2021 Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission v.02

2021 Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission v.02.docx

Qualified Domestic Relations Orders submitted to PBGC

OMB: 1212-0054

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission



AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation


TITLE: Qualified Domestic Relations Orders Submitted to PBGC


STATUS: Request for extension of a previously-approved collection of information, with modifications (OMB Control number 1212-0054; expires February 28, 2022)


CONTACT: Karen B. Levin (202-229-3559)

  1. Need for collection. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) is requesting

that the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) extend its approval of the information collection under its booklet, Qualified Domestic Relations Orders & PBGC, for a three-year period under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

PBGC is a federal agency that insures the benefits of workers, retirees, and beneficiaries participating in qualified, private-sector defined benefit pension plans. A defined benefit pension plan that does not have enough money to pay benefits may be terminated if the employer responsible for the plan faces severe financial difficulty, such as bankruptcy, and is unable to maintain the plan. In such an event, PBGC becomes trustee of the plan and pays benefits, up to certain legal limits, to plan participants and beneficiaries.

The benefits of a pension plan participant generally may not be assigned or alienated. However, title I of ERISA provides an exception for domestic relations orders that relate to child support, alimony payments, or the marital property rights of an alternate payee (a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of a plan participant). The exception applies only if the domestic relations order meets specific legal requirements that make it qualified, i.e., a qualified domestic relations order, or "QDRO." ERISA provides that pension plans are required to comply with only those domestic relations orders which are QDROs, and that the decision as to whether a domestic relations order is a QDRO is made by the plan administrator. Thus, as statutory trustee of terminated plans, PBGC must first determine whether any domestic relations order submitted to PBGC is qualified – i.e., is a QDRO – before any obligation to comply is triggered.

When PBGC is trustee of a plan, it reviews submitted domestic relations orders to determine whether the order is qualified before paying benefits to an alternate payee. PBGC has provided the public with model QDROs and accompanying guidance in the booklet, Qualified Domestic Relations Orders & PBGC, to assist attorneys, other professionals, participants, and alternate payees in preparing orders for plans trusteed by PBGC.

Before providing the model forms and the QDRO booklet, PBGC received many inquiries on QDRO requirements and PBGC’s procedures for handling orders submitted for a qualification determination. In addition, many domestic relations orders, both in draft and final form, did not meet the applicable requirements under ERISA. PBGC worked with practitioners, participants, and alternate payees on a case-by-case basis to ensure that their orders were amended to meet applicable requirements. This process was time-consuming for all parties and for PBGC.

Since making the booklet and the model forms available, PBGC has experienced a decrease in (1) the number of inquiries about QDRO requirements, (2) the number of orders that do not meet the applicable requirements, and (3) the amount of time that practitioners, participants, and alternate payees spend to ensure that the orders meet the applicable requirements and the time PBGC spends to assist them in meeting the requirements. The requirements for submitting a QDRO are established by statute. The model QDROs and accompanying guidance do not create any additional requirements.

Based on its experience in reviewing and processing domestic relations orders, PBGC is making the following non-material changes to the QDRO booklet including:

  • Changing how the age for required minimum distributions is referred to by referencing the applicable section of the Internal Revenue Code, section 401(a)(9), instead of an exact age.

  • Increasing the amount of time parties have to contact PBGC to extend a hold after submission of a DRO or a non-DRO written notice of a pending DRO.

  • Clarifying that PBGC will delay commencement of benefits to a participant upon receipt of written notice of a pending DRO.

PBGC is also making minor editorial changes to the QDRO booklet.

  1. Use of information. PBGC uses the information it obtains from domestic relations orders

that it has qualified to determine the proper amount and timing of benefit payments to participants and alternate payees.

  1. Information technology. For informal review of a draft order, PBGC will accept a draft

that is submitted electronically (by fax or email). However, the use of other technology is impracticable for domestic relations orders that are submitted to PBGC for official qualification determinations. Official qualification determinations require original signed orders (or certified or authenticated copies) issued by a state court, agency, or other instrumentality with the authority to issue judgments, decrees, or orders pursuant to state domestic relations law. Since few, if any, states currently have technology in place to submit such orders to PBGC electronically, they must be submitted to PBGC by mail or commercial delivery service.

  1. Duplicate or similar information. All information required to be submitted under this

collection of information is statutorily required in order for any part of a participant’s benefit to be assigned to an alternate payee, or for a former spouse of the participant to be treated as the participant’s surviving spouse for benefit payment purposes. The information requested is not available from another federal agency or another source.

  1. Small businesses. Not applicable.

  2. Consequences of reduced collection. In the absence of a domestic relations

order qualified by PBGC, PBGC is prohibited from making benefit payments to an alternate payee.

  1. Consistency with guidelines. This collection of information is conducted in a manner

consistent with 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).

8. Outside input. On October 6, 2021, PBGC published a 60-day notice (86 FR 55638) of

intent to request an extension of this collection of information, as revised, and invited public

comment by December 6, 2021. No comments were received.

  1. Payments to respondents. PBGC provides no payments or gifts to respondents in

connection with this collection of information.

  1. Confidentiality. Confidentiality of information is that afforded by the Freedom of

Information Act and the Privacy Act. PBGC's rules that provide and restrict access to its records

are set forth in 29 CFR Part 4901.

  1. Personal questions. This collection of information does not include any questions of a personal or sensitive nature.

  2. Hour burden on the public. PBGC expects to receive approximately 428 domestic relations orders annually. Based on calls to up to nine respondents to determine filer experience, PBGC expects the overwhelming majority, if not all, of the domestic relations orders submitted to PBGC for qualification to be prepared primarily by a professional, rather than by an alternate payee or participant solely on his or her own. Nonetheless, the estimated average hour burden for the alternate payee or participant is estimated to be 0.75 hours. The estimated total average annual hour burden is 321 hours (0.75 hours per order x 428 orders).

  3. Cost burden on the public. PBGC estimates based on filer experience that the cost burden per order to be 3.5 hours of professional time spent preparing an order and obtaining its qualification, at an average hourly rate of $200. Based on these estimates, the estimated cost burden per order is $700 ($200 per hour x 3.5 hours). This cost burden per order was used as the average professional fees to prepare each of the estimated 428 orders s, for a total annual cost of approximately $299,600 ($700 per order x 428 orders).

  4. Cost to the government. Because work on processing this information will be

performed by existing staff as part of their regular duties, there is no cost to the federal government.

  1. Explanation of burden changes. The change in the estimated annual hourly burden and cost burden of this collection of information (from 473 hours and $945,500 to 321 hours and $299,600 respectively) is attributable to several changes. First, the trend over the last three years has been to fewer overall filings (from approximately 630 to 428 orders filed). Second, based on the experience of respondents, the estimated average hourly professional rate has decreased to approximately $200 from an estimated average hourly rate of approximately $250, as estimated in 2018. Taken together, these changes result in a decrease in the total cost (to approximately $700 per order, down from $1,500 per order) to prepare orders for participants and alternate payees.

  2. Publication plans. PBGC does not plan to publish the results of this collection of information.

  3. Display of expiration date. Not applicable. PBGC will display the expiration date.

  4. Exceptions to certification statement. There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorDecressin.Anja
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-12-17

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy