Burden Calculations Table

1964t10.xlsx

NESHAP for Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Renewal)

Burden Calculations Table

OMB: 2060-0496

Document [xlsx]
Download: xlsx | pdf

Overview

# Respondents
# Responses
Respondent Burden
Agency Burden


Sheet 1: # Respondents

NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Renewal)




Number of Respondents

Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Year Number of New Respondents Number of Existing Respondents Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents Number of Respondents





(E=A+B+C-D)
1 0 7 0 0 7
2 0 7 0 0 7
3 0 7 0 0 7
Average 0 7 0 0 7
1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed, and modified affected facilities.

Sheet 2: # Responses

NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Renewal)





Total Annual Responses

(A)
Information Collection Activity
(B)
Number of Respondents
(C)
Number of Responses
(D)
Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports
(E)
Total Annual Responses
E=(BxC)+D

ERG Notes:
Notification of 5-year performance test/retest 2.16 1 0 2.16

Reports of performance test/rested 2.16 1 0 2.16

Semiannual compliance reports 7.0 2 0 14.0




Total 18.32








Footnotes:





a These notifications are initial notifications for sources constructed, modified or re-contructed after August 2011 and prior to September 2015.




hrs/response: 80


Sheet 3: Respondent Burden

Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Renewal)














Burden item (A)
Person-hours
per occurrence
(B)
Annual occurrences
per respondent
(C)
Person-hours
per respondent
per year (AxB)
(D)
Respondents
per year a
(E)
Technical hours per
year (CxD)
(F)
Management hours per year (Ex0.05)
(G)
Clerical hours
per year
(Ex0.10)
(H)
Annual cost
($) b



1. Applications N/A







Labor Rates:
2. Survey and Studies N/A







Management $153.55
3. Reporting requirements








Technical $122.20
A. Familiarize with rule requirements c 2 1 2 7 14.00 0.70 1.40 $1,904.40
Clerical $61.51
B. Required activities










i. Initial performance tests d 200 1 200 0 0 0 0 $0


ii. 5-year performance test d 221 1 221 1.8 397.8 19.89 39.78 $54,112.14


iii. Repeat of performance test d 221 1 221 0.36 79.56 3.98 7.96 $10,822.98


iv. Monitoring of operations and equipment e See 4E









v. Operation, maintenance, monitoring plan 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0


c. Create information See 3B









d. Gather existing information See 3B









e. Write reports a, d










i. Notification of construction/reconstruction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0


ii. Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0


iii. Notification of applicability of standard 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0


iv. Notification of performance test/retest 2 1 2 2.16 4.32 0.22 0.43 $588.13


v. Notification of compliance status 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0


vi. Reports of performance test/restest (through CEDRI using ERT) f 4 1 4 2.16 8.64 0.43 0.86 $1,174.73


vii. Semiannual compliance report with instances of failure to meet applicable standards g 16 2 32 1.4 44.8 2.24 4.48 $6,094.08


viii. Semiannual compliance report with no instances of failure to meet applicable standards g 8 2 16 5.6 89.6 4.48 8.96 $12,188.15


Reporting Subtotal



735 $86,884.61


5. Recordkeeping requirements










a. Familiarization with rule requrements See 3A









b. Plan activities See 3B









c. Implement activities See 3B









d. Develop record system N/A









e. Time to enter and transmit information required by the rule h 1.75 52 91 7 637 31.85 63.7 $86,650.15


f. Time to train personnel N/A









g. Time for audits N/A









Recordkeeping Subtotal



733 $86,650.15


TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded) i



1,470 $174,000


TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded) i






$0


GRAND TOTAL (rounded) i






$174,000


N/A - Not Applicable






















Assumptions:


a There are an estimated 7 respondents (i.e., wet‑formed fiberglass mat production facilities), 5 with one production line and 2 with two lines, which are subject to this standard. We have assumed that there will be no new lines constructed over the three year period of this ICR.


b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $122.20 per hour for Technical labor, $153.55 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor, and $61.51 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics survey titled March 2021 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates United States.” The rates are from column 8, “Mean hourly wage.” The rates have been increased by 110% to account for varying industry wage rates and the additional overhead business costs of employing workers beyond their wages and benefits, including business expenses associated with hiring, training, and equipping their employees.


c We estimate that it will take the respondent 2 hours to read and understand rule requirements.


d It is assumed there are no new sources subject to the initial rule requirements, including the initial performance test, over the three-year period of this ICR. The rule requires a performance test every five years since the initial test was conducted. We have estimated that each performance test will take approximately 21 hours to complete it since sources will be using EPA Method 316 to measure formaldehyde and applicable test methods specified in the NESHAP to determine resin free-formaldehyde content and the loss-on-ignition of the fiberglass mat. In addition, we have assumed that it will take approximately 200 hours to conduct the pretest survey, equipment calibration, and sample analysis and report preparation for a total of 221 hours per performance test. We have further assumed that 20 percent of the performance tests fail and will have to be repeated. There are an estimated 7 respondents, with 9 affected drying and curing ovens. On average each year, the number of respondents conducting the performance test is 1.8 (9 / 5 = 1.8). On average each year, the number of respondents repeating the performance test is 0.4 (1.8 x 0.2 = 0.36).


e Monitoring of operations include: 1) monitoring operating parameters for control equipment (i.e., thermal oxidizer or other control equipment); 2) urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin solids application rate; 3) resin-free formaldehyde content; 4) loss-on-ignition; 5) UF-to-latex ratio in the binder; 6) weight of the final mat product per roofing square; and 7) average nonwoven wet-formed fiberglass mat production rate (roofing square per hour).


f There are an estimated 7 respondents (with 9 affected drying/curing ovens). On average each year, the number of respondents conducting a performance test or repeat performance test and electronically submitting their test results is 2.16 (1.8 tests + 0.36 retests).


g We have assumed that approximately 80 percent of the 7 respondents (or 5.6) will report no instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year and approximately 20 percent (or 1.4) will report instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year.


h We have assumed it takes each source approximately 1.75 hours per week to record and transmit the information and that a year will consist of 52 weeks.


i Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.



Sheet 4: Agency Burden

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Renewal)






















Burden item (A)
EPA
person-hours
per occurrence
(B)
Annual occurrences
per respondent
(C)
EPA
person-hours
per respondent
per year (AxB)
(D)
Respondents
per year a
(E)
Technical hours
per year
(CxD)
(F)
Management
hours per year
(Ex0.05)
(G)
Clerical hours
per year
(Ex0.10)
(H)
Annual cost
($) b



Review initial notifications: applicability, performance test, compliance status a 2 3 6 0 0 0 0 $0
Labor Rates:
Review notifications of 5-year performance test/retest b 2 1 2 2.16 4 0.2 0 $248.43
Management $69.04
Review performance test/reports c 8 1 8 2.16 17 0.9 2 $992.60
Technical $51.23
Review semiannual reports








Clerical $27.73
Review reports of excess emissions d 16 2 32 1.4 45 2 4 $2,573.98


Review reports of no excess emissions d 8 2 16 5.6 90 4.48 9.0 $5,147.97


TOTAL COST (rounded) f



180 $8,960














Assumptions:


a There are an estimated 7 respondents (i.e., wet‑formed fiberglass mat production facilities), 5 with one production line and 2 with two lines, which are subject to this standard. We have assumed that there will be no new lines constructed over the three year period of this ICR.


b This cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: Managerial rate of $69.04 (GS-13, Step 5, $43.15 + 60%), Technical rate of $51.23 (GS-12, Step 1, $32.02 + 60%), and Clerical rate of $27.73 (GS-6, Step 3, $17.33 + 60%). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2021 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.


c The rule requires a performance test every five years since the initial test was conducted, which is applicable for this ICR renewal. The number of respondents that will conduct the performance test, averaged over the 3-year period of this ICR, is 1.8 (9 / 5 = 1.8). 20% of the respondents will repeat the performance test (1.8 x 0.2 = 0.36)


d We have assumed that approximately 80 percent of the 7 respondents (or 5.6) will report no instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year and approximately 20 percent (or 1.4) will report instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year.


eTotals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy