Minimum Technical Standards
for Class II Gaming Systems and Equipment
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
06/29/2022
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
06/30/2022
431
685
7,666
1,651
0
0
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA
or the Act), 25 U.S.C. 2701, et seq., laid out a comprehensive
framework for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. Amongst
other actions necessary to carry out the Commission’s statutory
duties, the Act directs the Commission to monitor class II gaming
conducted on Indian lands on a continuing basis in order to ensure
that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming
operation and to protect such gaming as a means of generating
tribal revenue, and to assure that gaming is conducted fairly and
honestly by both the operator and players. 25 U.S.C. 2702(2),
2706(b)(1). The Act allows Indian tribes to use “electronic,
computer, or other technologic aids” to conduct class II gaming
activities. 25 U.S.C. 2703(7)(A). The Commission has promulgated
part 547 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, to aid it in
monitoring class II gaming facilities that use electronic,
computer, or other technologic aids to conduct class II
gaming.
US Code:
25
USC 2701 Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
It should be cautioned at the
outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices
are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many local,
state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size
and complexity and range from small truck stops to world-class
casino resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes
expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and
is further complicated by different Tribal governance practices and
varying levels of investment in, and adoption of, new technologies
and technical expertise. For these reasons, estimates provided by a
statistically insignificant group of rotating tribal consultants
has limited value and it would be improper to extrapolate from
these burden estimates any definitive trends. It should also be
noted that, in previous years, the NIGC did not break out wage
costs in its data. This deficiency was identified in the previous
review process and has now been rectified, however, because these
costs were previously lumped together, it is not possible to make
direct caparisons between costs this review cycle. Overall, this
past cycle saw a significant increase in burden hours. There has
been no program change to account for this increase. The
requirements are record-keeping requirements that would appear to
be less burdensome over time, nevertheless, these are the estimates
provided by Tribal partners and the Commission will honor these
results.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.