Minimum Technical Standards for Class II Gaming Systems and Equipment
Revision of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
12/01/2025
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
05/31/2026
811
431
8,897
7,666
0
0
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or the Act), 25 U.S.C. 2701, et seq., laid out a comprehensive framework for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. Amongst other actions necessary to carry out the Commissionâs statutory duties, the Act directs the Commission to monitor class II gaming conducted on Indian lands on a continuing basis in order to ensure that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation and to protect such gaming as a means of generating tribal revenue, and to assure that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly by both the operator and players. 25 U.S.C. 2702(2), 2706(b)(1). The Act allows Indian tribes to use âelectronic, computer, or other technologic aidsâ to conduct class II gaming activities. 25 U.S.C. 2703(7)(A). The Commission has promulgated part 547 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, to aid it in monitoring class II gaming facilities that use electronic, computer, or other technologic aids to conduct class II gaming.
US Code:
25 USC 2701
Name of Law: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
Updated burden estimates are based upon stakeholder consultations and it should be cautioned at the outset that tribal gaming operations and their business practices are unique to each gaming Tribe and influenced by many local, state, and regional factors. Tribal gaming facilities vary in size and complexity and range from small truck stops and lotteries to world-class casino mega-resorts. The amount of time and resources that gaming tribes expend fulfilling regulatory requirements can vary dramatically and is further complicated by different Tribal governance practices and varying levels of investment in, and adoption of, new technologies and technical expertise. For these reasons, estimates provided by a statistically insignificant group of rotating tribal consultants has limited value and it would be improper to extrapolate from these burden estimates any definitive trends.
This collection cycle saw a 112% increase in the number of class II gaming systems being deployed by tribes a their gaming operations, as reported by the NIGC compliance division. This is reflected in the 88% increase in the number of IC respondents, although it is notable that the number of burden hours did not rise in tandem (a modest 16% increase) and, in fact, shows a relative decline in hours per response. The likely explanation for this relative decline in burden hours is that, in general, the records being collected and maintained under these regulations - particularly post-pandemic - are electronic documents and more efficiently managed in electronic format.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.