power analysis in Category 2 seller updates • Notices of change in status As background, Order No. 860 amended the Commission’s regulations governing market-based rates for public utilities. Rather than collecting certain information through transmittal letters and attached spreadsheets, the Commission now collects this information in a consolidated and streamlined manner through a relational database. With the relational database, each Seller now enters its own assets (and those of any of its non-market-based rate affiliates) and the database will automatically add in the assets of the Seller’s market-based rate affiliates, who have themselves entered their own assets. In addition, as relevant here, under Order No. 860, Sellers are now required to provide information on their ultimate upstream affiliates in the relational database to facilitate the auto-generation of asset appendices.

US Code: 16 USC 824(d) Name of Law: Federal Power Act
   US Code: 16 USC 824(e) Name of Law: Federal Power Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  84 FR 36390 07/26/2019
86 FR 47562 08/26/2021
Yes

  Total Request Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 3,106 2,666 0 440 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 61,000 60,999 0 1 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
Note that the new burdens (in the new IC due to the August 2021 Order) are offset by decreases in the previous requirements and corresponding previous 4 ICs. The addition of 440 responses is due to adding a new IC dealing with the requirements related to the August 2021 Order. The addition of 1 burden hour is due to ROCIS and its rounding of figures in each of the ICs and is not due to the real addition of 1 burden hour. That one fictitious hour due to ROCIS's rounding is presented as a change in #15 of the supporting statement only to match the ROCIS burden figure.

$258,262
No
    No
    No
No
No
No
No
Ryan Stertz 202 502-6473 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
09/14/2021


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy