Minimum Technical Standards for Class II Gaming Systems and Equipment

ICR 202206-3141-005

OMB: 3141-0014

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2022-06-29
Supplementary Document
2022-06-29
Supporting Statement A
2022-06-29
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
3141-0014 202206-3141-005
Received in OIRA 201809-3141-005
NIGC
Minimum Technical Standards for Class II Gaming Systems and Equipment
Extension without change of a currently approved collection   No
Regular 06/29/2022
  Requested Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved 06/30/2022
431 685
7,666 1,651
0 0

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or the Act), 25 U.S.C. 2701, et seq., laid out a comprehensive framework for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. Amongst other actions necessary to carry out the Commission’s statutory duties, the Act directs the Commission to monitor class II gaming conducted on Indian lands on a continuing basis in order to ensure that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation and to protect such gaming as a means of generating tribal revenue, and to assure that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly by both the operator and players. 25 U.S.C. 2702(2), 2706(b)(1). The Act allows Indian tribes to use “electronic, computer, or other technologic aids” to conduct class II gaming activities. 25 U.S.C. 2703(7)(A). The Commission has promulgated part 547 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, to aid it in monitoring class II gaming facilities that use electronic, computer, or other technologic aids to conduct class II gaming.

US Code: 25 USC 2701 Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  87 FR 10833 03/29/2022
87 FR 36880 06/21/2022
No

  Total Request Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 431 685 0 0 -254 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 7,666 1,651 0 0 6,015 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
No
No
It should be cautioned at the outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many local, state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size and complexity and range from small truck stops to world-class casino resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and is further complicated by different Tribal governance practices and varying levels of investment in, and adoption of, new technologies and technical expertise. For these reasons, estimates provided by a statistically insignificant group of rotating tribal consultants has limited value and it would be improper to extrapolate from these burden estimates any definitive trends. It should also be noted that, in previous years, the NIGC did not break out wage costs in its data. This deficiency was identified in the previous review process and has now been rectified, however, because these costs were previously lumped together, it is not possible to make direct caparisons between costs this review cycle. Overall, this past cycle saw a significant increase in burden hours. There has been no program change to account for this increase. The requirements are record-keeping requirements that would appear to be less burdensome over time, nevertheless, these are the estimates provided by Tribal partners and the Commission will honor these results.

$4,800
No
    No
    No
No
No
No
No
Tim Osumi 202 632-7054 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
06/29/2022


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy