2022 Survey for ESA Stakeholder Engagement Forum

Generic Clearance for Customer Interactions

2022 Survey for ESA Stakeholder Engagement Forum

OMB: 2120-0772

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0772
EXPIRATION DATE: 01/31/2025



Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement

A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0772 Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately (5) minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

All responses to this collection of information are voluntary. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524

2022 ESA Stakeholder Engagement Forum 

Top of Form

Question Title

1. How would you rate the overall quality of this Engagement Forum?

Shape1 Very high quality

Shape2 High quality

Shape3 Neither high nor low quality

Shape4 Low quality

Shape5 Very low quality


Question Title

2. Did the scope of this Engagement Forum meet your expectations? w

Shape6 Extremely well

Shape7 Very well

Shape8 Moderately well

Shape9 Slightly well

Shape10 Not at all well


Question Title

3. Overall did the Engagement Forum help improve your understanding of the FAA/Airport Sponsors/Airlines and Stakeholders involved in the community engagement process? w

Shape11

Shape12 Agree

Shape13 Neither agree nor disagree

Shape14 Disagree

Shape15



Question Title

5. On a scale from 1 (not at all relevant) to 5 (extremely relevant), please rate how relevant each Topic was to you.  w

Shape16 FAA – How are we organized?

Shape17 Community Engagement

Shape18 NCI Noise Portal

Shape19 Federal Register Notice on noise research

Shape20 Noise Compatibility Program Guidance

Shape21 Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning

Shape22 Airport Led Session

Shape23 Airline Led Session

Shape24 FAA Led Panel Discussion

Shape25 Working with Airport Users/Communities {Massport}

Shape26



Question Title

6. On a scale from 1 (Low Quality) to 5 (Very High Quality), please rate the Quality of each Topic presentation. w

Shape27 Community Engagement

Shape28 NCI Noise Portal

Shape29 Federal Register Notice on noise research

Shape30 Noise Compatibility Program Guidance

Shape31 Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning

Shape32 Airport Led Session

Shape33 Airline Led Session

Shape34 FAA Led Panel Discussion

Shape35 Working with Airport Users and Communities {Massport}

Shape36


Question Title

7. What topic(s) was most helpful? w

Shape37 NCI Noise Portal

Shape38 Federal Register Notice on noise research

Shape39 Community Engagement

Shape40 Noise Compatibility Program Guidance

Shape41 Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning

Shape42 Airport Led Session

Shape43 Airline Led Session

Shape44 FAA Led Panel Session

Shape45 Working with Airport Users and Communities {Massport}

Shape46

Shape47



Question Title

8. What topic(s) was least helpful? w

Shape48 NCI Noise Portal

Shape49 Federal Register Notice on noise research

Shape50 Community Engagement

Shape51 Noise Compatibility Program Guidance

Shape52 Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning

Shape53 Airport Led Session

Shape54 Airline Led Session

Shape55 FAA Led Panel Session

Shape56 Working with Airport Users and Communities {Massport}

Shape57

Shape58

Question Title

9. What topic(s) would you like to learn more about? w

Shape59 How FAA is organized

Shape60 Community Engagement

Shape61 NCI Noise Portal

Shape62 Federal Register Notice on noise research

Shape63 Noise Compatibility Program Guidance

Shape64 Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning

Shape65 Airport Sponsors

Shape66 Airline Representatives

Shape67 Airport Users

Shape68

Shape69



Question Title

10. The Engagement Forum was offered for one day. Was that helpful to you? w

Shape70 Yes

Shape71 No

Question Title

11. Did you receive the invitation directly from FAA or was it forwarded to you from a colleague? w

Shape72 Received Directly

Shape73 Forwarded


Question Title

12. Did you attend the entire session or just portions you were interested in? w

Shape74 Full Session

Shape75 Partial Session

Question Title

13. Is having the option to participate in the Engagement Forum in-person and virtual helpful? w

Shape76 Extremely valuable

Shape77 Very valuable

Shape78 Somewhat valuable

Shape79 Not so valuable

Shape80 Not at all valuable

Question Title

14. Do you have ideas for future topics?  w

Shape81

Question Title

15. Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns? 


Bottom of Form

Additional questions

Shape83 Shape82
  • If you would like to host a future meeting please include your name and contact information

  • We are targeting twice yearly meetings of this group. Is this frequency appropriate?

    • Good

    • Too Frequent

    • Not Frequent enough









DONE

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorCormier, Edward P (FAA)
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2023-08-26

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy