SETO 2020 Peer Review Reviewer Checkout Questionnaire

SETO 2020 Peer Review: Reviewer Checkout Questionnaire
* 1. Overall, how would you rate this event?
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Poor
Please elaborate on why you chose the ranking above.

2. What was your role?
Reviewer
Lead Reviewer
Chair

* 3. Which track(s) did you participate in?
Photovoltaics
Concentrating Solar-Thermal Power
Systems Integration
Soft Costs
Planning and Strategy

1

* 4. How would you rate the track breakout sessions?
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Poor
Please elaborate on why you chose the ranking above.

* 5. How would you rate the plenary session?
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Poor
Please elaborate on why you chose the ranking above.

* 6. How likely is it that you would participate in this event in the future or would recommend a colleague to do
so?
0 (Not at
all likely)

1

2

3

4

5 (Neutral)

6

7

8

9

10
(Extremely
likely)

Please elaborate on why you chose the rating above.

2

* 7. How well do you feel you understand the scope of SETO's goals and project portfolio?
A great deal
A lot
A moderate amount
A little
None at all
Please elaborate on what you found valuable or challenging in forming this view.

* 8. Has your view of SETO changed as a result of this event?
Much More Favorable
More Favorable
Unchanged
Less Favorable
Much Less Favorable
If so, how?

* 9. How well did the resources we provided prepare you for the peer review event? (Ex: informational emails,
webinars, instruction guides)
Exceptionally prepared
Well prepared
Adequately prepared
Poorly prepared
Not prepared at all
What additional information or guidance could we have provided to help you prepare for this event?

10. How could we improve this event in the future?

3

11. How do you feel the switch to a virtual event affected your involvement and ability to give valuable
feedback?

12. Is there anything else you would like us to know?

4